Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) enable new approaches for the management of nutrients, carbon, pesticides, and waste within agricultural settings to achieve sustainable development goals surrounding equitable access to nutrition.These biological solutions often replace more energetically and economically costly chemical or physical processes.However, biological-based interventions pose a specialized risk in that the remediation technique may proliferate beyond the target area.Therefore, appropriate threat assessments must be available to product designers and regulators to ensure that the behavior of GEMs in agricultural settings are predictable, controllable, and monitorable.In response to this need, the objectives ofSTRATAGEMfocus on developingthe tools and framework to supportGEM threat assessments. Specifically, the long-term goal of STRATAGEM is to develop a standardized suite of DNA watermarks and laboratory bench tests to assist product developers, agricultural professionals, and regulatory agents in fingerprinting new GEMs, predicting their behavior in the environment, and ultimately tracing the product after release. With these tools resulting inthe unambiguous tracking of the GEM, STRATEGEM further supports soundecological threat assessments and regulatory monitoring campaigns. Overall, STRATAGEM explores the survival and fitness of GEMswhereas demonstrating a DNA watermarking method that can assist future large-scale deployments or field studies.
Animal Health Component
25%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
25%
Applied
25%
Developmental
50%
Goals / Objectives
The long-term aim of STRATAGEM is to develop a standardized suite of genetic watermarks and laboratory bench tests available for product developers, agricultural professionals, and appropriate regulatory agents to support genetically engineered microorganism (GEM) threat assessment screens by tracking and assessing associated biosecurity concerns. These laboratory assays are designed to complement in silico prediction tools to inform the product development life cycle. Five key objectives support this overall aim:Objective 1. Develop and test genetic watermarks to enable mark-recapture of GEMs during threat assessments and field deployments;Objective 2. Establish batch-suspended media degradation tests similar to chemical regulatory risk assessments to inform biological threat assessments;Objective 3. Establish batch attached-growth biofilm degradation tests;Objective 4. Establish a model agriculture runoff cycle (combination of sewer, activated sludge, and stream systems) to test hazard assessments; andObjective 5. Develop a framework for utilizing this ecological threat assessment technique to inform the management and regulation of GEMs.
Project Methods
The general methods associated with each objective within the experimental plan are further detailed. To develop genetic watermarks (Obj. 1),a software pipeline will be first developed to query genome repositories for absent sequences,the designed watermarks will be inserted on plasmids, and the performance of the resulting GEM will be evaluated through growth competition assays with the best performing recommended for further development. These watermarks further enable the establishmentof batch-suspended GEM degradation tests (Obj. 2), with the performance of thesesystems evaluated through direct, targettedquantification of the GEM's abundance as well as the assessment of the sequenced profile of the full microbial community. A similar approach supports the development of standardized biofilm tests (Obj. 3), with initial biofilms grown on glass slides incubated instorm sewer/irrigation ditches, sanitary sewers, and riverine systems and assessed in batch tests. To better represent field-experienced conditions, further drip-flow tests are performed, with the stagnate and flowing systems directly evaluated against each other. If the biofilm experiments with flow display a significantly different community profile, then these will be recommended for further development.Simultaneouslywith the design and demonstration of the watermark, a model agricultural runoff network will be constructed (Obj. 4). The network will comprise both a mock rural and urban sewer system, and further GEM spike-challenge assays will be performed at different points in both systems toevaluatethe fate of the GEM and the response of the resident microbial community. Each of the preceding objectives inSTRATAGEMwill developtheapproaches and results to inform acomprehensivethreat assessment framework (Obj. 5).The measurable success metrics for each objective are as follows:Objective1. The design of a suite of at least 10 watermark candidates by Quarter 2 (Q2) of 2024, the successful deployment of at least two of these watermarks in fitness tests by 2024 Q4, and the successful deployment of at least one watermarkin competition assays by Q4 2024.Objective2. The establishment of an aerobic batch test system by Q2 2025, the description of the microbial community impact resulting from the invading GEM by Q4 2025, and the incorporation of the results into a defined interpretation guideline by Q4 2025.Objective 3. The standardization of field-grown biofilm harvesting by Q3 2026 capable of harvesting consistent biomass, the successfuldemonstration of stagnate biofilm tests by Q3 2026, and the demonstration of flow-through biofilm tests by Q3 2026.Objective 4. The establishment and demonstration of a model rural drainage system by Q4 2026, the establishment and demonstration of a model urban drainage system by Q4 2026, and the demonstration of GEM spike tests by Q2 2027.Objective 5. The establishment of an interpretative framework pipeline, the contextualization of all previous results, and the recommendation of a final test hierarchy all by Q2 2027.