Source: DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER submitted to
SHRINKING THE URBAN-RURAL DIVIDE: A STUDENT NETWORK FOR CORN AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1027590
Grant No.
2022-67037-36092
Cumulative Award Amt.
$685,205.00
Proposal No.
2021-07214
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Nov 1, 2021
Project End Date
Oct 31, 2024
Grant Year
2022
Program Code
[A7801]- Food and Agricultural Non-formal Education
Project Director
Callis-Duehl, K. L.
Recipient Organization
DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER
975 NORTH WARSON ROAD
ST. LOUIS,MO 63132
Performing Department
Education Research & Outreach
Non Technical Summary
As farmers attempt to evolve quickly to confront 21st Century challenges including leveraging innovative technology to improve yield and reduce deleterious impacts from climate change, so too must the education in their surrounding communities. While rural communities in education deserts and urban communities in food deserts face different challenges and are often juxtaposed in the media, they have shared educational goals and complementary environments that have yet to be adequately leveraged. Both rural and urban schools are often under-resourced, leaving gaps in structured hands-on experiences that are often filled in by non-formal education programs. With precision agriculture and vertical farming growing in popularity because of their ability to increase crop yield in rural and urban areas, respectively, it is clear that the next generation of plant growers must understand and embrace the use of plant science and technological innovation. Our Food and Agricultural Non-formal Education project will develop summer program curricula that introduces urban and rural youth to agricultural research and technology, fosters collaborations between urban and rural youth, and encourages students to develop connections between their community's cultural wealth and plant science.This project will use corn as the model system to train rural and urban youth in agricultural technology, galvanize cross-pollination of ideas and experiences between the two summer programs, and iteratively adjust the curricula based on student input and ideas. The curricula developed will be designed and assessed using the community cultural wealth (CCW) framework (Yosso 2005). Borne out of critical race theory, CCW promotes the integration of a participant's identity and culture into their education including non-formal STEM education programs (Kelly et al. 2019). Youth will identify the familial and social capital they have early during the project, sharing their knowledge with others. The youth will also become experts in the agricultural technology and crop problems unique to their region, visiting each other's site to learn from one another and share their discoveries. The most successful and transferable aspects of the curricula will be used to design a scalable program for other rural and urban communities.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
100%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
90315103020100%
Knowledge Area
903 - Communication, Education, and Information Delivery;

Subject Of Investigation
1510 - Corn;

Field Of Science
3020 - Education;
Goals / Objectives
The three project golas (G)each with two objectives (O) are:G1) Increase youth understanding of the roles that technology and science play in agriculture.O1.1: Provide youth with opportunities to use and critically evaluate novel agricultural technology.O1.2: Introduce youth to the utility of bioengineering by growing and comparing non-GMO and GMO crops.G2) Foster youth agency to employ STEM innovation to solve agricultural and community problems.O2.1: Develop an authentic research experience program to engage youth in helping to develop a curriculum that answers research questions centered on local ag-science problems.O2.2: Increase student agricultural and scientific interest and self-efficacy (e.g. confidence).G3) Close the rural-urban divide.O3.1: Establish field trips for urban and rural youth to visit each other's summer program growing sites and provide leadership opportunities for youth at the host program.O3.2: Foster collaboration by sharing data and presenting technology and research recommendations at an end-of-summer conference seminar.
Project Methods
Participants will be tasked with interviewing their family and various community members about their plant knowledge and the food issues facing their communities (Objective 2.1). By interviewing community members and speaking with DDPSC plant scientists, this activity is meant to humanize scientists and help the youth make connections between plant science and issues facing their local community. The overarching issue facing Illinois that our project will evaluate is climate change. Urban air temperature can be up to 7°F warmer than surrounding rural areas, and this heat island effect is also observed in soil (U.S. EPA 2008; Shi et al. 2012). Because of this urban heat island effect, corn grown at JJK can simulate the climatic and biotic pressures that rural croplands will face in the near future. At JJK, corn will be planted in three 10'x4' beds using a FarmBot, one bed for each of the corn varieties: sweet corn, non-GM commodity, and Bt corn. With the help of interviewing their community and conducting a primary literature search, the youth will design how the FarmBot will plant the corn in each bed. When rural students visit JJK, the JJK youth will serve as experts and discuss how robotics was helpful to them on an urban farm. At the Baebler Farm, approximately one acre of corn will be planted in a strip trial design with field zones. The acre will be divided so that each corn variety is planted in one third of the acre. Participants at both sites will be responsible for monitoring a subplot of the corn and digitally reporting their data on a weekly basis. Monitoring their subplot will include measuring plant height and leaf angle using apps available on any smartphone, manually checking the subplot for germination, and visually inspecting each plant for signs of maturity, herbivory, and disease. These subplots will provide youth with ownership while at the same time requiring them to focus on the botanic details of the corn plant.As an entire group, each summer program will be able to collect environmental data using a PheNode and plant images using a multirotor drone and/or time-lapse camera. The PheNode is a solar powered, cloud-connected device that can collect soil water content and soil temperature data, as well as wind speed, rainfall, and Photosynthetic Active Radiation, making it an efficient monitoring system for scientists and farmers focused on climate change solutions.Rural students will be introduced to the utility of drones for agriculture by capturing images to monitor plant height and signs of herbivory, pests, and disease in their assigned subplot. When JJK students visit Baebler Farm, the rural students will serve as the experts and demonstrate how the drone helps evaluate a field of corn. The drone will primarily be operated by the teacher, but in the second year of the program, all participants 16 years-old and older will be provided with the opportunity to become certified to operate a drone in accordance with FAA.Each summer program will visit their counterpart twice over the summer. The first field trip will allow the "host" children to serve as experts for their technology: robotics or drones. The second field trip will occur later in the summer and allow the youth to see the mature corn in the region they are less familiar with and help the "host" children collect germination data from their corn. During this second field trip, Bayer entomologists will also lead a collection effort for invertebrates in and around the different corn varieties. This will allow the youth to meet a new type of agricultural scientist while also observing differences in invertebrate populations between the GM and non-GM corn. To show youth cutting-edge research in action and allow them to meet early career scientists, both summer programs will take a field trip to visit DDPSC's research field in O'Fallon, Missouri and hear from DDPSC graduate students conducting their summer research in the fields. To help deepen the collaboration between urban and rural youth, their summer programs will conclude with a joint field trip to DDPSC's main campus in St. Louis, Missouri. This field trip will be organized for summer program participants to present their research and ideas for next year's summer research, tour the DDPSC facilities, and meet the inventor of one of their technology instruments, the PheNode.JJK will recruit East St. Louis youth while UIE will recruit youth throughout Monroe County belonging to organizations including 4-H Federation, 4-H & Farm Bureau's Teen Teachers program, and FFA students. Brochures and flyers will be distributed to youth and parents so they can understand what the summer program entails. We will send materials home each year to keep parents updated on what children are learning and share photos of the research the children are doing. In addition, the JJK Foundation will organize spring events for their After School Program to increase interest among students and build excitement.Project Evaluation and ReportingSummer program participants will be evaluated using quantitative surveys for three different outcomes: the STEM semantics survey, a questionnaire designed to assess secondary and postsecondary school student perceptions of scientific disciplines including ag-science and plant science (Tyler-Wood et al. 2010). To measure participant confidence, they will complete the general self-efficacy scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem 1995). To further evaluate our project and avoid the ceiling effect, both summer program groups will also complete the community-based learning impact scale, a survey developed to gauge the impact of service-learning experiences (Carlisle et al. 2017).Opportunities for participants to provide feedback will be formalized as a conclusion to their digital lab notebook writing at the end of each week. Observations of the summer programs will also be conducted by the DDPSC co-PD, a trained classroom instructional consultant. These formative data will be used by the co-PD to iteratively adjust the curricula. A bi-weekly check-in with the instructor and Key Personnel will allow for additional feedback based on what the instructor overhears. As part of their field trip to DDPSC, youth participants will present their research and "lessons learned" from the summer, which will serve as an additional opportunity for students to provide constructive feedback and recommendations for future summers.Agricultural technology curricula will be iteratively developed based on authentic research experiences and analysis that spans urban and rural non-formal education programs in western Illinois. These curricula will be transferable and implementable in other communities, made available on the DDPSC Authentic Research Experience web portal. Small non-formal education programs can select either a rural or urban-focused curriculum, while larger programs, especially those in metropolitan Midwestern cities, can use the curricula that directly addresses shrinking the urban-rural divide through collaboration. The shared research of GM and non-GM corn in different habitats and regions will be leveraged to create a digital database on the DDPSC education web portal for students to ask comparative research questions.

Progress 11/01/22 to 10/31/23

Outputs
Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Time: The summer camp duration of 2 weeks was perceived as too short for implementation of the 51 lesson STEAM +Ag curriculum Summer camp programming conflicts with collaborative partner schedules e.g. county fairs, training sessions prior to camp constrained engagement of both the adults and youth. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project has provided training in STEM Education research and out-of-school time STEAM +Ag learning experiences of rural and urban youth for a graduate student that is currently enrolled at the University of Illinois Urban Champaign, and is interested in research on youth development. Out-of-school time educators (2) and University of Illinois Extension educators (3) were provided opportunities for professional development training in Agriculture and Agriculture technologies during the youth summer camp field trips to Agriculture enterprises and through interactions with Agricultural professionals that visited and engaged the youth during the summer camp. The summer camp also provided 5 high school-age students with opportunities for training in leadership and near-peer teaching by serving as interns in the 2023 Ag -tech summer camp focused on middle school age youth. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Five posters were generated by participant youth and presented to the Danforth Plant Science Center community an end of summer camp, poster session conference in July 2023. Poster were titled; How precipitation amounts affect corn Effects of temperature on corn height and bug presence for GM and Non GM Dent corn How climate change affects the appearance of corn How does climate impact GM versus Non GM corn? How does temperature affect the height and number of ears on GM dent and non GM dent corn? A graduate student poster was prepared and presented to the 2023 American Association for Agricultural Education(AAAE) National Conference, May 15-18, 2023, Raleigh, NC titled; "Conceptions of the Agriculture Industry: How Students Draw Agriculture Professionals". Authors: Dodoo, S., Gill, K., Leman, A., Kaggwa, R., Walsh, L., Callis-Duehl, K. A graduate student poster titled "Youth Experiences at An Ag-Tech Summer Camp," was presented at the annual international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) in Chicago, IL from April 18-21, 2023. Authors: Dodoo, S., Walsh, L., Callis-Duehl, K., Kaggwa, R., Leman, A. A graduate student presentation was delivered at the American Evaluation Association (AEA) Conference in Indianapolis, October 9 - 14, 2023. The presentation was titled; "A Day in the Life of an Agricultural Professional: Telling Stories from the Images Drawn by Middle and High School-Aged Youth." Authors of the presentation: Dodoo, S., Leman, A., Kaggwa, R., Callis-Duehl, K., Walsh, L. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? We plan to revise the Ag tech summer camp schedule to 3 weeks long and 4 days a week to avoid conflicts on Fridays. We are iteratively revising the STEAM +Ag summer camp curriculum informed by input from summer camp educators and observations of students. We will also include a buffer week or half week before each week of the summer camp to allow for ample time to prepare for summer camp activities. We plan to include more Farm to table lunch options by identifying local chefs and restaurants to speak to kids about agriculture in their spaces. We are considering inviting parents to the youth end -of-summer camp poster session at Danforth to broaden audiences for dissemination of project results. We have also included the use of interviews of adults and youth as a data source to supplement current tools and instruments.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? O1.1: An all-day, two-week-long Ag tech summer camp was designed and implemented for middle school-age youth (11-15 years old) from rural Illinois (WaterLoo) and urban Illinois (East St. Louis.IL). The camp ran from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. daily, from June 12-16th and July 17-21st, 2023, and was located at the Jackie Joyner Kersee Food Ag and Nutrition Innovation Center on Mondays and Wednesdays and at the Baebler Education Farm, in Waterloo Illinois on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Each Friday of the summer camp, the participant youth were provided with field trips to various Ag enterprises, including the Melvin Locks and Dam in Alton, IL, to explore the logistics of corn transportation along the Mississippi River and to the Southern Illinois University Edwardsville GIS laboratory for exposure to remote sensing and GIS technologies and their applications. Youth were also provided hands-on experiences operating drones and examining their use in agriculture and geography for remote sensing. Participant youth were also provided opportunities for exposure to biotechnology tools and techniques, including tissue culture and genetic engineering, during field trips to the St Louis Community College's Center for Plant and Life Science Lab and to the research facilities of a global Ag seed company, KWS, in St Louis, MO. Youth were given opportunities to engage with and evaluate novel ag technology devices such as the PheNode, a phenotyping device and weather station. Key outcomes: Written reflections submitted by youth indicate that youth valued the learning opportunities given to them to use various agricultural technologies. Selected quotes below demonstrate this: "We got to see how a tractor plants the corn seed in the field" "We worked with drones and talked about how useful they can be in agriculture" O1.2: Participants (21 middle school-age youth, 7 from rural Illinois), and 5 high school interns were provided with opportunities to plant, nurture, and compare GM dent corn and non-GM dent corn in raised bed gardens at the urban location and the field at the rural location. Participant youth compared growth rates and various phenotypes of GM corn versus non-GM corn, such as total plant height and height to first ear, for rain-fed corn plants grown at a rural farm location in Waterloo, IL, and irrigated corn plants grown in raised garden beds at an urban location in East St. Louis, IL. Participant youth in collaborative teams of 4-5 prepared posters to synthesise data collected on the GM and non GM corn. Key outcomes: Youth toured the global Ag seed company KWS in St Louis, MO for hands-on demonstrations of bioengineering processes including tissue culture. Following their corn measurements and data collection, the youth prepared and presented their final posters to scientists at the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center. O2.1: Participant youth were empowered to contribute to the development of an Ag curriculum that is informed by local Ag- problems in their community through youth-led community interviews. Key outcomes: The curriculum was redesigned from year 1 based on student's experiences and feedback. We developed an "Ag tech community interview guide protocol" that can be used by 9-12th grade youth to interview community members about their knowledge of plants, climate, and the food issues facing their communities Youth were given an opportunity to interview community members to gain knowledge of their local communities on issues of food security and climate change using the newly developed protocol. The findings of the interviews will inform changes in future curriculum. 5 youth successfully conducted interviews with members of their local communities gaining agency in solving their local Ag challenges as well as skills in qualitative data collection. We developed a 51-lesson STEAM +Ag curriculum for out-of-school focused on corn, tech and climate change O2.2: All participant youth were provided opportunities for interaction with STEM and Ag professionals each day of the two-week-long summer camps that included Ag Breeders, technology inventors, drone specialists, local extension Ag educators, Ag phenotyping experts, and an entomologist to share their enthusiasm for science and Ag and their career trajectories, to increase the participant youth's interest in Ag and science. In addition, participant youth were provided field trips to diverse Ag enterprises such as biotechnology laboratories, Ag transportation facility, GIS and remote sensing lab, for experiential learning opportunities. Key outcomes: From written reflections, youth reported gains in data collection, research skills and interest in agricultural science. These gains are attributed to the hands-on experiences youth had to collect data and to take ownership and care for a corn plant as an off-site home activity. Selected quotes reflect this: · "Measuring and taking data about the corn growth. I loved being able to measure the corn and take notes on it. It showed me how to take data and use it." · "Taking care of the corn has impacted me because I now know what and what not to do with home-grown corn." We had multiple students return to participate in the summer year 2 as alumni. Two urban youth participants from year one returned and served as interns for this year's camp while four rural youth and one urban youth returned as participants again this year due to their interest in the camp. One participant from the 2022 Ag tech summer camp was inspired to conduct an Ag research project focused on corn leaf angles and competed in the Illinois State Science Fair following their summer camp experience. O3.1: The Ag tech summer camp (2023), schedule was adjusted to provide for more contact hours of collaboration and interaction between the rural and urban youth participants enrolled in the summer camp to facilitate the bridging of the rural-urban divide. Thus all participant youth (rural and urban) were hosted at the same location each day for the two weeks of the camp, urban site at the Jackie Joyner Kersee Food Ag and Nutrition Innovation Center in East St. Louis, IL and the rural farm site, Baebler Educational Farm in Waterloo, IL to allow youth to acquaint themselves with one another's community and environment. Key outcomes. Intentionally structured team activities fostered friendships and connections among youth throughout the camp. Staff observations revealed different pairs of urban-rural friendships that blossomed throughout the camp, see illustrative quotes below; " The kids got more opportunity to be together and interact this year" "Rural and urban kids formed groups , worked on team posters together, GMO debate e.t.c." O3.2: On the final day of the 2023 Ag-tech summer camp, participant youth were hosted at the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center for an End-of-summer camp poster session conference. Students had opportunities to present posters in collaborative teams of both rural and urban youth, to share findings with their peers and with STEM and Ag professionals from the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center. Key outcomes. Youth in collaborative teams generated and presented five posters to their peers and to scientists at the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center. Students posters included data collected from routine measurements of their corn plants and from the PheNode, and innovative Ag tech device that comprises a weather station. Posters were titled; How precipitation amounts affect corn Effects of temperature on corn height and bug presence for GM and Non-GM Dent corn How climate change affects the appearance of corn How does climate impact GM versus Non-GM corn? How does temperature affect the height and number of ears on GM dent and non-GM dent corn?

Publications


    Progress 11/01/21 to 10/31/22

    Outputs
    Target Audience:The target audience for this project included students who were actively participating in the project, education professionals who worked collaboratively to design and implement the project, scientists who can use the data collected by the students on the project and ultimately, farmers who can use the results of the data to make informed decisions around how climate change could impact their corn yields. Education professionals: Educational experts and instructors from the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, the University of Illinois Extension office, and the Jackie-Joyner Kersee Foundation worked together to design an informal education curriculum around agtech, corn, and climate change. During regular (monthly, then weekly) meetings, the three teams of educators collaborated on everything from recruitment strategies for student participants, to deciding and ordering supplies, to creating lessons and activities, to deciding on invited speakers. The three groups of educators had never worked together previously and the efforts of this project brought a true collaboration where each entity was learning from each other entity. Student participants: This project recruited middle and high school age youth (11-15 yrs) to participate in the agricultural science summer camp. This included 8 racialized minority (African American) urban youth from East St. Louis, Illinois, an economically disadvantaged community. It also included 12 youth from the rural agricultural community in WaterLoo, Illinois as participants in a Ag summer camp. Summer camp participants attended camp twice a week (3 hours per day) for eight weeks to receive informal instruction in Agriculture, focused on corn, technology, and climate change. Informal instruction included indoor Ag science lectures, activities and games, question and answer sessions with local scientists and Ag professionals, outdoor planting of three corn types, sweet corn, GM Dent corn, and Non GM Dent; outdoor monitoring and measuring of corn plants, UAV (drone) use, poster development and presentations, and field trips. Other stakeholders: The data collected from the students and by the students has been disseminated to agriculture professionals and researchers. Changes/Problems: Specific Ag technology equipment such as the Phenode could not be acquired for participants' use during the summer camp as previously planned due to global delays in the supply chain that hindered manufacturing. We instead acquired alternate technology devices including a weather station and drone. Hazardous Weather (severe flooding) led to the cancellation of a previously scheduled second field trip for youth participants from the urban location (East St Louis) to Waterloo, IL, the rural location. High attrition of participant youth from the urban location East St Louis, IL due to conflicts with previously scheduled summer plans resulted into smaller numbers than planned. Participants at the rural location also were inconsistent in attending the summer camps due to conflicts with previously scheduled summer plans.To address these conflicts and attrition, we have adjusted the summer camp schedule to a compressed 2 week, full day schedule for Summer 2023 instead of spreading it over the course of 8 weeks as in Summer 2022. Human Resources issues and concerns with the summer 2022 instructor have led us to hire a new instructor for this coming summer 2023. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Sarah Dodoo was hired by the Danforth Plant Science Center as a graduate student at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, to help with data analysis of the project participant youth outcomes and experiences. She has been doing the data analysis on the 2022 summer data and has submitted a paper for a poster presentation of results from the project's Summer camp 2022 at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching( NARST) 2023 Annual conference. An undergraduate intern, from the University of Tennessee and funded by the Danforth Center, became an educational assistant on the project for the summer, helping with curriculum design and implementation, classroom management, and fostering interactions between students. The project has also funded UAV/ Drone training for 3 instructors. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Students presented data from their experiences to Ag professionals at the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center through poster boards over a one day end of summer camp conference. This mini-conference was attended by over 30 Danforth Center Scientists, two Bayer scientists, and several other ag professionals, along with Jackie Joyner-Kersee, herself. Students had posters in the main center of the Danforth Center, and attendees circulated, asking questions of the students and chatting about their summer experience. Results are being prepared to be submitted as a paper for a poster presentation and dissemination at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching( NARST) 2023 Annual conference. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? To increase opportunities for students to interact with one another, collaborate towards achieving goal 3 and objectives 3.1 and 3.2, the Summer camp structure and schedule has been adjusted to combine all participant youth from the rural and urban locations at the same location for a full week (5 days) of summer camp learning. The new schedule will allow for flexibility of participants who have other summer obligations and the contact time with students will go from 46 contact hours to 60 contact hours. Additionally, the new schedule will have the rural and urban students together every day during the two weeks of the camp, providing them additional opportunities to engage with each other - a request the students from 2022 communicated. We have also added new data collection instruments and tools to expand assessment of participant outcomes that include A STEM Identity survey A Community Engagement Survey Ag Literacy Surveys (Judd-Murray, 2019) Drawings of urban versus rural community representations Plans are also underway to disseminate findings to both traditional professional audiences at societal meetings and to local non-traditional audiences at gatherings of out-of -school time program stakeholders. As technology is forever changing, we are adding new pieces of technology such as an updated PheNODE sensor, for students to use and experience.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? G1) O1.1 1) Major activities completed / experiments conducted; A Corn and Ag Tech Summer camp was designed from November 2021 to May 2022 and implemented in Summer 2022, from June 13th to Aug 4th. During each 3-hour camp day, youth used Ag technology devices that included a planter, farm bot, drones, and a weather station. Visiting scientists also introduced students to a porometer, and soil moisture and temperature meters. 2) Data collected; changes in participant youth attitudes to STEM, using the STEM semantics survey (Tyler-Wood et al. 2010) prior to and after participation in the summer camp and written weekly reflections with guided prompts. Findings showed increases in participant youth's perceptions of the importance of technology. Sample quotes from the participant youth's weekly reflections included: "We used a drone to gather data about our corn field" "I enjoyed learning about the farmbot" 3) Summary statistics and discussion of results Findings demonstrate the value of opportunities to experience Ag technology on improving youth's perceptions. For the majority of our participant youth, the summer camp provided novel experiences that ignited interest in technology. 4) Key outcomes or other accomplishments realized.Participant youth interest and awareness of Ag technology was increased. G1) O1.2 1) Major activities completed / experiments conducted; Participant youth were provided with opportunities to grow, measure, harvest and compare GM and non-GMO corn in their locations East St. Louis and Waterloo, Illinois over the course of the summer camp. 2) Data collected; Weekly data on plant height, number of leaves, and at harvest corn ear length, number of corn ears per plant and corn ear health for the three types of corn (GM Dent, Non-GM Dent, Sweet corn) and at both locations. 3) Summary statistics and discussion of results: GM Corn had healthier ears, the percentage of ear damage by pests for each corn type was per ear was, 20-70% for sweet corn, 1-100% for Non GM dent corn and GM Dent (0-30%).Participant youth observed the utility of bioengineering by comparing the corn ear health of GM Dent corn with Non-GM Dent corn plants. 4) Key outcomes or other accomplishments realized. Participant youth's awareness and knowledge of bioengineering and GM corn was increased. G2) O2.1 1) Major activities completed / experiments conducted; A 25 lesson Corn and Ag Tech focused STEAM + Ag curriculum was drafted and piloted with youth during the camp and feedback on the curriculum solicited from participant youth and instructors using weekly reflections and project team meetings. 2) Data collected; a Community-based learning impact scale survey (Carlisle et al. 2017) was used.Participants indicated high levels of agreement to items from the survey such as; "The summer program has increased the likelihood that I will pursue more experiences with community-based research," (57% indicated they were 'Somewhat Likely"). 3) Summary statistics and discussion of results Participant youth reported positive changes in their connection to local ag science problems after participating in the project's Ag-tech summer camp suggesting that their experiences contributed to nurturing interest in community engagement. 4) Key outcomes or other accomplishments realized. This project provided a new curriculum on corn Ag Tech and climate change to contribute to improvements in K-12th Ag teaching at an urban out-of-school time Center. G2) O2.2 1) Major activities completed / experiments conducted; Participant youth were provided opportunities to engage in agricultural activities such as planting, use of ag technology devices, harvesting, interactions with Ag professionals 2) Data collected; Changes in participant youth's self efficacy before and after summer camp were measured using the General self efficacy scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995). Changes in participant youth's attitudes and interest in STEM and agriculture were measured using the STEM semantics survey (Tyler -Wood et al.2010). 3) Summary statistics and discussion of results. Data from participant youth at the urban location indicated an increase in general self efficacy after the summer camp, compared to the start of the summer camp. Compiled data from the STEM semantics survey revealed a change in participant youth's perceptions of the importance of agriculture. These results suggest that approaches such as Ag focused summer camps are effective in improving youth's perceptions of Agriculture, and self efficacy. 4) Key outcomes or other accomplishments realized. Participant youth demonstrated changes in interest in agriculture and science as shown by their survey response data. G3) O3.1 1) Major activities completed / experiments conducted; Participant youth were provided with field trip opportunities to visit each other's community and interact with one another. Rural youth from Waterloo, IL visited the Jackie Joyner Kersee center, an urban out of school time program in East St. Louis, IL. and urban youth visited the Baebler Farm in Waterloo, IL. 2) Data collected; Participant youth's experiences of visiting rural/urban locations and leadership were assessed using weekly written reflections at the end of each summer camp week. Participant youth's reflections included; "This week was really fun because we got to go to JJK Center and meet the other kids" "Interacting with other students and hearing their ideas made me feel like i learn more from other people" 3) Summary statistics and discussion of results Participant youth enjoyed visiting new places, meeting and learning from new people at a different location. The field trips thus a successful initial approach in exposing youth from disparate locations to one another's community, helping to bridge the rural urban divide. 4) Key outcomes or other accomplishments realized. Findings indicate an improved exposure and awareness of rural and urban Ag environments and demographics. G3) O3.2 1) Major activities completed / experiments conducted; Participant youth shared data and research recommendations from their Ag tech summer camp experiences with one another and with Ag professionals through poster presentations at the end of summer camp conference hosted at the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center. 2) Data collected; Participant youth poster presentations, video recordings and end of summer camp written reflections such as shown below: "Talking to the scientist and the Danforth center about the boards I made" "I loved learning how corn grows and presenting the boards we made" 3) Summary statistics and discussion of results. Participant youth shared their data and summer camp experiences with one another and with professional STEM and Ag professionals using posters and enjoyed the opportunities for interacting with one another. 4) Key outcomes or other accomplishments realized. Participants gained knowledge on scientific data analysis, presentation and science communication skills in presenting their data

    Publications

    • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2023 Citation: Dodoo, S.Walsh, L. Callis-Duehl, K, Kaggwa, R and Leman A.M. et al.2023 Applying Situativity Theory to Assess Urban and Rural Adolescents Experiences at An Ag-Tech Summer Camp