Progress 07/01/24 to 06/30/25
Outputs Target Audience:Livestock producers, veterinary microbiologists, veterinary immunologists, animal feed and health companies, animal nutritionists, and infectious disease and microbiomeresearchers are all interested in the outcomes of the research, which have been presented in professional meetings and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Two graduate students and one undergraduate students have received research training through participation in various research activities. They have gained invaluable hands-on experience in conducting animal trials, sample collection, postmortem analysis, DNA isolation, 16S rRNA sequencing, and bioinformatics. A few students have participatedin national, regional, and university research conferences andgiven oral or poster presentations. Several studentshave published their research findings in peer-reviewed scientificjournals. Overall, the students have gainedboth oral and written scientific communication skills. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The PD and the students havepresented their research findings at several national, regional. and university research conferences. Additionally, threeresearch manuscripts have beendrafted by the students and have beenpublished in peer-reviewed scientific journals in the past 12 months. Additional manuscripts are being drafted and will be submitted for publication soon. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Different chicken breedsare known toexhibit notable differences in disease resistance. Several inbred chicken breeds will be compared for their resistance to necrotic enteritis (NE). The intestinal microbiota will be compared between NE-resistant and susceptible breeds. The commensal bacteria that are enriched in NE-resistant breeds will be evaluated for their efficacy in protecting chickens against NE. The results will pave the way for developing novel probiotics for NE mitigation.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Coccidiosis, caused by Eimeria parasites, is a major predisposing factor for necrotic enteritis. Additionally, coccidiosis remains one of the most economically devastating diseases in poultry, significantly impacting animal health, production performance, and welfare. This disease imposes a substantial economic burden, costing the global poultry industry up to $13 billion annually. However, effective mitigation strategies for coccidiosis remain elusive. While different chicken breeds exhibit varying resistance to coccidiosis, no commensal bacteria have been directly linked to this resistance. To assess the relative resistance of different breeds to coccidiosis, 10-day-old Fayoumi M5.1, Leghorn Ghs6, and Cobb chickens were challenged with 50,000 sporulated Eimeria maxima oocysts or mock-infected. Body weight changes, small intestinal lesions, and fecal oocyst shedding were evaluated on d 17. Ileal and cecal digesta were collected from individual animals on d 17 and subjected to microbiome analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Our results showed thatFayoumi M5.1 chickens showed the lowest growth retardation, intestinal lesion score, fecal oocyst shedding, and pathobiont proliferation compared to Ghs6 and Cobb chickens. The intestinal microbiota of M5.1 chickens also differed markedly from the other two breeds under both healthy and coccidiosis conditions. Notably, group A Lactobacillus and Ligilactobacillus salivarius were the least prevalent in both the ileum and cecum of healthy M5.1 chickens, but became highly enriched and comparable to Ghs6 and Cobb chickens in response to coccidiosis. Conversely, Weissella, Staphylococcus gallinarum, and Enterococcus durans/hirae were more abundant in the ileum of healthy M5.1 chickens than in the other two breeds. Despite being reduced by Eimeria, these bacteria retained higher abundance in M5.1 chickens compared to the other breeds. In summary, Fayoumi M5.1 chickens exhibit greater resistance to coccidiosis than Leghorn Ghs6 layers and Cobb broilers. Several commensal bacteria, including group A Lactobacillus, L. salivarius, Weissella, S. gallinarum, and E. durans/hirae, are differentially enriched in Fayoumi M5.1 chickens with strong correlation with coccidiosis resistance. These bacteria hold promise as probiotics for coccidiosis mitigation, with potentially beneficial role in NE intervention as well.
Publications
- Type:
Peer Reviewed Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2024
Citation:
Liu J, Guo J, Whitmore MA, Tobin I, Kim DM, Zhao Z, Zhang G. Dynamic response of the intestinal microbiome to Eimeria maxima-induced coccidiosis in chickens. Microbiology Spectrum 2024, 12: e00823-24.
- Type:
Peer Reviewed Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
Guo J, Zhao Z, Broadwater C, Tobin I, Liu J, Whitmore MA, Zhang G. Is intestinal microbiota fully restored after chickens have recovered from coccidiosis? Pathogens 2025, 14(1): 81.
- Type:
Peer Reviewed Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2025
Citation:
Broadwater C, Guo J, Liu J, Tobin I, Whitmore MA, Kaiser MG, Lamont SJ, Zhang G. Breed-specific responses to coccidiosis in chickens: Identification of intestinal bacteria linked to disease resistance. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2025, 16: 65.
|