Progress 08/01/24 to 07/31/25
Outputs Target Audience: Scientific community. The scientific community was reached through seminars, development of new methods, and the lab website. Postdoc. A postdoc was hired for this project. She is being trained in techniques used in the field of plant-microbe interactions, and is developing oral and written communication skills. Graduate students. One graduate student is working on this project. This individual is being trained in scientific techniques, oral and written communication. Undergraduate students at UC Berkeley. Individuals are recruited to the lab through two main undergraduate research programs. They receive training in scientific techniques, oral and written communication. 8 undergraduate students were trained through this project. Growers. Farmers and UC Berkeley scientists interacted through a farm visit, where participants exchanged information and learned more about each other's work. We posted growers' questions and answers from the literature on the lab website. General public. Student scientists presented scientific topics of interest at PubScience, which reaches the general public at local breweries. This outreach event has been very well received and covers a wide range of scientific topics, with opportunities for open discussion. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Through this project, one postdoc, one graduate student, and 8 undergraduate students have been trained in plant-microbe interactions, plant biology and microbiology. Three lab members participated in the Bay Area Plant Hub meeting to expand their professional networks. One graduate student served as an ASPB (American Society of Plant Biologists) Ambassador at the meeting. One undergraduate student presented her research at an undergraduate poster session. Three lab members gave seminars in the PGEC seminar series. One graduate student presented their work in the Genetics Training Grant symposium. Three lab members interacted with farmers through our farm visit. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The PI gave a talk on this research in the UC Davis plant pathology seminar series. Three lab members gave talks in the PGEC seminar series and/or the Genetics Training Grant symposium. One undergraduate student presented her research in an undergraduate poster session. PubScience ran five events on diverse scientific topics, including plant diseases. Lab members discussed their research with farmers during a farm visit. One lab member served as an ASPB Ambassador. The Lewis Lab website was regularly updated with news and resources, as well as questions & answers from the farm visit. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?For objective 1, we will quantify the HR induced by EtHAn and P. syringae D36E using conductivity assays. We will continue generating single mutants of the remaining harpin genes as well as higher order mutants lacking all harpins. We will test for protein expression of the 10 candidate bacterial genes that were transiently expressed in SP. We will expand our candidate list of bacterial genes for testing in SP using Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression assays. For objective 2, we will carry out qRT-PCR on the different polymutant strains to quantify the level of HR suppression in these different strains. We will also quantify the level of HR suppression using conductivity. We will begin knocking out effectors that contribute to HR suppression. For objective 3, we will finish screening additional lines in the natural diversity panel of tomato lines. We will continue analyzing candidates from the GWAS analysis using different sequence and protein databases, and compare the candidates between full sequenced accessions with or without an HR. We will conduct synteny analysis of the regions of interest between SLL and SP. We will begin cloning the strongest candidates. For objective 4, we will continue training undergraduate students in scientific research. We will continue reaching the public through PubScience and farmers/growers through our farm visits. We will recruit a Fisk student for summer research, and embed them in a different undergraduate summer research program if needed.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Our first objective was to identify molecules from effectorless P. syringae D36E strain that trigger HR in wild tomato. We tested several Solanum pimpinellifolium (SP) accessions for their ability to recognize EtHAn and P. syringae D36E and found that both strains caused a similar hypersensitive response (HR) phenotype. This result supports our conclusion that the recognized molecule is shared between the two strains. To determine whether a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) is recognized, we carried out HR assays with heat-killed bacteria grown in rich media or hrp-inducing media. The type III secretion system (T3SS) is induced in hrp-inducing media but is not induced in rich media. We found that heat-killed bacteria grown in either media did not induce the HR, suggesting that a PAMP is not recognized. It is possible that the P. syringae D36E secretes an active protein that produces damage-associated molecular patterns, or that P. syringae D36E translocates a molecule into the plant that is recognized. To determine whether translocation is necessary for the HR, we have been generating knockout mutants in harpin genes, which are needed for translocation. Single mutants of hopAK1, hrpZ1 and hopP1 still showed an HR, as well as double mutants of hopP1 and hopAK1, or hopP1 and hrpZ1. However, a double hopAK1 hrpZ1 mutant did not cause an HR and was impaired in translocation, as the hopAK1 hrpZ1 double mutant carrying the recognized effector protein AvrPto, did not cause an HR in SP. These results support that translocation of an unknown molecule is necessary for the P. syringae D36E HR. Lastly, we have been testing 10 candidate proteins for their ability to induce the HR when transiently expressed in SP by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Although the positive control, AvrPto, induced a strong HR in all experiments, none of ten tested candidates caused an HR. These candidates included five harpin or harpin-like proteins and five T3SS proteins that are translocated to the plant. We still need to validate that these proteins are expressed by Western blotting. Our second objective was to identify effectors that suppress the P. syringae D36E-triggered HR in SP. We have carried out preliminary qRT-PCR experiments to examine induction of two HR marker genes, hin1 and hsr203J, compared to a ubiquitin housekeeping gene, and found that both are induced during the HR with P. syringae D36E or EtHAn but not P. syringae D36EΔhrcC. This is consistent with our expectation that a functional type III secretion system is necessary for immune induction. Our third objective was to identify tomato genes responsible for recognition of P. syringae D36E and characterize diversity of recognition in wild tomato. We tested ~150 accessions of S. lycopersicum var. lycopersicum (SLL), S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme (SLC) and SP for their ability to recognize P. syringae D36E. For 115 of these, we tested 20-30 cotyledons per line and observed reproducible phenotypes in multiple experiments. For the remaining lines, the number of tested cotyledons is too low or we have observed inconsistent phenotypes in different experiments. We will continue to test additional accessions to increase the number of cotyledons, test a new seed source for lines with inconsistent phenotypes, and test more divergent wild tomato species. We found that the majority of SLL lines lacked recognition of P. syringae D36E, and most SLC lines had no or weak recognition. Most SP accessions were able to recognize P. syringae D36E. We carried out GWAS using binary or continuous phenotypes, and identified the strongest signal on four different chromosomes. We have identified genes of interest on one chromosome with the strongest signal and have begun comparing the sequences in accessions with or without an HR. Our fourth objective was to train the next generation of scientists, connect scientists and farmers and communicate with the public about science. We trained 8 UC Berkeley undergraduate students through various research programs. Students were involved in genetic screens to identify accessions resistant to P. syringae. We worked with Dr. Steven Damo and Dr. Jose Vasquez-Medina to coordinate a summer research experience with a student at Fisk University. Unfortunately, the NSF REU program funding was not awarded until May 30, 2025 and the prospective Fisk student had already made other plans for the summer. Since the NSF REU program has now been funded, we will be able to recruit the Fisk students for subsequent years and embed them in this program. We carried out a farm visit to Live Earth Farm as part of the "Fresh from the Farm: A conversation with growers" program. The visit involved 6 scientists from undergraduate students, graduate students, technicians, postdocs and staff researchers. In pre-assessment surveys, respondents ranked their knowledge of farming as low (average score 2/5, where 1 is little knowledge and 5 is highly knowledgeable). They expressed interest in learning about the challenges faced by farmers. In post-assessment surveys, respondents ranked their knowledge of farming much higher (average 4.2/5). They enjoyed learning about techniques employed by the farm, including the use of compost tea, grafting and dry farming. We posted questions from the growers and our responses to the lab website, where they are publicly accessible. In addition, we were involved in the PubScience program, where student scientists talk about their research to the public. Five PubScience events occurred in this reporting period.
Publications
|