Progress 04/01/24 to 03/31/25
Outputs Target Audience:The target audiences I reached throughout the project are: Research institutions and Universities Graduate and undergraduate students Agricultural technology companies focused on producing green fuels and chemicals. Individuals interested in food systems and sustainable bioproducts Changes/Problems:No changes or problems were encountered during the first year, so there were no delays that could significantly impact the expenditure rate. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project provided an opportunity for training for one Ph.D. graduate student and one postdoctoral researcher who was recently promoted to Assistant Research Professor. Their work on the project dramatically enhanced their skills and abilities to help others achieve greater proficiency. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?No, the results and knowledge gained from this project have not yet been shared with communities of interest. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We plan to complete the following activities: Activity 3a- Production of furfural from hydrolysate sugars and optimization of the process, Activity 3b- Production of diols and triols from hydrolysate sugars, Activity 4: Production of HMF from glucose and optimization of the process. We also plan to start working on the following activities: Activity 5a: Conversion of furfural into different biofuel additives and process optimization. Activity 5b: Conversion of HMF into different biofuel additives and process optimization. We plan to publish two or three manuscripts and present our findings at domestic and international conferences.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
During this period, we synthesized and characterized three different cost-effective bimetallic magnetic nanocatalysts: (NiO-Fe3O4/SiO2), (Co3O4-Fe3O4/SiO2), and (ZrO2-Fe3O4/SiO2). We conducted hydrothermal pre-treatment of corncob biomass to extract hydrolysate sugars (glucose, xylose, galactose, arabinose, and mannose), followed by acidic hydrolysis. We also started producing furfural from hydrolysate sugars and optimizing the process. The following major activities were completed. Activity 1: Preparation and characterization of the bimetallic magnetic nanocatalysts Preparation of SiO2 nanoparticles: 27.6 mL of ammonia, 16.4 mL of water, and 156.3 mL of methanol were added to a conical flask and stirred together for 5 minutes. Then, 36 mL of TEOS (tetraethyl orthosilicate) was mixed with 164 mL of methanol in another flask and added dropwise to the ammonia solution while maintaining constant magnetic stirring at room temperature for 24 hours. After that, the solution was sonicated for 30 minutes at 35 ?, and the colloidal solution was filtered and washed with methanol three times to remove excess ammonia; it was then dried in an oven at 100 ? for 2 hours. Preparation of sulfonic acid (SiO2-SO3H-S) and chlorosulfonic acid (SiO2-SO3H-Cl) silica nanocatalyst: A sulfonic acid functionalized silica (SiO2-SO3H-S) nanocatalyst was prepared by adding 0.5 g of silica nanoparticles to a 100 mL round-bottom flask. Then, 10 mL of H2SO4 was added and heated at 140 ? for 20 hours. After completion, the sulfonated sample was washed with deionized (D.I.) water, filtered, and dried in an oven. Chlorosulfonic acid functionalized silica (SiO2-SO3H-Cl) nanocatalyst was prepared by adding 0.5 g of silica nanoparticles to a 100 mL round-bottom flask. Subsequently, 5 mL of chlorosulfonic acid (HSO3Cl) was added dropwise at room temperature for 30 minutes. The mixture was shaken for an additional 30 minutes after completion. The SiO2-SO3H catalyst was then washed with ethanol and dried overnight. Preparation of cost-effective bimetallic magnetic nanocatalysts (ZrO2-Fe3O4/SiO2), (Co3O4-Fe3O4/SiO2), and (NiO-Fe3O4/SiO2) To prepare the (Co3O4-Fe3O4/SiO2) catalyst, 1.2 g of silica nanoparticles and 100 mL of deionized water were added to a 200 mL beaker and sonicated for 1.5 h at 50 ?. Next, 1.98 g of Co(NO3) 2·6H2O and 2.898 g of Fe(NO3) 3·9H2O were dissolved in 50 mL of deionized water, sonicated for 5-10 min at 40 ?, and then slowly added to the silica solution with continuous stirring. The Co3O4-Fe3O4/SiO2 catalyst solution was sonicated for one hour at 80 ?, then covered with aluminum foil and placed in an oven at 80 ? overnight. The dried mixture was transferred into a crucible and placed in a muffle furnace at 550 ? for five hours. The Co: Fe: SiO2 percentages were 20%, 20%, and 60%, respectively. The prepared bimetallic magnetic nanocatalyst was stored in a closed vial for further use. The other two catalysts ZrO2-Fe3O4/SiO2 and NiO-Fe3O4/SiO2 were prepared using the same method mentioned above but using different salt weights (1.413g of ZrOCl2·8H2O + 1.936 g of FeCl3·6H2O) and (1.982 g of Ni(NO3) 2·6H2O + 2.898 g of Fe(NO3) 3·9H2O). The metal (Zr, Co, or Ni): Fe: SiO2 ratios were kept constant (1:1:3) in all the prepared catalysts. Characterization of the prepared nanocatalysts The characterization of SiO2-nanoparticles, SiO2-SO3H-S, SiO2-SO3H-Cl nanocatalysts, and bimetallic magnetic nanocatalysts was performed to study the physicochemical characteristics of the prepared catalysts. The functional groups were analyzed by using FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific Nicolet IS50) in the range from 400 to 4000 cm-1. FTIR spectra of the three prepared nanocatalysts ZrO2-Fe3O4/SiO2, NiO-Fe3O4/SiO2, and Co3O4-Fe3O4/SiO2 show two weak absorption peaks at 2975 cm-1 and 1634 cm-1, which are due to OH bending and stretching vibrations of absorbed water on the silica surface. High intensity broad peak at 1076 cm-1 and sharp peak at 454 cm-1 indicate Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching and O-Si-O bending vibrations, respectively. The peak at 559 cm-1 represents Fe-O bending vibrations. The thermal stability of the prepared catalysts was studied using the thermogravimetric analyzer (SDT Q600 series) at a heating rate of 10 ?/min, from 25? to 800 ?, under a nitrogen atmosphere. The obtained chromatogram represented the weight loss of the catalyst within the following temperature ranges: 25-150 ? for moisture loss, and 250-350 ? for the decomposition of organic compounds. For ZrO2-Fe3O4/SiO2 catalyst, no loss occurred after 350 ?, indicating the stability of ZrO2. In the case of NiO-Fe3O4/SiO2, weight loss occurs in the temperature range of 500-600 ? due to the reduction of NiO to Ni metal. For the Co3O4-Fe3O4/SiO2 catalyst, Co3O4 was reduced to CoO around 500-600 ?, and CoO is further reduced to Co metal above 600 ?. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed using the Kratos Axis Ultra X-ray photoelectron spectrometer to assess the prepared material's surface's elemental composition and chemical state. The study of XPS indicates all three bimetallic nanocatalysts (ZrO2-Fe3O4/SiO2, NiO-Fe3O4/SiO2, and Co3O4-Fe3O4/SiO2) surfaces consisted of the Metal (zirconium, Nickel, and Cobalt), Iron, Oxygen, Carbon, and Silicon. The textural properties of the catalysts, including pore size distribution and surface area, were analyzed using nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms. The BET and BJH methods were employed to determine these characteristics for silica nanoparticles and all catalysts. The adsorption isotherms exhibited a typical type III pattern, confirming the non-porous nature of the prepared nanocatalyst. The results of BJH-derived values for surface area, pore size, and pore radius were determined. XRD is used to determine the composition and crystallinity of the synthesized NiO-Fe3O4/SiO2, ZrO2-Fe3O4/SiO2, and Co3O4-Fe3O4/SiO2 bimetallic nanocatalysts. The observed diffraction peaks indicated the presence of a crystalline structure in all prepared catalysts. Activity 2a: Hydrothermal treatment and extraction of the biomass hydrolysates. The corncobs biomass was mixed with deionized water in various ratios (5, 10, and 15g biomass per 100 mL H2O) and transferred to 450 mL high-pressure Parr batch reactor 5500 series (Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL). The reactor was purged with nitrogen to eliminate air and heated to different temperatures (150, 160, and 170 ?) for varying times (30, 60, and 90 min) at a constant stirring speed of 500 rpm. Twenty-seven experiments were conducted to optimize the hydrothermal pretreatment step for preparing hydrolysate from corncobs. The concentrations of sugars (glucose, xylose, galactose, arabinose, and mannose) before and after acidic hydrolysis were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography HPLC. The concentrations of HMF and furfural before and after acidic hydrolysis were also determined using an HPLC instrument. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize hydrothermal pretreatment. The Box-Behnken design (BBD) was utilized to explore optimal experimental conditions for maximizing the yield of xylose and arabinose. Activity 3a: Production of furfural from hydrolysate sugars Hydrolysate was converted to furfural by mixing different ratios of corcobs hydrolysate with the catalysts in a 100 mL Parr reactor. This work is still under investigation, and the complete results will be published soon and reported next year. Activity 3b: Production of diols and triols from hydrolysate sugars This work is still under investigation, and the results for this activity will be published soon and reported next year.
Publications
|