Progress 07/01/24 to 06/30/25
Outputs Target Audience:On the extension side, target audience, including dairy producers, nutritionists and extension specialists and county agents, will have a further understanding of how different management approaches at the time of milking cessation can affect cow immunity and subsequent health and performance. These audiences will be reached through the dairy extension newsletters, popular express articles, regional workshops and conferences, and surveys. On the research side, the audiences include dairy scientists and students. The knowledge obtained from this study will be delivered via presentations and posters at national and international meetings, and peer-reviewed publications. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The projects supported by this grant have provided many opportunities for training and professional development for undergraduate and graduate students, extension agents, and other industry professionals. During our experiments, at least 6 undergrad research assistants or intern students were involved. They actively participated in animal trials and lab analysis. This provided opportunities for these students to train their professional skills and gain experience in farm management and animal care and dairy cattle research. Further, this grant supports one graduate student who oversees animal studies. This student has gained experience in experimental design and conducting animal trials and has opportunities to communicate with producers to understand the current trend and development of the dairy industry. Further, many other graduate students have participated in this experiment as well to gain experience in dairy management on commercial dairy farms. We have also provided opportunities to county extension agents for professional development. We collaborated with county extension agents in different workshops which not only intended to educate the dairy producers but also provide an excellent opportunity for extension agents to learn the newest technologies in the dairy industry. Further, in our workshops, in addition to dairy producers, we have invited many industry professionals. We also present results in different meetings for industry professionals. These all provide opportunities for them to receive further professional training in the latest technology in dairy cattle management. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have disseminated the results to communities of interests in several approaches: Department seminar presented by the graduate student Presentations and posters in the annual meeting of American Dairy Science Associations Presentation presented by the graduate student in the Sixth International Lactation Biology Symposium. Publication in UGA DairyFax newsletter. DairyFax newsletter is published quarterly by the UGA dairy Extension team. The subscribers include not only ALL dairy producers in GA but also industry personnel, veterinarians, Extension agents, and agriculture teachers in GA and nationwide. A producer workshop has been hosted during which the UGA dairy extension team disseminated the results to dairy producers, extension agents, and other industry professionals. Face-to-Face meetings with producers have been hosted to deliver the results. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In the next reporting period, we will: Continue to analyze the data collected from experiments conducted in this current reporting period to have a full understanding how reduced milking frequency and advancing dry cow vaccination affect mammary health and their potential to replace the antibiotics treatment at milking cessation. Perform additional animal experiments to explore additionalstrategies to minimize stress and inflammation of the cow in her early dry period, e.g., administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and their impacts on intramammary infection and the antibiotic usage at the time of milking cessation. Research results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented in the annual meeting of American Dairy Science Association and/or National Mastitis Council, and the GA dairy conference. The producer survey will be completed, and data will be analyzed. More producer workshops and face-to-face producer meetings will be hosted in different areas of Georgia. More articles will be published in the DairyFax newsletter, UGA extension bulletin, and other popular express journals. The results from these projects will also be posted online through our website and social media to reach a broader impact.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Dry period, the two-month non-lactating interval between two consecutive lactations, is a stressful period for a dairy cow. Cows transitioning from the late lactation to the early dry period undergo major shifts in management and nutrition, including udder engorgement from abrupt milking cessation, social disruptions due to regrouping, dietary change from energy-dense lactating cow diet to a low-energy dry cow ration, and dry cow vaccination. These events trigger stress and induce systemic inflammation of cows in the early dry period. The upregulated stress and inflammatory responses may contribute to the increased intramammary infections by impairing the immune function of cows in the early dry period. A common approach to prevent intramammary infections in the dry period is the intramammary administration of antibiotics at the time of milking cessation. It is effective but raises concerns over antibiotics resistance. In contrast, strategies that minimize stress and inflammation may improve the immune functions of cows in the early dry period, reducing the intramammary infection rate during the dry period and alleviating the need for antibiotics treatment at the time of milking cessation. Thus, two novel management approaches have been studied in this reporting period, namely reduced milking frequency in the late lactation and advancing dry cow vaccination. Reduced the milking frequency lowers the milk production of cows prior to dry-off, minimizing stress and inflammation following milking cessation. And performing dry cow vaccination earlier will minimize inflammation in the early dry period. We hypothesize that these two approaches will enhance the cow immunity and reduce the intramammary infection rate and mastitis incidence in the subsequent lactation. In the first study, a total of 324 late lactating cows were enrolled. Cows received dry cow vaccines either at 11 d prior to scheduled dry-off, or at 2 d prior to dry-off according to the standard operating procedure of the farm. The circulating inflammation and stress markers and peripheral immunity were examined in the early dry period and the disease incidences, reproduction and lactational performance in the subsequent lactation were recorded. Preliminary data suggest that multiparous cows (more than one birth prior to dry-off) who received vaccines earlier had similar intramammary infections in early lactation but produce more milk in the subsequent lactation compared with multiparous cows who receive vaccines closer to dry-off. In the second study, late lactating Holstein cows (n = 996) were milked either 3 times a day (n = 480) or 2 times a day (n = 516) in the last 13 d of the lactation. The circulating concentration of inflammation and stress markers, and immune functions were examined around dry-off. And pooled milk samples were collected within 3 d post-calving from each cow and cultured to detect common mastitis pathogens. Preliminary data suggest that reduced milking frequency in late lactation did not affect systemic inflammation in the early dry period but increased the milk culture positive incidence in early lactation. The preliminary results from these experiments were presented in GA dairy conferences, and at different producer workshop and face-to-face meetings during this reporting period. Multiple presentations or posters will be presented in the annual meeting of the American Dairy Science Association at the end of June 2025. The other objective is to develop and distribute a survey to capture current management practices and challenges that dairy producers, veterinarians, and other industry members face, specifically as it relates to antibiotic use and dry-off protocol. This information will drive future Extension programming toward meeting the needs specified by the respondents. To address this objective, the UGA dairy team has developed and initiated three targeted surveys designed to capture the perspectives and practices of Georgia's dairy industry stakeholders. The producer survey aims to (1) summarize current dry-off management practices, (2) assess attitudes toward antibiotic use and alternative protocols, (3) identify perceived barriers to adopting non-antibiotic approaches, (4) gather herd productivity and health data related to mammary health, and (5) evaluate preferred communication and education methods. The survey created for veterinarians is designed to gauge their views on antibiotic stewardship and how they view their role in communication about antibiotics with producers. The survey for extension agents differs in that it focuses on their understanding of and confidence in addressing antibiotic use in the dairy industry. While survey distribution was delayed due to an overlapping data collection timeline and heightened biosecurity concerns related to HPAI, we are now in the active data collection phase. Informal producer feedback has also been gathered through two recent forums involving both small- and large-scale operations. Finally, we have assembled a producer panel that is reflective of Georgia's diverse dairy industry. We also intended to develop an Extension program to educate on the best management dry-off practices and judicious antibiotic usage and evaluate its impact. During this reporting period, we have hosted one producer workshop in one dairy concentrated area of Georgia to discuss the strategies to minimize stress and inflammation in the early dry period and visit different dairies for face-to-face meetings with dairy producers. We also attended GA dairy conference to showcase our research and progress with dairy producers and industry professionals. We have also published results in GA dairy newsletters to achieve broader impacts. Although we are at the beginning of this grant, we have already received positive feedback from dairy producers. We have learned that several producers are starting to consider a change in management to minimize inflammation and stress in the early dry period. We expect more positive behavioral changes of the dairy producers as our project continues.
Publications
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Accepted
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
Gao, J., C. G. Savegnago, N. L. P. Kant, A. M. Roper, T. N. Marins, and S. Tao. 2025. Effect of milking frequency before dry-off on milk yield and mammary health in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. (accepted).
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Accepted
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
Gao, J., Y. B. Amancio, N. Andriotti, C. G. Savegnago, T. N. Marins, A. M. Roper, and S. Tao. 2025. Effect of intramammary infusion of chitosan on immune cell infiltration and mammary health in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. (accepted)
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
J. Gao, G. Guzi Savegnago, T. Nogueira Marins, A. M. Roper, and S. Tao. 2025. Effect of chitosan on viability of bovine immune and mammary epithelial cells and neutrophil chemotaxis. Poster in GA Dairy Conference; Savannah, GA.
- Type:
Other
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
Gao, J., Tao, S. Managing inflammation around dry-off. Heat Stress Producer Workshop 2025. 03/04/2025. Greenville, GA
- Type:
Other
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
Gao, J., S. Tao. 2024. Advancing dry cow vaccination: Insights from UGA research. Oct Nov Dec, Georgia DairyFax newsletter.
|