Source: KNIPBIO, INC submitted to
OFF-FLAVOR MITIGATION IN ATLANTIC SALMON GROWN IN RAS VIA THE USE OF A NOVEL SINGLE CELL PROTEIN BASED FEED
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1025992
Grant No.
2021-33530-34539
Cumulative Award Amt.
$100,000.00
Proposal No.
2021-01786
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2021
Project End Date
Jun 30, 2022
Grant Year
2021
Program Code
[8.7]- Aquaculture
Project Director
Salze, G.
Recipient Organization
KNIPBIO, INC
142 STILL RIVER RD
HARVARD,MA 014511501
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Recently, several large commercial aquaculture farms have started their operations as recirculated aquaculture systems (RAS). As these enterprises are closely watched by the seafood community, they face numerous challenges, off-flavors are consistently ranked among top issues facing the RAS industry. Off-flavors are caused mainly by geosmin (GSM) and 2-methylisoborneol (MIB), which accumulate in edible tissues and confer highly undesirable muddy/musty taste. Currently, fish are purged to remove GSM/MIB - implying significant increases in OpEx, doubled with weight and quality loss. This is a grossly inefficient process. Past trials repeatedly showed that feeds containing our single-cell flour (KBM) reduced the GSM and MIB fillet contents in three species. Moreover, these effects were seen while all fish shared the same water, and the fillet and water GSM/MIB levels were poorly correlated. We intend to use such feeds in a finishing diet approach, i.e., just before harvest. The proposed trial would see market-size Atlantic salmon fed a control or a KBM-containing feed for 8 weeks. At the 4- and 8- week timepoints, fish will be sampled for fillet for measurement of GSM and MIB, and the fish tank water and biofilter will be sampled for microbiome evaluation. We aim to test the hypothesis that the levels of off-flavor in the fish will be lower in the KBM-fed fish than in the fish fed the control diet. The results will provide critical information on the mitigation methods of off-flavors in RAS, and our path to commercialization with major feed manufacturers. Clear benefits include immediate reduction of the purge and its related costs and biomass losses. This is in direct alignment with NIFA SBIR's topic area 8.7, priority #4.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3083712101050%
3084010110050%
Goals / Objectives
While a major world consumer of seafood by volume, the United States' domestic seafood production is limited. As a result, 90% of the seafood consumed in the US is imported, and the seafood trade deficit has grown to $14 billion in 2016 - second only to oil. Aquaculture will play a major role in meeting the ever-growing demand for seafood, and specifically in the United States, many of these production facilities will be land-based or recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). The first of several large commercial RAS facilities are coming online and are poised to play a key role in reducing the seafood trade deficit. Advantages of RAS include reduced water usage & waste discharge, controlled environment, no escape risk. The flexibility to locate RAS near major markets reduces carbon footprints associated with shipping and provides more stability along the supply chain given the Covid-19 pandemic era. However, RAS facilities face challenges including 1) off-flavor mitigation, and 2) sourcing high quality fish feed. Off-flavors are mostly associated with the compounds geosmin (GSM) and 2-methylisoborneol (MIB), imparting a muddy and/or musty taste to the fillet. The human senses of taste and smell can detect these compounds at very low concentrations, thus modest bioaccumulation is sufficient to taint the final product. While they are non-toxic and do not decrease fish performance, these off-flavors are highly undesirable by the consumer. Off-flavors delay or deny a sale leading to significant economic impact at scale. For these reasons, off-flavors are consistently ranked among top issues facing the RAS industry. According to our internal customer discovery efforts and consistent with peer-reviewed literature, off-flavors are either #1 or #2 biggest issue for RAS production systems. The current consensus indicates that GSM and MIB are water-borne compounds which are primarily absorbed by the fish through the gills. Because of their lipophilic nature, the rates of uptake of GSM or MIB by the fish are much faster than the rates of depuration from the tissues, leading to a bioaccumulation in the body of the animal and the development of an off-flavor perceivable by people. Considering this paradigm, there are two main strategies to mitigate off-flavors in aquaculture fish: 1) Target microorganisms present in the culture environment to control or remove the GSM/MIB producers, 2) Purge animals in a clean system devoid of GSM or MIB. To date, examples of the former have shown only limited effects, and none are used commercially. Additionally, purging fish for off-flavor mitigation is a grossly inefficient process and a significant burden to a farm's viability. Working with a local New England RAS farm, KnipBio and partners anecdotally discovered that one of the KBM flours led to a "cleaner" tasting fish after a growth trial terminated. Although this observation was repeated several times, there is a need to further validate it under a more robust experimental design. Briefly, the technical approach of the proposed proof of concept will directly compare groups of fish fed either a control or a test feed containing 5% KBM. Due to the relevance and scale, Atlantic salmon is preferred in this study. The fish will be housed in an indoor RAS at the industry leading CRO Freshwater Institute, where groups of fish will be randomly assigned either the control or the test feed. The feeding trial will last 8 weeks during which water GSM and MIB concentrations will be routinely monitored. At the 4- and 8- week time points, the fish will be sampled and fillet GSM and MIB will be measured. A sensory panel will be assembled to evaluate taste. Samples from the biofilter and fish tank will be taken to evaluate the system microbiome. Because each tank has its own dedicated, independent water filtration system, we will have replication at the system level. The specific objectives of the proposed Phase I work are as follows: Feed Generation - Produce 55 kg of KBM flour to be used to manufacture 1,100kg of feed (550kg of each formula) necessary to feed 600, 4kg Atlantic salmon for the duration of the study. Feeding Trial - Conduct the feeding trial for 8 weeks with regular sampling of the fish and water. Fish should perform well, with no mortality. Sample analysis - Upon termination of the feeding trial, all samples will be sent to external laboratories for analyses. Sensory panel - An external panel of trained panelists will evaluate the taste of the fish in a double-blind design. Data analysis and reporting - All data will be analyzed with statistical tools appropriate to the nature of the data and experimental design. The results will be interpreted, and a final report produced accordingly.
Project Methods
Feed Generation - Approximately 55 kg of KBM flour will be produced by KnipBio Inc. A control feed will be formulated to be representative of a typical feed for late grow-out of Atlantic salmon in RAS. We have consulted with commercial feed mills to delineate major parameters including major ingredients, pellet size and other physical characteristics. The feeds will contain 47% crude protein and 29% crude lipids and will contain about 15% fishmeal. The rest of the proteins will be supplied by various animal (e.g., poultry byproduct) or plants (e.g., soy and corn protein concentrates). The lipids will be supplied by a blend of plant and fish oils. The feeds will be nutritionally complete, balanced, and ensure that no nutritional deficiency is present (i.e., essential amino acids, fatty acids, minerals, vitamins). The test diet will include 5% KBM, and the feed formula will be adjusted to balance the protein contribution of KBM on a digestibility basis. Fish feed formulation will be led by KnipBio and manufactured by The Bozeman Fish Technology Center. Feeding Trial - The trial will be conducted at the Conservation Fund's Freshwater Institute (CFFI, Shepherdstown, WA) using six independent RAS (9.5m3 total volume) recirculates approximately 340L/min of freshwater through a 5.3m3 dual drain culture tank, a radial flow settler, a microscreen drum filter with 60μm screens, water chiller, fluidized sand biofilter, gas conditioning column, and a low-head oxygenator. RAS dilution rate is dictated by the combined wastewater volume removed, which is sensed and replaced with an equal volume of spring water by a float valve. Cumulative makeup water addition is measured by a magnetic drive flowmeter installed upstream of the float valve. Mixed-sex Atlantic salmon to be used for the proposed trial were received as fertilized eggs from Stofnfiskur (Hafnarfjörður, Iceland) and hatched at CFFI within a Heath-tray-style RAS incubation system in August 2019 and by July 2021, fish are expected to weigh 3-4 kg. At this time, fish will be randomized and redistributed once more to begin the proposed experiment. Salmon will be fed to apparent satiation for 8 weeks using a computer operated system (CFFI, Shepherdstown, WV, USA) programmed to deliver short feed bursts around-the-clock as facilitated by 24-h overhead LED lighting. Feeding rates will be fine-tuned separately per RAS based on observations of feeding activity and wasted feed. Background water chemistry will be assessed weekly at CFFI's Water and Environmental Chemistry Lab following standard procedures described by APHA (2012) and HACH (2015). All fish care and handling procedures described in this proposal have been developed with compliance to the Animal Welfare Act (9CFR) and are subject to approval by the Freshwater Institute's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Sampling and analysis - Upon manufacturing completion, both feeds will be analyzed for proximates and amino acid profile to ensure that neither is nutritionally deficient. The six culture systems will be monitored for water GSM and MIB concentrations once a week, in each fish tank and biofilter. Water samples will be collected in a glass vial and sealed without any air bubbles. The samples will be kept cold and shipped for analysis within 3 days of collection. Additionally, samples of biofilm will be taken at the same locations at the beginning, middle (4 weeks), and end (8 weeks) timepoints for 16S profiling. Finally, fish will also be sampled at the beginning, middle, and end of the trial. At each timepoint, 5 fish will be sampled from each tank. Each individual will be humanely euthanized according to standard protocols (pneumatic stunner followed by secondary step). Immediately after death, the fish will be filleted and skinned. One fillet will be frozen and conserved as backup. Half of the other fillet will be homogenized and frozen pending biochemical analysis including (crude lipids and GSM/MIB), while the other half will be vacuum sealed and frozen and used for sensory panel evaluation. All sample analyses will be performed by commercial laboratories. The AEL Tyler laboratory will analyze GSM and MIB in fish tissues following a protocol based on Schrader et al. (2003) with some modifications. Briefly, the samples are homogenized in a tissue grinder and extracted with methanol. The extract is then diluted with saltwater, and heated to volatilize the compounds onto a Solid Phase Micro Extraction fiber, which is then injected into the inlet of a GC-MS. For the microbiome analyses, we will be working with a UMass Lowell Next Generation Sequencing & Genomics lab where preliminary samples were analyzed to validate protocols from extraction to library preparations and will generally follow previously described protocols (Rimoldi et al., 2020). Briefly, bacterial DNA will be extracted using DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen, Italy) following manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of extracted DNA will be assessed using a NanoDropTM 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Italy). The 16S rRNA libraries will then be prepared following the Illumina protocol "16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation for Illumina MiSeq System". We will amplify the V3-V4 region using Platinum® Taq DNA Polymerase High Fidelity kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Italy). Finally, libraries will be purified, normalized, and pooled at equimolar concentrations before sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Sensory panel - A quantitative assessment of off-flavors will be conducted on the fish by a trained sensory panel according to a descriptive analysis Lawless and Heymann, 1999). A group of trained panelists (usually between 8-12 participants) serves as an analytical instrument for describing and quantifying the sensory profile of a set of samples. The descriptive panel will provide objective measurements on attribute intensities for product comparison. The frozen fillets will be thawed and cooked just prior to sensory panels until the internal temperature of the filet reaches 70°C. Approximately 1.5 ounces of each filet portion will be immediately served warm (40--50°C). Fish filet evaluation will be conducted in individual, lighted booths equipped with a computer, monitor, keyboard, and mouse. The trained judges will be asked to evaluate samples according to an intensity scale and will be asked to cleanse their palette with an unsalted cracker and water before and between sample evaluations. Data analysis and reporting - Husbandry-related data (growth, feed intake, feed efficiency) and tissue GSM/MIB will first be analyzed using t-tests or ANCOVA (dietary treatment and time) to compare the two treatment groups (KBM +/-). Data from the sensory panel will be correlated with GSM/MIB tissue content, fat content, and fish weight using discriminant factor analysis to evaluate alignment with treatment group membership. Microbiome profile data from the 16S sequences from the biofilter and fish tanks will also be summarized using principal component analysis (PCA) before being contrasted between the 2 dietary groups (t-test) and correlated with tissue levels of GSM and MIB as well as with the taste panel results.

Progress 07/01/21 to 04/04/22

Outputs
Target Audience:As an SBIR grant, the primary target audience impacted by these efforts is the grantee, KnipBio Inc. Partners in this work also directly benefited. Finally, the US aquaculture sector will also benefit as KnipBio makes progress to bring new solutions to some of the industry's most pressing issues. The efforts undertaken in this work were based on in vivo animal testing, both in research settings as well as in a commercial farm. Changes/Problems:Freshwater Institute Several attempts were made to raise the off-flavor concentration in the culture systems. Unfortunately, despite the best effort from the FI staff, these remained unsuccessful, and the trial was transferred to a commercial farm. Commercial farm Unfortunately, there has been a number of mistakes at the farm that impacted our work: Feeding KBM feed to a group of 3 tanks instead of a single tank for 30 days. Once realized, 1 tank of these tanks was reverted back to the regular commercial feed while the third tank was taken out of the trial. Fortunately, there was a separate tank with fish of a similar size, that had never been exposed to KBM, and for which samples had been taken at the same time the initial samples were taken in the other tanks. A portion of these samples were made available for geosmin analysis, and this tank was used as the new control tank for the entire trial. Still, the new control tank was on a different water treatment loop (different RAS), so redistribution of tanks from the original design introduced a confounding factor in the data which cannot be controlled statistically. Water samples were not taken/correctly processed, and only 3 samples were taken at the day-30 mark. Since this coincides with the reassignment of tanks, the absence of water data makes any meaningful comparison in geosmin and 2-MIB tissue contents impossible. Consequently, the following description of the results will be mostly based on the comparison of the KBM and the "reverted KBM" treatments. Though not a mistake per se, fish from the control tank were harvested just before the end of the trial. Additionally, new fish were moved into a neighboring tank to the control tank. This introduces a significant bias for the trial at the last time point, which therefore does not include the control group. Unaccomplished goal Sensory panel - A significant overage in costs was incurred during the attemps at raising off-flavor in culture systems at FRI and from moving the trial to its new location. After completion and considering the issues detailed above, we realized that the sensory panel would not have yielded meaningful data, and that the fillet geosmin levels would provide the necessary information. As such, the sensory panels were not conducted. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?As this is proprietary, confidential research, the results of this work have not been shared outside our direct partners, the Freshwater Institute and the commercial farm. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Accomplished goals 1- Feed production: the KBM was successfully produced and used to manufacture the feeds necessary to conduct the trial. There has been no issue with either productions, and the resulting feeds were of high quality. 2- Feeding trial: As documented in the annual report, we were unsuccessful in raising the water geosmin levels in the culture systems at the Freshwater Research Institute (FRI). In spite of many steps taken, it was finally decided to stop the activities at FRI and move the project to a commercial salmon producer where off-flavor issues are routinely observed. There, the trial was successfully conducted. The fish were fed the diets, though a mistake from the farm staff forced us to adapt the experimental protocol. The trial continued nonetheless, and samples were collected. 3- Sample analysis: All samples were sent for analysis as planned, and the results were reported back to us. 4- Data analysis and reporting: All data were analyzed statistically using a combination of analyses of variance and regression analyses. Reports were generated and shared internally between KnipBio and project collaborators. Key outcome Generally, the observations were positive, confirming the potential of the product in reducing the bioaccumulation of geosmin in the fillet of RAS-raised Atlantic salmon. Unfortunately, variability in the off-flavor measurements and the mistakes that occurred during the trial prevented us from reaching more firm conclusions. Nevertheless, it has become clear that the time during which the fish receive the KBM-containing feed is a critical factor to the reduction of off-flavor in the fillet. Impact statment Despite the difficulties experienced at the FRI in the initial phase of the project, we have gathered valuable information that will help us move forward as a business. First, with FRI we have gained knowledge in the dynamics and factors affected the rise (or not) of off-flavor compounds in a culture system. This knowledge is currently being incorporated into methods for future work. Second, with the commercial farm we demonstrated the potential of the product, though it is equally clear that more work is necessary before it can be brought to market. We have strengthened an existing relationship: they support our work and expressed interest in using feeds containing our product in the near future. Therefore, we have seen changes both in knowledge and in action as a result of this phase I project. As a result, we will submit our phase II application to continue this work.

Publications


    Progress 07/01/21 to 02/28/22

    Outputs
    Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems:First, weekly brushing and cleaning protocols, which are generally applied to manage biofilm growth on submerged RAS surfaces, were abruptly discontinued on June 7. It is important to note that discontinuation of standard cleaning protocols effectively supported rapid geosmin accumulation up to > 14 ng/L during a previous onsite study; albeit, in different fish production systems, i.e., partial reuse systems that exchanged large volumes of water and that lacked a biofilter. Conversely, after one and a half months without cleaning the six replicated RAS intended for use in the SBIR trial, geosmin and MIB levels averaged < 2 ng/L in RAS water, i.e., levels that were low and insufficient for the project. Other adjustments were then attempted including addition of biofilter sand from another onsite RAS that demonstrated higher off-flavor levels in the fish culture water (July 19) where introduction of off-flavor-producing bacteria that resided in the microbial biofilms surrounding sand particles was expected. Prior to adding sand to each of the six RAS biofilters, pumps were turned on and off several times to loosen and disrupt existing microbial biofilms. These procedures appeared to lead to positive trends for off-flavor accumulation; however, geosmin and MIB levels increased very slowly and not to levels that were supportive of the project. As such, a final attempt was made to further disrupt the seemingly robust microbial stability of the replicated RAS. On August 11 water flushing was increased nearly ten-fold and an ultraviolet light that treats the incoming spring water to these RAS was turned off. Periodic disruption of biofilm within the fluidized sand biofilter was also attempted via more frequent on/off cycling of the water recycle pumps. Trends for increasing off-flavor levels continued over the next two weeks and relatively high levels of MIB were achieved in some RAS on 9/7/21. However, analysis of water samples collected on 9/20/21 showed a significant drop in average geosmin and MIB concentrations to approximately 2-3 ng/L suggesting that base microbial populations had acclimated to the changes. Freshwater Institute scientists now hypothesize that microbially mature RAS that include fluidized sand biofilters that have been operated without shutdown for long periods of time (> 1 year) may develop a robust microbial consortium where opportunistic bacteria such as off-flavor-producers are crowded out or excluded. Anecdotally, these trends provide interesting and useful information for the RAS sector at large; however, the general lack of off-flavor production was not supportive of a study designed to evaluate the dietary effect of a novel single cell protein on off-flavor levels in Atlantic salmon flesh. It was therefore decided to terminate the efforts at the Freshwater Institute and transfer the project to a different facility where off-flavors were known to occur routinely. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Although the results described above precluded us from completing the trial as initally intended, the effort has provided valuable information regarding the onset of geosmin production in the system. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The Freshwater Institute has been replaced by AquaBounty as the partner for this project, and where the fish will be fed the experimental diets. AquaBounty is a commercial salmon farm where off-flavor are a common issue. We will also request a no-cost extension in order to allow enough time to complete the project.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? In support of research described in the USDA-SBIR funded project, "Off-flavor Mitigation in Atlantic Salmon Grown in RAS via the Use of a Novel Single Cell Protein Based Feed" (Award # 2021-33530-3453), the Freshwater Institute attempted to create elevated levels of naturally produced off-flavor in six replicated RAS via strategic adjustments to system operation. Unfortunately, geosmin and 2-methylisooborneol levels did not increase as expected, and sufficient concentrations were not created for purposes of the trial.

    Publications