Source: UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI submitted to
EXPANDING A DIVERSE DATABASE TO AID IN MAKING HIGH RISK DECISIONS UNDER VOLATILE PROFIT MARGINS AND ADOPTIONS OF CLIMATE SMART TECHNOLOGIES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1031214
Grant No.
2023-38504-41023
Cumulative Award Amt.
$500,000.00
Proposal No.
2023-04315
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2023
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2025
Grant Year
2023
Program Code
[FBMB]- Farm Business Management and Benchmarking Program
Project Director
Simonsen, J.
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
(N/A)
COLUMBIA,MO 65211
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
This project will build capacity and diversity in the FBMB National Database while collaborating to share tools and reports that enrich producers' understanding and use of benchmarking in times of volatile profit margins. Producers in all partner states will gain knowledge and skills from expanded: educational programs, farm financial data on ecological practices, and new benchmarking tools for their farms. Previously collected environmental sustainability data will expand to include Climate-Smart practices including cover crops. New and early career Farm Benchmarking professionals will be mentored live and online. North Carolina A&T State University will continue program expansion, while strengthening relationships with the 1890's Land Grant Center of Excellence for Food Systems, Rural Prosperity, and Economic Sustainability (CFSRPES) by building trust and educating minority farmers on financial concepts. This project addresses both FBMB objectives.Six partners including the University of Missouri Farm Business Management Analysis (MO), University of Minnesota Southwest Farm Business Management Association (SWMNFBMA), Minnesota State Farm Business Management Education Program (MN FBM), North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University (NCA&T), Illinois Farm Business Management (IL), and Wisconsin Technical College's Farm Business Instructors (WI) in five states will collaborate to maintain and grow the FBMB National Database, while expanding producer readiness for high risk decisions. This project will also address each of the five RFA-listed measures for these goals. All partners will work to: improve producer success in times of volatile profit margins, ensure uniform financial/benchmarking data, expand data publishing and outreach focusing on ClimateSmart practices, deliver mentorship/training, and advance small farm profitability.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
50%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
60160303010100%
Goals / Objectives
Goal 1: Build capacity and diversity in the FBMB National Database• Increase FBMB National Database participation by a minimum of 2% or 50 farms.• Increase underserved and emerging farmer participation by 20 farms.• Submit at least 5 farms each from NCA&T and the MN FBM Urban Agriculture Program.Goal 2: Enhance and share instructional tools to address volatile profit margins and high-risk decisions to improve Farm Business Management (FBM) instructor knowledge and skills.• Enhance Cost of Production instructional tools.• Compile and publish economic characteristics and trend data for high return producers.• Increase confidence and retention of instructors through training on instructional aids.Goal 3: Collaborate to share financial impact of implementing Climate-Smart practices.• Increase knowledge of financial impact of ecological practices for 200 producers.• Compile and publish an all-partner Cover Crop and an Environmental Practices report.• Broaden outreach to at least 20 national stakeholders.
Project Methods
A technique employed will be to enhance and share educational tools to provide resources to increase the knowledge and skills of producers. Access to instructional materials will add value to the professional's toolbox when working with producers. Those tools will enhance delivery and provide more detailed explanations of Climate Smart practices financial data and guide high risk decision making with a Cost of Production focus.A second technique that employs a new emphasis is the development of a list of financial benchmarks of a high return producer that generates less than $100,000 of Gross Farm Income. Identifying these benchmarks in the FBMB National Database will benefit specialty crop and underserved, minority producers being emphasized in this project.A third technique is a 2nd year emphasis to present benchmarking concepts to the 1890's CFSRPES, with the addition of National Extension Network. These presentations will expand on the previously shared benchmarking concepts, demonstrate basic recordkeeping tools, and share successes from NCA&T in developing a program for underserved producers.The fourth technique that provides a new emphasis is expanding outreach efforts to enhance producer understanding of benchmarking concepts and ecological practices. Value will be added when each partner identifies new stakeholders and disseminates materials developed in this project. By publishing reports on the financial impact of using Climate-Smart practices and sharing enhanced instructional materials, more relevant benchmarking concepts will be available to these new audiences and in turn, the general public.A fifth technique will be to continue to build on past project successes. Best practices from previous collaborations will guide and strengthen mentoring activities, enabling the partners to enhance training for early career instructors and producers. Lessons learned from developing an initial series of video clips will add value to the clips developed in this project. Using knowledge gained from successfully incorporating the Plan-on-a-Page report into FINPACK, partners will have confidence in exploring new opportunities for instructional tools, and share successes.Combined, these techniques will maintain and expand participation in the FBMB National Database. All five techniques are the next natural steps in building on past experience.

Progress 09/01/23 to 08/31/24

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience is farmers within a 5 state area. The data collected and the benchmarking analysis will be utilized by not only the farmers that participate in the program but other producers, education specialists, potential lenders, and agricultural business people. Changes/Problems:There were not major changes our approach. However,North Carolina is lacking staff support to increase trainings and activities and Wisconsin had a change in personnel so we have worked over the past year to bring the new individual up to speed with the project. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?4 retired/current FBM instructors mentored new instructors. Mentored instructors in Wisconsin, North and South Dakota through the MN Professional Excellence Program (PEP). Minnesota educators traveled to North Dakota to mentor state FBM program instructors. Delivered statewide webinars to MN, WI, ND, and SD instructors. Minnesota and Missouri educators traveled to NC and provided financial analysis for producers using FINPACK. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?MN State FBM Database information shared with farmers and stakeholders around MN at spring meetings (In excess of 4,000 attending). Updates made to the Minnesota Center of Excellence in Agriculture websites (centerofagriculture.org) and new reports added (FBM webpages receive in excess of 10,000 visits per year). Missouri hosted an annual 2-day fall conference with educators, students, and stakeholders in attendance. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Dissemination of information willcontinue via reports and continued education will take place through workshops. Continued recruitment of new farmers (including underserved audiences) will take place. North Carolina plans to conduct 4 workshops focusing on financial analysis with 25-30 farmers attending each session.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Goal 1 - Objective i: an increase was seen across the larger group but not all individually met the 2% Objective ii: 18 submissions from underserved producers Objective iii: no progress with this due to limited staff support and turn-over Goal 2 - Objective i: statewide webinars to discuss how to deliver individualized benchmarking and the plan on a page was further developed at an in-person meeting in September Objective ii: Incorporated NASS data which demonstrated FBM producers outperformed the NASS cohort Objective iii: Accomplished through PEP programming Goal 3 - Objective i: environmental and cover crop report promotion expanded Objective ii: Multi-state report published Objective iii: outreach working with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) on cover crops to expand national audiences

Publications