Source: NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV submitted to NRP
THE ROLE OF DISCO AND DISCO-R DURING PATTERN FORMATION IN DROSOPHILA
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0186769
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2000
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2005
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV
(N/A)
RALEIGH,NC 27695
Performing Department
GENETICS
Non Technical Summary
NA
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
100%
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3043110105090%
3043130105010%
Knowledge Area
304 - Animal Genome;

Subject Of Investigation
3130 - Nematodes; 3110 - Insects;

Field Of Science
1050 - Developmental biology;
Goals / Objectives
All metazoans rely upon a conserved group of genes, the HOM-C/hox genes to establish body pattern during embryonic development. These genes encode regionally expressed, homeodomain-containing transcription factors, and it is predicted that the encoded proteins specify regional identity along the body axis by regulate the expression of other "target" genes. Expression of the appropriate set of target genes ultimately governs formation of the body pattern. However, we have a very limited understanding of how target genes are selectively activated by the hox proteins. Recently, we have identified two, redundant genes from Drosophila that appear to participate with the hox genes during target gene selection. Drosophila embryos lacking these two genes, disco and disco-r, develop with larval head defects similar to those defects observed in embryos lacking the HOM-C genes Deformed and Sex combs reduced. We propose that disco and disco-r encode proteins that participate with the HOM-C proteins in target gene selection and/or activation. disco and disco-r encode zinc finger-containing proteins, so the proteins are likely to be transcription factors. Further, accumulation of the mRNA from the Deformed target gene, 1.28 is altered when both disco and disco-r are absent. The question remains as to how the encoded proteins carry out this role. Perhaps, as with co-factor Extradenticle, these proteins interact directly with the Deformed protein. On the other hand, the proteins encoded by disco and disco-r could affect pattern formation independently of the HOM-C proteins. Since genes similar to disco and disco-r are found in other animals, their role during development may be conserved. The hypothesis of this project is that disco and disco-r encode co-factors involved in target gene selection/activation by the HOM-C gene products Deformed and Sex combs reduced. The overall goals to this project are to determine whether or not the proteins encoded by disco and disco-r function with the HOM-C gene products, and if they do how is this achieved, and to determine whether or not this is a universal mechanism in the hox-regulated specification of body pattern during metazoan development. The specific objectives are: Since disco and disco-r encode transcription factors, can we identify genes that are their targets? If we can identify target genes, can we identify response elements and binding sites for these proteins? What proteins (HOM-C proteins included) interact with disco and disco-r? Are the disco and disco-r protien functions regulated transport within cells? If disco and/or disco-r are required with Deformed protein, will expression of both throughout the whole embryo transform many cells to maxillary identity, and if so, can we use this to discover more about specification of regional identity by HOM-C proteins? Since related genes are present in other animals, are the roles of disco and disco-r during development conserved.
Project Methods
Since Dfd and disco/disco-r target genes are likely to be the same, we will examine expression of known Dfd target genes (1.28, Distal-less, deadringer and Serrate) in embryos known to delete both disco and disco-r. We will examine expression of the Dfd target genes using in situ localization of mRNAs. If disco or disco-r is required for Dfd target gene activation, response elements should be identifiable at known Dfd target genes. We will use reporter constructs and p element transformation to search for small disco/disco-r response elements in genes we determine are likely candidates for direct regulation by disco/disco-r. We will also test known maxillary enhancer elements (as reporter constructs). If expression of these is altered by the absence of disco and disco-r, we will localize the disco/disco-r response element and determine whether the proteins bind to these elements using DNaseI footprinting. It is known that disco autoactivates in some cells and that disco binds to fragments of its own promoter (Lee et al., 1999).We will examine disco protien binding to these fragments. If necessary, we can use a PCR amplification/ DNA binding technique to determine the optimal binding site for disco and disco-r. We will use yeast two-hybrid assays) to identify genes encoding proteins that interact with Disco and Disco-r. Also using this assay, we can also test for evidence of interactions between Dfd and the Disco-proteins. We will produce bacterially synthesized Disco and Disco-r proteins, and have antibodies produced by a commercial source. Standard techniques will be used to localize the proteins in Drosophila embryos. We will use the GAL4/UAS system described by Brand and Perrimon (1993) to direct expression of Dfd and disco or disco-r throughout the embryo. Flies carrying the UAS-Dfd are available, and we will construct UAS-disco/disco-r using standard molecular biology procedures. We will transform these constructs into Drosophila, and, using standard genetic crosses, obtain lines with UAS-Dfd, UAS-disco/disco-r and UAS-Dfd with UAS-disco/disco-r. We will cross these lines to flies with GAL4 expressing enhancer traps and examine the cuticle of these embryos to determine whether a more complete segmental transformation occurs. We also will look for ectopic expression of Dfd/disco/disco-r target genes. If we can generate a more complete transformation of the larval segments into maxillary identity, we will utilize array technology to identify other genes that are regulated by Deformed/disco/disco-r during maxillary development. We will use RNAi to study the role of genes related to disco and disco- in the beetle Tribolium and in the nematode, C. elegans. We know that C. elegans has a single gene similar to disco, we will determine whether there is a single gene in the beetle. Since the phenotypes of larvae lacking the HOM-C/hox homologues of Deformed are known in these animals, we will compare these phenotypes to the phenocopy we obtain by removing the disco related genes using RNAi.

Progress 10/01/00 to 09/30/05

Outputs
During the tenure of this project we investigated the role of the partially redundant genes, disconnected (disco) and disco-related (disco-r) during Drosophila development. These genes encode zinc finger transcription factors that are required for normal development of the Drosophila larval head. Flies lacking both genes develop with defects similar to those lacking the two hox genes, Deformed and Sex combs reduced. Since the phenotypes were so similar, disco and disco-r are good candidates for Hox cofactors. hox genes encode homeodomain-containing transcription factors that control body patterning during development of all animals. Further, misexpression of hox genes has been linked to certain diseases and cancer. Therefore, understanding how they control gene expression and embryonic development is critical. All Hox proteins contain nearly identical DNA-binding homeodomains, and, therefore, they all interact with specific but nearly identical sequences of bases in the genome. Yet developmentally, these genes are very specific. Their encoded proteins promote specific segmental identities by establishing segment-specific arrays of gene expression, which are required for proper identity within each segment. Because of this discrepancy in specificity between DNA recognition and developmental function, it is not clear how each protein can impart a highly specific segment identity. The answer is that interactions with other transcription factors must participate in establishing developmental specificity, but, currently, very few Hox cofactors are known. Therefore, understanding why disco and disco-r mutants have a phenotype resembling loss of hox genes is quite important, as these could be hox cofactors. Since these zinc finger-encoding genes appear to be extensively redundant, we concentrated our work on the disco gene since it is smaller and more easily manipulated. The work we undertook during this project has shown that the hox proteins Dfd and Scr can only establish proper head segment identity when they are coexpressed with disco or disco-r. Our results indicate that the expression of disco establishes a developmental field in which these two Hox proteins can function in a head segment-specific mode. We used both genetic and molecular experiments to investigate this relationship. We determined that disco can bind to a specific DNA sequence, and that the zinc finger motifs and structure are necessary for disco function. We also found that disco and disco-r are members of an interactive network of zinc finger transcription factors that establish fields throughout the Drosophila larva permitting establishment proper of segment identity throughout the entire body. Finally, we obtained evidence that this developmental mechanism is conserved in many higher animals, including humans. These results provided a new look into the mechanisms of Hox control of embryonic development.

Impacts
Birth defects in livestock and humans cost our society millions of dollars each year. Because the hox genes and the parallel pathway of zinc-finger proteins described above are conserved in most animals, understanding how these factors interact to properly pattern animal forms is paramount to improving animal development and lowering the expense to society of developmental defects.

Publications

  • Robertson, L.K., and Mahaffey, J.W. 2005. Insect homeotic complex genes and development, lessons from Drosophila and beyond. In Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science,Vol. 1, reproduction and development (eds., L.I. Gilbert, K. Iatrou, and S. Gill) Elsevier Limited, London, UK.
  • Mahaffey, J.W. 2005. Assisting Hox proteins in controlling body form: are there new lessons from flies (and mammals)? Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 15, 422-429.


Progress 10/01/03 to 09/30/04

Outputs
All metazoans develop distinct morphological features at predictable positions along their anterior-posterior body axis. Development of these features is controlled by the spatially restricted expression of the homeotic or hox genes. hox genes encode conserved homeo domain-containing transcription factors, and their encoded proteins establish region-specific expression of realizator (or target) genes. In Drosophila, hox genes specify larval and adult segment identities. Lack of a particular hox gene disrupts development of the normal body pattern in a characteristic manner because the correct target genes cannot be activated. Exactly how the encoded HOX proteins control pattern formation is not well understood. The main dilemma is that, developmentally, HOX proteins have quite specific roles, yet they lack specificity in DNA recognition in vitro and perhaps in vivo, as well, so it is not clear how they can activate specific sets of target genes necessary for different body pattern elements. Interactions with cofactors must contribute to HOX protein function, but currently, only a few are known. Previously, we reported that the partially redundant Drosophila genes, disconnected and disco-related, encode potential cofactors functioning in the post-oral head segments (gnathal segments) with the HOX proteins DEFORMED and SEX COMBS REDUCED. Disconnected and disco-related encode conserved zinc finger-containing transcription factors. Our data indicate that these and other zinc-finger proteins form a genetic hierarchy of factors that function with the HOX proteins to establish regional body patterning. We have demonstrated that these gnathal HOX proteins cannot function well in embryos lacking these cofactor genes. Further, we have shown using ectopic expression studies, expressing these gnathal genes in the trunk segments, that the DISCONNECTED protein can transform the trunk toward what appears to be a gnathal identity, and this ectopic DISCONNECTED makes the trunk segments sensitive to the gnathal HOX proteins. The presence of DISCONNECTED and DEFORMED transforms the trunk segments toward a gnathal identity. We have begun studying the molecular basis of this process, examining the DNA-binding properties of the DISCONNECTED protein. We have identified a specific DNA recognition sequence for DISCONNECTED. In addition, we have begun several studies designed to determine whether DISCONNECTED and the gnathal HOX proteins interact directly.

Impacts
Birth defects in livestock and humans cost our society millions of dollars each year. Because the hox genes and the parallel pathway of zinc-finger proteins described above are conserved in all animals, understanding how these factors interact to properly pattern animal forms is paramount to improving animal development and lowering the expense to society of developmental defects.

Publications

  • Robertson LK, Bowling DB, Mahaffey JP, Imiolczyk B, Mahaffey JW. (2004) An interactive network of zinc-finger proteins contributes to regionalization of the Drosophila embryo and establishes the domains of HOM-C protein function. Development. 131:2781-2789.


Progress 10/01/02 to 09/30/03

Outputs
All metazoans develop distinct morphological features at predictable positions along their anterior-posterior body axis. Development of these features is controlled by the spatially restricted expression of the homeotic or hox genes. hox genes encode conserved homeo domain-containing transcription factors that establish region-specific expression of realizator or target genes. In Drosophila hox genes specify larval and adult segment identities. Lack of a particular hox gene disrupts development of the normal body pattern in a characteristic way because the correct target genes cannot be activated in that region of the embryo. Though the hox genes are thought to be the master regulators of this process, exactly how they control pattern formation is perplexing. The main dilemma is that, in vivo, HOX proteins have quite specific roles, yet they lack specificity in DNA recognition in vitro and perhaps in vivo, too, so it is not clear how they can activate specific sets of target genes necessary for different body pattern elements. Interactions with cofactors must contribute to HOX protein function, but currently, only a few are known. Previously, we reported that the Drosophila gene, disconnected, encodes one such cofactor functioning in the post-oral head segments (gnathal segments) with the HOX proteins DEFORMED and SEX COMBS REDUCED. Our work during the past year has further examined the role of disconnected using ectopic expression of the gene in the trunk segments, in places where it is normally not expressed. Our recent data indicate that the expression of disconnected establishes a domain within the Drosophila embryo in which the gnathal hox proteins can function. Further, we have found that there is a hierarchy of zinc finger proteins, including disconnected, teashirt, and spalt, that establishes domains within the Drosophila embryo, the trunk, and gnathal head domains. Spalt establishes the boundary between the trunk and gnathal by repressing the expression of teashirt. Teashirt, in turn, represses disconnected in the trunk, thereby separating the trunk and gnathal domains. This pathway establishes domains in which the hox proteins can then establish individual segment identities. All of these factors are conserved in metazoans, and we suspect that this developmental role is also conserved.

Impacts
Birth defects in livestock and humans cost our society millions of dollars each year. Because the hox genes and the parallel pathway of zinc finger proteins described above are conserved in all animals, understanding how these factors interact to properly pattern animal forms is paramount to improving animal development and lowering the expense to society of developmental defects.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 10/01/01 to 09/30/02

Outputs
All metazoans develop distinct morphological features at predictable positions along their anterior-posterior body axis. Development of these features is controlled by the spatially restricted expression of the homeotic or hox genes. The hox genes encode conserved homeo domain-containing transcription factors that establish region-specific expression of 'realizator' or 'target' genes. In Drosophila, hox genes specify larval and adult segment identities. Lack of a particular hox gene disrupts development of the normal body pattern in a characteristic way because the correct target genes cannot be activated in that region of the embryo. Though the hox genes are thought to be the master regulators of this process, exactly how they control pattern formation is perplexing. The main dilemma is that, in vivo, HOX proteins have quite specific roles, yet they lack specificity in DNA recognition in vitro and perhaps in vivo, too, so it is not clear how they can activate specific sets of target genes necessary for different body pattern elements. Interactions with cofactors must contribute to HOX protein function, but currently, only a few are known. Previously we reported that the Drosophila gene, disconnected, encodes one such cofactor functioning in the post-oral head segments (gnathal segments) with the HOX proteins DEFORMED and SEX COMBS REDUCED. Our work during the past year has further examined the role of disconnected using ectopic expression of the gene in the trunk segments, in places where it is normally not expressed. The results of these experiments indicate that disconnected may have multiple roles during specification of segment identity. These studies have helped us understand the role of disconnected and similar cofactors during Drosophila development.

Impacts
Birth defects in livestock and humans cost our society millions of dollars each year. Understanding the genetic regulation of animal development is paramount to improving animal development and lowering this cost.

Publications

  • Robertson L.K., Dey B.K., Campos A.R., Mahaffey J.W. 2002. Expression of the Drosophila gene disconnected using the UAS/GAL4 system. Genesis 34:103-106.


Progress 10/01/00 to 09/30/01

Outputs
The goal of this project is to investigate the interplay between the hox protein, Deformed, and the zinc finger proteins, disco and disco-related during development of the maxillary and mandibular segments in Drosophila. We have used a yeast two-hybrid assay to investigate whether Dfd and Disco proteins interact directly and have an indication that they do. We have used a Polymerase Chain Reaction technique to identify the DNA sequence to which disco binds. We have obtained the binding fragments and soon will send the resulting clones to be sequenced. We are also examining DNA binding of Disco and Dfd on a 3 kb gnathal enhancer from the gene, Serrate. This enhance element requires both proteins for expression in the head. We have evidence that disco will bind to this DNA fragment, and we are continuing to examine the specific DNA bases to which disco binds. We will then examine Disco and Dfd interactions at this enhancer sequence to understand the arrangement of binding sites for these proteins and to determine whether there is cooperative binding to the DNA. We have generated Drosophila lines with Disco, Disco and Deformed and Deformed genes under Gal4 control in order to determine the effect of ectopic expression of the proteins individually and in combination. We have examined over-expression in the embryo and in the developing adult eye. We have determined that overexpression of Dfd can only cause a transformation in the trunk in regions that are also expressing Disco and Disco-r. If overexpression is carried out in embryos lacking Disco and Disco-r, Dfd does not generate maxillary structures in the maxillary, labial or in the trunk segments. Using the uas overexpression of Disco and Dfd, we have found that overexpression of Disco alone has a more severe effect on development than does overexpression of any hox gene. This might be expected if the zinc finger can activate genes in the absence of the hox protein or if it can interact (destructively) with other hox proteins. It is not clear at this time what is happening to the trunk segments, but normal development is severely disrupted. However, overexpression of both Disco and Dfd has a much more severe effect than either alone. This supports the proposal that the two proteins (or disco-r and Dfd) function together to determine maxillary identity, supporting the overall model that developmental fate is specified by a combinatorial process composed of at least hox and regionally expressed zinc finger proteins. We find that joint Disco and Dfd expression act synergistically such that a more severe transformation occurs with lower levels of Dfd if Disco is also overexpressed. We have created P- element constructs to express inverted repeat RNAs of disco and disco-r under Gal4 regulation, so that we can use RNA interference to inactivate either mRNA. The Gal4 system will allow us to interfere with gene expression at various times and tissues during Drosophila development by using specific Gal4 expressing lines.

Impacts
Though it has been known for many years that the hox genes control anterior-posterior body pattern during animal development, how this is accomplished is unknown. Our studies indicate that regionally expressed zinc finger transcription factors are partners with the Hox proteins during this process. Understanding the mechanisms involved is critical to understanding the genetic control of development in all animals.

Publications

  • Pederson, J.A., LaFollette, J.W., Gross, C., Veraksa, A., McGinnis,W. and Mahaffey, J.W. 2000. Regulation by homeoproteins: a comparison of Deformed-responsive elements. Genetics 156: 677-686.