Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Pollinators, including bumble bees, are vital for maintaining crop production and natural biodiversity, and are currently experiencing numerous stressors. One major stressor faced by pollinators today is climate change. Specifically, increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) levels as elevated CO2 can alter plant phenology and physiology. Changes to plants in response to elevated CO2 can include changes to floral resources. For example, elevated CO2 can lead to changes in pollen or nectar nutritional quality as some plants have a lower pollen protein content when grown in elevated CO2 conditions. As many pollinators, and bees specifically, rely on pollen as their primary source of protein, a decrease in pollen protein content could have substantial negative consequences for bee nutrition and overall health but these effects are not yet well understood.In this research, I will address key knowledge gaps in how elevated CO2 alters the chemistry and nutritional value of the floral resources (pollen and nectar) that pollinators rely on for food and how changes to floral resources may alter pollinator foraging behavior or physiology. Specifically, I will characterize the effect of elevated CO2 levels on nectar and pollen production (quantity) and chemistry in six floral species essential for pollinators. These six plant species represent multiple life history traits and span a range of different plant families. Together these plants include a range of both functional and phylogenetic diversity and will allow us to evaluate potentials trends across plant families or functional groups in response to elevated CO2 growing conditions. After evaluating how flowering plants respond to elevated CO2 conditions, I will then investigate how floral resources grown under elevated CO2 may affect pollinators. To do so, I will use the Common Eastern Bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) as a model species as it is a critical pollinator of both wild and crop plants in North America. I will evaluate changes to foraging behavior or floral preferences, bee physiology, and colony growth of the Common Eastern Bumble bee when provided floral diets grown in both ambient and elevated CO2 conditions.The proposed research will address three main questions: (Objective 1) How does the projected increase in atmospheric CO2 affect the nutritional value of floral resources? (Objective 2) Does bumble bee foraging behavior or floral preferences change when floral resources are grown under elevated CO2? (Objective 3) What are the impacts of elevated CO2 pollen resources on bumble bee queen overwintering, survival and colony growth?The proposed work will generate foundational knowledge on how projected increases in atmospheric CO2 will impact bee biology and may impact future pollination services to both wild and agricultural crop plants. Data generated by this project will be essential in making management and conservation decisions to secure the pollination services and ensure future food security for the human population.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
100%
Applied
0%
Developmental
0%
Goals / Objectives
Pollinators, including bumble bees, are vital for maintaining crop production and natural biodiversity, and are currently experiencing numerous stressors. One major stressor is climate change, specifically, increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. Increasing CO2 levels can alter plant phenology and physiology, including changes to floral resources, which could have substantial consequences for bee nutrition and health; these effects are not well understood.I propose to address key knowledge gaps in how elevated CO2 alters floral chemistry and pollinator dynamics in North America. Specifically, I will characterize the effect of elevated CO2 on nectar and pollen chemistry and production in six floral species essential for pollinators, that vary in phylogenetic and functional diversity. I will identify the relevant impacts of these changes on the foraging behavior, physiology, and growth of a critical North American pollinator, the Common Eastern Bumble bee (Bombus impatiens).The proposed research will address three questions: (Objective 1) How does the projected increase in atmospheric CO2 affect the nutritional value of floral resources? (Objective 2) Does bumble bee foraging behavior or floral preferences change when floral resources are grown under elevated CO2? (Objective 3) What are the impacts of elevated CO2 pollen resources on bumble bee queen overwintering, survival, and colony growth?The proposed work will generate foundational knowledge on how projected increases in atmospheric CO2 will impact bee biology and future pollination services. Data generated by this project will be essential in making management and conservation decisions to secure pollination services and ensure future food security.
Project Methods
Objective 1: To investigate changes in bee nutrition in response to elevated CO2, I will grow six annual plants (Helianthus annuus (Asteraceae), Taxaracum officinale (Asteraceae), Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae), Trifolium pratense (Fabaceae), Phacelia tanacetifolia (Boraginaceae), and Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae)) from seed in greenhouse chambers at both ambient (415 ppm, N = 3 chambers) and elevated CO2 (600 ppm, N = 3 chambers) conditions. Elevated CO2 levels of 600 ppm were chosen as this level is likely to be attained by the end of the century. These six plant species were chosen for their known value to bumble bees, include species with multiple life history traits including nitrogen fixing plants (C. fasciulata and T. praetense), and collectively span phylogenetic diversity (4 families). Selecting a diverse suite of plant species to test the effects of elevated CO2 will allow us to identify potential trends within and across plant families and life history traits.As time-lapse camera system will automatically document plant phenology as time to flower or flower duration may change under elevated CO2 conditions and can have implications for pollination success (i.e., phenological mismatch). Plant phenology metrics will include time to area covered (when looking directly at the seedling from above, how long before bare soil is no longer visible), days to first flower, leaf number, flowering duration, and flower number, diameter, and area. After ten weeks of growth, I will measure dry plant biomass. During flowering, I will use a UV camera to detect changes to the UV flower signatures under elevated CO2, which could affect bee foraging cues. By collecting data on a variety of plant growth and phenology measurements, I can determine whether changes in nutritional quality of pollen or nectar are potentially offset by increases in floral quantity.Nectar and pollen samples will be collected from flowers of the same age (open an equal # of days). Nectar samples will be taken via microcapillary tube to quantify volume and sugar concentrations. Pollen or anther samples (a proxy for pollen if pollen collection is difficult) will be taken to quantify changes in protein content. I will use elemental analysis to measure %N (University of Wisconsin Soil and Forage Lab) within the pollen samples to estimate protein content, samples will be collected from five flowers per individual plant for ten plants per species in each CO2 treatment (n = 50/plant species in each CO2 treatment).To explore secondary chemistry of floral resources, samples will be pooled from five flowers per individual plant for each plant species to achieve five technical replicates per plant species per CO2 treatment for both nectar and pollen samples. Secondary chemistry will be assessed by combining an untargeted metabolomics approach to evaluate differences between overall secondary chemistry profiles with targeted quantification of specific compounds (i.e., quercetin, kaempferol, P-coumaric acid, caffeine, Gallic acid, and Cinnamic acid) known to have impacts on bee biology, such as immunity or behavior (Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry at the University of Wisconsin Mass Spectrometry/Proteomics Facility).Objective 2: Foraging cages (2 m3) of fine mesh (mosquito netting) stocked with a suite of floral resources (n=5 per plant species in obj. 1, n=30 per cage) grown in either ambient or elevated CO2 (n=15 replicate cages/CO2 treatment, N = 3 chambers/CO2 treatment) and matched for flowering phenology will be established within a climate-controlled greenhouse in either elevated or ambient CO2. Floral resources will be monitored daily throughout the duration of the foraging trial and restocked if no longer flowering. In each foraging cage, I will introduce microcolonies of Bombus impatiens workers for 8 days. All workers will be tagged with a unique barcode (BEEtag) and given 24 hours to adjust to the foraging cage. For the subsequent seven days, foraging behavior and floral visitation data, using custom, Python-based motion-capture software (implemented on a single-board computer e.g., Raspberry Pi) will be used. This system will automatically record the bee's identity, the flower species landed on, visit duration, and whether the bee sonicates (buzz-pollinates) by combining computer vision analysis with audio recordings. To identify pollen vs. nectar foraging bouts, I will perform supervised classification (e.g., random forest) on kinematic data derived from each foraging bout using neural network approaches. I will collect pollen balls from up to three returning foragers per day. The collected pollen balls will be weighed wet and one will be subjected to elemental N analysis (University of Wisconsin Soil and Forage lab) to determine aggregate protein content. The other will be used to determine the relative abundance of each plant species in the pollen sample by mounting fucshin-dyed pollen on a slide and using light microscopy and a pollen library created from the study plant species.Objective 3: Exp-1: Bumble bee queens will be removed from queen-producing colonies upon eclosion and fed pollen from ambient or elevated CO2 treatments to examine effects on overwintering success and nest initiation. Pollen will be collected from fall floral resource (mixture of: H. annuus, I. capensis, C. fasciulata in a constant 2:1:1 ratio, as H. annuus pollen is easy to collect in large quantities, it will represent a larger proportion of the pollen diet).Queens will be provided ad libitum access to control or experimental pollen for eleven days, during which time weight gain will be monitored every two days. During this feeding period (days 5-8), queens will be placed in an arena with males and monitored for mating activity. Queens that successfully mate will then be subjected to a CO2 narcosis to induce egg laying and colony initiation. Afterwards, queens will continue to be provisioned with pollen and nectar for four weeks in a climate-controlled environmental chamber to isolate nutritional effects via changes to pollen resources as a result of elevated CO2. The queens will be monitored at least daily to observe survival rates, monitor the presence and timing of nest initiation, and to replenish food resources.Upon death, failure to mate, or after 4 weeks post-CO2 narcosis, all queens will be frozen. Body mass (to assess weight gain) and body size (front marginal wing cell length as a suitable proxy for body size) of the queen will be recorded and I will evaluate ovarian development by dissecting the ovaries, measuring the 3 largest oocytes, and counting the total number of oocytes present.Experiment 2: Bumble bee (B. impatiens) microcolonies will be introduced to 2 m3 foraging cages stocked with floral resources (with species composition the same as in obj. 2, n = 15 microcolonies/CO2 treatment, N = 3 chambers/CO2 treatment). While bumble bee microcolonies are queenless, they will forage and grow, with the largest adult taking over reproductive duties producing only males, and thus serve as an important proxy for whole-colony growth in bumble bees Microcolonies will be permitted to forage and grow for 8 weeks, then colony contents censused. The wet weight and body size of all workers and males in the microcolony will be recorded, worker survival and the number of males, eggs, larvae, and pupae present within the microcolony will be documented, as well as the number of empty or in-use food storage pots. In microcolonies with pollen provisions, pollen from an individual pot will be homogenized and sent to the University of Wisconsin Soil and Forage lab for elemental N analysis (up to 5 pollen samples/ microcolony). By sampling microcolony pollen stores it can be determined if colony-level pollen stores in both treatments contain the same protein compositions, or whether, under elevated CO2 conditions, high levels of protein cannot be maintained within the colony.