Progress 09/01/22 to 08/31/23
Outputs Target Audience:The target audience for this project was US specialty crops growers, regional commodity group, extension educators, mating disruption manufacturers and distributors. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This work led to the training in meeting planning for the staff involved in this project. No other training or professional development occurred during this planning grant. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Objective 1. We established the first national research and extension community of practice focused on mating disruption (MD). The group included scientists, stakeholders, extension personnel, and distributors of MD products and engaged MD product manufacturers. We met via zoom calls to plan our activities and brainstorm about the future of MD in specialty crops on a regular basis and this effort used to develop three surveys. A meeting was organized in Chicago by the PD and the staff person at theHyatt Place O'Hare Airporton December 11-13, 2022. The meeting followed the agenda below. -------------------- Draft Planning Meeting Agenda Project Title: Killing them softly: defining the future of insect mating disruption in specialty crops Location: Hyatt Place O'Hare Airport, 6810 Mannheim Rd, Rosemont, Illinois DAY 1: Monday, December 12, 2022 - TIME ZONE is CST 7:30 AM Breakfast(free hotel breakfast) 8:30 AM Welcome, Introduction, Timeline, Objectives- Christelle Guédot (UW-Madison) Round-Robin introduction of all participants 9:00 AM Summary of survey results- Neil McRoberts (UC-Davis) 9:30 AM Moderated Panel 1: Specialty crops commodity representatives(hybrid) Panelists:Teah Smith (WA), Amy Irish-Brown (MI), Jeff Cook (GA, virtually), Jim Eve (NY, virtually) Moderator: Julianna Wilson Question 1.From a grower point of view, what are the barriers to adoption? Question 2.From a grower point of view, what do you see as priorities to improve adoption? 10:30 AM Coffee Break 11:00 AM Moderated Panel 2: Semiochemical company representatives(virtual panel discussion)Panelists:Peter McGhee (Pacific Biocontrol/ShinEtsu), Emily Symmes (Suterra) Moderator:Christelle Guédot Question 1.From an industry point of view, what are the barriers to increase adoption? Question 2.What do you see as solutions to these barriers? 12:00 PM Lunch 1:00 PM Intro to afternoon -Christelle Organize working groups from tentative Objectives Breakout groups: TBD based upon group discussion and priorities lists; discuss status of research in each area and identify research activities to address critical needs Objective 1.sociology/economics/regulatory effects on grower adoption (public goods and context of adoption) - how to integrate- moderators: Neil, Gigi, Matt What extension activities would stem from this objective? Objective 2.integrating MD into existing practices/IPM, methodology improvement -moderators: Anne, Brett, How would socio-economic aspects be integrated into this objective? What extension activities would stem from this objective? Objective 3.synergistic effects of MD and plant volatiles, mechanisms, developing new MD products, improving performance of existing MD products -moderators: Juan, Lukasz, Monique How would socio-economic aspects be integrated into this objective? What extension activities would stem from this objective? Objective 4.landscape context, crop system scale/complexity -moderators: Julianna, Tracy How would socio-economic aspects be integrated into this objective? What extension activities would stem from this objective? Note: Extension/student training will constitute objective 5 in the CAP proposal and is integrated in objectives 1-4. 3:00 PM Coffee Break 3:15 PM Continue Breakout groups 4:00 PM Group discussion Identify research priorities from survey and discussions, summarizing into 5 key items per objective (keeping all the notes) Individual ranking of priorities -Neil 5:00 PM Conclude Day 1- Christelle Guédot (UW-Madison) 7:00 PM Group Dinner DAY 2: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 7:30 AM Breakfast(free hotel breakfast) 8:30 AM Summary of ranked priorities- Neil Group discussion - a)Response to summary b)Finalize the objectives of a full SCRI CAP grant c)Identify objective leads for the SCRI CAP and schedule follow up meetings 10:00 AM Coffee break 10:30 AM Continue group discussion 12:00 PM Lunch 1:00 PM Group discussion Plan the preparation of a peer reviewed manuscript to summarize the outcome of the survey and planning meeting and delegate writing assignments. Proposal timeline, request for letters of support, identify Stakeholder Advisory Panel members (SAP roles: feedback at all meetings, methods, extension activities) c)Identify date and time for weekly zoom meetings to develop Stakeholder Relevance Statement (due date January 12, 2023), followed by CAP proposal 4:00 PM Closing remarks- Christelle Guédot (UW-Madison) ------------------- During the planning meeting, the teambrainstormed the objectives that would be developed in the SCRI CAP grant proposal. PIs, PDs, and SAP members were identified. Objective 2. Three surveys were conducted to determine the successful uses and barriers to adoption of MD in specialty crops. One survey was distributed to specialty crop growers to assess use and barriers to adoption, the other survey went to extension specialists who work withspecialty crop growers to assess their interest and ability torecommend and provide support on the use of MD, and finally the third survey was distributed to MD manufacturers to assess the future of MD product development. Results of the survey were presented to the meeting attendees. Objective 3. Following the planning meeting and using the outcomes of that meeting, the teamworked on and submitted an SRS proposal for an SCRI CAP for the 2023 funding cycle.
Publications
|