Source: UNIV OF WISCONSIN submitted to NRP
ASSESSING SOCIAL NETWORKS AS A NOVEL INDICATOR AND PREDICTOR OF WELFARE IN YOUNG RUMINANTS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1032353
Grant No.
2024-67015-42625
Cumulative Award Amt.
$650,000.00
Proposal No.
2023-08137
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2024
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2028
Grant Year
2024
Program Code
[A1251]- Animal Health and Production and Animal Products: Animal Well-Being
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF WISCONSIN
21 N PARK ST STE 6401
MADISON,WI 53715-1218
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Public concern about farm animal welfare often focuses on the management of pre-weaned animals, with particular attention paid towards social housing, painful procedures such as disbudding in dairy calves and tail-docking in lambs, and weaning. Automated technologies, such as real-time location systems, provide new opportunities to understand social dynamics in group-housed animals through continuous tracking of social interactions. We propose to examine social network analysis as an efficient and objective method for assessing and predicting the welfare of pre-weaned calves and lambs. We will investigate: (1) how early life management practices shape an individual's social development; (2) how an individual's position in their social network predicts response to a painful procedure, and how this response changes their subsequent position in the network; and (3) how an individual's social network position predicts their response to weaning. We expect these findings to provide novel insight into the ability to predict and improve animal welfare through understanding of social interactions. This research will help to (1) advance objective measures of animal welfare using novel, automated tracking technology, and (2) support the development of precision management systems to improve welfare in pre-weaned animals.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
50%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3153610106050%
3153410106050%
Goals / Objectives
This project focuses on assessing social network analysis as an indicator and predictor of welfare in pre-weaned, socially housed animals, with the goal of advancing efficient, noninvasive measures of welfare and supporting the development of precision management systems in socially housed livestock. Specifically, we will investigate: (1) how early life management practices shape an individual's centrality (i.e., how connected they are) in their social network; (2) how an individual's centrality predicts response to a painful procedure, and how this response changes their subsequent position in the network; and (3) how an individual's network centrality predicts response to the weaning transition.
Project Methods
Treatments. We will investigate the effects of a social partner and cauterization in the first week of life on the development of social networks using a 2 x 2 factorial design, with animals cauterized at an Early (2-7 d) or Later (32-37 d) age and assigned to Pair social contact (consecutively born peer in calves or twin in lambs) or Single social contact (individual hutch in calves, or dam only in lambs). Lambs and calves will experience these housing conditions for the first 4 or 10 days of life, respectively. After this period, 4 paired individuals (consisting of 1 cauterized pair and 1 uncauterized pair) and 4 singles (consisting of 2 cauterized individuals and 2 uncauterized individuals) will be moved to a group pen, where they will remain together until weaning. Each pen will be filled with consecutively born animals to minimize age ranges within pens, with a maximum range of 5 d. In total, we will use 96 animals of each species (24 animals/treatment * 4 treatments) housed in groups of 8 individuals (12 groups/species).Disbudding and tail-docking. At 5 days of age, calves assigned to the Early cauterization treatment will be disbudded using the hot-iron method. At 2 days of age, lambs in the Early cauterization treatment will be tail docked using an electric docking iron. At 32-37 days of age, all 4 Later cauterized individuals in a group will be removed from the pen together, cauterized sequentially within 10 min of each other following the procedures described above, and immediately returned to the group. Both cauterization procedures will be performed with local anesthesia and analgesia, given the overwhelming scientific evidence that these procedures are painful and this is unequivocally best practice. However, the effects of local anesthesia and analgesia are short-lasting and research has shown that behavioral and physiological changes still occur in animals receiving pain relief.Weaning. All calves within the group will be gradually weaned from milk simultaneously during a 14-d period beginning when the calves are 43 days old on average, by reducing milk allotment using an incremental step-down program implemented by the automated milk feeder (12 L/d to 2 L/d). Calves will be completely weaned at 56 days of age and will remain in their group pen for 1 week after weaning. Data collection will end after 63 days of age. Ewe milk production will be reduced by removing energy supplement (corn) and lowering forage quality by removing chopped haylage and limit-feeding dry grass hay beginning when the lambs in the group pen are 43 days old on average. Ewes will be removed from the pen when lambs are 56 days of age on average, marking the end of weaning. Lambs will remain in the pen until 63 days of age, after which time data collection will end.Social networks. The day before moving to group housing, individuals will be fitted with collars containing a tracking device that collects data on the animal's location in real-time (TrackLab, Noldus Information Technology, Netherlands). The tracking devices will remain on the animals until weaning at 63 days of age. The tri-axial accelerometer in each tag will be activated to discriminate between lying and standing proximity networks. Each tag will be set to a 1s refresh rate, and will log location and accelerometer data continuously, providing sufficient data to generate robust estimates of the network. We will characterize proximity-based social networks over weekly intervals through weaning. Patterns of social proximity are a meaningful proxy for social behavior, and are associated with other forms of social interaction (e.g., grooming). Individuals' networks will be characterized with three centrality measures to assess how connected they are in their networks: closeness (number of steps to nearest neighbors), strength (sum of an individual's edge weights), and eigenvector (sum of the centralities of an individual's direct and indirect connections).Pain response. To assess behavioral and physiological changes following cauterization at 35 days of age, we will record behavior continuously beginning 48 h before until 48 h after the procedure using video cameras mounted above each pen. In both calves and lambs, we will measure bouts and duration of self-grooming. We will assess activity levels using leg-based accelerometers. Calf-specific behaviors will include frequencies of ear flicks, tail flicks, head shakes, head scratches, and head rubs, as these behaviors change consistently across disbudding studies. In lambs, we will measure previously validated behaviors of tail-docking pain: frequencies of tail wagging, head turning, and foot stamping/kicking; and durations of abnormal lying and walking. To assess the physiological stress response to cauterization at 35 days of age, we will measure fecal cortisol 12 h before (baseline) and 36 h after cauterization. We will sample 36 h after the procedure since plasma cortisol peaks after the local anesthetic and analgesia have worn off (24 hours after the procedure).Response during weaning. From 45-60 days of age, we will assess changes in feeding behavior and activity, and occurrence of abnormal oral behaviors, which can develop in response to hunger and potentially reflect frustration. We will also characterize activity using accelerometers in the tracking tags to measure standing duration and bouts, as an indicator of restlessness. To investigate physiological stress responses to weaning, we will sample hair cortisol from all animals at 63 days of age. Hair cortisol is a relatively novel and non-invasive retrospective measure of long-term HPA activity, that is therefore robust to fluctuations in diurnal rhythms and acute challenges, and has been validated in cattle and sheep. Animal health and performance, including weight gain, will be monitored 3 times per week throughout the pre-weaning period, and averaged to obtain weekly scores.Hypotheses: We hypothesize that: (1) management practices in the first week of life will predict an individual's centrality in their social network in subsequent weeks; (2) there will be a positive bidirectional relationship between an individual's centrality and their resilience to painful procedures; and (3) there will be a positive bidirectional relationship between an individual's centrality and their resilience to weaning.Efforts: We expect the proposed research to generate foundational and applied knowledge for advancing proximity-based networks as an objective measure of animal welfare and inform the development of precision management tools using automated tracking technologies. We will present the results to producers, industry representatives, and the scientific community at extension events and research conferences, statewide and nationwide. We will also use social media and campus outreach events to reach the public and policy makers. For each objective, we will prepare at least one conference paper, one extension article, and one open-access peer-reviewed papers for publication in reputable journals. In total, we expect to generate 6 peer-reviewed publications (3/species).Evaluation: Our team will meet regularly to monitor our progress towards our expected outcomes. We will meet at the beginning of the project to critically review the project objectives, establish the suitability of our approach, and refine as needed. Thereafter, we will meet bi-monthly to critically review our efforts to identify where the project has yet to maximize its potential impact, develop approaches for corrective action, and discuss how well previously identified corrective actions were implemented. All team members will review project outputs, including training SOPs, videos, spreadsheets, publications, and abstracts. At the end of the project, we will critically discuss the project's impact and priorities for future research and outreach efforts.

Progress 09/01/24 to 08/31/25

Outputs
Target Audience:Target audience: The most immediate beneficiaries of this research are livestock producers, veterinarians, and animal welfare scientists. By advancing automated approaches to welfare assessment, producers may gain tools to monitor animals more effectively and respond earlier to welfare concerns. In the longer term, this work benefits the animals themselves through a clearer understanding of the welfare impacts of early-life stressors, while also benefiting the public by supporting sustainable livestock production practices that address welfare and align with societal expectations. Changes/Problems:University of Wisconsin: A modification to the original experimental design was necessary due to management constraints. The initial plan to compare singleton and twin lambs raised welfare concerns, as assigning high-producing ewes to raise singletons increased mastitis risk. To address this, we shifted to comparing twin lambs from multiparous versus primiparous ewes. This adjustment kept the project aligned with its objectives while protecting ewe health and maintaining balanced groups for robust social network analysis. University of Florida: A delay in starting data collection was necessitated by facility upgrades, such that beginning the first experiment was delayed by close to a year. Animal data collection should be completed as planned within the next two reporting periods, but we expect that a no-cost extension may be needed to complete data analysis, behavioral observation, and scientific writing at the end of this project. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?University of Wisconsin: One PhD student (grant-funded; started January 2025) received training in experimental design, animal handling, analgesia use, algometer testing, data analysis, and writing. Five undergraduate students gained hands-on research experience, including data collection, animal handling, and video coding as part of independent study credits. University of Florida: One PhD student (grant-funded; start date in August 2025) began training in experimental design and data analysis, with plans to begin experimental data collection in the next reporting period. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Data collection and analysis are ongoing - there are no results to report yet. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?University of Wisconsin: During the next reporting period, we will focus on data collection and analysis, including: Behavioral video analysis: Assess the lambs' behavioral responses to weaning and tail docking. Social network analysis: Social network analyses of the continuous location tracking data collected from lambs and ewes during the Spring 2025 trial. This will include calculating individual centrality measures (closeness, strength, eigenvector) and evaluating how these metrics are shaped by docking age and predict responses to weaning. Pain response and healing analysis: Analyze algometer data and wound photographs to compare pain sensitivity and healing trajectories between lambs docked at birth versus at five weeks of age. We will relate these measures to lambs' social network positions. Dissemination: Prepare an abstract for presentation at a scientific conference and begin drafting manuscripts for peer-reviewed publication. We will also plan future extension and outreach materials to share results with producers and veterinarians once analyses are complete. Student training: Continue providing research training opportunities for the PhD student and undergraduate assistants in data collection, analysis, and preparation of presentations/publications. University of Florida: During the next reporting period, we will begin conducting experiments in dairy calves, with activities including: Data collection: In calves assigned to individual or pair housing, and early or late disbudding, we will collect continuous location tracking data using Noldus TrackLab, calf performance and health measurements, and continuous video recordings for later behavioral recording. We project that half of the animal enrollment will be achieved in the next reporting period. Student training: We will provide training opportunities for the PhD student and additionally involve undergraduate research assistants in data collection.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Problem that project seeks to address: Farm animals often experience painful management procedures (such as tail docking in lambs and disbudding in dairy calves) and abrupt weaning, both of which raise welfare concerns. Current methods for assessing animal welfare rely on labor-intensive behavioral observation. This project addresses the need for efficient, non-invasive, and continuous measures of animal welfare, with the goal of determining whether automated social network analysis can be used to understand the welfare effects of early-life stressors and which individuals are more or less susceptible to these effects. Major activities / experiments conducted: We conducted a trial at the UW-Madison Arlington Sheep Unit (Feb-May 2025) with 30 ewes and 60 twin lambs. Twins were randomly assigned to tail docking either within 48 hours of birth or at 5 weeks of age. All docked lambs received pain relief (meloxicam and local lidocaine). Lambs were weaned at 8 weeks of age and monitored from birth through one week post-weaning. Data collected: We collected: 1)continuous location tracking data (x, y, coordinates) using Noldus TrackLab collars to capture ewe-lamb and lamb-lamb interactions; 2) daily video recordings; 3) body weights at birth, 5 weeks, weaning, and post-weaning; 4) weekly images to assess the healing process of tail docking wounds; 5) weekly algometer tests to assess pain sensitivity of tail docking wounds. Results: Data analysis is ongoing. Social network analysis of the location tracking data will be conducted in the next reporting period. At this time, no results are available to report. Summary: During this reporting period, the project completed its first experimental trial, generating a comprehensive behavioral and performance dataset. These data will be used in the next reporting period to directly address the project's key objectives.

Publications