| Progress 09/15/23 to 09/14/24
 Outputs
 Target Audience:Program locations include Fortune Society sites (Mandaela and Castle Garden), Harlem Wellness sites (General Locations and Philip Randolph Houses). Fortune Society provides wrap-around supportive housing for formerly justice-involved seniors. Harlem Wellness provides healthy living workshops for Harlem residents within the 10026, 10027, 10030 and 10031 zip codes. Over 160 familes participated in bi-weekly produce box distributions starting February 2022. Changes/Problems:During the implementation of our Food as Medicine (FAM) program, Corbin Hill Food Project (CHFP) encountered significant challenges that required changes to our evaluation strategy. These changes stemmed primarily from limited capacity among institutional partners and the complexities of aligning research timelines with urgent community programming needs. Despite these hurdles, CHFP prioritized integrity in program delivery while actively seeking alternatives to fulfill our evaluation goals. Our original evaluation partner, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, secured IRB approval in late 2022 to oversee data collection for the project (Award No: 2022-70423-38076). At the same time, Bronx Health REACH (BHR) obtained its own IRB approval for evaluation efforts through the Institute for Family Health. As implementation began in February 2023, CHFP launched programming at high-need residential sites, such as the Philip Randolph Houses, based on requests from trusted partners working directly with food-insecure populations. Although Mount Sinai had been slated to lead data collection at both clinical and residential sites, logistical and capacity-related delays prevented its clinical sites from participating in program launch. Residential sites, on the other hand, had referring providers and participants ready. CHFP was thus faced with a difficult decision: delay programming to wait for evaluation infrastructure, or proceed to meet community needs. Given the urgency, CHFP began implementation without collecting pre-survey data, maintaining responsiveness to our community-first commitment. Despite multiple planning meetings and efforts to re-align evaluation timelines, Mount Sinai ultimately withdrew from the project in April 2023, citing the inability to provide IRB coverage for residential sites outside its institutional network. Their formal withdrawal left a significant gap in our evaluation process. To rebuild our evaluation infrastructure, CHFP formed a new partnership with Lehman College and Dr. Katherine Burt, Program Director of the undergraduate Dietetics, Foods & Nutrition Program. This partnership aligned well with CHFP's evolving mission under new executive leadership, which emphasized food and data sovereignty, and deeper community integration. Together with Dr. Burt, CHFP co-developed a revised IRB proposal during the fall and winter of 2023. However, due to institutional timelines and limited dedicated staff capacity, the IRB was not submitted and approved until February 2024--leaving fewer than six months remaining in the grant period. Ultimately, this delay rendered it unfeasible to collect robust pre- and post-survey data or complete qualitative components in the final three months of the project. Despite these constraints, CHFP remains committed to learning from these challenges and has significantly strengthened its internal research capacity to ensure future projects can be launched with greater alignment and readiness. Our Director of Research and Narrative, Norma Gonzalez--who previously led multiple roles across the program--now leads all research efforts, bringing dedicated oversight to our data and evaluation strategy moving forward. Importantly, while we were unable to execute the full evaluation plan as originally envisioned, our programming outcomes, community council activities, and implementation insights continue to inform our evolving Food as Medicine framework. The lessons learned will support our efforts to document and disseminate models of food access rooted in justice, sovereignty, and long-term community leadership. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Our project provided several meaningful opportunities for training and professional development that centered community knowledge and leadership. One of the core innovations was the integration of a Community Chef who facilitated regular skill shares during program pick-up times. These sessions served as hands-on, bi-lingual, and culturally grounded learning experiences, where participants explored ancestral healing practices, nutritious cooking techniques, and fresh food preparation. The workshops not only increased nutrition literacy but also empowered participants with transferable skills that support household wellness and community-based food education. Additionally, members of our Food as Medicine program were invited to join our Community Council--a leadership and decision-making body that meets regularly to guide program implementation. Participation on the Council has allowed community members to deepen their skills in facilitation, evaluation, and program co-design, cultivating confidence and agency as peer educators, advocates, and local food system leaders. Through both direct skill-building and ongoing involvement in program governance, the project supported a broader pipeline of community-centered professional development that will extend beyond the life of the grant. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have not yet released a full report to our target populations, but we are committed to transparent and accessible dissemination of our program outcomes. To ensure that results are shared in a meaningful and community-centered way, we are developing a one-page summary that highlights key findings, outcomes, and next steps from the program. This summary will be designed for digital distribution and will be shared via text message, email, and our social media platforms to maximize reach and accessibility. We are also exploring opportunities to present the findings at upcoming community gatherings to allow for direct dialogue, feedback, and continued relationship-building with those most impacted by the program. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?During the next reporting period, our primary focus will be on completing and distributing our one-page program summary to former participants and community members. To prepare for this, we will first confirm and update all contact information to ensure that outreach is successful and inclusive. We are currently finalizing the content and layout of the one-pager, with remaining tasks including refining image selections and validating visual data comparisons to ensure clarity and accessibility. Our goal is to disseminate the finalized one-pager by the end of August 2025, using multiple communication channels--including text, email, and social media--to reach as many stakeholders as possible. This effort supports our broader aim of community transparency, continued engagement, and sustained impact beyond the formal grant period.
 
 Impacts
 What was accomplished under these goals?
To address structural barriers to food access, we shifted our Produce Prescription (PrX) distribution model from clinic-based pick-ups to an on-site delivery system located directly at the residential housing complex where participants live. This innovation significantly increased access and convenience, as participants were able to retrieve their produce just feet from their homes. Compared to our previous GusNIP award cycle--where participants had to pick up their boxes at health clinics and attendance rates ranged from 50-60%--our residential model saw a remarkable 99% pickup rate, demonstrating the effectiveness of reducing logistical barriers. Our project emphasized iterative learning and collaboration through monthly meetings with key partners and frequent in-person site visits. These regular check-ins created a feedback loop that allowed us to make rapid adjustments to the Food as Medicine (FAM) program design in response to community and partner needs. While we were unable to establish formal collaborations with external health centers within the grant timeline, our internal coordination created a strong foundation for future cross-sector partnerships. To deepen community education and engagement, we included weekly bilingual recipe sheets and produce descriptions in every box. These were paired with live skill shares led by our Community Chef, allowing participants to see and taste recipes in action using ingredients from their boxes. These materials will be archived and made publicly accessible on our website by the end of 2025, ensuring their availability to the wider community well beyond the duration of the program. Although we did not formally conduct research case studies during this grant cycle, our Community Council continues to play a critical role in documenting and evolving our approach. The Council--composed of self-selected and community-elected members from our FAM program--has remained active beyond the grant period and entirely on a volunteer basis. Council members have helped shape the implementation of the FAM program and are now playing a pivotal role in the planning and development of our forthcoming brick-and-mortar location. Together, we are co-creating a new, replicable framework for community-based PrX programs grounded in food access, food justice, and food sovereignty principles--ensuring lasting impact and community ownership well into the future.
 
 Publications
 
 
 | 
| Progress 09/15/22 to 09/14/23
 Outputs
 Target Audience:Our target audience are residents in the Bronx and Upper Manhattan; focusing on Black and Latinx communities that are food insecure. The program is available to residents that qualify for EBT Benefits and to residents that do not qualify for benefits. Theresidentsare over the age of 55 and include individuals who were formerly incarcerated andindividuals who have disabilities with limited mobility. The program provides a home delivery model and addresses the need of individuals living in supportive housing. The three residential locations are Mandaela Housing (60 Residents), Castle Gardens (35 Residents),and A. Philip Randolph Houses (40 Residents). Changes/Problems:Major changes/problemsin approach include a delay in our IRB approval and a change in partner relationship with Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospitalwhich caused the progrm to start later than initially planned. Logistic issues with proposed innovationssuch as refrigerated lockers have not been implemented; the residential sites cannot accomodate the required equipment. Our main food producers are in the northeast region; the planting/growingseason in this region maylimit the variety of produce and fruit available (example: Apples are the primary fruit availableduring January - March). What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Peer to Peer training amongst staff, educational seminars, and conferences pertaining to the changes in the food ecosystem have benefited our team and have allowed us to share this knowledge with residents. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Program results have been disseminated to communities of interests through newsletters, community meetings, and social media. Changes to our website draws visual attention to our work in the community via the Food as Medicine (FAM) program. Community Council meetings assist in providing feedback to/from residents and other community leaders. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?To accomplish the goals in the next reporting period, we plan to have food skill share events, continue food demonstrations, and launch an App to assist with food choices based on individualpreferences (health condition, food preparation time, type of produce).
 
 Impacts
 What was accomplished under these goals?
Under the program, 135 Residents/Families in the Bronx and Upper Manhattan were provided access to fresh produce and fruitin the convenience of their own home. Removing travel barriers, reducing physical efforts of lifting packages, and lower dependency for online ordering. Residents were educated on healthy food choices, attended food demonstrations on how to prepare meals, and engaged in dialogue on what affects their community. Residents receive fresh produce and fruit delivered to their home every two weeks. At each location, we traina resident to manage the distribution process of the fresh produce and fruitto their neighbors. This collaboration createsa trusting &welcoming environment for the other residents, empowersthe site resident because they assisted the program serving their community,and providesdirect feedback about the challenges of the program.
 
 Publications
 
 
 |