Source: EDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YORK submitted to
URBAN GARDENER, ACTIVIST, CHEF: SHAPING THE NEXT GENERATION OF FOOD JUSTICE ADVOCATES IN NEW YORK CITY
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1030615
Grant No.
2023-67037-39952
Cumulative Award Amt.
$300,000.00
Proposal No.
2022-08867
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jun 15, 2023
Project End Date
Dec 14, 2025
Grant Year
2023
Program Code
[A7501]- Professional Development for Agricultural Literacy
Project Director
Engelberg, L.
Recipient Organization
EDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YORK
20 JAY ST STE M09
BROOKLYN,NY 112018356
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Edible Schoolyard NYC seeks to expand access to food and garden education for students in New York City through direct service teaching, advocacy, and professional development. Our project, Urban Gardener, Activist, Chef: Shaping the Next Generation of Food Justice Advocates in New York City, will pilot a unique and deep professional development program for NYC educators with the purpose of increasing their capacity to (1) build their own knowledge and skills related to urban gardening and cooking education, (2) develop a scope and sequence and food education curriculum to implement with their students, and (3) launch their own Edible Education programs at their schools.Our professional development pilot will be developed and designed to specifically respond to the needs and opportunities of New York City public school students and educators. The content of this pilot will draw upon the diverse food traditions of New York City, as well as the robust culture of urban agriculture in NYC. This comprehensive professional development experience will train elementary and middle school educators, over the course of one school year, to implement Edible Education programming that: (1) is culturally-responsive and uses a social justice lens to engage students in growing and cooking the unique foods of New York City, and (2) supports students to discover the important role they play in making a green and more just urban food system in NYC.Together, our pilot will lead to the creation and maintenance of more Edible Education programs across New York City, especially in under-resourced school communities of color that are disproportionately affected by food, health, and education system inequities.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
80660993020100%
Knowledge Area
806 - Youth Development;

Subject Of Investigation
6099 - People and communities, general/other;

Field Of Science
3020 - Education;
Goals / Objectives
Our project has the following goals and objectives to build NYC educators' capacity to implement Edible Education:Goal 1: NYC educators will have increased knowledge and greater understanding of the NYC food system, urban agriculture, and food justice, enabling them to effectively teach these topics to their studentsObjective 1a: Educators will be able to implement at least three Edible Schoolyard NYC lessons in their classrooms.Objective 1b: Educators will be able to use Edible Schoolyard NYC pedagogical techniques to teach lessons effectively, as measured through classroom observation.Goal 2: NYC educators will have the skills, resources, and support to implement sustainable Edible Education programs in their own schoolsObjective 2a: Educators will have the technical skills to maintain their school gardens.Goal 3: NYC educators will implement a curricular scope and sequence that aligns seed-to-table education with their own curriculum in core academic subjects.Objective 3a: Educators will identify competencies within their curriculum that connect to Edible Education.Objective 3b: Educators will develop strategies to integrate Edible Education into their core academic plan.Goal 4: NYC educators will implement Edible Education programs in their own schools over the course of this PD pilot. In their implementation, educators will:Objective 4a: Teach at least one class of students (15-32 students) at least three, consecutive hands-on cooking and/or gardening lessons during the school year.Objective 4b: Establish or maintain an indoor or outdoor growing space at their siteGoal 5: NYC educators will create a committee of school community members such as parents, administrators, faculty, and facilities staff to ensure support for and sustainability of Edible Education at their schoolsObjective 5a: Educators will learn strategies to recruit and maintain a committee committed to program sustainability.Objective 5b: Educators will be able to share their technical gardening knowledge with other committee members to ensure garden sustainability.
Project Methods
Project MethodThis project combines the traditional workshop model of teacher education with a more hands-on, sustained component of coaching and technical support. It also provides participants with the financial support needed to launch Edible Education programming. Participants will be exposed to the content and techniques of Edible Education through our workshops and will have ongoing, individualized support and feedback to implement programming. The stipend will allow participants to purchase the needed supplies for a school garden and Edible Education programming. The project method will be supported by the activities, services, events, and products listed above.Project EvaluationIn order to assess our outcomes, we will identify and/or develop evaluation tools based on reliable and valid instruments to answer the evaluation questions below. The project evaluation questions are:Planning and ImplementationDid the professional development take place as planned?Which training formats were rated most favorably by participants?How satisfied were participants with the professional development offering?What percentage of the participants would recommend the training to colleagues/peers?Goal Attainment and ImpactHow has participant readiness to teach changed since participating in the professional development program?How has school readiness to implement a cooking and gardening program changed post the professional development program?The evaluation questions will be addressed through a variety of tools, including:Post-workshop exit surveys: Following each professional development session, participants will complete a short exit survey to assess satisfaction with and obtain feedback on that particular session.Pre & post program participant surveys: Professional development participants will be surveyed at pre and post to assess their confidence, skills, knowledge and preparedness to implement cooking and gardening programming within schools. Pre surveys will be conducted prior to the first professional development session, and post surveys will be implemented immediately after the last session.Teacher observations: Teachers will be observed at the conclusion of the professional development by an experienced ESYNYC facilitator. The tool will be adapted from ESYNYC's current teacher observation tool, which focuses on pedagogical best practices for hands-on learning, and will be tailored to assess core professional development learning objectives, including knowledge related to teaching about cooking and gardening in schools.School readiness assessment: In partnership with participating schools, ESYNYC staff will complete a school readiness assessment pre and post program. The assessment will include school site information, such as presence of a health team and wellness policies; administration and teacher objectives and support for the program; garden planning, maintenance and support; parent and community engagement and support, and student experience goals. Development of the assessment tool will be informed by tools used previously by ESYNYC.Follow-up survey: A follow-up survey will be administered to former program participants approximately 6 months after program completion to assess the impact of the professional development training at this point, including whether former participants are implementing edible education, and if not, what the barriers have been.

Progress 06/15/23 to 06/14/24

Outputs
Target Audience:Edible Schoolyard NYC (ESYNYC) works in school communities across NYC that experience poverty, diet-related diseases, and other disproportionate effects of systemic inequities in education, food, and health access. The same criteria apply to our fellowship. We advertised our fellowship in a variety of ways to be equitable and to receive a diversified pool of applicants. We sent an email out to ESYNYC's network, posted on social media and LinkedIn, posted on an NYC school garden listserv, and sent emails to various committees we participate in. We created an application for interested participants that gauged the level of interest and school administration's support in implementing edible education by having each applicant answer a series of questions and specify their vision for edible education programming. We received 27 applications and created a committee, which included ESYNYC teachers, our Director of Horticulture and Operations, and our Director of Education and Quality to review and select the participants. All of the schools we selected are Title 1 schools in disinvested neighborhoods. The ten schools selected for the Fellowship's first cohort are located throughout the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and East Harlem. Changes/Problems:There have been no major changes thus far. We did have some schools that were unable to attend a workshop but we asked them to complete the missed assignment and sent them the PowerPoint presentation. We have also reduced the stipend for schools that missed multiple workshops and will reallocate funds to next year's schools. Next year, we plan to have clearer expectations and explicitly say there will be a financial reduction for missing multiple workshops. We encouraged each school to have more than one person in the event someone cannot attend a workshop another individual can come on behalf of the school. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?So far we have shared a list of relevant grant opportunities that our participating schools can apply for to receive additional funding for cooking and gardening with students. Further, we provided each school with a list of supplies they would need to have a functioning kitchen and garden space. We have also shared our edible education curriculum for educators to reference and adapt for their students and school communities. Lastly, we continue to share relevant workshops they can attend provided by other organizations. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results will be disseminated in late summer. At the end of the school year, we will conduct the post-surveys. After examining our pre and post-surveys, our evaluation consultant will then sort through and analyze the data to share with our participants. We will use these findings to make recommendations and adjustments for the second year of our project. In addition to sharing our findings with our fellowship participants, Edible Schoolyard NYC will include our findings in our annual impact report which is sent to our broad base of supporters. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?By the end of the next reporting period, we will have collected and analyzed data from the first year of our program. The results will have been disseminated to our participants and shared publicly with our broad base of supporters to demonstrate the impact. We will use these findings to make any needed modifications for the second year of our program. We will also receive information on the committees each school created to ensure the edible education programming is sustained. Lastly, the second set of schools will have been selected and the workshops will have begun.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Goal 1: To date, we have conducted six workshops that have increased NYC educator's knowledge of the NYC food system, food justice, and urban agriculture enabling them to implement edible education in their respective schools. For example, one of our workshops, which was led by two of our educators, focused on collaboration and celebrating the varying cultures of NYC in an urban school garden. Every participant was assigned a garden job in which they had to work together, showcasing social-emotional learning in the garden. Then, we modeled two lessons: how rice is grown in different parts of the world and companion planting through The Three Sisters. Another workshop focused on how to create an urban school garden while making it inclusive to one's school community. Our Director of Horticulture and Operations spoke about how ESYNYC makes its gardens accessible to the community through initiatives such as open gardens and how we engage with the community and school-based staff to ensure our crops are culturally relevant to the communities we serve. Participants then engaged in various garden jobs such as potting basil that they were able to take home. Lastly, we have shared our edible education curriculum with each of the schools to either use or adapt to fit their specific schools' needs. For each workshop, we require each school to send at least one representative. Goal 2 In addition to the workshops, each school has received three site visits to date, with a fourth scheduled for the end of June. Our Director of Horticulture and Operations conducted one of the site visits, where he examined the growing spaces and gave technical support on how participants could start a garden or improve their existing one. Our Director of Education and Quality has observed lessons and given guidance on lesson instruction. We have noticed improvements since our first site visit. For example, one of the schools had garden beds that were falling apart, since they have built new beds and are full of plants. Both our Director of Horticulture and Operations and Director of Education and Quality are available via email should anyone have any questions or need support. Furthermore, we conducted a pre-survey and will conduct a post-survey at the end of the school year. In our pre-survey, we assessed various categories, such as whether the school already had an established garden, whether there was a garden committee, and whether they had any experience cooking and gardening with students. Goal 3 Through the mandatory attendance of our workshops, educators learn about and participate in our interactive edible education curriculum. The goal is that they will use our scope and sequence to adapt our lessons and create new lessons that meet the needs of their students while also making connections to the core academic curriculum. Our scope and sequence include five bands that touch upon our core competencies and themes, such as Environmental and Community Stewardship and Social-Emotional Learning. Our scope and sequence are also broken into two age groups (i.e., 3-k and pre-k), and to avoid redundancy, we have created an A/B year rotation. Additionally, our Director of Education and Quality has observed each educator teach a lesson and has provided constructive feedback. At the end of the school year, each school will have to submit three lesson plans. Goal 4 Our Director of Education and Quality has observed each school teach one lesson to see how each site is implementing edible education in a way that works best for them. For example, one educator conducted a lesson with various ingredients ranging from black beans to grapes. Students were broken into groups to pick toppings to make and write out a recipe for nachos. After creating a recipe with ingredients that might not typically go together students then had to write a paragraph on what they would change and why they thought the recipe did not work. Additionally, at the end of the year, we will receive three written lessons from each school that will also demonstrate how they plan to implement edible education programming in their own schools. Lastly, through our site visits, we are able to observe whether the gardens are being used and maintained--which they have been! Lastly, at the end of our workshops we ask participants to provide us with feedback that helps us to gauge any potential implementation barriers and if they found the workshop to be useful for how they would be implementing programming. Goal 5 In one of our workshops and during our site visits we have spoken to our participants about the importance of creating a committee of members that are dedicated to edible education to help ensure its sustainability. Having a variety of backgrounds on a school committee has proven to be beneficial for the ESYNYC team and we have advised each site on the variety of roles that could be helpful such as a teacher, custodian, parent etc. We also shared examples of the types of activities and policies a committee could accomplish such as ensuring proper recycling in school cafeterias. At the end of the school year each site will have to show us their plan for the committee and who will be on it.

Publications