Progress 09/01/24 to 08/31/25
Outputs Target Audience:Undergraduate students with an interest in animal science, veterinary sciences, entomology, and related disciplines were our target audience. The selected Scholars were identified as talented individuals for graduate and professional programs interested in livestock-associated careers. Changes/Problems: In July 2025, we completed the first cohort of the program. Although significant challenges and problems did not arise or significantly impact the program, minor daily challenges made it difficult to work with the Scholars. To help with this, we will develop and provide Scholars with a tentative program book, so they know what is expected of them and when it is expected. Many of the Scholars struggled with note-taking, finishing tasks on time, and prioritizing their work efforts. Additionally, they did not come prepared to use Microsoft programs (Office, Word, Excel, PowerPoint). Many said they had never written a report or paper for a class, and if they had, it was not evaluated for grammar, clarity, or readability. For us, this was a wake-up call that many of the Scholars are not receiving the necessary professional skills training/practice in college (although they do possess content knowledge). To help with the second cohort, we will plan to include a weekly meeting that focuses on research to Extension and includes Experimental Design, use of Microsoft products (Word/PowerPoint/Excel), simple data analysis (Excel vs RStudio), and how to use different AI products for "good". We plan to provide more structure in year two than we did in year one. Additionally, Stakeholders mentioned to us that the Scholars may have taken the program for granted, especially with meeting conference attendees. To help with this, we will ask Scholars to meet with and interview previous winners of the Livestock Insect Workers Conference Lifetime Achievement Award, who typically attend the meeting. Each Scholar will be placed with a winner and develop a small summary on that winner which will be posted to the project website. Not only does this instill networking and professional behaviors, but it will also help the Scholars appreciate the audience. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? The REEVES program was specifically designed to provide veterinary entomology training to the selected Scholars, expose them to research and Extension, as well as help develop their professional skills through meetings and one-on-one work with their mentors. Training Activities. Pest collection and identification Molecular methods (DNA extraction, gene amplification through PCR or qPCR) Image capture using microscopes Data collection and analysis Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, TEAMS) Professional Development. Weekly leadership session with leaders in the discipline Weekly teamwork session to discuss how to work as a team to reach a common goal Networking at a conference, Scholars learned how to prepare for a conference, which included their own presentations and setting up / attending lunches and dinners with professionals in the discipline Weekly Journal club had Scholars identify, read, and discuss a peer-reviewed journal article in veterinary entomology Scholars created CVs and LinkedIn accounts Scholars practiced producing factsheets covering some of the most prevalent pests in animal agriculture How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? The REEVES team and Scholars shared results with communities of interest in different ways. All Scholars presented at a National conference (Livestock Insect Workers Conference), wrote an article for a trade journal (Tennessee Cattle Business Magazine) highlighting and summarizing three talks at the conference, and participated in a webinar about their work and experience in the program. Additionally, each hosting university shared the project with its own local communities. In Tennessee, two Scholars participated in an Extension Field Day, discussing their activities in the program with participants. They also met with leaders at the university (Dean of AgResearch, Dean of Veterinary Medicine, Dean of Herbert College of Agriculture/Teaching, Entomology and Plant Pathology Department Head, and Entomology and Plant Pathology Director of Graduate Studies) to learn more about the university, graduate school opportunities, and life after graduation. In Kansas, Scholars interacted with livestock owners in both Kansas and Iowa to disseminate information of Theileria orientalis and Haemaphysalis longicornis. They attended seminars and went on Extension visits to producers to educate on current outbreaks happening in the state. The University of Georgia's College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences covered UGA's two REEVES students in the article Collaborative research program gives students hands-on experience in veterinary entomology CAES Field Report. In Texas, Scholars interacted with livestock owners and County Extension Agents in multiple counties to assist with a horn fly research project and help disseminate information on ticks in Texas and the impact they have on cattle, plus discuss the not yet found Haemaphysalis longicornis tick making its way throughout the United States. They attended seminars and went on extension visits to producers to educate and visited the USDA-ARS Kerrville Center and TAMU Research Center in Uvalde. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? We are now at work preparing for year two of the REEVES program. We are beginning by assessing feedback from the Scholars and participants based on the evaluations organized by the Synergy Institute. We are also restructuring the website to highlight our past Scholars and provide details that the next cohort would be interested in learning. Our current plans are to rework the application and website (October 2025), recruit and select Scholars (November 2025 - February 2026), prepare for the program (March - May 2026), and then run year two of the program (June-July 2026). Concurrently, we will complete our work with the 20025 Scholars on their Extension fact sheets, send them another experience feedback evaluation, and (if needed) assist with their applications to graduate or professional schools.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
The problem.There is a documented shortage of veterinary entomologists, exacerbated by the lack of training in entomology among veterinarians and similar animal scientists. Proposed solution.Identify and train Scholars in veterinary entomology, providing them with research and extension experiences, discipline-specific training, exposure to various leadership styles, and opportunities to work in a dynamic, multi-state team environment. What we did.In the first year of the project, we onboarded 8 Scholars but successfully trained 7 scholars in veterinary entomology over 8 weeks (June 1-July 25). They worked in independent research teams at each institution and together on a tick-associated project. Scholars received compliance training, networked, and presented at a professional conference (Livestock Insect Workers Conference [LIWC]), as well as participated in an online webinar (Expo). Throughout the 8 weeks, they developed and gained an appreciation of professional skills (communication skills, leadership skills, team science, networking) as well as research skills (develop, implement, and report progress towards project goals). Learning Outcome 1: Research Knowledge and Experience Pre-/Mid-/Post-Survey.The survey data indicate strong growth in scholars' scientific attitudes and perspectives during the program. Across all time points, 100% of scholars agreed that forgetting facts does not diminish their ability to apply scientific thinking skills and that the process of writing in science helps them understand concepts. At the end of the program, scholars showed more trust in science, appreciation for writing and problem-solving, and recognition of creativity and cross-disciplinary connections, and negotiating how to reconcile personal experience with scientific evidence. Scholar Research Rubric.For Research Experience, scholars were scored in 9 areas by program faculty and staff on a scale from 1 (Poor) to 4 (Excellent). Overall, the scholars were rated highest in "Initiative and Independence" with a mean score of 3.4 and lowest in "Engagement with Literature" with a mean score of 2.8. Learning Outcome 2: Connection to the Sector Pre-/Mid-/Post-Survey.100% of scholars consistently rated continuing their education and managing their health as very important across all timepoints. Shifts across the timepoints suggest they increasingly prioritized education, health, financial independence, and social contribution, while placing less emphasis on family proximity, spirituality, and community ties. Scholar Research Rubric.In Extension Experience, scholars were scored in 8 areas were evaluated by program faculty and staff on a scale from 1 (Poor) to 4 (Excellent) and were rated highest in "Teamwork and Collaboration," with a mean score of 3.7, and scored lowest in "Communication Skills (Verbal & Written)," with a mean score of 3.1. For REEVES, scholars were scored in 5 areas and rated highest in "Professionalism and initiative," with a mean score of 3.3 and lowest in "Research Skill Development," with a mean score of 2.9. Event Survey.Program faculty, staff, and scholars were asked to select their level of agreement on general and Veterinary Entomology topics, such as "the presentations were informative" and "I have a better understanding of the event's entomology topic(s) in veterinary applications," on a 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree) scale. For the LIWC, respondents gave the event a mean score of 3.6. The faculty rated the event with a mean score of 3.5. Scholars rated the event higher at 3.8. The Expo was rated much higher than the LIWC, with faculty providing an overall mean score of 4.7, and scholars noting an overall mean of 4.2. Scholar Networking Survey.Scholars were requested to rate their level of agreement on a 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree) scale for 5 statements regarding their discussions with parents/guardians, students, and mentors. Scholars noted a high level of agreement on most items, with mean scores of 3.7 to 4.7, indicating that they readily discuss research and experiences with others. Collaborator Survey.Most collaborators felt the program was an excellent way to introduce students to entomology and should be continued. 100% of collaborators were either satisfied or strongly satisfied with the clarity of vision and planning process for its goals and?objectives, activity follow-through, diverse influential people participation, partner and scholar diversity, partner organizations' resource support, and leadership competence and strength, and decision-making transparency. Learning Outcome 3: Professionalism and 21st Century Skills Pre-/Mid-/Post-Survey.Scholars were asked to rate their confidence in their level in various professional skills compared to the average college student. The data show clear growth in scholars' self-reported skills across all areas from pre- to post-program. By the end of the program, 100% of scholars rated themselves above average in writing, public speaking, social skills, computer skills, leadership, and collaboration, with math also showing improvement. Scholar Research Rubric.In Teamwork, scholars were scored in 4 areas by program faculty and staff on a scale of 1 (Poor) to 4 (Excellent) and scored highest in "Collaboration" with a mean score of 3.6 and lowest in "Responsibility" with a mean score of 3.1. For Leadership, scholars were assessed in 5 areas and were scored highest in "Teamwork and Empowerment" with a mean score of 3.4 and lowest in "Decision-Making and Problem-Solving" with a mean score of 3.1. Teamwork Series Survey.The survey included concepts of trust, vision, self-awareness/emotional intelligence, leadership, mentoring, team evolution/dynamics, communication, recognition/sharing success, conflict/disagreement, and navigating/leveraging networks and systems. Scholars were asked to rate the Teamwork Series' helpfulness in developing their knowledge on a scale of 1 (Very Unhelpful) to 5 (Very Helpful). Most of the items received scores of 4.5 or above. Only "Research teams form and develop to their highest potential" and "Conflict can be both a resource and challenge within a team" received a score of 4.3 and 4.1. Leadership Survey.100% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the presenters were knowledgeable, resources were helpful, they were interested in using what they learned in other settings, received useful information for preparing for future career development, have better understanding of the importance and applications of research technologies in entomology related areas, and are more interested in a career or professional work in?veterinary or animal sciences.?Several students enjoyed speaking with established field professionals, but there were suggestions to improve program organization and time management to provide more interactions with professionals in veterinary entomology and industry. Key outcomes or other accomplishments realized. We successfully finished the first cohort of the REEVES program. Seven of eight Scholars finished and went on to give a presentation at a conference and an updated project talk at a REEVES-specific webinar (attended by 60+ people). The Scholars gained knowledge in veterinary entomology through hands-on and engaging experiences. They were able to discuss their projects and transfer the knowledge they gained to a variety of stakeholders through a conference presentation, a webinar, a trade journal article, and by draftingfact sheets for the public. At the conference, they made professional connections with industry and academic stakeholders. Throughout the program, Stakeholders provided us with project-specific feedback, asked for more information from the Scholars (and even followed up with them via email), and increased contact to discuss graduate and professional school opportunities. One Scholar even mentioned applying to graduate school with a person he met at the conference.
Publications
- Type:
Websites
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2024
Citation:
https://reeu.utk.edu/reeves/
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
Trout Fryxell, R.T., K. V. Smith, J. G. Chavez Renteria, A. D. Fajardo, S. R. Frost, S. I. Piper, C. C. Ratliff, J. O. Saufley, S. E. Stacy, P. L. Stroup, N. Hinkle, C. Olds, and S. L. Swiger. July 2025. Developing a collaborative tick surveillance and management network: insights from eight veterinary entomology scholars on emerging tick-borne threats to U.S. cattle (year 1). Submitted a 30-minute presentation at the Livestock Insects Workers Conference, Cody, WY.?
- Type:
Other Journal Articles
Status:
Submitted
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
The Scholars worked together to create a Highlights of the 2025 Livestock Insect Workers Conference article for the Tennessee Cattlemens Association trade journal.
K. Smith and R. Trout Fryxell. September 2025. Highlights from the 2025 Livestock Insect Workers Conference. Vol. 40. No. 9.
- Type:
Other
Status:
Other
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
Smith, K. V., J. G. Chavez Renteria, A. M. Tucker, and R. Trout Fryxell. In Prep. Tickborne Diseases of Tennessee Cattle. University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture; Extension Publication XXXX.
- Type:
Other
Status:
Other
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
Six factsheets were drafted and are currently in progress at the University of Georgia.
- Type:
Other
Status:
Other
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
Three factsheets were drafted and are currently i progress at Texas A&M.
|