Source: UNIV OF MINNESOTA submitted to NRP
CRITICAL CONVERSATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT AROUND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IN AGRICULTURE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1030304
Grant No.
2023-68008-39859
Cumulative Award Amt.
$300,000.00
Proposal No.
2022-10032
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
May 1, 2023
Project End Date
Apr 30, 2026
Grant Year
2023
Program Code
[A1701]- Critical Agricultural Research and Extension: CARE
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF MINNESOTA
(N/A)
ST PAUL,MN 55108
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Producers are under pressure, both within their industries and local communities, to demonstrate and document environmental sustainability. Responding to these pressures requires literacy in popular sustainability metrics, and measurements to demonstrate metric benchmarks and/or changes over time. This project proposes two methods to engage farms to promote these critical conversations and environmental engagement. The specific objectives are to: (1) Enable youth to serve as environmental leaders for family ag operations through engagement in environmental sustainability metric and communication exercises; (2) Engage producers in on-farm data collection to inform themselves and the broader community of greenhouse gas emissions from manure storages; and (3) Foster environmental sustainability conversations within farms, and between livestock and feed production sectors. Activities to support these objectives include a learning series for youth that promotes inter-generational discussion about farm operations, inputs, efficiency measures, and environmental stewardship. Simultaneously, dairy and swine producer cooperators will contribute manure samples for lab-based analyses of greenhouse gas production rates. Manure emissions are a major component of carbon footprints for livestock systems, and these samples and analyses provide producers farm-specific data forsustainability metrics, and the opportunity to improve science-based estimates for the broader industry. Finally, a Conversation Guide resulting from project activities and facilitated focus groups will identify common goals, and strategies for cooperation. An advisory group includes livestock industry representatives, scientists, and youth programming and education experts.
Animal Health Component
75%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
75%
Developmental
25%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3073599202025%
3073499202025%
3075330202025%
8060430302025%
Goals / Objectives
The overall goal of this integrated research and Extension project is to encourage critical conversations about environmental sustainability metrics between generations, within and beyond the agricultural community, to promote engagement and broaden opportunities for continuous improvement.The specific objectives are to:Enable youth to serve as environmental leaders for family ag operations through engagement in environmental sustainability metric and communication exercises;Engage farmers in on-farm data collection to inform themselves and the broader community of greenhouse gas emissions from manure storages; andFoster environmental sustainability conversations within farms, and between livestock and feed production sectors.
Project Methods
This project proposes two methods (Activities 1 and 2) to engage farms to promote these critical conversations and environmental engagement. Activity 1 will engage youth as agents of change to promote wider spread understanding and adoption of sustainability metrics within their families and communities. Activity 2 provides opportunity for farmers to actively participate in greenhouse gas emission measurements for one of the largest on-farm sources - the manure storage. The results of these two methods will merge in Activity 3, which includes focus-group discussions to assess what has evolved from the project, and chart future directions and conversations. There are key tasks associated with each activity. Each activity supports one or more objectives.Activity 1. Youth as Environmental LeadersThis activity and related tasks support Objectives 1 and 3. Key groups are youth participants, the project team, and an evaluation specialist, with oversight and input from the advisory committee. The initial scope for participants is Minnesota and region - to limit the range of systems for consideration in initial educational content development. However, the flexible modes of content delivery, in conjunction with teacher guides, can facilitate broader adoption and delivery beyond the region.Task 1a. Curriculum DevelopmentThis task includes syllabus and content development for a learning series, designed for youth ages 15 and older.Task 1b. RecruitmentRecruitment for participants will be a multi-pronged approach using existing connections to engaged youth interested in agriculture and leadership, regardless of their affiliation with a farm. Task 1c. Learning SeriesParticipants will be divided and taught within cohorts specific to livestock or crop systems. There will be a minimum of 10 and maximum of 25 participants in each cohort. The Learning Series will be hosted at UMN Extension offices. Participants will also have free access to course material through a web platform. The platform facilitates course material access, assignment submissions and instructor feedback, as examples.Task 1d. AssessmentOutcomes will be measured using a mixed methods approach to understand the program's impact on youth. Assessment methods will evaluate short-term change in knowledge and engagement, and long-term knowledge retention and action. For participants of the Learning Series, quantitative, summative survey instruments will measure learning indicators. Examples of work completed (any identifiable information removed), and observational measures by an independent observer (i.e. participation in discussions) will add qualitative data for the assessment of actions. For Short Courses, a post-then-pre format survey will assess change in knowledge.Activity 2. Manure Storage Emission MeasurementsThis activity and related tasks support Objectives 2 and 3. Key groups are farmer cooperators and the project team, with input from the advisory committee. Through participating in the scientific process, farmers are informing their individual farm's carbon footprint and manure emission data in general. The scope of this activity is limited to liquid manure systems - but this accounts for the majority of pigs and dairy cows in Minnesota and region.Task 2a. Sample CollectionWith assistance from advisory board members with farmer ties, we will recruit participants that represent 15 finisher swine farms, 15 sow farms and 30 dairy farms. The priority will be diversity between farms with respect to geography (within the region), integrator (where applicable for swine farms), or cooperative (where applicable for dairy farms). Each cooperating farm will be asked to commit to collecting and submitting 4 samples for each manure storage at a farm (i.e. rooms for swine barns; stage for earthen manure storages) over a one-year period (approximately quarterly), in addition to a sample collected during manure removal and agitation. This will result in approximately 450 samples.In conjunction with each manure sample, responses to a brief questionnaire will documentmanagement decisions with potential to influence manure emissions.Task 2b. AnalysisThis task draws heavily on the methane production rate (MPR) assay developed by Andersen et al. (2015). We are also testing a nitrous oxide production rate (NOPR) assay to build a suite of GHG measurement methods for manure storages. Task 2c. Aggregation and ReportingThe manure emission tests anchor the manure emission rate to farms. Any one sample is not necessarily representative for annual emissions from the sampled farm, or representative of all manure storages of the same type in the region; hence multiple samples will be collected at each farm over a year. Manure sample results will be shared with the cooperating farmer.The project team will aggregate and analyze the methane and nitrous oxide emission results with supporting manure measurements (Task 2b), and barn and manure management factors (Task 2a). The aggregated results will be continuously added to a dynamic online database to visualize patterns and variability across samples.Task 2d. Model ValidationIn conjunction with the database entries and maintenance, the measured emission will be compared to predicted emissions based on farm-specific input variables. Annual emission estimates will consider the manure production rate for the farm, seasonal temperatures, and relevant gas emission rates.Activity 3. Fostering ConversationsThis activity and related tasks support Objective 3. Key groups are youth participants, cooperating farmers and the evaluation specialist, with review and commentary from the project team and advisory committee. In the course of evaluating the ripple effects of Activities 1 and 2, we aim to foster conversations, broader perspectives and greater cooperation among agriculture production industries of different types.Task 3a. Focus Group DiscussionsIn Year 3, participants from Activity 1 and farmer cooperators from Activity 2 will be invited to participate in one of two focus group discussions. The proposed task benefits from participation by indirect stakeholders, who will be identified and invited by the advisory committee. Indirect participants includes partner farm members of youth participants, agricultural industry representatives, and local community representatives. The ideal group size is 15 to 20 people. Ripple Effects Mapping, or REM (Chazdon et al., 2017) is an evaluation method that helps uncover intended and unintended (positive or negative) consequences resulting from a program.Task 3b. Analysis, Reporting and SharingThis task provides quantitative and qualitative results to demonstrate objectives and outcomes, and support future "conversations" by a broader audience. This task will be guided by an evaluation plan developed at project inception to ensure there are appropriate metrics and evidence to support each objective. Annual updates will support advisory committee discussions, and annual reports on progress towards objectives. Some analyses and data overlap with Activity 1 assessment. The Conversation Guide product will deepen conversations about agricultural environmental sustainability on and off farms to a broader audience. The Conversation Guide will include abbreviated curriculum (Activity 1), resources for farm-specific sustainability metrics (Activity 2), and case studies based on project participants (Activity 3).

Progress 05/01/23 to 04/30/24

Outputs
Target Audience:In the initial year of this project, an advisory committee met three times. Requests of the advisors were connections to (1) youth-oriented programs in Minnesota and the region to introduce the "Youth as Environmental Leaders" program; and (2) swine and dairy farm operators. The project team connected with almost 50 dairy farmer-operators in Minnesota and western Wisconsin to introduce the project, and enrolled 28 dairy sites in manure sampling arrangements. The support of 3 swine integrators facilitates access to four or more farms per integrator. ? Changes/Problems:A Just-in-Time (JIT) IRB approval was sought for the project, but did not fully satisfy the requirements for the full release of funding. Completing the full IRB in the midst of preparing the Learning Series led to a 6-month delay in funding, but project work continued during this time with the start-up funding amount. In the spring of 2024, influenza was detected in dairy cattle. We revised our biosecurity protocol for on-farm visits. Thus far, all farms have remained open to our visits for sample collection, but we will continue to monitor guidance and adjust our protocols for farm-specific requirements. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Postdoc Erickson and Graduate Student Soriano are the primary mentors for two undergraduate research assistants supporting this project. In addition to supporting lab and field work, Postdoc Erickson guided the undergraduates to develop individual research projects to complement project objectives. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Initial results have been shared with cooperating farms upon request. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Project activities continue for all objectives. Curriculum development for the Learning Series is an iterative process of development and testing. Additional test audiences are identified through the summer of 2024, with plans for cohort enrollment in the coming academic year. Additional swine farm cooperators are being sought, as are alternative methods to manure sample collection to ease the sampling burden on project staff and farm cooperators. We are investigating alternative nitrous oxide detection methods to lower the minimum detection limit

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1 The Learning Series curriculum is evolving, with content supported by in-class activities, and a vision to online adaptation. We drafted a Syllabus and Module Structure outlining program topics, teaching approaches, and resources. The introductory modules labeled "Talk the talk" introduce terminology and relate existing environmental management practices and outcomes to region and climate. The secondary modules promote "Walk the walk" to apply (simplified) assessment principles to nutrient management and greenhouse gas assessment. The "Talk the talk: Manure management" module was delivered through a webinar to regional Dairy Ambassadors (live and archived; shared with 27 ambassadors). Objective 2 Farmer cooperators in Minnesota and Wisconsin were identified and contacted, and where feasible, enrolled for quarterly manure sampling. At present, we have cooperation from 28 dairy farms, 9 finishing swine sites and 4 sow sites. Project team members conduct the majority of sampling on the dairy farms, whereas farm staff collect the samples on the swine farms for biosecurity concerns. As of May 31, 2024, we collected 146 manure samples. The methane production rate (MPR) assay for collected manure samples begins within 24 hours after manure sample collection and involves a 3 day incubation period. Wet chemistry analyses of the manure is proceeding as well. Preliminary data suggests a wide variation in MPR estimates, similar to Andersen et al. (2015; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.003). Additional analyses will be performed before reporting aggregated MPRs. We attempted to measure nitrous oxide emissions using the MPR assay protocol. Nitrous oxide emissions are not detectable with present equipment and assay protocol. In the meantime, a random subsample (10%) of samples will be tested for nitrous oxide detection; if nitrous oxide is detected, additional samples will be tested. Objective 3 Postdoc Erickson and PI Cortus drafted a synthesis of concepts and methods to inform research and practice on sustainability initiatives. The paper is intended for a peer-reviewed publication, with translation into the Conversation Guide.

Publications