Source: FORMOLOGY, INC. submitted to NRP
DECORATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PANELS FROM AGRICULTURAL BYPRODUCTS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1031136
Grant No.
2023-33610-40704
Cumulative Award Amt.
$599,005.00
Proposal No.
2023-03919
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2023
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2025
Grant Year
2023
Program Code
[8.8]- Biofuels and Biobased Products
Recipient Organization
FORMOLOGY, INC.
5757 SW MACADAM AVE # 140
PORTLAND,OR 972393787
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
The Architecture and Design (A&D) industry is constantly in need of new, attractive, durable, and sustainable materials to specify for use in their design projects. Our research through Phase II will continue the success of Phase I in bringing to market a line of beautiful, unique, strong and highly sustainable panels made from agricultural and other byproductswhich can be specified in many applications including wall and ceiling panels, cabinets, furniture, tabletops, flooring and more. By introducing these innovative productsto the A&D industry we are effectively making it possible for everyone to have access to highly sustainable and quality panels for use in their interior/exterior construction and design projects. Whether it is a home owner using our panels for their kitchen countertops, a large corporation needing desksor a hospital needing a solution for attractive and highly durable wall coverings, our materials will provide excellent solutions. The introduction and large scale sales of our panels willalso provide excellent opportunity to the agricultural community to upcycle their waste and increase their "bottom line". By selling their byproducts to Formology rather than paying for them to be discarded in landfills, farmers/growers will not onlycontribute to a new and sustainable product, they will also turn a cost into a revenue stream. It is not only the argiculture industry who will benefit from these opportunites. Manufacturers of other products who end up with waste materials such as textile scraps, coffe bags, wood waste, glass, plastics and more will have the chance to sell these byproducts to Formology rather than sending them to the landfill.There will be multiple steps taken to produce data/results in both tecnical/machanical areas and marketing/commercialization. First, we will build on the successful research of Phase 1 and continue with tests to determine the best methods for panel production. These steps will include refining/optimization of the metal mould for efficient infusion of resin, experimenting with different methods to maximize packing of fiber content, determining the best methods and equipment for removal from the mold and manipulation of the finished panels and others. We will also conduct technical testing to learn and optimize structural properties such as surface hardness, bending/breaking strength, screw withdrawl, moisture resistance, reaction to heat/cold, etc. Once we have this critical data we will have the tools to educate and inspire the A&D community as to the quaility and benefits of using our materials. This education will come in the form of email outreach to our extensive network of designers, trade show appearances, ongoing individual and group presentations both in person and through Zoom, creating photo/video marketing assets for both physical pamphlets and website presence, etc.Once manufacturing techniques and market outreach have been executed and refined we expect to achieve a strong market presence with our new and innovative agricultural panels. Our goal is to continue on the success of our existing wood based panels and our strong relationships within the design community to propel our new materials to high sales volume rapidly. By carving out a good portion of overall industry panel sales we will be ensuring that more projects contain our materials which have highly sustainable properties rather than the high resin, laminate, plastic and other non-sustainable products. At the same time we will offer opportunities for members of the agricultureand other industries to reduce waste and create more revenue for the businesses. Our new manufaturing facility will create and sustain jobs not only within our company but in those that supply us with raw materials, machinery and custom fabrication.
Animal Health Component
40%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
40%
Applied
40%
Developmental
20%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
4031210202050%
5115310302050%
Goals / Objectives
Formology's Phase II Grant work will be focused on a number of areas relevant andessential to refining our new panel product line. Of course, the ultimate objective of all Phase IIwork is executing the launch and sales success of these new and unique architectural panels.This work includes the refining of machinery and fabrication techniques, technical testing ofpanel materials to optimize performance, identification of the best resin to use in terms of resinflow, cure time and sustainability, replication of additional machinery to allow for immediateproduction of panels by Formology which can be sold to customers already hoping to purchasethese materials, creation of marketing assets specific to these new products, update and design ofweb presence, hand out materials, sample kit design, email marketing, customer presentation andtrade show strategies.Following are the five technical tasks formulated to achieve the objectives are to:1. Determine a protocol to consistently build binder-less preforms within the 4 ft by 8 ft all-metal mold cavity using various agricultural byproducts and determine the maximumfiber volume fractions specific to the type of agricultural byproduct.2. Identify through trials the most ideal resin type for efficient and effective resin transferand establish ideal resin infusion parameters for preforms of various agriculturalbyproducts.3. Manufacture large-size panels and evaluate their performance.4. Learning from the production of prototype panels and their properties, evaluate theperformance of the 4 ft by 8 ft mold and make design upgrades as necessary to increasequality and efficiency of output.5. Build two additional all-metal molds that can be installed at Formology to train theiremployees and fabricate demonstration panels for their clients.The technical tasks of the Phase II project will be tackled in collaboration with Co-PIs fromWashington State University's (WSU) Composite Materials and Engineering Center (CMEC).Following are the three business tasks formulated to further these objectives:1. Develop new marketing strategies and assets for education and promotion of these newmaterials. Our marketing strategy will include creation and utilization of photo and othermarketing assets for use in promoting the new RTM panels and educating prospectiveclients as to the merits and value of specifying these materials. We will also use theWSU developed product specs for education of our in-house team in preparation forpresentations, trade shows and other marketing outreach efforts. These new marketingassets and product specs will be used to create new pages on our website(www.formologyproducts.com) specific to the RTM panels to make further educationavailable "on demand" for clients to research and learn at their discretion. Physicalmarketing assets will also be created in the form of pamphlets and fliers for distributionat trade shows and to include in outgoing sample kits.2. Utilize new machinery to manufacture RTM panels for immediate sale/availability. Usingthe two new molds fabricated by WSU's Engineering Shop (Technical Task 5),Formology will work closely with its clients to produce and supply prototype panels forimplementation into various interior (and potentially exterior) design projects. Theseprototype panels and early installations will enable Formology to produce valuable photoand marketing assets as well as gather product performance data.3. Train our employees to produce consistently high value products and find efficiencies inmanufacturing over time to reduce production times, material wastage and save costs. Itis critical that every panel that is produced by Formology meets the industry standardsand meets the product specifications of its clients. Therefore, Formology will providecomprehensive training to their employees about how to prepare the materials, conductquality control checks, load the mold, close the mold to ensure vacuum can be pulled,inject the resin and operate the entry and exit port valves, and understand the working andcuring times, open the mold, remove the panel, and check the panel for its quality.Providing a good understanding of these steps will also enable the employees to findefficiencies in process and reduce the production time per panel and material wastage. Inthe beginning, Formology will work closely with WSU's Co-PIs to help train theiremployees. We will require all employees working on this product to read the SOPs andwatch the training videos developed with WSU's Co-PIs.These tasks will enable Formology to manufacture market-acceptable natural fiber decorativepanels, offer new product lines, hire more employees, and expand our business opportunities. Itwill also promote recycling industrial crop waste streams and contribute to sustainable practices.
Project Methods
The agricultural byproducts that will be used primarily in this study include hazelnut shells, sunflower hulls, ancient grain hulls, flax, hemp hurd and even woven fabric scraps made from cotton such as denim or recycled coffee bags.Task 1: Determine a protocol to consistently build binder-less preforms within the mold cavityusing various agricultural byproducts and determine the maximum fiber volume fractionsspecific to the type of agricultural byproduct. From Phase I, we determined that the mold cavitypacking limit with hazelnut shell particulates was approximatelyaround 45 pcf. We will confirm this packing limit for the corresponding particle size distribution.An ideal roller pressure necessary to pack the material into the cavity will also be determined.Achieving the ideal packing configuration is critical to ensure that particles do not move duringthe process of resin transfer process, for ease of resin flow during the process, to maximize fibervolume fraction to achieve good stiffness, and to keep the material costs low.As for the other types of feedstocks, we will first determine the ideal particle sizedistribution to process each of the byproducts into. Particle size distribution can potentiallyinfluence the surface quality of the panel. If more fines are present, they will tend to movedownwards during the molding process and influence the quality of the bottom surface in termsof aesthetics. PIs at WSU will coordinate with Formology to ensure that any given feedstock(i.e., byproducts of interest) are reduced to an appropriate size that would result in panels that areacceptable to their clients not only from performance aspect, but also aesthetically. Then,following the same procedure as for hazelnut shell particles, each of the byproduct particles willbe packed into the mold cavity and maximum possible packing density or bulk density will bedetermined. This will provide Formology with a known amount by weight foreach byproduct that has to be packed within the mold cavity to produce a resin infused hazelnutshell panel with highest achievable fiber volume fraction and high-quality surfaces.Task 2: Identify through trials the most ideal resin type for efficient and effective resin transferand establish ideal resin infusion parameters for preforms of various agricultural byproducts. InPhase 1, we determined that epoxy resin with a viscosity of around 290 cPs works well inregards to achieving a good resin flow through the preform in a reasonable time. However, forproduction purposes, it would be ideal to further reduce the resin fill time while achieving goodfiber wetting and ensuring that the preform surface and interior spaces are filled with resin. Thisis critical to ensure no voids are present. However, resin viscosity will influence the voidformation as it affects the surface tension. Higher viscosity would help to reduce the probabilityof forming voids. Therefore, in Phase II, we will explore epoxy resins with varying viscosities tofurther determine more ideally suitable resin for filling these biobased preforms for generatingdecorative architectural panels with market acceptable surface quality.The mold, in Phase I, was also designed to enable injecting resin into the mold withexternal positive pressure in addition to using vacuum pressure. In Phase II, we will determineappropriate external pressure, if needed, to speed up the process of resin infusion and fill theperform adequately to yield high surface quality panels. New resins are being developed that arepartially, if not completely, biobased. In some cases, the catalyst is bio-based or added resinmodifiers are bio-based. In Phase II, we will explore other resins that have been recentlydeveloped and considered more sustainable as they are partially bio-based. They must beconsidered economical, safe to handle during processing, and sustainable by Formology. Goalwould be to shorten the molding process time from start to finish to the extent possible. At theend of this task, we would understand the amount of resin needed to properly fill the preform,duration of vacuum to evacuate air from the preform, resin injection pressure necessary to fill thepreform uniformly and adequately, and the resin cure time. The outcome of this task will be astandard operating procedure outlining step by step the process of resin infusion and curing foruse by Formology to produce high-quality decorative architectural panels using differentagricultural byproducts mentioned previously. Responses measured will be resin infusion timeand surface roughness using the stylus method.Task 3: Manufacture large-size panels and evaluate their performance. Using the materialsneeded and processing variables determined in Tasks 1 and 2, several full-size (4ft by 8ft) panels(three for testing and few more for demonstration) will be produced and evaluated for theirperformance. Panel properties evaluated will be density, vertical density profile, flexural strengthand stiffness, moisture sorption and thickness swell, screw withdrawal strength, impact andscratch resistance and surface roughness.Using this data, a productspecification sheet for each feedstock material type will be developed for Formology to provideto their customers and market the product. Formology will be able to produce 0.5-inch thick 4 ft by 8 ft panels that can consistently deliverthe required mechanical performance, dimensional stability, and high-quality finish required fora decorative architectural panel application.Task 4: Evaluate the performance of the 4 ft by 8 ft mold and make design upgrades asnecessary to increase quality and efficiency of output. During the process of producing prototypepanels using various feedstocks, PIs will be constantly keeping track of data in regard to materialpacking, amount of resin consumed, mold release application to ensure ease of cleaning the moldafter a panel is fabricated and before loading with furnish to make the next panel, resin fill times,required external positive pressure in addition to vacuum, and resin cure time. This practical knowledge willbe passed on to Formology in the form of standard operating procedures (SOPs) and instructionalvideos to train their employees. This information will also be useful to make any design upgradesto the mold for constructing subsequent molds for Formology to use in their facility to producepanels for their clients.Task 5: Build additional all-metal molds that can be installed at Formology to train theiremployees and fabricate demonstration panels for their clients. We are also requesting funds inPhase II to build two all-metal molds like the one designed and fabricated in Phase I for use byFormology in their facilities to resin transfer mold decorative architectural panels for their clientswhile conducting the described research and development work with Co-PIs at WSU. During thefirst year of this project, based on the lessons learned at WSU while working with the mold builtin Phase I, the original mold design in Phase I will be modified as necessary to improve itfurther. Using further modified and improved design in the first year of Phase II, Formology willwork with WSU's Engineering Shop, who manufactured the mold in Phase I, to fabricate thenew all-metal molds based on the modified design. The new molds will be installed atFormology to train their employees using the SOPs and instructional videos generated in Task 4and to produce demonstration panels for the clients to successfully commercialize the panels.

Progress 09/01/23 to 08/31/24

Outputs
Target Audience:As planned our new decorative architectural panels from agricultural byproducts have been introduced and promoted to our target audience of the Architecture and Design community. Through virtual and in person presentations we have educated these architects and designers about the concept, properties and value propositions of these new panels and urged them to begin creating designs that will incude these innovative,sustainable, and beautiful products. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project has helped train a couple of undergraduate students on the technique of vacuum assisted resin transfer molding, and a post doc, Muhammad Khusairy Bin Bakri, on designing the intricacies of a mold needed for ensuring proper resin transfer and infusion, while developing a new technique and understanding the over-all process. The work done on the project has also helped in the growth and development of Avishek Chanda, one of the primary inventor of the F- VARTM technology, who has been promoted to the position of Research Assistant Professor from the position of a post-doc in May 2024. The work has also enabled the co-PIs (Bakri and Chanda) to gain experience in working with industries while ensuring quality work is carried out for a fruitful technology transfer. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Formology has been agrresively promoting our new Agricultural Byproduct based decorative panels, which we refer to as AgriFORM, to Archtiects and Designers, as well as other prospective clients,throughout the United States and Canada in the past 12 months. This outreach has primarily been on the form of virtual (Zoom) presentations and in person visits to share our established wood based product lines and introduce/promote the upcoming release and availability of these new AgriFORM materials. We currently have a prototype table top made from Hazelnut Shellsin place at a Winery in Canada where they are testing the material in an exterior application. The feedback has been verypositive as the prototypematerial has held up to the sun, rain and general high demands of an outdoor environment. The architects and designers who have seen our new materials are almost universally intrigued and excited about the prospect of having these unique options to design with elevated sustainability and fresh visual aesthetics.We have had many requests for samples and have begun sending them to designers as part of our standard sample kits. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The remaining tasks, based on that detailed in our original major project goals, will be carried out with the hope of technology transfer to Formology, once necessary IPs and licensing agreements have been completed, by the end of Summer, 2025.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1 - The major challenge is the use of different types of particulates (hazelnut shells - HS, hemp hurd - HH, Emmer hulls - EMH, Einkorn hulls - EKH, Coconut husk- CH) to fabricate decorative panels. These particulates have variations in density, porosity, shape, size and outer layer coatings. Therefore, to understand the porosity of the preforms, the true densities were calculated using a Pycnometer at WSU's CMEC (refer Project Update Product). The HS were observed to have the highest density, with the HH having the lowest density. This was followed by calculating the bulk densities (ASTM E873 standard), where although HS still had the highest value (39.99 pcf), but EKH had the lowest (5.37 pcf). This variation can be attributed to the size distribution, resulting in lower packing amount in a fixed volume. Binder-less packing techniques were further evaluated to understand the fastest method that helps achieve the highest fiber volume fraction (FVF) of the packed preform. Three techniques were utilized: 1. Filling the desired weight based on target FVF together and then compacting using a compactor. 2. Dividing the thickness into 2 to 5 layers and then compacting each layer with a compactor before introducing each layer. 3. Pouring all the furnish in the frame and using a heavy roller to achieve uniform packing height. Two types of compactors were used, heavy metal and light plywood. The studies showed that the small increase in fiber volume with the increase in the number of layers was not economical and was labor intensive. The roller helped achieve the highest packing density (see Project Update Product). Finally, using the roller with occasional compaction using plywood compactor was established to be the most suitable, economical and efficient technique for packing. The process also helped to calculate the compaction density of the preforms. The true density and the compaction density also helped to calculate the preform porosity, which was observed to be the lowest for HS (0.425) and highest for EKH (0.862), proving as expected that hull type materials with very low bulk density will need highest amount of resin. Relationships were drawn based on the compaction density and bulk densities of the particulates, which were further verified with different furnish types having varying particle sizes. The particle distribution of thematerials was also achieved to understand whether sieving is critical. Initial studies were conducted without sieving, although the hemp panels had fine accumulation proving the need of sieving. This relationship will be further refined and validated. Objective 2 - Small-scale decorative panels were fabricated using the established F-VARTM technique. The Teflon and wooden frames designed and manufactured using WSU OC supported funds were used to make the panels, with the different furnish. The influence of initial furnish moisture content (MC) was studied for HS and EMH panels. It was observed that there is no need to dry the furnish and using the supplied furnish at 11.5% MC (labeled "as-is" furnish) helps in fabricating panels with similar mechanical strengths and slightly enhanced dimensional stability. However, care must be taken not to exceed above 12% MC as it would result in voids during infusion. The resin infusion time was also very similar for the dried and as-is furnish. The confirmation study with EMH also showed similar results with no significant variation in properties. Therefore, it was established that none of the furnish will be dried below 12% MC, enabling time and energy savings. The reduced dimensional stability might be attributed to the drying of the furnish making space for moisture to easily infiltrate through to microopenings that are not visible to the naked eye. The panels achieved with HS were then tested and compared to those of the all-metal molds, showing similar flexural properties but 100% lower water absorption (WA) and 400% lower thickness swell (TS), as per ASTM D1037 standard. The ideal resin viscosity study was carried out using HS particulates with epoxy resins of three different viscosities, 300 cps, 600 cps, and 1200 cps. The 1200 cps failed to complete the infusion process, and comparative study between the 300 cps and 600 cps resins were conducted. The panels made with 600 cps resin showed superior mechanical performance for hazelnut shells, with 19% increase in flexural strength and 91% increase in flexural modulus. However, they experienced 42% increased WA and 200% increased TS. These values, although higher comparatively, are extremely lower when compared to traditional wooden or similar commercial products used in the decorative panel, table-top and furniture industries. Another drawback of the higher viscosity resin is the 12% increase in infusion time, which can be a concern for furnishes with higher porosity. Panels from EMH, HH, and CH were also made successfully using the F-VARTM technique and 300 cps resin with minimal to no voids on both the surfaces. The mechanical results were compared, where the variations in flexural strength and modulus were minimal for the panels tested. The highest flexural strength was achieved with the CH furnish at 28.8±8.4 MPa, and the lowest for HS at 25.4±2.2 MPa. Similarly, the highest modulus was observed for CH furnish at 4.9±0.2 GPa, and the lowest for EMH at 3.7±0.3 MPa. The limited variations prove reliability on the panels, while also proving that minimal interaction between the resin and particulates is present. The increase in modulus for the CH panels can be attributed to the increased interaction between the coconut husks and the epoxy resin due to the higher porosity of the CH particulates. The waxy coating observed on the emmer husks limits the amount of fiber-matrix interaction and adhesion, resulting in reduced modulus. The dimensional stability, however, was the highest for the EMH panels, and the lowest for the CH panels with 1.39±0.1% TS and 1.21±0.5% WA. The infusion times for HH and CH were about 25-30 mins, taking it very close to the pot life of the resin. Therefore, it was established that 300 cps resin will be used primarily, whereas 600 cps resin has the potential to enhance the mechanical properties while compromising the dimensional stability. A plywood backer was introduced to enhancemechanical properties of the panels. Two ways were studied, one with quarter inch plywood being glued using epoxy on the finished panel, and the other being infusing a hybrid preform with the plywood backer usingF-VARTM. The studies showed that the introduction of plywood, in any way, helped improve the mechanical strengths tremendously, with more than 250% increase in strength, 73% increase in modulus, and 230% increase in screw withdrawal strength. Additionally, the comparison between the two ways showed that glued plywood had about a 25% increase in modulus but a 6- 26% decrease in strength. Therefore, there is an option to choose between the methods based on application, whereas the ease of infusing everything together has significant advantages in ensuring uniform packing, faster panel production and repetitive high quality infusion, as surface-voids are almost eliminated in the process. Objective 3 - The various studies on the current design of the F-VARTM exploited some of the issues with the edges, uniform packing height, and post-process cleaning. Therefore, the design was updated with continuous walls and marked edges to ensure a more uniform packing and final panel thickness. Refer Product for design details and a provisional patent has been filed through WSU Office of Commercialization with the updated designs. Two updates have been introduced, with the inlet port being at the bottom and middle of the inlet side, along with the introduction of a reservoir, based on the studies carried out on the all-metal mold. The designs will be 3-D printed using PETG plastic.

Publications