Source: MICHIGAN STATE UNIV submitted to NRP
ADDRESSING BARRIERS TO BETTER SERVE SOCIALLY-DISADVANTAGED MICHIGAN PRODUCERS: A COMMUNITY-MSU INCLUSIVE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1029774
Grant No.
2023-70417-39233
Cumulative Award Amt.
$3,472,678.00
Proposal No.
2022-06536
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Mar 1, 2023
Project End Date
Dec 31, 2027
Grant Year
2023
Program Code
[ARP]- ARP Technical Assistance Investment Program
Recipient Organization
MICHIGAN STATE UNIV
(N/A)
EAST LANSING,MI 48824
Performing Department
COMMUNITY SUSTAIN
Non Technical Summary
This project will develop an educator-technical assistance network of experts in Michigan to improve provider skillsets, resources, outreach, and engagement processes collaboratively and systemically with an outcome to better serve agricultural producer needs of socially-disadvantaged farming communities in Michigan. In strong partnership with Michigan Food and Farming Systems, MSUE, and Julian Samora Institute, this educator-technical assistance network's primary goal is to reach more socially-disadvantaged agricultural producers in Michigan, with improved MSU and community organizational resources co-designed by understanding and engagement with community needs. This transformative model of network engagement in Michigan will create a core pathway for Michigan socially-disadvantaged farmers to engage with agricultural resources in a way that is restorative and supportive.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
50%
Developmental
50%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
6026099303050%
9036030302050%
Goals / Objectives
MSU College of Agriculture and Natural Resources does not have a network of educators and specialists,particularly one connected to external partners to serve Black, Indigenous, Latinx and New Immigrant Producers across the state, this project will create one.Currently the Black, Indigenous, Latinx and New Immigrant farming populations do not have full and complete trust with the Land-Grant University System and the USDA. They often do not seek resources and have more limited access to educators and connecting agencies. We will work to create trust between BIPOC farmers, MSU and state and federal entities.External organizations have provided feedback that MSU does not recognize and incorporate community-based expertise into their educational model. This network will change that.We will hold engagement sessions, in which external producer groups, BIPOC farming support and advocacy organizations, and BIPOC farmer funds have been invited to engage with and inform MSU Educators to influence programming.A major shift in outreach success, with increased enrollment and engagement by BIPOC producers, was and will be made when MSU CRFS, MIFFS and MSU Extension offereBIPOC-focused education, outreach and technical assistance.The sheer amount of MSU, CRFS and MIFFS resources makes it hard to identify changes needed to get to inclusive & equitable documents. This network will make resource identification an inter-institutional network effort to identify and updateresources most relevant to BIPOC producers.There is both historical national, state, and local meta-data on racism within agriculture. There is also ongoing anecdotal and regional data from BIPOC producers on why they do not access USDA, state and Extension resources, financing, and risk management products. With a change in thinking in what and how TA is provided, we can make the change in Michigan.More low-interest financings for business growth, more access to risk managementinsurance protection, more success in writing and receiving USDA grant funding and NRCS reimbursement grants to grow their businesses and find financial success.Technical assistance data can be captured at many levels in the MSU system. Data is captured anonymously from time of registration in a meeting or program and to end with impact survey through Qualtrics. This data collection will provide insight on program changes, producer opinion, touch points and improvements in TA. We will ensure we launch and utilize all aspects of data collection to inform work and systemic changes due to this project.We believe a shift to more inclusiveoutreach technical assistance to underserved groups in Michigan, which will be measured and accountable to this project, it will be valuable to share across the country for a potential national impact.
Project Methods
The NIFBE network would have targeted engagement to BIPOC residents of Michigan interested in or entering farming, this includes Black, Indigenous, Latinx and New Immigrant Population of Michigan. We would be engaging a target of 400 farmers (0.5 unique farmers per month over 48 months by 20 TA educators) over 3 years through 15 or more Community Based Organizations (CBOs) and a current BIPOC farming demographic of: 777 Tribal Producers; 186 Asian Producers; 466 Black Producers; 50 Native Pacific Island Producers; 1,024 Latinx Producers and with a Statewide focus in counties with the largest population of NIFBE producers including Wayne, Genesee, Calhoun, Kalamazoo, Washtenaw, Kent, Berrien, Muskegon, Oakland, Keweenaw, Marquette, Chippewa, Luce, Baraga, and Ingham.The twenty-one metrics for the project along with the expected data type, collection and reporting methods are discussed in the data management plan. MSUE and CRFS share a data management and metrics collection system called PEARS and collectively develop and launch surveys through Qualtrics and an event management system called ANR EVENTS, and these three systems will be the primary method of capturing and confidentially storing the metrics.Details of Metricsi. Targeted audience(s);Collection Method: MSU Program Evaluation and Reporting System (PEARS) MSU ANR Event Registrations, meeting reports, Qualtrics surveys responses.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal team meeting updates.Objective: 3,7ii. The type of outreach and technical assistance to be conducted (in person workshops, virtual meetings).Collection Method: MSU PEARS Reporting System and Google Drive shared reporting sheets for external partnersReporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal team meeting updates.Objective: 2iii. Number of outreach and technical assistance activities and number of types of producers reached.Collection Method: Google Drive shared reporting sheets for external partners keeping confidential business data stored in MSU SharePoint or One Drive.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal team meeting updates.Objective: 6iv. The preliminary and actual targeted dates of events.Collection Method: CRFS, MSUE, and MIFFS newsletters, social media, and websites, MSU PEARS Reporting Systems and Google Drive.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 7v. Targeted location for outreach or technical assistance (county, city, state).Collection Method: PEARS Reporting System and Google Drive,Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 7, 9vi. Detailed requested amount for outreach or technical assistance activities.Collection Method: Collection Method: MSU PEARS Reporting System through CVENT registrations, Google Drive, meeting reporting, Qualtrics surveys responses.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 1,2,7vii. General allocation of requested amount for outreach or technical assistance activities.Collection Method: MSU SharePoint shared folders for internal team.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates. Objective: 1,2,7viii. Numbers of underserved agricultural producers served and their general geographical location.Collection Method: Engagement registration through MSU PEARS reporting systemAnd Google drive surveys and shared folders.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 6,7,10ix. Number of underserved agricultural producers impacted by COVID.Collection Method: Qualtrics Survey on effects of Covid and 2ndary data.Reporting Method: Final Reports to USDAObjective: 6,7,10x. General demographics of those served as appropriate.Collection Method: MSU PEARS reporting system.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 2xi. How many underserved agricultural producers have improved their businesses and financial condition.Collection Method: Evaluation tracking through Qualtrics survey and data provided by CBO'sReporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 2,6,7,10xii. How many have developed or improved their business plans and/or marketing plans.Collection Method: Evaluation tracking through Qualtrics survey and data provided by CBO's.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 2,6,7,10xiii. How their improvement translates into the success of their operation.Collection Method: Evaluation tracking through Qualtrics survey and data provided by CBO's.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 9xiv. How many underserved agricultural producers will make progress towards, securing, and/or maintaining ownership of their land or acquire new land for their farming, ranching or forest land operation.Collection Method: Google Drive and evaluation tracking measures (Qualtrics)Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 2,6,7,9,10xv. How many individuals and families will be able to deal more effectively with heirs' property concerns and fractionated land loss concerns and plan for or execute changes that positively impact their ability to resolve heirs' property or land fractionationCollection Method: Evaluation tracking through Qualtrics survey and data provided by CBO's.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 2,6,7,9,10xvi. What new markets are opened or accessed by producers;Collection Method: Evaluation tracking through Qualtrics survey and data provided by CBO's.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 4 through 10xvii. How many new cooperative businesses or other agricultural-based business enterprises are created or expanded within the targeted producer groups;Collection Method: Evaluation tracking through Qualtrics survey and data provided by CBO's.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates. Objective: 4 through 10xviii. How many underserved agricultural producers have new knowledge and are applying that knowledge concerning agriculture tax issues.Collection Method: Evaluation tracking through Qualtrics survey and data provided by CBO's.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 4 through 10xix. How many underserved agricultural producers will be able to retain land or acquire new land.Collection Method: Evaluation tracking through Qualtrics survey and data provided by CBO's.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates. Objective: 4 through 10xx. How many underserved agricultural producers improve their knowledge of or improve access to and use of key decision support business planning tools tailored to agriculture.Collection Method: Evaluation tracking through Qualtrics survey and data provided by CBO's.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internalmeeting updates.Objective: 4 through 10xxi. How many underserved agricultural producers are seeking and participating in USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service programs, Farm Service Agency farm loan programs, Rural Development loan or grant programs or any other programs and services administered by USDA.Collection Method: Evaluation tracking through Qualtrics survey and data provided by CBO's.Reporting Method: Interim and final reports to the USDA and internal meeting updates.Objective: 4 through 10

Progress 01/01/24 to 12/31/24

Outputs
Target Audience: Urban, rural and small scale (<100 acres) farmers: Our work matters to this audience because they represent farmers who historically have not been able to access the same resources as conventional farmers from land grant universities and the USDA. We seek to increase both the participation in USDA programs and the success of these farmers in the food system to create more resilient, equitable, and thriving communities. The Urban Agriculture Summit targeted urban farmers and small scale, peri urban farmers through direct contact, social media, email, and word of mouth. We have not calculated the final numbers for attendees, but over 240 people registered for the Urban Ag Summit; over 100 attendees identified as farmers. This will also include spanish speaking growers and workers. Policy, academic, food systems, educators, non-profit organizations that support urban agriculture and urban farmers. We target these groups to enhance access and network opportunities for urban and rural farmers to connect with markets and resources. Changes/Problems:Lack of availability of program officers at USDA is resulting in the delay in our ability to reallocate funding to key community partners delivering USDA technical assistance, that isidentified in this report which may stall relationship development and trust building. Uncertainty of USDA funding freeze impacts on programs have exacerbated longstanding trust issues between the target audience, USDA, and institutional partners. There is often intense technical assistance provisions required to support farmers in the target audience in accessing relief funding from USDA, which may be needed if we experience food supply chain disruptions. We will be working with the network, workgroups, community partners to assess and directly respond to emerging needs (such as the highly pathogenic avian influenza). This team will be discussing best practices for data security and farmer confidentiality related to this project in support of producer engagement and food system development. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? The MSU Urban Agriculture Summit provided workshops covering technical assistance for crop production, policy work, business management skills, farmer education, working with institutions for funding, and network building between farmers, MSU CRFS, MIFFS, and MSU Extension. Specific topics covered during conference workshops/sessions included: Climate resilience and regenerative agriculture Micro-business/ small business management, product aggregation Utilizing MSU, USDA, and other institutional resources for funding, equipment, and farm infrastructure Farmer education programs available around the state Environmental stewardship - water, soil, ecosystem management Land access MIFFS participated in NRCS train-the-trainer workshops planning and delivery to midwest patterns through the Midwest Agriculture Conservation (MAC) Network and connected MI community organizations with upcoming training opportunities. MIFFS participated in several technical assistance networks providing USDA technical assistance to partners in the wake of federal funding freezes and potential impacts on programs and farmers. These include networks hosted by MSU, community partners, and national partner organizations centered around: CSA Networks, Transition to Organic Partnership Programs, NRCS Technical Assistance, Risk Management, gap funding for frozen programs, and Local Food Procurement Agreements to identify emerging needs of partners and farmers. Key challenges and opportunities identified by MIFFS and recommended to MSU partners for developing collaborative response include: Technical assistance to demonstrate eligibility for USDA disaster assistance and emergency relief funding for extreme weather events and food system disruption. Record keeping is a key barrier that reduces eligibility for the target audience to participate in farm safety net programs and results in the underutilization of programs. Outreach and technical assistance to Spanish-speaking farmers about the Tree Assistance Program. A number of Latinx farmers in MI operate blueberry farms that are often prone to flooding. There is a need to increase awareness of the Tree Assistance Programs existence, how to access the program, and set farmer expectations about how the program works. Training materials and exams for Restricted Use Pesticide Applicators available in Spanish are outdated and poorly translated. These materials are generally developed by EPA in partnership with universities like MSU. MIFFS collaborated with MSU staff to address concerns and differences between English and Spanish resources and MSU identified opportunities to improve the Spanish training materials. They also confirmed the Restricted Use Pesicide exam differs between the English and the Spanish version. MSU is coordinating to update training materials and are working with the state to get permission to update the exam. This will also be connected to updated worker protection training offered by MSU. Legal assistance and risk management technical assistance is a major need identified by farmers. As farmers move toward collaborative farming models, and partnering with institutions they are seeking technical assistance on developing partnership Memorandums of Understandings and transition plans to protect business viability in the event a partner leaves or stops farming. MIFFS referred 5 farmers to the USDA Regional Food Business Center managed by MSU CRFS for fund development support and grant writing technical assistance for Value Added Producer and Resilient Infrastructure grants. MIFFS, CRFS and MSU Extension have worked with a grower and food hub in Kalamazoo MI to support them in leveraging local funds to host a community food systems extension educator at their offices. MIFFS worked with community partners to identify the need and explore developing a technical assistance provider summit/conference. MIFFS participated in the state of Michigan Regenerative Ag workgroup and connected with partners on USDA technical assistance. MIFFS joined a Michigan based land access network with key partners MIFFS has organized with national partners, and MI-based community orgs to evaluate best practices for equitable community engagement as an organization and is working to develop a theory of change and equity containers to guide our work. We are also undergoing an equity audit with a community-based contractor to identify room for improvement. MIFFS, MSU Extension, MSU CRFS, and the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development are coordinating the development of Train the Trainer programs on Biosecurity best practices for urban and rural farms. These programs will be for technical assistance providers to minimize the impact on the food system of bird flu and the associated risks related to multi-species transmission and exposure from wild animal interactions. NIFBE members will be co-developing outreach strategies to reach small-scale and homestead operations to raise awareness about best practices to mitigate the spread of bird flu.? How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Promoted Urban Agriculture conference through a variety of listservs and MSU Extension outlets Provided Pesticide Safety and Worker Protection Safety training in spanish in a statewide conference (Great lakes EXPO) 10 attendees were in attendance We're in the process of synthesizing data from the urban agriculture summit and creating a report to email and post on participating organizations' websites. We will print copies as well as appropriate. One-on-one and community workgroup feedback was collected by MIFFS through their TA and farmers workgroups and disseminated to MSU colleagues. Workgroups included a grassroots farmer advocacy workgroup and other workgroups that MIFFS collaborates with (both in English and Spanish). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Organize a Worker Protection Train-the-Trainer for educators to program to underserved audiences Translate Restricted Use of Pesticide Applicator and Worker Protection certification program trainings, manual and exams into Spanish. Collaborate further with statewide and local community organizations to improve and expand technical resources provided rural and urban producers Host a Worker Protection and Pesticide Safety review and test for Spanish-speaking farms and farm workers Prepare unique and practical guides in multiple formats (social posts, printable, audio/video) in English and Spanish for farmers and food producers to increase access to resources from the USDA, MSU, MIFFS, and other organizations. Create a website hub that easily curates a whole library of relevant resources for producers and technical assistance providers to have easy access and shareability to USDA resources, programs, business support etc. USDA technical assistance navigator and farmer training on obtaining USDA farm numbers, conservation planning for NRCS programs, and record-keeping to demonstrate eligibility for USDA safety net programs (MIFFS). Continue to be involved in the codesign process of the Urban Agriculture summit which will be held in February 2025. Information from this summit will be processed, analyzed and discussed by the community, MSU Extension and others to decide on next steps which may include the formation of a statewide urban agriculture network or other model consisting of farmers, MSU staff, and other stakeholders to coordinate and inform future programs to support urban farmers. Continue to (MIFFS) collaborate with a group of community organizations to support the development of a community-led peer-to-peer technical assistance network, developed as the result of a USDA RMA cooperative agreement. MIFFS has been supporting fund development efforts to back the network and will be providing USDA technical assistance to farmers it reaches. To date $100k has been leveraged through these fund development efforts, to community partners leading this work. The network has been invited to submit a full proposal to the NCR SARE Research and Education grant. They have also been invited to request funding from this award. Host (MIFFS) USDA train-the-trainer trainings for community organizations that deliver conservation technical assistance to farmers in the target audience who are applying for USDA programs. Deliver (MIFFS and MSU Extension) New Worker Protection training required for farms in Spanish in April. MIFFS will continue to consult with and provide guidance to the MSU team about key barriers faced by farmers accessing USDA program and the co-development of guides to increase farmer and TA provider's awareness of these programs and how to navigate applications and implementation of awards/contracts. Collaboratively (MIFFS, MSUE and CRFS) develop resources about USDA program awareness outreach materials, understanding USDA service centers and services, and navigating pathways to USDA programs like NRCS costshare opportunities MIFFS will continue to work with the Great Lakes Navigators and the Land Access Workgroup currently under development in the state. MIFFS will work on the development of a Guide to NRCS practices and USDA programs for Blue Blueberry growers that will be translated into Spanish and developed into outreach at TA programs. Launch a biosecurity essentials program to rapidly build awareness and knowledge about disease, biosecurity, and disease response for small and medium sized livestock and poultry farmers - particularly as the Highly pathogenic avian influenza spreads in Michigan. Establish Evaluation and data collection metrics

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? As planned, a productive network of MSUE, MSU and MIFFS educators working across MI has become more established this year with clear plans for working together that included the development of group norms, regular convening, clear outlines of work plans and processes for effective work together (such as grievance policies, a dashboard for information and regular monthly updates). A consultant assisted with this process on a part time basis. (Goal 1) After meeting with program officers at USDA in fall of 2024, a proposal system was set up for the NIFBE network to develop and implement community engaged projects to achieve the deliverables of the grants. A rubric was also set up to assess the projects for meeting program deliverables and goals. Multiple projects have been identified to engage communities to support easier access for producers to USDA programs, USDA resources and other business resources. Conversations with program officers to assess these as they relate to the budget is requested. Stronger collaboration with the partners on this project has been established and multiple plans for collaborative education and training are in place (as shared in this report). (goal 1) Trust building is underway with producers. Different educators are reaching out to community partners across Michigan in rural and urban areas to build communication channels and seek engagement and recognition of community expertise. (Goal 2 and 3) We have hired a partnership specialist (25% on this project) to support the goal of trust building. (Goal 2) (contributing to Goals 1-4 and others as possible) The Network synthesized needs assessments for producers resources needs for updating MSU, MIFFS, and CRFS resources. Based on this and MSUE needs assessments, identified MSUE resources to prioritize for updating and/or translating to provide producers with increased access to these resources. (Goals 1, 3, 6 and 7) Provided Pesticide Safety and Worker Protection Safety training in spanish in a statewide conference (Great lakes EXPO) 10 attendees were in attendance (goal 6) MIFFS developed draft guides for filling out USDA Farm Operating Plan Forms for LLCs and Nonprofits which were passed to the MSU team for collaboration and co-design of outreach materials and technical assistance services. MSU will work on the draft guide for Farm Operating Plan forms for individuals (goal 6) NIFBE members have been individually building relationships with local and statewide USDA staff.(Goal 1) During 2024 members of the NIFBE team conducted significant co-design and planning for the MSU - Urban Ag Summit. This was initiated and took place with Community partners, MSU CRFS, MIFFS, and MSU Extension. Three members of our NIFBE network were engaged throughout this process and began addressing goals 1-5 of the project. The one-day conference held in February, 2025 attended by over 220 farmers, educators, and urban agriculture stakeholders from local, state, and national institutions. The conference provided workshops covering technical assistance for crop production, policy work, business management skills, farmer education, working with institutions for funding, and network building between farmers, MSU CRFS, MIFFS, and MSU Extension.

Publications


    Progress 01/01/23 to 12/31/23

    Outputs
    Target Audience:Outreach strategies are still being developed by our outreach and engagement group to engage producers from different BIPOC groups. Some 1:1 conversations have been had with a farm in Detroit to discuss their learning needs. In addition, MIFFS has had ongoing conversations about these needs on a bimonthly basis with a group of Black farmers (urban and rual) and many one on one conversations to document these needs. MIFFS has also developed a TA list to document emergent TA needs of BIPOC farmers. Changes/Problems:This year it has taken time to discuss the structure of the network and the best outreach strategies and the training strategies for the NIFBE members. Progress has not been as fast as hoped, but is inevitable with a new network and the trust building that must take place. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Year 1 has been used to build out the network and understand staff training and producer needs. A survey conducted among the network established racial equity and justice training needs that will be provided in 2024. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/nifa-awards-msu-crfs-3-45-million-to-expand-culturally-relevant-support-for-farm-and-food-business-owners What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We plan to finalize the cataloguing of resources within MSU Extension for farm business management. We plan to analyze the findings from the partner staff survey pertaining to previous professional development activities. Diversity Equity Inclusion Justice Accessibility and Belonging training and resources will be available for the group. Collectively, we will assess the resources catalogued to determine those that require updating/editing and develop resources that may needed based on gap analysis. Listening sessions will begin and learning documented. NIFBE will continue to build an environment of learning and stratgic change for reaching groups through regular meeting, listening and development of resources and outreach planning. As part of the development of NIFBE we will seek to build increased trust such that true transformative change can take place.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? -In year 1 we met regularly as a network to build further connection, understanding, trust and infrastructure to build and coordinate a Michigan-based inclusive and intersectional network of trained educators from MSU CRFS, Julian Samora, MIFFS, MSU Extension who are prepared to lead engagement with NIFBE farming communities that is consistent, empathetic and restorative. Within the network, a resources workgroup and an outreach and engagement workgroup have convened to address goals 3, 4 and 6. -The resources work group is cataloguing the extensive pool of resources that exist across MSU Extension and organizations such as MIFFS as part of the workgroup strategy. This will enable the institutes within MSU Extension to more easily share/find resources with those providing technical assistance to historically underserved groups in our audience. -MIFFS has had ongoing conversations about producerneeds on a bimonthly basis with a group of Black farmers (urban and rual) and many one on one conversations to document these needs. MIFFS has also developed a TA list to document emergent TA needs of BIPOC farmers. - The outreach and engagement workgroup is developing listening sessions to begin in 2024 with stakeholder partners across the state from different BIPOC groups to gather information on collectively identifying strategies and organization that can address impactful change for NIFBE educators and resource providers to better reach underserved groups. These listening sessions will also appreciate leadership with BIPOC groups. - there has been a sharing of USDA resources with the NIFBE participants

    Publications