Source: Intralytix, Inc. submitted to
PHAGE BIOCONTROL OF VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS FOR ENHANCING SEAFOOD SAFETY
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1025762
Grant No.
2021-33530-34359
Cumulative Award Amt.
$99,975.00
Proposal No.
2021-00878
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2021
Project End Date
Feb 28, 2022
Grant Year
2021
Program Code
[8.5]- Food Science & Nutrition
Recipient Organization
Intralytix, Inc.
701 E. Pratt St
Baltimore,MD 21202
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
The seafood consumption is the United States (US) is increasing. In 2018, for which the most recent data is available, the consumption of seafood was highest in the past decade. Seafood is an important source of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids and '2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans' recommend eating at least 8 ounces of seafood per week. However, this increased seafood consumption also enhances the health risk associated with seafood-borne infections. Vibriosis is a leading seafood-borne infection causing an estimated 80,000 illnesses and 100 deaths every year in the US. The economic burden of the Vibriosis, primarily stemming from seafood-borne infections is estimated to be around $300 million. Vibrio parahaemolyticus is the most common species associated with seafood-borne infections and accounted for approximately 34,664 foodborne infections in the US in 2016. The pandemic clone O3:K6 and its serovariants are widely distributed and cause the majority of infections worldwide.The shellfish industry relies primarily on processes such as rapid cooling of the harvest, restricted harvesting in warmer/summer and rainy months, relaying and depuration, high-pressure processing (HPP) and irradiation to control the microbial contamination. These approaches are not only inadequate but also restrictive for production (for example - restricted harvesting in summer) and may entail a high cost of operations e.g irradiation and HPP. Also, low consumer acceptance of irradiation has limited its usage and wide application by the producers. A few additional interventions such as organic acids and ozone treatment, are presented in literature but could potentially impact the organoleptic and textural properties of the product.The lytic bacteriophages are viruses that specifically lyse the target bacterial strains or a subgroup of bacterial strains. The use of lytic bacteriophages for food safety is gaining recognition recently, and emerging evidence strongly suggests that a direct application of lytic phages on various food surfaces significantly reduce or eliminate foodborne bacterial pathogen. The FDA and USDA have approved several commercial phage-products for biocontrol of foodborne bacterial pathogens in various foods. Bacteriophages are abundant in the marine environment and several studies have identified lytic bacteriophages against V. parahaemolyticus. For instance, the application of pVp-1, a lytic bacteriophage, on the surface of oysters reduced V. parahaemolyticus counts by approximately 6 log CFU/g. However, no commercial product is currently available to the industry that can help reduce the V. parahaemolyticus incidence in the seafood. A wide-scale availability of such a product will not only help improve the safety of seafood products but will also greatly benefit the industry by reducing monetary and reputational damages associated with recalls. Intralytix is uniquely positioned to develop a bacteriophage-based product and make it widely available. Noteworthy, Intralytix was the first company in the world to receive FDA/USDA clearance for its phage-based product ListShield™, designed as a food-additive to reduce Listeria monocytogenes in various foods (21 CFR§172.785; FSIS Directive 7120.1; GRN No. 528). Since then, Intralytix has obtained approvals for three more phage-products targeting Salmonella, STECs and Shigella spp. in a variety of food products (GRN No. 435, GRN No. 834, GRN No. 672, FSIS Directive 7120.1, FCN No. 1018) as well as several products for controlling bacterial pathogens in the pet-foods.Our overarching goal is to create a cocktail of monophages with optimal lytic efficiency against pathogenic strains of V. parahaemolyticus that will be made available to the seafood industry to help improve the seafood safety. The objective of this proposal is to develop a phage cocktail targeting V. parahaemolyticus, referred hereafter as "VibrioShield" and to determine the optimal treatment regimen for seafood such as oysters. This proposal addresses the critical need "topic area 8.5, Food Science, and Nutrition.1. Food Safety. Developing technologies for the detection or mitigation of foodborne hazards (microorganisms, chemicals, toxins) during pre- and post-harvest processing and distribution". To demonstrate the efficacy of phage-biocontrol on seafood and provide proof-of-concept, two specific aims are proposed:-Specific Aim #1. Formulation of a candidate phage cocktail with optimal lytic potency against Vibrio parahaemolyticusIntralytix has isolated and acquired several V. parahaemolyticus phages and their host strains for propagation as well as pathogenic strains for the development of the phage cocktail. The lytic efficiency of individual phages will be tested against all the V. parahaemolyticus strains in the Intralytix library using the spot test method. Additionally, an effort will be made to isolate unique lytic phages from the Chesapeake Bay and seafood obtained from different sources. The isolated phages will be characterized for their lytic efficiency in a similar fashion described above. Intralytix has developed a unique proprietary tool PhageSelector™ program, which helps in identifying a combination of phages with the widest possible lytic spectrum. The resulting data from lytic efficiency tests will be fed to the PhageSelector™ program to identify phages for inclusion in the cocktail. Three different cocktails varying in their phage compositions and the three most wide lytic spectrum as predicted by PhageSelector™ will be tested further. The lytic spectrum of the three cocktails will be empirically determined and compared by testing the lytic activity of the cocktail against all the V. parahaemolyticus strains in the Intralytix library. The cocktail demonstrating the most comprehensive lytic spectrum will be named as VibrioShield and used for further studies. Since the phages isolated and screened against the most prevalent and pandemic serovars including O3:K6, we highly anticipate a successful formulation of the VibrioShield. Furthermore, the effort to isolate and identify new and unique phages will use a strain of O3:K6 serovar and other pathogenic strains which will further increase the likelihood of successful formulation of VibrioShield.Specific Aim #2. Perform pilot efficacy studies to determine the optimal treatment regimen for using VibrioShield to reduce V. parahaemolyticus loads on seafood products.Emerging evidence from our laboratory and other laboratories across the globe, as well as our experience with the food industry, clearly indicate that phages can efficiently reduce, and in certain cases completely eradicate, the levels of their targeted bacterial hosts contaminating various foods. Therefore, the goal of the studies proposed to meet Specific Aim #2 is to determine the optimal dosing regimen; i.e., the application time and dose (the volume and phage concentration of VibrioShield) that will result in a maximal reduction of V. parahaemolyticus in two types of seafood products: raw and ready-to-eat fish and shellfish. The efficacy of VibrioShield treatment will be determined by (i) the enumeration test (during which the levels of V. parahaemolyticus in foods, as expressed by the number of colony-forming units [CFU]/g of food, is determined), and (ii) the enrichment-detection test (during which the presence or absence of V. parahaemolyticus is determined). The enumeration test will be performed essentially as we and other investigators previously described for evaluating the ability of various phage preparations to reduce or eliminate specific bacterial pathogens from various foods. The enrichment-detection test will be conducted using the method described in the Bacteriological Analytical Manual (Revised May 2004; available at https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-vibrio), Chapter 9, Vibrio.
Animal Health Component
25%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
25%
Applied
25%
Developmental
50%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
7124010110050%
7124030110150%
Goals / Objectives
The current interventions employed by the seafood industry such as rapid cooling of the harvest, restricted harvesting in warmer/summer and rainy months, relaying and depuration, high-hydrostatic pressure processing (HPP), mild heat processing, and irradiation are inadequate, restrictive, and in certain cases cost-prohibitive. The overarching goal of this project is to develop a commercial product (tentatively designated VibrioShield™) suited for direct application on food surfaces including raw or RTE fish and other seafood to eliminate or reduce their contamination with V. parahaemolyticus. Post successful commercialization, the product will be linked with a service component that will monitor product efficacy (including factors such as the development of resistance to specific phages), optimize and customize phage administration, and assist producers in their overall efforts to control V. parahaemolyticus contamination. Intralytix is the first company to have received an FDA/USDA approval for a phage-based product ListShield™ in 2006. The ListShield™ was designed for and is applied directly onto the surfaces of fish, shellfish, poultry, and other meat products (including RTEs), and significantly reduces the levels of Listeria monocytogenes in those foods. ListShield™ was also approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as a "microbial pesticide" to decontaminate surfaces in food processing plants and other food establishments that may be contaminated with L. monocytogenes. Additionally, ListShield™ is also approved for food safety applications by Health Canada and the National Food Service of Israel. Following ListShield™, we have developed and successfully commercialized three additional phage products for food safety applications, including SalmoFresh™, EcoShield™ PX, and ShigaShield™ for controlling Salmonella spp., STECs, and Shigella spp., respectively. Noteworthy, the SalmoFresh™ preparation was developed under the auspices of USDA, utilizing SBIR Phase I and II grants. The product has been successfully commercialized and serves as an excellent example of how USDA SBIR funding can have a real and positive impact on the food industry in the United States. We believe that the VibrioShield™ product we propose to develop with support of this SBIR program will serve as another strong example of this impact.The etiology of V. parahaemolyticus contamination of fish and shellfish and subsequent transmission to humans is a complex phenomenon and involves various stages of harvesting and subsequent processing and packaging. While bacteriophage application can be effective/contemplated in various stages of that cycle, we believe 1-2 that the most effective and commercially viable approach is to use bacteriophages in the post-harvest environment, specifically by direct application of phages on (i) raw fish/shellfish carcasses after post-gutting/slicing and washing and before the carcasses are packaged, and (ii) on final food products, including RTEs. Correspondingly, our regulatory approval strategy would be to have VibrioShield™ approved as generally-recognized-as-safe (GRAS), for direct applications on post-harvest seafood products, including RTEs. Multiple bacteriophage preparations including ListShield™, SalmoFresh™, EcoShield™ PX, and ShigaShield™ have been already granted GRAS status 1, 3, so this type of regulatory approval strategy is clearly attainable. Our approach will be to undertake additional studies needed for assembling the GRAS application/notification package during our Phase II SBIR project after the studies suggested in this Phase I SBIR project are completed. The FDA typically issues a GRAS "no-objection" letter within 180 days after they receive a GRAS application. Thus, the overall timeframe for this project, from Phase I through Phase II and to commercialization is potentially very short - an excellent outcome for an SBIR application whose ultimate goal is to help rapidly commercialize the promising technologies. The studies proposed in this Phase I SBIR application are well focused and realistic, the necessary experience is in place, and we therefore, fully anticipate successfully completing them in the timeframe allocated to the project. We will proceed by addressing the following two specific aims:Specific Aim #1. Perform studies required to identify phages for inclusion in VibrioShield™ and formulate the candidate phage cocktail.Specific Aim #2. Perform pilot efficacy studies to determine the optimal treatment regimen for using VibrioShield™ to reduce V. parahaemolyticus loads on raw and RTE fish and shellfish.References1. Sulakvelidze, A.; Pasternack, G., Industrial and regulatory issues in bacteriophage applications in food production and processing. In Bacteriophages in the control of food- and waterborne pathogens, Sabour, P. M.; Griffiths, M. W., Eds. ASM Press: Washington, DC, 2010; pp 297 - 326.2. Sulakvelidze, A.; Barrow, P., Phage therapy in animals and agribusiness. In Bacteriophages: Biology and Applications, Kutter, E.; Sulakvelidze, A., Eds. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2005; pp 335-380.3. Vikram, A.; Woolston, J.; Sulakvelidze, A., Phage Biocontrol Applications in Food Production and Processing. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2021, 40, 267-302.
Project Methods
Specific Aim#11. We will begin our studies by (i) cultivating all of the anti-V. parahaemolyticus bacteriophages currently in our phage library, to obtain adequate sample size for each, and (ii) determining their lytic potency against all of our strains of pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus serotypes. The lytic potency will be determined by using a well-described and commonly used Spot Test method. The Spot Test method is commonly used to determine host-range and lytic efficiency and is now optimized to be performed by our high throughout robotic system Neptune™. The host range for each bacteriophage will be determined at two different concentrations of each phage against each strain: the commonly used phage concentration (ca. 1x109 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL) followed by lower concentration (ca. 1x104 PFU/mL). We will take that approach because comparing the lytic potency of low (ca. 1x104 PFU/mL) and high (ca. 1x109-1010 PFU/mL) concentrations of a given phage against the targeted bacterial strains can be used (as described below) as a supplementary selection criterion when formulating VibrioShield™. As an additional measure, we will also determine the Virulence Index (VI) for all promising phages using the robotic system "Neptune". The VI data would be used as yet another selection criterion when formulating the VibrioShield ™ cocktail.2. The second step in the course of the project will be characterization of the bacteriophages. As part of our commitment to "safety first", the identity and purity of the selected bacteriophages with the strongest lytic activity in in-vitro sensitivity screening assays, will be confirmed. The purity/homogeneity will be verified by performing a series of studies to determine their grossly observable plaque morphology and their electron microscopic (EM) appearance. Phages will also be characterized by (i) PFGE analysis of phage DNA, (ii) Sequencing followed by bioinformatic analysis and/or RFLP analysis of phage DNA (in case the phages are refractory to sequencing or restriction analyses).3. Following successful identification of effective bacteriophages and their characterization, candidate phages for preparation of a phage cocktail that lyses majority if not all of the targeted V. parahaemolyticus strains will be identified. The Intralytix has developed a proprietary software, the PhageSelector™ program, that facilitates the designing of optimally effective phage preparations. This tool will be employed to identify the bacteriophages for inclusion in candidate phage cocktail. After the phages for inclusion in the preliminary version of VibrioShield™ are identified, we will use a benchtop bioreactor to propagate small amounts of each component monophages. After confirming the identity, potency (lytic titer), and bacteriological sterility of each component phage preparation, we will blend them to form the VibrioShield™ cocktail to be used during the studies outlined in Specific Aim #2.Specific Aim#2The goal of the studies proposed to meet Specific Aim #2 is to determine preliminary optimal dosing regimen; i.e., the application time and dose (phage concentration of VibrioShield™) that will result in a maximal reduction of V. parahaemolyticus in two types of seafood products: raw fish/shellfish carcasses and cooked fish/shellfish. The efficacy of VibrioShield™ treatment will be determined by (i) the enumeration test (during which the levels of V. parahaemolyticus in foods, as expressed by the number of colony-forming units [CFU]/g of food, is determined), and (ii) the occurrence test (by enriching the contaminated food matric to determine the presence or absence of the V. parahaemolyticus).To achieve the objectives outlined in Specific Aim#2, We will generate an in house nalidixic acid-resistant mutant that (i) is fully susceptible to the candidate VibrioShield™ preparation, and (2) can grow on at least 25 µg/mL nalidixic acid without a growth defect. This strain will be used to experimentally contaminate the surfaces of raw and cooked fish/shellfish surfaces. The V. parahaemolyticus-selective V. parahaemolyticus sucrose agar (VPSA; recommended by the FDA) supplemented with nalidixic acid (25 µg/mL, to minimize the risk of nonspecific bacterial growth which could complicate our data analysis) will be used in all experiments. In tandem with experimentally contaminated specimens, aliquots from each food specimen will be analyzed for (i) naturally occurring V. parahaemolyticus and (ii) other bacteria capable of growing on VPSA medium supplemented with nalidixic acid to determine any potentially confounding bacterial species.We anticipate that a recovery of ca. 3 log CFU of V. parahaemolyticus from 25 g of the experimentally contaminated control (not treated with phage) food specimens will be needed to observe statistically significant reductions by phage treatment. Therefore, before initiating VibrioShield™ treatment, the challenge dose of V. parahaemolyticus to recover ca 3 log CFUs from 25 g of contaminated, untreated food will be empirically determined. After determining the appropriate challenge dose, the test specimens will becontaminated with that dose and treated with VibrioShield™ as briefly described below.The general design of the studies will be as follows: (i) contaminate the food specimens with the challenge dose of the V. parahaemolyticus test strain (as explained above, that dose will be different for the enumeration test than for the enrichment-detection test), (ii) allow the bacteria to adhere to the food surfaces for at least 30 minutes, (iii) apply VibrioShield™ to the contaminated specimens by spraying with a pre-calibrated spray gun (Basic Spray Gun, Model #250-2; Badger Air-Brush Co., Franklin Park, IL, or equivalent), and (iv) allow the contaminated specimens to remain in contact with VibrioShield™ for 15, 60, and 120 minutes before analyzing them by the enrichment-detection test (to determine the presence/absence of the V. parahaemolyticus test strain) and by the enumeration test (to determine the concentration [CFU/g of food] of the V. parahaemolyticus test strain). Food specimens experimentally contaminated with the same challenge dose of the V. parahaemolyticus test strain but treated with sterile saline or PBS will be used as positive controls.In addition to the time variable (i.e., the period for which VibrioShield™ is allowed to stay in contact with the food specimens before they are analyzed for residual V. parahaemolyticus contamination - item #iv above), we will examine the impact of phage concentration (PFU of VibrioShield™/g of food) on the efficacy of VibrioShield™ treatment.

Progress 07/01/21 to 02/28/22

Outputs
Target Audience:Target Audience The project was focused on developing a Phage biocontrol to reduce or eliminate the Vibrio parahaemolyticus contamination of various food products. The overarching goal of the SBIR Phase I project (Award # 2021-33530-34359) was to generate data and material to formulate a preliminary phage cocktail and provide a proof of concept for efficacy on various seafood products. We have successfully developed a phage cocktail, named "VibrioShield" and demonstrated that it can reduce the levels of V. parahaemolyticus on two seafood products. The data and material generated during the SBIR Phase I project have enabled us to submit a SBIR Phase II grant to fully develop and commercialize the VibrioShield. Our ultimate goal is to seek "Generally Recognized As Safe" status for VibrioShield and make it available to the food industry which are at high risk of V. parahaemolyticus contamination. Seafood industry is especially affected by the V. parahaemolyticus contamination of the products that leads to significant losses. Our goal is to make VibrioShield commercially available to help seafood processors to help improve the safety of the various food products. It is our expectation that VibrioShield will also be tremendously helpful in making the US food supply safer by reducing the V. parahaemolyticus contamination. Therefore, the ultimate audience for the project is the seafood industry. Since seafood industry has limited number of interventions available to control bacterial pathogen, we fully anticipate that the VibrioShield will provide a natural and safe solution to manage V. parahaemolyticus. Changes/Problems:Several project challenges, some foreseen and some unforeseen, were encountered as follows. 1) Phage isolation work was hindered during winter months as the Vibrio population and consequently phage poulation decreased. 2) Another challenge in the project was due to the difficulties in extracting and sequencing these deep-water phages. 3) The initial toxicity of the unpurified phage cocktail presented some challenges in scaling up the experiment while an effective method of purifying the phages was being identified. 4) The inability to initially identify phages with sufficiently broad host specificity against V. parahaemolyticus strains necessitated more time than anticipated to screen additional seawater samples for phages with broad specificities. However, none of these challenges were insurmountable and we are happy to report that except complete sequenicng and analysis of one phage, the goals of projects were achieved and with in the alloted time frame. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results of the project will be published in a peer reviewed journal. A manuscript is in works currently and is expected to be submitted in near future. Additionally, reults will be presented at national and international meetings including International Association of Food Protection in 2023. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? 1.0 Accomplishments Below are details of the accomplishments under the specific aims. 1.1 Specific Aim 1. Perform studies required to identify phages for inclusion in VibrioShield™ and formulate the candidate phage cocktail Host Strains. At Intralytix, we have assembled a collection of over 30 strains from various sources, including ATCC, that are positive for the TRH gene (trh+) TDH with several also positive for the TDH gene (tdh+ trh+). These serotypes represent 15 V.parahaemolyticus serotypes including the pathogenic serotypes O1:K1 and O3:K6. Table 1. Lytic efficiency of monophages and the cocktails Phage Percent of strains lysed RPVP31-3 75.76 RPVP16-1 45.45 RPVP00-9 30.30 RPVP00-1 30.30 3-phage cocktail 63.64 4-phage cocktail 100 Phage isolation. Phages were isolated from water collected from various locations of cheasapeake bay. The phages were isolated using agar overlays on the target host bacterial lawn. Individual plaques were picked and grown on the host V. parahemolyticus strains. We currently have 24 phages in our collection that demonstrate strong lytic activity against V.parahaemolyticus. Nineteen of these phages have been extensively characterized and identity and homogeneity of the remaining 5 phages is currently being studied. In-vitro screening of phages. The phages were screened for their lytic efficacy against our entire collection of V.parahaemolyticus strains using the standard spot test method. Our screening protocol typically uses the phage concentrations commonly used in standard spot test assays (109-1010 plaque-forming units per mL (PFU/mL). However, we additionally used a spot test utilizing lower concentrations of phages (ca. 104 PFU/mL), which favors identifying the most potent bacteriophages. The screening identified 11 candidate phages that can lyse at a minimum of 5 with one phage lysing 25 strains of different serotypes. Formulation of preliminary version of cocktail. After completing the screening study with all 24 well-characterized phages against all strains, the phage-isolate interaction network was analyzed using Intralytix's proprietary software PhageSelector™. The program identified 4 phages: RPVP31-3, RPVP16-1, RPVP00-1, and RPVP00-9 that is lytic for 100% of our V.parahaemolyticus collection (Table 1). However, RPVP31-3 has not been fully characterized and is currently undergoing genomic sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. Therefore, we ran the PhageSelector™ with a set of 19 phages that are fully characterized. The resulting cocktail included RPVP16-1, RPVP00-1, and RPVP00-9 and showed a potent lytic activity against 21 or ~64% of the 33 V.parahaemolyticus strains (Table 1). Note: assuming the RPVP31-3 phage passes all safety criteria - including currently ongoing bioinformatics analysis - we will continue our studies (and eventual commercialization) with the four-phage version of VibrioShield. Characterization of phages. Each phage in VibrioShield was rigorously characterized for its protein and genomic composition by a variety of methods. In addition, they were examined by electron microscopy and their taxonomic assignments were made according to phage classification scheme developed by Ackermann and Berthiaume. RPVP00-1 and RPVP16-1 were found to belong to the Siphoviridae family of double-stranded DNA bacteriophages while RPVP00-9 belongs to the recently discovered Autolykiviridae family of non-tailed dsDNA phages. Finally, whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatic analyses of 3 of the monophages has been completed, while the characterization of the fourth phage is currently undergoing. The primary goal of the genome analysis is to ensure that all of the phages are lytic and do not contain any of the undesirable (e.g., bacterial toxin-encoding) genes listed in 40 CFR §725.421. The genome assembly and annotation showed that the 3 sequenced phages do not carry any antibiotic resistance genes (determined by BLAST against Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database) or virulence factors. The results support the lytic nature of the 3 sequenced monophages and confirm the absence of undesirable genes, thus making our candidate phage cocktail well suited for subsequent regulatory approvals and commercialization. The actual genome sequences of the component phages contained in VibrioShield, and corresponding bioinformatics analysis, will be included in the GRAS package we plan to submit to the FDA (or the Agency may be provided with GenBank accession numbers). 1.2 Specific Aim 2 Perform pilot efficacy studies to determine if using VibrioShield™ can reduce V.parahaemolyticus loads on raw and RTE fish and shellfish VibrioShield was examined for its efficacy to reduce V.parahaemolyticus on contaminated cooked shrimp and raw salmon fillets. V.parahaemolyticus strain EB101 (ATCC 17802T), a type strain, was used in the challenge studies. The foods were experimentally contaminated with ~4.0 - 5.0 log10 CFU/g EB101 and incubated at room temperature (~22°C) for 20 min to allow bacteria to attach to the food matrix. A total of 12 samples were contaminated for each experiment and each experiment was repeated on five different days. The contaminated samples were randomly divided into two groups. A VibrioShield preparation of 3 phages (i.e., RPVP00-1, RPVP00-9, and RPVP16-1) was used for the efficacy studies described below. The phage preparation was sprayed at the rate 4 mL/lb to achieve an application of 1x108 PFU/g on one group while the second group was sprayed with PBS (control). Both phage treated and control samples were stored at 4°C. At 1h and 24h post-treatment, three phage-treated and three control samples were removed from cold storage and V. parahaemolyticus was enumerated. The data was analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.3.1 for macOS (GraphPad Software LLC, San Diego, CA). Application of 1x108 PFU/g VibrioShield significantly (P<0.01) reduced the V.parahaemolyticus levels on raw salmon (~85%) and cooked shrimp (~84%) after 1h storage at 4°C. After 24h storage at 4°C, the reductions were ~83% on raw salmon and ~79% on cooked shrimp. These reductions were statistically significant (P<0.01). Additional treatment time (i.e., 24h vs. 1h) did not have an effect on the reductions, i.e., based on two-way ANOVA, the reductions observed at 1h were statistically similar (P>0.05) to the reductions at 24h. These results indicate that (i) VibrioShield effectively and significantly reduced the V.parahaemolyticus levels on two different seafood products and (ii) the reductions achieved at 1h were maintained (but not significantly improved) through 24h, the duration of the test. This observation is similar to previous reports showing that the reductions achieved following phage application at 1h are maintained during longer incubation periods. These results provide strong basis for performing additional efficacy studies and moving forward with the commercialization of VibrioShield. In summary, during Phase I of the NIFA SBIR project: (i) We have developed a multivalent phage preparation (designated VibrioShield) possessing excellent lytic activity against major V.parahaemolyticus serotypes of high public health importance, (ii) The three component phages included in the three-phage version of VibrioShield have been confirmed to be lytic phages free of any "undesirable" (e.g., bacterial toxin-encoding) genes - a critical requirement for all phage-based commercial products, and (iii) During our preliminary efficacy studies, VibrioShield consistently and significantly reduced viable V.parahaemolyticus levels in experimentally-contaminated seafood products, at an estimated and commercially feasible cost of ≤4cents/pound of treated seafood. Thus, we have successfully achieved all of our goals for the Phase I project, and we are now seeking Phase II support to pursue the subsequent development and commercialization of VibrioShield.

Publications