Source: UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS submitted to NRP
THE EVOLUTION AND SPREAD OF RESISTANCE TO INSECTICIDES IN COLORADO POTATO BEETLE, LEPINOTARSA DECEMLINEATA
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0188170
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Mar 1, 2001
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2006
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS
(N/A)
AMHERST,MA 01003
Performing Department
PLANT, SOIL & INSECT SCIENCE
Non Technical Summary
Areas where plants are left untreated can provide refuges for susceptible insects that can slow the evolution of resistance to pesticides. The success of refuges depend on how their size and placement interact with the movement of the insects. This project studies movement in Colorado potato beetle from untreated refuges onto treated areas and uses this understanding of movement to design refuge crops.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
100%
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
21131101130100%
Goals / Objectives
Objective 1: Measure the fitnesses of resistant and susceptible genotypes. In order to extract estimates of movement from cline shape, selection for or against resistance must be measured on both sides of the cline. Objective 2: Measure gene flow rates within fields. We take two approaches. In Objective 2A, we create a cline in imidacloprid resistance in a large field, and use cline theory and estimates of selection strength to measure the gene flow rate. The method permits measurement of gene flow at different times in the season. Clines in a both continuous single fields and in adjacent but separate fields will be created and analyzed. In Objective 2B, we use newly developed radio-tagging methods to generate unbiased recapture records in the same field. These are combined with life table information from Objective 2 in a computer simulation to estimate the gene flow rate independently. Objective 3: Measure gene flow rates among fields. We take two approaches. In Objective 3A, we measure the movement from resistant fields using potted plants as traps set around the field at increasing distances. In Objective 3B, we measure both the resistance of CPB populations and the strength of selection as reflected in imidacloprid concentrations in foliage in most of the potato fields in Western Massachusetts. This will allow us to factor out the effects of spraying within fields and examine resistance as a function of the proximity and resistance of surrounding, increasingly distant fields. These objectives will allow us to measure all the selection and gene flow parameters necessary to generate recommendations for managing the evolution of resistance. They lead to the more general objectives: Objective 4: Determine rules for the optimal size and placement of refuges. We will generate rules of thumb for refuge placement patterns that minimize the probability that resistant individuals will mate and reproduce. These will rely on selection strengths from Objective 1 and within-field gene flow estimates from Objective 2. Objective 5: Design strategies to control the spread of resistance among fields. We will generate rules of thumb for containing the spread of resistance from populations that develop high frequencies of resistance. These principles will also help quantify the economic consequences to neighbors of those growers that chose to ignore refuge recommendations. These rules will rely on principles developed in Objective 5, combined with among-field gene flow estimates from Objective 4.
Project Methods
The two main approaches are the creation of clines in resistance to examine movement, and the survey of changes in resistance in field populations as a function of selection strength, and the size, distance, and resistance of surrounding fields. We will create resistance clines in a long (500 m) narrow (23 row) field in South Deerfield, MA, by treating one half of the field with imidacloprid at planting and the other half with no CPB controls or Bt spray. To create clines in larger fields and under realistic management conditions we will collaborate with a local grower to create clines in some of his fields using the same approach. We will collect emerging adults from the woody margins surrounding field prior to exposure to the treated and untreated field areas as well as adults. Finally, we will experiment with alternative refuge scenarios by planting adjacent but non-contiguous fields and measuring the cline formed between them. We will identify all locally planted commercial fields in Franklin and Hampshire counties in Western Massachusetts, most of which we are familiar with from this year. In order to quantify the effects of movement among fields on resistance we will measure resistance in CPB populations during periods prior to and following the peaks of long distance movement, associated with emergence from diapause sites in spring and exodus from harvested fields in late summer. Prior to the spring emergence we will collect adults from overwintering sites adjacent to those fields that were planted last year. We will house those adults in a 27C L:D 16:8 greenhouse and collect clutches and assay the larvae for imidacloprid resistance using direct applications to second instars. When the first generation starts laying we will collect clutches from each field along with samples of foliage. We will measure dose response curves for populations from each field. We will collect clutches laid by the summer generation in late July and early August and foliage samples at the same time and measure dose response curves of the second generation as well. We will also collect survey data from each field, including field area and beetle population size estimates for overwintered, 1st and 2nd generations. In the fall and winter we will carry out the ELISA assays on the foliage extracts collected during the summer. The following spring we will collect overwintered beetles from each field, house them in the greenhouse and collect clutches and perform assays on the larvae from those clutches. The data we collect will document the resistance of CPB populations in each field before and after the times of greatest CPB movement, and also the strength of selection for resistance to imidacloprid within each field. We will analyze resistance in each field following a migratory phase as a function of resistance in that field prior to movement, the strength of selection for resistance within that field, size, distance, and resistance (LD50) of the nearest field and also as a function of the sum (within bands of increasing distance from that field) of the surrounding fields' population size and resistance relative to the focal field.

Progress 03/01/01 to 09/30/06

Outputs
This research has generated valuable data for our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of resistance to imidacloprid in Colorado Potato Beetle. The funds on this grant have played supporting roles for larger investigations of this question, funded by other sources. These funds permitted the gathering of sufficient pilot data demonstrating the feasibility of our approach, which was to create clines in pesticide resistance and measure microevolutionary parameters from the resulting cline shape. They also provided funds to initiate satellite studies of mating preference, overwintering ability, and associated costs for resistant beetles, as well as helping us accumulate families of known resistance genotype for molecular genetic analysis. The larger studies are devoted to building replication among fields and populations, significantly more sophisticated theoretical and computational analysis of the problem, and thorough study of the costs of resistance. As this project terminates, we have accumulated large data sets on resistance evolution in 20 treated fields (funded elsewhere), of which 12 showed appropriate responses. In the remainder, 3 were unusable because the resident population had so little background resistance that the population was wiped out on the treated side; we were defrauded by the grower on 3 fields in South Deerfield, MA (who we confirmed had applied pesticide to the entire field, not half), and we believe the remaining 2 fields in ME also were fully treated. We are using other funding sources to increase the sample size of usable fields to 15 before initiating the computationally intensive data-analysis phase. The approach works: preliminary analysis indicates that resistance has evolved on several of these fields; others are ambiguous pending full analysis. We measured reproductive success in of males that had overwintered in diapause, and found significantly lower survivorship in resistant males. We measured the inheritance of resistance; partly covered by these funds. We found resistance to be polygenic, and evidence that modifier genes had evolved between 1999 and 2004 that affected hatching success of resistant beetles. Our undergraduate honors student at UMass, Jeff Ahern, determined that the beetles were unlikely to be able to distinguish and avoid treated foliage, whether by taste or by the resulting physiological effects of ingestion. He is now a PhD student at Rice University, studying plant-insect interactions.

Impacts
When the analyses are finished, we believe this will give much clearer insight into the complex evolutionary dynamics underlying the evolution and spread of resistance. The high costs of resistance we find imply that significant evolutionary trade-offs are taking place, and are likely to mitigate impact even of resistant beetles (at least, until compensatory evolutionary changes restore their fitness). The measurement of dispersal rates of resistant genes will permit us to parameterize models of refuge design, optimizing refuge size and placement. The funds have contributed to the education of several undergraduate students, one of whom has gon on to graduate study in a closely related field.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 10/01/04 to 09/30/05

Outputs
Our project studies the evolution of resistance to imidacloprid in Colorado potato beetle in both commercial and experimental fields, and in laboratory studies of resistance costs and mating behavior. We developed our lab for assaying larger numbers (up to 2,000/day) of Potato beetle larvae and the rearing cages and facilities for maintaining 10 colonies of 150 adults or 400 larvae each. We surveyed imidacloprid resistance in Maine and Long Ialand NY, growing families for breeding experiments on the genetics of resistance, and assaying their resistance status using dose-response curves on offspring. We developed backcross lines to assay genetic markers for resistance, and are performing additional replicates prior to molecular genetic work. We also assayed the offspring of females mated in situ in the fall vs. those mated to overwintered males. Offspring of fall matings were almost 3x more resistant, implying a strong cost of resistance during adult overwintering. An honors student (J Ahern, UMass) completed his thesis on the ability of beetles to detect imidicloprid in the foliage and avoid feeding upon it. If found, this behavior could have important implications of how resistance to pesticide is mediated and evolving in the patchwork of pesticide-treatment methods among fields in potato-growing regions. However, no evidence was found that beetles could detect or avoid the pesticide.

Impacts
We will derive estimates for the strength of selection for resistance to imidacloprid in Massachusetts fields. We are educating students in the evolutionary dynamics of pesticide resistance.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 10/01/03 to 09/30/04

Outputs
We planned experiments in replicate fields in ME and MA for this summer as part of a larger NRI-supported study (Porter et al.), with the pesticide bioassays from both areas to be carried out in MA; these MAES funds support MA work. Experiments went according to schedule in ME, but research in MA was temporarily delayed. Experimental work: MAES funds supported office assistance for manuscript preparation by Ferro, as well as lab assistance (undergraduate M. Rosenbusch) and supplies. This winter and spring, with partial support from MAES funds, honors student Jeff Ahern will test the ability of CPB to recognize pesticide-treated foliage and modify their behaviors in response. To the extent that pesticide can be avoided, we predict this will increase the dispersal rates of beetles in treated vs. untreated fields. MAES funds contributed to lab supplies for experiments on relative fitnesses of resistant and susceptible beetles. Fecundities (a measure of fitness) of resistant MA and ME populations were 36.8 (SE3.7) and 40.0(3.8) vs. 56.6(3.0) eggs/day in susceptible beetles, but hatching success did not differ. This predicts a stable polymorphism of resistant and susceptible beetles, and explains why resistance has not risen to 100% in MA. Sperm-precedence: Mated CPB females overwinter and emerge capable of laying fertile eggs. We showed that if they do mate in the spring, those new matings have almost complete precedence over stored sperm. If overwintered adults from refuges and treated areas mix as they colonize spring fields, and resistant genotypes have lower survival (which we are testing separately), this will reduce resistance levels in the spring offspring. This facilitates the refuge effect in resistance management. The manuscript in is revision.

Impacts
We will derive estimates for the strength of selection for resistance to imidacloprid in Massachusetts fields. We are collaborating with one local grower, to experiment with mixed/partial treatment fields to slow the evolution of insecticide resistance.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 10/01/02 to 09/30/03

Outputs
Our project studies the evolution of resistance to imidacloprid in Colorado potato beetle in both commercial and experimental fields, and in laboratory studies of resistance costs and mating behavior. We developed our lab for assaying larger numbers (up to 2,000/day) of Potato beetle larvae and the rearing cages and facilities for maintaining 10 colonies of 150 adults or 400 larvae each. We surveyed imidacloprid resistance in Maine and western Massachusetts (9000 larvae from 5 fields in Maine and 19 fields in Massachusetts) and found similar levels of resistance as in 2001 in Massachusetts, a surprising result given the number of years imidacloprid has been in use. Resistance to imidacloprid in most areas in Maine was much lower than even untreated (with imidacloprid or related insecticides) fields in Massachusetts, but fields near the town of Freyburg, ME, have been located with high levels of resistance that will be ideal locations for creating resistance clines in 2004. We secured a 55-acre field in Massachusetts for the creation of imidacloprid resistance clines on 4 fields separated by roads or corn in 2004. We used a sterile male technique to investigate mating competition and gene flow between resistant and susceptible beetles. Imidacloprid-resistant and susceptible males were placed with either virgin susceptible females on untreated plants, or virgin resistant females on treated plants, for 24 hours, and mating behavior and subsequent hatch rates were recorded. Resistance to imidacloprid does not appear to convey mating costs on untreated foliage; resistant males mated just as frequently and sired as many offspring. Treated foliage is a strong barrier to gene flow, as resistant males were much more likely to mate and sired the vast majority of offspring when the contests were staged on treated plants. We are in the middle of a 10 generation drift experiment. We started with a population of fairly resistant CPB (12 times as resistant as the most susceptible field populations in Massachusetts, and 34 times as resistant as the most susceptible fields in Maine). We divided the resistant line into two lines. Each line is maintained at 60-100 adults each generation, and similarly sized susceptible lab colonies are assayed each generation.

Impacts
We will derive estimates for the strength of selection for resistance to imidacloprid in Massachusetts fields. We are collaborating with at least one local grower and possibly others, to experiment with mixed/partial treatment fields to slow the evolution of insecticide resistance.

Publications

  • Boiteau G., Alyokhin A., Ferro D. N. 2003. The Colorado potato beetle in movement. Canadian Entomologist 135: 1-22.


Progress 10/01/01 to 09/30/02

Outputs
This year we developed a more sophisticated mathematical and statistical model of the evolution of cline shape (Objective 2A). We will apply this model to data from new experiments on the evolution of resistance in artificial clines. The model was used as a basis for grant proposals to USDA/NRI and NSF to fund these new experiments. These proposals have been funded (USDA/NRI) or recommended for funding (NSF) and the experiments will start in May 2003. These experiments will involve the study of evolutionary changes in resistance in 20 fields in Massachusetts and Maine over the next 2-year period.

Impacts
Our study of the evolution of resistance addresses basic-science issues by enhanding our understanding of rapid evolutionary change under non-equilibrium conditions. This knowledge is critical for understanding the evolution and spread of resistance, which evolves to prevalence very rapidly once it emerges in a species. This research moves applied science goals forward by providing us with a measure of the spread of resistance within fields. From this measure, we will be able to recommend the optimal size and placement of refuges for the control of the evolution of resistance.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 10/01/00 to 09/30/01

Outputs
New Project

Impacts
(N/A)

Publications

  • No publications reported this period