Recipient Organization
PITTMOSS LLC
2603 DUSS AVE
AMBRIDGE,PA 150031426
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
In all aspects of agriculture, the need to operatemore sustainably iscreating pressures and needs for advancements. This project is designed to investigate a more sustainable, locally produced, alternatives to the current materials used for growing plants and in much of agriculture.Potting soils, greenhouse and nursery growing media, and landscape soil amendments are currently highly dependent on imported mined sphagnum peat which is considered a valuable but non-sustainable environmental asset. Mining and transportation of this bulky materials, from distant places, significantly increases the environmental impact.Ireland and the United Kingdom are leading the way in prohibiting the mining of peat for use in horticulture. Many are concerned about the greenhouse gas emissions, and the results. Additionally, supplies of sphagnum peat have become limited due to variable weather in Canada andsupply chain limitations that hamper imports from Northeastern Europe.Good environmental stewardship requires the use of more reliable and sustainable sources of fibrous substrates for horticulture and in all of agriculture.All these factors are driving market demands for more sustainable fibrous substrates. The resurgence of production of industrial hemp makes application of this locally produced high yielding fibrous agricultural product a very attractive candidate for supplying the fibrous components in growing media.These investigations will examine the application of industrial hemp fiber to meet horticultural needs.Laboratory analyseswill define the nature of the fibers. Applications of modern fiber processing equipment will test processing methods and development of the best substrate structure. Processes will be developed to formulate the components for use in growing media to achieve advanced structural requirements. The processes will build on industry experience and standards using experience and knowledge to go to the next level of substrates in the horticultural industry. Applying advanced patent pending processing will assure fiber production to meet the advanced particle structure requirements. The substrates will be engineered and formulated to meet the well-established and more advanced chemical and physical properties defined to be more environmentally sustainable and less polluting.An array of substrate laboratory analyses will assist in the development.After final formulation a proof of concept will be conducted in university and industry growing trials where crop data will be collected to demonstrate effectiveness in production and reductions in environmental impact. Results will be published in modern media and professional scientific papers. Early adapters will be followed to evaluate the effectiveness of the new sustainable substrate.Upon completion of this research, information will be obtained on processing and application of industrial hemp showing that it is a more sustainable and exceptional substrate, for application in agriculture, specifically for production ofhorticultural plants.Applications to consumer gardening, landscaping, and other sectors of commercial agriculture are expected.The investigations will provide foundational information on the physical and chemical aspects of industrial hemp fibers. It will develop methods of processing for use inhorticultural growing substrates.Growing mix formulations, incorporating the new substrate, will be developed and tested demonstrating the effectiveness in growing plants.Observations on management and production techniques will look at the impact that the new substrates could have on reducing run off and polluting effects from growing plants. In summary this advancement should reduce the impact of mining and importing peat, increased options for more profitable local agricultural production, development of local processing and manufacturing enterprises while improving crop growth with better environmental stewardship.
Animal Health Component
30%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
60%
Applied
30%
Developmental
10%
Goals / Objectives
Generally stated the goals of this research are to investigate thefeasibility and application of industrial hemp fiber as an agricultural substrate incorporated into greenhouse and consumer growing mixes, thus advancing the use ofnew farm produced Industrial Hemp biomass as a component for applications in agriculture. The work is designed to advance the production and use of locally grown industrial hemp and employing processing systems to manufacture agriculturalsubstrates specifically formatted as horticultural growing media.The More Specifically TheGoals Are:Measure and define the make-up of industrial hemp fiber as applied to growing substrates.Develop mechanical milling processes to format the desired structure.Develop blends incorporating hemp substrates into growing media to replace some or all of the sphagnum peat.Evaluate the developed growing media formulations containing hemp fibers and rigorously characterize the physical and chemical properties.Conduct growing trials to assess the influence of hemp fiber oncrop growth performance.production management characteristics while in application.environmental impacts related to water use and nutrient leaching.Create formulations for marketing to growers and consumers containing industrial hemp fibers.The objectives are grouped into five categories.FirstHemp Components,we will evaluate those properties that are known to influence the quality and performance of a substrate.Second,Nutrient Efficiencies,will be evaluated for the nutritional and environmental factors associated with the substrate and how it behaves in production.Third,Water Efficiency,will be observed to measure the quantities of water used to grow a crop in simulated production.Fourth,Adaptability,where we evaluate the effectiveness of the substrates under a varied range of crops and management systems. AndFifthQuality Enhancements,where we compare crop growth data and analyze the crop performance for size, quality, and shelf life.More details of theseinvestigations are presented in more detail in Table 1. Most of the projects and lab work will progress simultaneously. Mary Deemer and Dr. Bethke will coordinate the events.Table 1: TECHNICAL OBJECTIVESObjectiveEvaluation/ TargetsExperiments/ProjectsExpected InformationHemp Components- MalleabilityWill form into rounded particles4 to 6 trial runs with adjustments to timing, screens, feed rates, additiveQ/C data- PH, EC, Bulk Density Wettability, Water Absorption, Particle Sizes- Blend AbilityDoes the material intermix uniformly with componentsMix Product with Perlite & Shake in 1 CF box, volume that segregates.Particles will float in mixing when to dry or to light weight, moisture, and particle formulation dependent- WettabilityDrop time Absorb water in <60 secondsQ/C on Final Mixes with 30 and 60 % Hemp BlendsTime to sink into beaker of water- Particle Sizes95% formed particles from 1.0-2.5 mmSieve Analysis using Rotap shaker with sievesThe Distribution of materials when dried and shaken through a bank of standard sieves.- Air PorosityBetween 8 and 24% at saturationNCSU Substrates Lab analyses & Q/C on raw materials & prepared blendsAt Saturation in formulated Hemp Particles, Sphagnum, Paper Particles, Formulated Blends, and control blend- Water HoldingSaturation 3.0 to 5.0 g water per g dry blendNCSU Substrates Lab analyses & Q/C on raw materials & prepared blendsWater held in formulated Hemp Particles, Sphagnum, Paper Particles, Formulated Blends, and control blend- Bulk DensityWithin Range from 0.06 to 0.12 g/ccNCSU Substrates Lab analyses & Q/C on raw materials & prepared blendsWater held in formulated Hemp Particles, Sphagnum, Paper Particles, Formulated Blends, and control blendNutrient Efficiency- Maintain pHProduce and maintain in 5.5 to 7.2 pH rangeTrial blends (Q/C), UofA, Bethke Project, MMI Lab cropping, & Q/C incubations.pH at production, at blending, from grow trial at UofA, from four grow trials at Bethke, from all MMI Labs.- Nutrient BalanceIn the raw materials & can formulate in blendTrial blends (Q/C), UofA, Bethke Project, MMI Lab cropping, & Q/C incubations.Saturated Media Extraction (SME) - blending, trials, leachate UofA (3 stages), trials at Bethke (before, leachate, after), soluble nutrients MMI Labs.- Nutrient HoldingRetains Nutrients for crop growthTrial blends (Q/C), UofA, Bethke Project, MMI Lab cropping, & Q/C incubations.Total Mineral Analysis (TMA) at blending, grow trial UofA, grow trials at Bethke. Full TMA nutrients & heavy metals - MMI Labs.- Nutrient Run OffRetains Nutrients against leachingLeaching in UofA & the Sunflower project at BethkeConcentrations applied vs concentrations in leachate as EC (total soluble salts) and individual nutrients in leachateWater Efficiency- Water RequiredReduces water applied in productionMeasured Water applications and leachate in Sunflower crop at BethkeComparison of water applied in each blend and association to percent leachate- Crop GrowthWill support a crop regardless of managementManagement at UofA & Bethke with water, fertilizer, fungicide variations at BethkeCrops will grow in all substrates regardless of variety, water, fertilizer, and will allow normal effects of fungicideAdaptabilityAllows normal use of appliedfertilizers and chemicalsManagement at UofA & Bethke with water, fertilizer, fungicide variations at BethkeCrops will grow in all substrates regardless of variety, water, fertilizer, and will allow normal effects of fungicideQuality Enhancements- Better PlantsCrop performance good as commercial blendsAt UofA, three crops & at Bethke, four cropsEqual or better performance; Earliness, Ht., F.Wt., D. Wt, Ht. Wdt. Branch. No. Fl.- Shelf LifeCrop holds longer in pot when matureChrysanthemum crop at BethkeDays to wilt from saturationIt is anticipated that these findings will lead to future investigations into commercialization and systematic applications into sound local sustainable agricultural enterprises fostering improved environmental stewardship and wise use of local agricultural fibers with application to other industries including landscaping, mushroom production, animal bedding, regenerative agriculture, and environmental remediation.
Project Methods
The methods used for this project are presented in Table 2.It lays out the tasks in ten activity groups with detailed descriptions and methods.How and where the tasks will be performed are listed alone with the statistics and analyses planned.Table 2: WORK PLAN, TASKS, METHODS, and DESCRIPTIONSTaskDescriptionMethodologiesStatisticsHowWhere1. Selecting and acquiring materials (mostly performed prior to grant)Paper, Hemp,ProMix-BXManufactured & Purchase By PhoneN/AShip By TruckTo PittMossAmbridge, PA2. Processing using variations to established systems.(mostly performed prior to grant)Formulate particles of hemp in PittMoss proprietary machineryDry to desired level, fiberize in equipment and reconstitute to particles.N/AIn PittMoss Proprietary SystemAt PittMoss Plant in Ambridge, PA3A. Evaluating properties of the base product.(months 1&2)pH, E.C. Bulk Density, Moisture, Wettability, Particle Sizes, Color2:1 pH &EC, DryWt/vol, Drop Time, Rotap Sieve ShakerN/AUsing Q/C lab methods.Q/C lab at PittMoss Plant in Ambridge, PA3B. Continued(months 1&2)Cellulose, Hemicellulose, Lignin, SugarsAOAC Methods 973, 973.18, 978,and 2002.04N/ASee MethodsDairy Land Lab. Inc. 219 E. Min St. Arcadia, WI3C. Continued(months 1&2)Saturated Media, Total Minerals, N-Profile, Porometer Physicals for MCC Air/Water ProfileWarnke 1983, Mills 1996, Milks 1994, Westerman 1990,Fonteno 1995, Fields 2014, 2016.Non Linear Regression &ANOVSee MethodsDr. Jacksons Substrates Lab - North Carolina State University4. Reformulating growing blends(months 1&2)Blend Determined Growing Formulas with Required AdditivesN/AN/AAt PittMoss Plant in Ambridge, PA5. Evaluate the growing blend mixes before cropping in labs(months 1&2)Same as 3A, 3B, and #C aboveSame as 3A, 3B, and #C aboveSame as 3A, 3B, and #C aboveSame as 3A, 3B, and #C aboveSame as 3A, 3B, and #C above6A. Growing and evaluating crops in blends at the end of cropping In Michigan (months 2&6)3 crops,10 reps, 12 weeks, in 8 trial mixes, Normal Greenhouse Practices,Measure Growth Responses and create an index of responses for each blend.Data ANOV modeled using MicroSoft v10Normal Greenhouse ProductionDr. Bethke R&D GreenhouseWilliamston MI6B. Growing and evaluating crops in blends at Cornell(months 2&7)4 blends with 3 crop replicates & 5 pour through analysesSame as 3A, 3B, and #C aboveNon Linear Regression &ANOVNormal Greenhouse ProductionDr. Dickson Lab -UofA7. Evaluating the blends at the end of cropping(month 7)Same as 3A, 3B, and #C aboveSame as 3A, 3B, and #C aboveSame as 3A, 3B, and #C aboveSame as 3A, 3B, and #C aboveNCSU & MMI Labs8.Analyzing leachate (months 2&6)Capture run off in 3 reps of each blend in 6b aboveCapture in tray in production and run mineral analysis, Mills 1990ANOV mean separations using SAS v9.3Micro Macro LabMicro Macro LabAthens, GA9. Evaluating and compiling and coordinating all results(months 7&8)Compile data from each project when completed and analyze and store according to data mgt planN/AVariable as needed see aboveCollect in offices PittMoss, record in Data Mgt. PlanAt UofA & PittMoss Plant in Ambridge, PA10. Correlating findings, write report, describing relationships (months 8&9)Compile data from each project when completed and analyze and store according to data mgt planN/AVariable as needed see aboveCollect in offices at PittMoss, record in Data Mgt. PlanAt UofA & PittMoss Plant in Ambridge, PA