Progress 09/01/23 to 08/31/24
Outputs Target Audience:This research is an integral part of efforts to aid in the growth of the local and national oyster aquaculture industry, represented in the United States of America by the East Coast Shellfish Growers Association (ECSGA) and the Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association (PCSGA). In addition to the oyster aquaculture industry, this research is targeted to a wide range of members of the bivalve shellfish community that are interested in shellfish health, characterizing host-microbial-environment interactions in shellfish hatcheries, and applying that knowledge for the management of wild and cultured populations of shellfish. These include hatchery managers that provide seed for public (restoration) and commercial aquaculture, aquatic pathologists, and companies involved in health management in aquaculture (vaccines, probiotics, health screening, antibiotics). This research is also of interest to regulators and managers looking for alternative options to the use of antibiotics in disease management in aquaculture. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?In addition to the training of the graduate student involved in the project in previous years, this project has trained one more undergraduate student in research. This project also continues to complement the project "The Northeast Bivalve Hatchery Health Consortium (NEBHHC): Managing larval mortalities in Northeast Hatcheries", funded by the Northeast Regional Aquaculture Center. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Dissemination efforts included: a) direct outreach and participation of commercial hatcheries and companies involved in aquaculture health management in the research; b) scientific presentations at aquaculture meetings, including the Annual Meeting of the National Shellfisheries Association (March 2024), Aquaculture America 24 meeting (February 2024 in San Antonio Texas); and c) organization of a workshop to be held at the Northeast Aquaculture Conference and Exposition, Providence, Rhode Island, January 2024. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In 2025, analysis of the whole genome sequences from candidate pathogens and probionts will be completed. Publications are being prepared and outreach to stakeholders is ongoing. Outreach efforts being planned for this project and the BHHC NRAC project include one workshop at Aquaculture 2025 targeting researchers and one remote webinar targeting both researchers and hatchery managers.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
From January to December 2024, we isolated an additional 414 isolates for a total of 536 from samples of eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica), quahogs (Mercenaria mercenaria), and bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) larvae from 33 production runs from commercial and research hatcheries. About one third of these production runs were classified as "bad" runs (i.e., lower production than usual or a complete crash). These isolates corresponded to 41 genera and 236 unique species. The most abundant genera identified were Pseudoalteromonas (146, 46%), Vibrio (118, 38%), and Alteromonas (14%). Of these isolates, 43% were uniquely present in normal production runs, 31% were shared between normal and unproductive runs, and 26% were unique to unproductive runs. Isolates are being screened for antimicrobial activity, hemolytic activity, quorum quenching, biofilm formation, and toxicity to oyster hemocytes to evaluate the potential for pathogenicity or probiotic activity. After screening more than 300 isolates, in addition to five additional isolates of the known probiont of bivalve shellfish and turbot Phaeobacter inhibens, four isolates from other species were identified as potential probionts (Algoriphagus winogradskyi DEN5, Marinomonas gallaica Clam9, Glutamicibacter soli Clam16, and Pseudooceanicola nitratireducens NEH7). Larvae treated with these isolates and challenged with the bacterial pathogens Vibrio coralliilyticus RE22 and Aliiroseovarius crassostreae CV919-312 showed from 16% to 81% increase in relative percent survival (RPS) as compared to larvae only treated with the pathogens. Larvae treated with MgClam9 (46%) and AwDEN5 (52%) had higher RPS when challenged with the pathogen Vibrio tasmaniensis DEN41. Probiotic treatment did not improve survival (1-9% RPS) when larvae were challenged with the pathogen Vibrio neptunius DEN11, and high mortality rates indicated that VnDEN11 had significantly higher levels of pathogenicity that VcRE22 and Ar919-312. A combination of all selected probiotic strains, along with probiont Phaeobacter inhibens S4, resulted in better larval survival than S4 alone.
Publications
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2024
Citation:
Samson, J.S., Kulesh, K., Rowley., D.C., Nelson, D.R., Gomez-Chiarri, M., 2024. Isolation, screening, and selection of potential pathogenic and probiotic bacteria from bivalve shellfishes. Northerast Aquaculture Conference and Exposition. Providence, RI, January 2024.
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2024
Citation:
Samson, J.S., Kulesh, K., Rowley., D.C., Nelson, D.R., Gomez-Chiarri, M., 2024. Screening of potential pathogenic and probiotic bacteria from bivalve shellfishes. Aquaculture America 2024, San Antonio, TX, February 2024.
|
Progress 09/01/22 to 08/31/23
Outputs Target Audience:This research is an integral part of efforts to aid in the growth of the local and national oyster aquaculture industry, represented in the United States of America by the East Coast Shellfish Growers Association (ECSGA) and the Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association (PCSGA). In addition to the oyster aquaculture industry, this research is targeted to a wide range of members of the bivalve shellfish community that are interested in shellfish health, characterizing host-microbial-environment interactions in shellfish hatcheries, and applying that knowledge for the management of wild and cultured populations of shellfish. These include hatchery managers that provide seed for public (restoration) and commercial aquaculture, aquatic pathologists, and companies involved in health management in aquaculture (vaccines, probiotics, health screening, antibiotics). This research is also of interest to regulators and managers looking for alternative options to the use of antibiotics in disease management in aquaculture Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This project has provided training in microbiology to one undergraduate (summer research) and one graduate student. The project also involved the participation of one extension specialist through Rhode Island Sea Grant, and to professional development opportunities for several bivalve hatchery managers that provided samples. As part of the sample collection, two graduate students, the extension specialist, and the Project Director visited two hatcheries and discussed issues affecting larval production with hatchery personnel. This project also complements another project recently funded by the Northeast Regional Aquaculture Center, titled "The Northeast Bivalve Hatchery Health Consortium (NEBHHC): Managing larval mortalities in Northeast Hatcheries", which has the goal of supporting the growth of the bivalve shellfish industry in the Northeast USA by ensuring reliable production of bivalve seed by hatcheries. The NEBHHC is developing a collaborative, stakeholder-driven, and proactive approach to collection and analysis of samples from both good (high survival) and bad (low survival) larval production runs. We are currently enrolling hatcheries in the NEBHHC. Numerous extension and professional opportunities will derive from this related project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Dissemination efforts included: a) direct outreach and participation of commercial hatcheries and companies involved in aquaculture health management in the research; b) scientific presentations at aquaculture meetings, including the Annual Meeting of the National Shellfisheries Association (March 2023 and 2024), Aquaculture America 24 meeting (February 2024 in San Antonio Texas); and c) organization of a workshop to be held at the Northeast Aquaculture Conference and Exposition, Providence, Rhode Island, January 2024. We have also established a NEBHHC site at the Aquaculture Information Exchange site. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We will continue the isolation and screening of bacteria from hatchery samples from January - June 2024 using the methods developed in this past reporting period. We also plan to add another assay based on the ability of the candidate probiont isolates to inhibit quorum sensing in pathogens, and potentially develop an assay test for improvement of water quality parameters and larval feeding. The genome of selected isolates will be sequenced in order to identify potential virulence factors, and genes involved in metabolism and the production of secondary metabolites. The interactions between candidate probionts and pathogens will then be tested using in vitro competition assays, as well as in vivo assays using oyster and clam hemocytes.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
A total of 122 bacterial isolates from water, algae, and larval samples collected from bivalve (eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica and quahogs or hard clams Mercenaria mercenaria) hatcheries were identified using 16S rRNA sequencing. These isolates came from samples from normal production runs, as well as from samples of larvae experiencing mortality events. Among the 20 genera identified, Vibrio (34%), Pseudoalteromonas (23%), and Alteromonas (18%) were the most abundant, consistent with previous microbiome research in shellfish hatcheries. Other genera isolated included several Phaeobacter spp., Algoriphagus spp., and Pseudomonas spp. We screened these 122 bacterial isolates using a battery of assays, including: (1) antimicrobial activity against the bacterial pathogens of bivalves Aliiroseovarius crassostreae (causative agent of Juvenile or Roseovarius oyster disease), Vibrio coralliilyticus RE22 (a causative agents of vibriosis in bivalve larvae), and Vibrio parahaemolyticus PSU5579 (a causative agent of Acute HematoPancreatic Necrosis Disease in penaid shrimp), (2) antimicrobial activity against probionts we have previously isolated (Phaeobacter inhibens S4 and Bacillus pumilus RI0695), (3) hemolytic activity (indicative of potential pathogenicity), and (4) biofilm formation at different temperatures relevant to shellfish hatcheries (indicative of an ability to colonize surfaces in the hatchery and outcompete other microbes). We used a heat map to cluster bacterial isolates based on these traits, and identified several isolates with pathogenic potential, as well as several potential probionts to be used in shellfish aquaculture. The pathogenicity of the selected potential pathogenic and probiotic isolates was tested with oysters and clam larvae, and a newly developed high throughput screening colorimetric assay based on the effect of the bacterial isolates on oyster hemocyte viability. Results showed that potential probiotic isolates are generally safe while some potential pathogens (Clam15, DEN12, CH1, CH7, CH3, CH30, CH4, CH6) showed host-specific pathogenicity to either clam or oyster larvae. The lowest relative percentage survival in both clam and oyster larvae was observed in larvae challenged with Vibrio neptunius DEN11 (0%) and our control strain V. coralliilyticus RE22 (0.88%). Vibrio fortis CH6 caused higher levels of larval mortality in oysters (0% survival) than in clams (70% survival), while Vibrio tubiashii DEN12 and DEN41 were more pathogenic to clams (around 15% survival) than oysters (about 50% survival). Results from the high-throughput screening assay using oyster hemocytes were concordant with the results of the more labor-intensive larval assays. We have sequenced the genomes of Vibrio neptunius DEN11 and Vibrio alginolyticus DEN32 and deposited in GenBank (PRJNA758975).
Publications
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2022
Citation:
Takyi, E., LaPorte, J., Sohn, S., Stevick, R.J., Witkop, E.M., Gregg, L.S., Chesler-Poole, A., Small, J., White, M.M., Giray, C., Rowley, D.C., Nelson, D.R., Gomez-Chiarri, M., 2023. Development and evaluation of a formulation of probiont Phaeobacter inhibens S4 for the management of vibriosis in bivalve hatcheries. Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries 3, 256267. https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.112
|