Progress 12/01/23 to 11/30/24
Outputs Target Audience:The primary focus over the length of the project was to convene a workshop entitled, "Reducing Food Loss and Waste: Dual Impact Actions to Address Climate Change and Improve Nutrition." Organized by Ahmed Kablan and Nika Larian (USAID), Shibani Ghosh and Robin Shrestha (Feed the Future Food Systems for Nutrition Innovation Lab, Tufts University), and Jean Buzby (USDA), the workshop aimed to develop recommendations to reduce food loss and waster (FLW) across geographies, with a particular emphasis on transforming sustainable food systems in low- and middle-income countries. The gathering brought together 34 experts hailing from 14 countries and a range of sectors and disciplines to understand the potential of technological, behavioral, and financial innovations that can reduce food loss and waste across the food supply chain.A primary audience of this project was these individuals - ensuring that they benefited from substantive peer learning and network building. Secondary audiences include those not in attendance at the workshop, but who will benefit indirectly from lessons learned in the effort. This includes colleagues of the workshop participants, workshop funders (USDA, NASA, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Food Systems for Nutrition Innovation Lab), communities served directly by workshop participants, and the broader research community looking to understand future directions for coordinated efforts to reduce food loss and waste. Changes/Problems:No major changes occured over the course of the project.One challenge over the workshop week, and in discourse about FLW more broadly, is identifying cross-regional opportunities to scale reduction strategies. While many participants reflected in evaluations on how much they valued learning from peers in other countries, it was challenging at times to discuss opportunities that can translate across geographies in discrete terms. In synthesis sessions, however, participants were tasked with enumerating tangible case studies to illustrate many of the cross-regional themes with greater specificity. These regional case studies are being integrated into the synthesis white paper. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The workshop afforded all workshop organizers and participants with a significant professional development opportunities, regardless of career stage. In the post-workshop evaluation, participants gave overwhelmingly positive evaluations with comments highlighting the richness of discussion, a welcoming and supportive environment, and transformative networking experiences across disciplines and geographies. A majority of participants also reported positive impacts on their career development including broadening of their professional network (86%), deepening existing relationships (76%), motivation to work across disciplines (62%), and in their own field (76%). Many participants also reported that they anticipated the workshops would improve the quality of their work (58%) or spark a new career or research direction (24%). Selected Comments from Evaluations: "The technical level was impressively high and the team was so supportive all the time, so lovely and they make me felt at home :) it was an amazing experience" "The workshop was represented by the experts from all over the world. Learning from other countries is very useful and we can initiate some of the activities in our own country. The discussion was so enriched we learned a lot of new things and new ideas were generated. The overall management and logistics were excellent. The venue is superb with all modern facilities." "WONDERFUL WEEK. Thank you so much - I have NEVER had a more productive space to network and form new collaborations, and I have been to many many of these sort of workshops. THANK YOU." "??An overall appreciation for the warm and creative environment that was provided by AGCI" How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Workshop participants have already begun sharing programmatic and research recommendations through their various networks and institutions, and incorporating lessons into their daily work. AGCI is briefing funders on key takeaways through various funder reports and presentations. Once the workshop white paper has been finalized, it will be published as an open access resource to facilitate dissemination among the broader research community. In the meantime, the extended workshop description, participant profiles, workshop agenda, video recordings, presentations, and other educational materials are available to the public on the workshop webpage: https://www.agci.org/workshops/foodlossandwaste. This includes the workshop's public lecture entitled, "Why Food Systems Hold the Key to Reversing Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss," by Pete Pearson (World Wildlife Fund), which was designed to be in accessible language to engage the public on the societal relevance of this workshop topic. The public lecture was given for a general audience in person and livestreamed on Zoom: https://www.agci.org/resources/a12Nu000003A3qvIAC/walter-orr-roberts-memorial-public-lecture-why-food-systems-hold-the-key-to-reversing-climate-change-and-biodiversity-loss What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Major Activities Planning and coordination of the workshop took place over more than a year, with major activities including the execution of workshop logistics, as well as the development and implementation of a scaffolded workshop program to address the proposed objectives. Before the workshop AGCI staff and co-chairs engaged in regular planning calls to develop a roster and program for the workshop that addressed the proposed objectives. AGCI staff also oversaw participant invitations, registrations, travel logistics, and contracting aspects of the workshop. Workshop Program Overview The AGCI workshop opened with presentations outlining the state of food loss and waste and the benefits of FLW reduction in several countries and regions across the globe, including the U.S.. Participants on regional panels presented strategies for reducing food loss or waste, with attention to "triple win" approaches that improve nutrition security, mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, and are affordable (addressing multiple global issues at once). Globally, goal setting and policy development to reduce food loss and waste vary enormously. While some countries aggressively pursue such targets, others have set goals but lack the policies or plans to achieve them, and others still struggle to capture baseline data to understand the problem and set meaningful goals. Day 1 concluded with a session on biotechnology and novel food options to reduce FLW. Day 2 continued with a session on tailoring combinations of innovations to reduce FLW. The next session focused on behavioral change among different actors in the supply chain, emphasizing opportunities for public-private partnerships, working with chain brands, and enabling regulatory conditions. Day 3 continued the discussion on behavioral change with a panel on stakeholder engagement in evaluating readiness to scale FLW innovations. Day 4 reviewed financing mechanisms through making the economic case for action, sustainable development finance, and mechanisms for monetizing mitigation benefits. The following session was focused on addressing key FLW data gaps, with presentations providing examples of innovative approaches to measure FLW across scales from the household level, to within a country, to across shipping routes. Synthesis discussions began on Day 4 with breakout groups tasked with prioritizing research, data, policy and program needs at the pre-farmgate, post-farmgate, and retail/consumer stages of the supply chain. On Day 5 writing teams spent the last half day together drafting synthesis reflections and case studies to support the development of the post-workshop white paper. Data Collected Documentation of discussions, breakout groups, and individual journaling on the workshop objectives were captured throughout the workshop. In addition, video recordings of workshop proceedings are published on the AGCI website, extending the impact of workshops to audiences beyond workshop participants. Summary / Discussion of Findings Addressing Key FLW Data Gaps Participants across regions highlighted the need for consistent definitions and metrics to address limited data interoperability and improve evaluation of reduction strategies. Standardized metrics, measurement protocols, and data sharing are key to making the case in low-resourced environments for the value of prioritizing policies that reduce FLW. These data and metrics could also be leveraged in more sophisticated diagnostic tools to pinpoint loss and waste hot spots along local food supply chains, which can inform tailored interventions, behavior change campaigns, and financial investments. The participants recommended dedicated engagement of private, public, and NGO communities to coordinate and enhance existing national and international standards with clear definitions relevant to prevention practices, rescue, recovery, donation, redistribution, trade, and valorization. Scaling Up Innovations and Technologies There are myriad opportunities in low- and middle-income countries to scale up basic technologies and innovations to reduce post-harvest losses, including better handling and processing practices, improved preservation and storage, cold supply chains, and investment in infrastructure like reliable roadways, electricity, and communications. Innovations can be bundledfor localized contexts based on local stakeholder collaborations and enacted through public-private partnerships where appropriate. In low-resourced environments, innovations should pass the tests of consumer desirability, technical feasibility, and financial viability. Trainings can ensure local work forces are able to build and maintain new equipment and infrastructure. In some countries, there are also opportunities forbiotechnology innovationsandnovel foodsto improve nutrition and resilience to climate impacts. Behavior Change Across Key Actors Promoting behavior change is critical to prevent FLW,and messaging must be tailored to different key audiences, including smallholder farmers, processors, retailers, companies, and consumers. Trainings can help provide technical support for farmers, transporters, and especially processors to minimize handling and damage early in the supply chain. Wholesalers and retailers can be targeted with awareness campaigns aboutfood redistributionopportunities. In countries with high food waste, educating consumers about the scale of food waste and how their approach to purchasing, cooking, and leftovers can make a difference has been shown to be effective, as hasmaking the business case for FLW reduction, to incentivize implementation of needed innovations. Key stakeholders in high-food waste sectors like thehospitality industrycan be engaged on strategies to reduce food waste while saving costs. Financing FLW Reduction Financing and improved funding mechanisms are also in development to reduce FLW and associated methane emissions.Workshop participants highlighted opportunities to make the economic case for reducing FLW,incorporate FLW reduction into voluntary carbon credit markets, and provide tax incentives to reduce the barriers to known technologies in under-resourced environments. They noted that capital is ready to be mobilized, but often hard to connect with shovel-ready projects, and that multilateral funding partnerships that help de-risk investment are especially needed in areas that are most nutrition insecure. Participants recognized the importance of right-sizing investments and prioritizing more foundational infrastructure (such as power for cold storage facilities) before progressing to more advanced interventions. When strong local partners are identified, investing over medium to longer timelines (7-10 years) can help to break the cycle of short-term investment in deployment without critical support for sustained maintenance and progress. Key Outcomes Organizers and participants are preparing a variety of workshop outputs, including a peer-reviewed synthesis of workshop findings and reports to government agencies, funders, and the private sector highlighting priority development strategies and research projects (including data improvement, technologies, novel foods, behaviors, preferences, policies, and processes) to reduce food loss and waste. Participants are also planning actionable programmatic recommendations, tailored to specific regional contexts, to support sustainable food system transformation.
Publications
|