Source: BIOSTONE ANIMAL HEALTH LLC submitted to NRP
AN ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY TO DETECT ANTIBODIES AGAINST AVIAN INFLUENZA VIRUS (AIV) SUBTYPE H5 AND H7 IN COMMERCIAL POULTRY
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1030164
Grant No.
2023-70501-39489
Cumulative Award Amt.
$175,000.00
Proposal No.
2023-00826
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2023
Project End Date
Feb 28, 2025
Grant Year
2023
Program Code
[8.3]- Animal Production & Protection
Recipient Organization
BIOSTONE ANIMAL HEALTH LLC
2815 EXCHANGE BLVD STE 400
SOUTHLAKE,TX 760927515
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Avian Influenza Virus (AIV) can be transmitted by migrating birds over long distances, and AIV outbreaks can pose a major threat to commercial poultry worldwide. The United States is suffering from an ongoing AIV outbreak, which has resulted in a loss of >58 million birds. The last AIV outbreak in the United States (2014) resulted in a loss of 50 million poultry, a direct loss of $1.6 billion, and additional recovery cost estimated at $1.7 billion. The cost of the current outbreak is still forthcoming. While some strains of AIV pose a relatively low risk, the greatest risk comes from AIV subtypes H5 and H7, which can become highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) and cause deadly outbreaks. One favorable method to diagnose AIV is the enzyme linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA), which detects antibodies from blood samples. ELISA is preferrable because it is relatively faster and less expensive than alternative methods. However, AIV ELISAs that are used to screen commercial poultry require a second lab test to identify AIV subtypes H5 and H7. There is no commercially available ELISA that can diagnose AIV subtypes H5 and H7. Therefore, our project goal is to develop an ELISA to diagnose AIV subtypes H5 and H7, which can improve the time and cost of responding to a deadly AIV outbreak. New ELISA tools will be easily integrated into the current infrastructure and could have an immediate impact for AIV surveillance and prevention in the poultry industry.Our team previously conducted research and development for competitive ELISA (cELISA) to detect chicken and turkey antibodies against AIV subtypes H5 and H7. We have developed an H5 cELISA and an H7 cELISA prototype, which are at different stages of development. This project will focus on continuing to develop the H5 and H7 cELISA by using laboratory approaches that will improve their diagnostic performance. We will collaborate with Canada's National Center for Foreign Animal Disease (CFAD), which will provide us with exceptional support to evaluate each cELISA. Samples from different countries will be evaluated to address the issue of AIV originating from migratory birds over long distances. The CFAD maintains a collection of samples from poultry infected with American, Eurasian, and African AIV subtypes, historic samples collected from past outbreaks, and samples collected from the current outbreaks in North American (Canada, U.S., and Mexico). Our project will result in bringing the H5 and H7 cELISA prototypes to an advanced stage of development, which will allow us to pursue a Phase II project for large-scale global validation and commercialization.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
31132991090100%
Knowledge Area
311 - Animal Diseases;

Subject Of Investigation
3299 - Poultry, general/other;

Field Of Science
1090 - Immunology;
Goals / Objectives
The United States is suffering from an ongoing Avian Influenza Virus (AIV) outbreak. Historically, the AIV subtypes H5 and H7 pose the greatest risk of mutating into highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) strains that cause deadly outbreaks. However, current diagnostic methods to detect AIV H5 and H7 subtypes have limitations (time, cost, process volume). Our project goal is to commercialize an H5 and H7 test using enzyme linked immune-sorbent assay (ELISA) formats. ELISA would reduce the cost, time, and efforts of AIV management by providing a high-throughput screening method to diagnose high-risk AIV subtypes at an earlier stage of surveillance. ELISA is frequently used for disease surveillance, but only as a pre-screening tool; it is typically followed by a gold-standard test, such as the Hemagglutination Inhibition assay to determine the H5 or H7 subtypes. There are no USDA-approved AIV subtype ELISAs, which provides us with a great opportunity to develop and commercialize these diagnostic tools for commercial poultry. New ELISA tools will be easily integrated into the current infrastructure and could have an immediate impact for AIV surveillance in the poultry industry. Our team has ongoing research and development efforts for competitive ELISA (cELISA) prototypes to detect chicken and turkey antibodies against AIV subtypes H5 and H7. However, each ELISA prototype is at a different stage of development. Our project efforts will focus on continuing optimization, validation, and eventually commercialization of these two products. We will collaborate with Canada's National Center for Foreign Animal Disease, which provides us with an excellent opportunity to validate each ELISA with extensive sample collections including antiserum from birds infected with North American,Eurasian, and African AIV strains, historic samples collected from past H5 and H7 outbreaks, and samples collected from the current H5 and H7 outbreaks in North American (Canada, U.S., and Mexico).Objectives1. Develop cELISA to detect AIV H5 antibodies1.1. Screening monoclonal antibodies against AIV H5 antigens The success of a cELISA is dependent upon producing monoclonal antibodies (mAb) that have binding characteristics similar to the host antibody that is being detected. We will screen previously generated hybridoma cell lines for competitive binding against a panel of antisera collected from birds infected with different AIV H5 strains. We will also evaluate H5 mAb competitive binding against H5 antiserum collected from Mexico and Ghana.1.2. Develop and optimize AIV H5 cELISA We will use mAb screening and validation data to identify gaps in diagnostic sensitivity, and we will strategically optimize mAb and antigen combinations to eliminate gaps to achieve full diagnostic coverage. ELISA optimization will include: (a) Optimize antigen concentrations, microtiter plates, and blocking buffers. (b) Optimize sample and reagent diluents and enzyme linked reporters. (c) Optimize plates and reagent preservatives.1.3. Validation benchmark: We aim to reach specificity and sensitivity of >98% for the AIV subtype H5 cELISABioStone will conduct preliminary validation of specificity with AIV negative chicken sera (n=500) and an H5-positive sera sample (n=1) from chicken. Validation experiments will be continued in Berhane lab using sera from chicken and turkey, which are AIV-negative (n=300) or AIV H5-positive (n=100). To evaluate the impact of antigenic drift in groups of H5 subtypes that have been endemic to and evolving in Mexico since the1990s, they will also evaluate the ELISA with LPAI H5-positive (n=50) and AIV-negative (n=50) chicken serum samples collected from Mexico in 2022. They will evaluate additional samples from the 2021 Ghana H5N1 outbreak (n=25). They will evaluate cross-reactivity with antisera for AIV subtype H1, H2, H3, H4, H6, H7, H8, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H14, H15, and H16 infected poultry (n=1 per subtype), and they will evaluate cross-reactivity with antisera from poultry infected with six non-AIV avian viruses: avian paramyxovirus type 1 (n=1), type 2 (n=1), and type 3 (n=1), and avian metapneumovirus subtype A (n=1), subtype B (n=1), and subtype C (n=1).2. Develop cELISA to detect AIV H7 antibodies2.1. Screening monoclonal antibodies against AIV H7 antigens We will screen previously generated hybridoma cell lines for competitive binding against a panel of antisera collected from birds infected with different AIV H7 strains. We will also evaluate H7 mAb competitive binding against H7 antiserum collected from Mexico.2.2. Develop and optimize AIV H7 cELISA We will use mAb screening and validation data to identify gaps in diagnostic sensitivity, and we will strategically optimize mAb and antigen combinations to eliminate gaps to achieve full diagnostic coverage. ELISA optimization will include: (a) Optimize antigen concentrations, microtiter plates, and blocking buffers. (b) Optimize sample and reagent diluents and enzyme linked reporters. (c) Optimize plates and reagent preservatives.2.3. Validation benchmark: We aim to reach specificity and sensitivity of >98% for the AIV subtype H7 cELISABioStone will conduct preliminary validation of specificity with AIV negative chicken sera (n=500) and an H7-positive sera control (n=1) from chicken. Validation experiments will be continued in Berhane lab using sera from chicken and turkey, which are AIV-negative (n=300) or AIV H7-positive (n=100). AIV positive samples have been collected from different global regions and different years (from routine surveillance and major HPAI outbreaks), which includes birds infected with North American and Eurasian strains. The panel will also include the HPAI H7-positive (n=50) and AIV-negative (n=50) chicken serum samples collected from Mexico in 2022. They will evaluate cross-reactivity with antisera for AIV subtype H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, H8, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H14, H15, and H16 infected poultry (n=1 per subtype), and they will evaluate cross-reactivity with antisera from poultry infected with six non-AIV avian viruses: avian paramyxovirus type 1 (n=1), type 2 (n=1), and type 3 (n=1), and avian metapneumovirus subtype A (n=1), subtype B (n=1), and subtype C (n=1).
Project Methods
EffortsEfforts will be achieved through ongoing evaluation of ELISA through our collaboration with Canadian Center for Foreign Animal Disease (CFAD). We will maintain communications and potentially work with multiple prototypes during the optimization process. We will provide CFAD with reagents, data, and instruction. We will work collaboratively to troubleshoot and identify sources of error when needed. From this experience, we will deliver new knowledge.EvaluationMonoclonal antibody evaluation. We will screen hybridoma cell lines for the production (and secretion) of H5-specific antibodies in the culture supernatants using iELISA and Western blot (WB). ELISA plates will be coated with H5 antigens from North American and Eurasian strains to evaluate H5 specificity. Supernatants will be used directly to examine H5 mAb reactivity with both antigens. To evaluate H5 specificity by WB, H5 antigens will be resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose for WB. WB will be probed using hybridoma supernatants as the primary antibody. A commercial anti-mouse-HRP will be used as the secondary antibody for both assays, iELISA and WB. We will evaluate H5 mAb candidates based on specificity to North American and Eurasian H5 antigens. The selected antibodies will also be screened for competitive binding against a panel of antisera collected from birds infected with different AIV H5 strains (from U.S., Canada, Mexico, and Ghana). The AIV H7 monoclonal antibodies will be screened and evaluated by the same approach, but the H7 competitive assay screen will not include the H5 antisera from Ghana.cELISA evaluation. During optimization, BioStone will conduct preliminary validation of specificity with AIV negative chicken sera (n=500) and an H5-positive sera sample (n=1) or an H7-positive sera samples (n=1) from chicken. Validation experiments will be continued in Berhane lab at CFAD using sera from chicken and turkey, which are AIV-negative (n=300), AIV H5-positive (n=100), or AIV H7-positive (n=100). AIV positive samples have been collected from different global regions and different years (from routine surveillance and major HPAI outbreaks), which includes birds infected with North American and Eurasian strains. To evaluate the impact of antigenic drift in groups of H5 subtypes that have been endemic to and evolving in Mexico since the1990s, they will also evaluate the ELISA with LPAI H5-positive (n=50) and AIV-negative (n=50) chicken serum samples collected from Mexico in 2022 They will evaluate additional samples from the 2021 Ghana H5N1 outbreak (n=25). For H7 cELISA, they will use a panel that includes the HPAI H7-positive (n=50) and AIV-negative (n=50) chicken serum samples collected from Mexico in 2022. They will evaluate cross-reactivity with antisera for AIV subtypes H1, H2, H3, H4, H5*, H6, H7*, H8, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H14, H15, and H16 infected poultry (n=1 per subtype), and they will evaluate cross-reactivity with antisera from poultry infected with six non-AIV avian viruses: avian paramyxovirus type 1 (n=1), type 2 (n=1), and type 3 (n=1), and avian metapneumovirus subtype A (n=1), subtype B (n=1), and subtype C (n=1). Cross-reactivity of AIV H5* will only be evaluated on the H7 cELISA and cross-reactivity of AIV H7* will only be evaluated on the H5 cELISA.The Berhane lab will use samples that were previously subtyped and confirmed AIV negative by Np-based ELISA and confirmed AIV H5-positive or H7-positive by standard HI test methods. We will use these data to determine the accuracy of the ELISA. Data from all samples will be used to evaluate performance of the ELISA sensitivity and specificity to determine if additional optimization is necessary, and we will prepare data and analysis according to CVB requirements, using the statistical test package for R, DiagTestKit.ELISA data will be collected on 96-well plate readers, as optical density (OD) at 450 nm, and saved in Excel file formats. These files will be shared between labs to evaluate and discuss results. Analysis of cELISA data is based on Inhibition Percent (IP) relative to the negative control, and evaluation of correct diagnosis is determined by the IP cut-off values calculated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Progress 07/01/23 to 02/29/24

Outputs
Target Audience:We have reached segments of our target audience during this period by training staff and communicating the advancement of our objectives. We have technicianstaff members, from the junior scientist audience, reached through training and developing key research skills for animal disease diagnostic development. Through mentorship and independence, junior scientists in the biotechnology industry are gaining new skills, confidence, and technical training to become successful independent scientists. We have also reached our audience from avian influenza reference laboratories, for biosecurity and avian serosurveillance, with whom we collaborate on this project. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) represent a critical part of our audience, as they place a high value on strengthening biosecurity and developing animal disease diagnostics. Communicating and working with CFIA will provide important channels for reaching future audiences that place trust and confidence in CFIA. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project includes teams of PhD-level scientists and BSc-level technicians. The Project Director and other scientists work together to mentor BSc-level technicians, providing training in technical protocols and in strategic thinking for research and development. Technicians are trained to develop assays at the bench-scale for R&D, but they are also trained for scaled assay production, which is applicable to validation studies and commercial scale manufacturing. The interactions with team-members foster intellectual discussions and broader education about agriculture biosecurity and the impact of developing diagnostic tools for transboundary animal diseases. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?1.Develop cELISA to detect AIV H5 antibodies 1.2. We aim to continue to evaluate prototypes of the H5 cELISA, and we will determine if there are any disadvantages to consider with the current prototype. We will complete evaluation of the final prototype, which includes a total of 500 AIV-negative poultry serum and an H5-positive sera sample (n=1) from chicken. Then, we will scale production to provide our collaborator with sufficient H5 cELISA plates and reagents to evaluate their samples for validation. 1.3. We aim to reach our validation benchmark specificity and sensitivity of >98% through our work with the Berhane lab. Their lab will evaluate AIV-negative (n=300) or AIV H5-positive (n=100), and an additional collection of LPAI H5-positive (n=50) and AIV-negative (n=50) chicken serum samples collected from Mexico in 2022. They will also evaluate samples from the 2021 Ghana H5N1 outbreak (n=25). To evaluate cross-reactivity, they will use antisera for AIV subtype H1, H2, H3, H4, H6, H7, H8, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H14, H15, and H16 infected poultry (n=1 per subtype), and antisera from poultry infected with six non-AIV avian viruses: avian paramyxovirus type 1 (n=1), type 2 (n=1), and type 3 (n=1), and avian metapneumovirus subtype A (n=1), subtype B (n=1), and subtype C (n=1). 2.Develop cELISA to detect AIV H7 antibodies 1.2. We aim to continue to evaluate prototypes of the H7 cELISA, and we will determine the optimal conditions to cuse for validation. We will complete evaluation of the final prototype, which includes a total of 500 AIV-negative poultry serum and an H7-positive sera sample (n=1) from chicken. Then, we will scale production to provide our collaborator with sufficient H7 cELISA plates and reagents to evaluate their samples for validation. 1.3. We aim to reach our validation benchmark specificity and sensitivity of >98% through our work with the Berhane lab. Their lab will evaluate AIV-negative (n=300) or AIV H5-positive (n=100), and an additional collection of LPAI H7-positive (n=50) and AIV-negative (n=50) chicken serum samples collected from Mexico in 2022. They will also evaluate samples from the 2021 Ghana H5N1 outbreak (n=25). To evaluate cross-reactivity, they will use antisera for AIV subtype H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, H8, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H14, H15, and H16 infected poultry (n=1 per subtype), and antisera from poultry infected with six non-AIV avian viruses: avian paramyxovirus type 1 (n=1), type 2 (n=1), and type 3 (n=1), and avian metapneumovirus subtype A (n=1), subtype B (n=1), and subtype C (n=1).

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? 1.Develop cELISA to detect AIV H5 antibodies 1.1. We have screened hybridoma cell lines for AIV H5-specific and competitive monoclonal antibodies (mAb), and we identified the optimal mAb against AIV H5 antigens. The optimal combination of antigens and mAb have been determined for detection of antibodies against AIV H5, and they are being employed to optimize H5 cELISA conditions. We have optimized scaled production and purification of the H5 mAb. 1.2. We have optimized and evaluated AIV H5 cELISA prototypes, which utilize different biochemical strategies. During this process, we have screened 200 AIV-negative poultry serum samples to evaluate specificity. We have optimized antigen binding concentrations on polystyrene microtiter plates, and we have optimized formulation of ELISA reagents (blocking buffers and assay diluents) to be compatible with poultry serum and the H5 mAb. We are currently evaluating the enzymatic chemistry for horse-radish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated to the primary mAb and comparing alternative formats (ie. mAb-biotin conjugates + streptavidin-HRP or secondary mouse anti-chicken-HRP). We have developed scaled production protocols for H5 cELISA plates, and we initiated real-time stability studies. 2.Develop cELISA to detect AIV H7 antibodies 2.1. We have screened hybridoma cell lines for AIV H7-specific and competitive monoclonal antibodies (mAb), and we identified the optimal mAb against AIV H7 antigens. The optimal combination of antigens and mAb have been determined for detection of antibodies against AIV H7, and they are being employed to optimize H7 cELISA conditions. We have optimized scaled production and purification of the H7 mAb. 2.2. We have optimized and evaluated AIV H7 cELISA prototypes, which utilize different biochemical strategies. During this process, we have screened 200 AIV-negative poultry serum samples to evaluate specificity. We have optimized antigen binding concentrations on polystyrene microtiter plates, and we have optimized formulation of ELISA reagents (blocking buffers and assay diluents) to be compatible with poultry serum and the H7 mAb. We are developing an mAb conjugate with horse-radish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated to the primary mAb, and we will compare this to mAb-biotin (+ streptavidin HRP) and secondary mouse anti-chicken-HRP. We have developed scaled production protocols for H7 cELISA plate production, and we initiated real-time stability studies of antigen coated plates.

Publications