Progress 01/01/25 to 12/31/25
Outputs Target Audience:During this reporting period, our primary target audience wasundergraduate students interested in applied agricultural research and integrated pest management,with particular emphasis on students fromtwo-year institutions. Because the award was delayed and the funding timeline remained uncertain for several months, our recruitment window was compressed, and we were ultimately able to supporttwo participantsduring this period. Despite the smaller cohort, these students represent the core audience this program is designed to serve: early-career learners seeking hands-on experience in IPM-centric research and exposure to engaged scholarship in agricultural and natural systems. These students were targeted because they stand to benefit most from structured mentored research, cohort-building, and experiential learning opportunities that connect classroom instruction with real-world challenges in crop protection and dryland systems. Students from community colleges and historically underrepresented groups are especially likely to have limited prior access to agricultural research opportunities, and engaging them directly supports our long-term goals of strengthening the agricultural workforce pipeline and broadening participation in STEM. The project reached these audiences through formal research mentorship, integration into active laboratory and field projects, weekly cohort-building meetings, and structured professional development activities. Both participants engaged in foundational training in experimental design, data analysis, scientific communication for diverse audiences, and Extension-oriented deliverable development. These efforts ensured that even with a reduced cohort, the program served the audience for whom the work matters most: early-career students motivated by sustainability, climate-resilient agriculture, and applied pest management, and who will directly benefit from mentored research experiences that build skill, confidence, and career readiness. Changes/Problems:The primary challenge during this reporting period was delayed funding, which postponed recruitment and resulted in a smaller than anticipated cohort of two students. Compressed recruitment timelines limited outreach to community colleges and reduced the diversity of the applicant pool relative to program goals. To address this issue, the team will implement earlier and more proactive recruitment strategies next year. Planned improvements include initiating recruitment at the beginning of the fall semester, expanding outreach to community colleges across Colorado, coordinating with units across Colorado State University, and connecting with REEU hosting institutions nationally to broaden applicant reach and visibility. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Students received structured training in applied research through intensive mentored experiences in their chosen laboratories, including experimental design, data collection, data analysis, and interpretation. They met regularly with their faculty mentors to discuss research progress and to troubleshoot challenges in real time. Program staff also met with the students every other week to build cohort connections and support research skill development. These meetings incorporated group discussions of project progress and focused workshops on how to communicate scientific findings to academic and nonacademic audiences. Students practiced designing audience appropriate presentations and received iterative feedback from faculty mentors and peers. Two group outings further contributed to cohort building and professional development by creating informal settings to discuss career paths, program experiences, and the role of research in agricultural systems. Survey data indicate that students showed pronounced increases in confidence in formulating hypotheses, designing experiments, conducting fieldwork, analyzing data, constructing data stories, and adapting when experiments did not go as planned. Students also reported that the program improved their understanding of scientific communication, graduate school pathways, and career opportunities in agricultural sciences. All participants strongly agreed that their research skills improved and that the program supported their professional development. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Dissemination activities during this reporting period focused on preparing students to share their research with diverse audiences, including academic researchers, agricultural stakeholders, and the broader community. Students delivered internal lab presentations and end of program talks designed for both expert and general audiences. These presentations were shared with faculty mentors, graduate students, and departmental personnel. Work is ongoing to develop future outreach materials from the student projects for stakeholder groups in agriculture and natural resource management. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?During the next reporting period, recruitment efforts will be expanded substantially to reach a full cohort of scholars with a strong focus on students from community colleges. Because we had fewer student participants this past year, we plan to expand the 2026 cohort to 15 students. Recruitment will begin early in the fall semester and will include targeted outreach to two-year institutions across Colorado, collaboration with campus partners at Colorado State University, and connection with REEU hosting institutions nationwide. Earlier and broader advertising will increase applicant diversity and ensure that students have adequate time to prepare competitive applications. Program activities will also expand to strengthen cohort building and professional development. In addition to meetings every other week, the next cohort will participate in a structured series of community-building activities and more frequent interactions with graduate students involved in IPM and agricultural research. Graduate students will assist with workshops on experimental design, data analysis, scientific communication, and career pathways, providing near-peer mentorship that mirrors the supportive interactions identified as valuable by this year's students. Additional field trips and on-campus engagement opportunities will be incorporated to further strengthen the sense of community and belonging within the program. Educational and extension objectives will be enhanced through more formalized training modules on creating stakeholder-focused deliverables, as well as opportunities for students to engage with CSU Extension personnel and local agricultural stakeholders. These improvements will ensure that next year's cohort has a robust, community-rich experience that advances the goals of the project and deepens the applied research and communication skills of participating scholars.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
During this reporting period, the project advanced all three components of the integrated research, education, and extension objectives, although on a smaller scale due to delayed funding and a shortened recruitment window. Two undergraduate students participated in the program and engaged in applied research projects focused on crop protection and pest management in arid environments. Under the supervision of faculty mentors, both students formulated hypotheses, designed and executed experiments, collected and analyzed data, and participated in discussions of research progress every other week. These activities supported the research objective by immersing students in authentic inquiry aligned with integrated pest management. Progress was also made toward the educational objective. Students developed foundational research competencies, including experimental design, field and laboratory data collection, statistical analysis, visualization, and construction of coherent data stories. They created visual data representations and practiced iterative improvement of their communication materials. Program meetings included workshops that focused on research communication for academic and nonacademic audiences, and each student produced two presentations tailored to the needs of different target audiences. Survey results indicate strong gains in confidence across all research competencies, including hypothesis generation, troubleshooting, and adapting when experiments did not go as planned. Students also reported increased understanding of post-baccalaureate pathways, the mission of land-grant universities, and potential careers in agriculture. Progress was made on the extension objective through the development of stakeholder-focused research presentations created by each student. These products demonstrated the students' growing ability to translate applied research findings for audiences outside academia. In addition, frequent discussions with mentors and cohort meetings supported growth in soft skills such as problem solving, time management, and professional communication. Overall, even with a small cohort, the program accomplished meaningful progress toward improving research skills, communication capacity, and awareness of the broader agricultural research and extension landscape.
Publications
|