Source: GEOVISUAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. submitted to
PRECISION HARVEST FORECASTING OF FRESH VEGETABLE CROPS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1024312
Grant No.
2020-33530-33101
Cumulative Award Amt.
$600,000.00
Proposal No.
2020-06868
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2020
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2022
Grant Year
2020
Program Code
[8.13]- Plant Production and Protection-Engineering
Recipient Organization
GEOVISUAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.
9191 SHERIDAN BLVD # 311
WESTMINSTER,CO 800313011
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Specialty crop producers routinely overproduce to hedge against losses from cultivation and environmental impacts and market price fluctuations and to ensure sufficient supply to meet retail and food service account demand. If they had greater certainty in advance of how much they will produce and when it will be harvest-ready, they could consistently improve the match between supply and demand, reducing overall costs, any resulting losses and increasing margins. This project will develop precision crop maturity forecasting models for several key fresh vegetable crops. Current approaches forecast harvest dates based on historical planting and harvest information and do not capture the significant variabilities from local weather, soil conditions and farmer practices. Our approach is to apply forecasted weather data with a unique modeling technique and supplement with innovative computer vision analysis of aerial imagery collected over fields during the crop growing cycle. During this second phase of the project, we will refine the methods that were proven for iceberg lettuce during the first phase , acquiring more data and validating the approach for different varieties and geographic locations. In addition, we will extend the techniques from lettuce to other leafy green crops that have been identified by our grower partners as priorities for improved forecasting.The proposed innovation will help growers and grower-processors produce more efficiently, reducing crop waste and saving on their production costs in a number of direct ways: first by determining earlier if fields will not produce sufficient yield, or within the needed time window, to justify additional expenditures; then by helping them allocate worker resources more cost-effectively, by directing harvest crews where they are most needed and when; and finally by helping them plan and manage their supply against fluctuations related to weather, pests, weeds or disease outbreaks. Our commercialization strategy is to demonstrate the improved forecasting to our current customers by comparing our forecasted harvest dates and yields to their actual schedules and yields. We will integrate results into our web and mobile applications, which our customers currently use for production management and with less precise forecasting based on plant population counts we derive for them from aerial imagery. Interested customers can then purchase the enhanced service as an upgrade to their current subscriptions.
Animal Health Component
30%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
30%
Applied
30%
Developmental
40%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2041430303060%
2040420208020%
2040440208020%
Goals / Objectives
The major goals of this project are 1) to release a commercial-ready forecasting capability for lettuce, rather than just a prototype, that works consistently with different crop varieties, against extreme weather events, in different geographies, and be scalable to thousands of acres of fields; 2) integrate the capability into our existing SeedGreen web and mobile applications that deliver related services to the industry; and 3) anticipate delivering a prototype capability for 2-3 additional crops for which we have received expressed interest by our customers. Anticipated additional crops include romaine lettuce, red/green leaf lettuces, and brassicas. The specific objectives towards these ends are the following:Obtain sufficient iceberg lettuce historical planting and harvest data from additional growers to confidently constrain the average weather-weighted time to harvestObtain sufficient iceberg ground truth plant measurements to confidently model plant growth along with temperature, radiation and ground area cover (GAC) measurements.Develop a forecasting model for iceberg head weight distributions equivalent to head size distributions.Operationalize the Phase I forecasting proof-of-concept for iceberg lettuceExtend the forecasting capability to other priority crops.
Project Methods
The following scientific methods and associated efforts will be used to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed forecasting system:1) Phase II Data Collection for Iceberg and Other CropsWe will begin the planning and execution of data collection early during Phase II since it involves field work and equipment, and it will be ongoing for much of the 24-month project. We will focus on obtaining 1) additional data for iceberg lettuce to supplement our Phase I modeling and 2) data for additional crops for which we will adopt and modify successful methods from iceberg.2) Test and Refine Prototype Iceberg Forecasting ModelsWith more data, we expect to gain insights on how to improve the forecast models. With more historical data, we may find that different seasonal varieties benefit from different temperature and solar radiation weights in our weather-based model. With more ground truth data, we may find that other functions provide better data fits to accumulated weather variables, that a multiple regression fit better constrains the accumulated variables for optimal harvest, or that different measurements are better fit with different functions for phenological reasons. For example, fresh lettuce plant and head weights tend to increase over time up continuing through harvest and beyond, whereas the increase in head diameter slows as the plant enters its reproductive state and the head becomes denser.Other local site effects that may contribute to variability in crop maturity include field watering, fertilization practices and soil quality. While many of these inputs might be difficult to track (e.g. many growers only monitor fertilizer use as an aggregate across fields), more extensive ground truth data, including water and fertilizer schedules, may offer insight into how water and fertilizer application affects plant phenological parameters like fresh weight and radial diameter. Our parallel work on an irrigation scheduling project may accelerate this area of research.After refining our forecasting capabilities for lettuce, we expect to receive customer feedback on value propositions and cost-effectiveness, to guide additional improvements.3) Operationalize Iceberg ForecastingA key requirement for effective operation of our forecasting system is ensuring that growers provide regular and accurate information on their historical and current operations: acreages planted, planting and harvest dates, yields, and dates of irrigation, fertilization and other production practices. To that end, we include in this task the development of related tools to facilitate customer data capture and ingest. This effort is not intended to be exhaustive but rather comprehensive enough to ensure our forecast results are 1) as accurate as possible, minimizing the impacts of unknown cultural practices, and 2) as easy to use as possible, by modernizing and synchronizing how growers record and manage their production data.4) Extend Forecasting to Other Customer-Priority CropsDifferent crops will have different metrics for optimal harvest conditions, but we expect the methodology of combining a weather-based model with GAC or other imagery-derived measurements and ground truth data generally will transfer to different crops. We will focus initially on romaine lettuce, which has some advantages because the entire plant is the harvestable unit. As such, plant size at harvest should be obtainable with a model informed by how GAC changes.Brassicas (broccoli and cauliflower) are high-priority fresh crops for improved harvest forecasting, given their total production value and the relative difficulty of obtaining accurate harvest yield forecasts. Challenges for using aerial imagery to monitor growth of brassicas are that the harvestable heads become occluded by leaves very soon after head formation, and per-plant GAC is not measurable after the canopy closes. However, field-level fractional cover has been used successfully as a maturity metric, so our initial strategy for extending our forecasting methods is to accumulate weather variables, track fractional cover development with imagery, and use ground truth measurements of head sizes throughout the growth period.5) Prepare a Final ReportA final report of the Phase II effort will be prepared during the last 2 months of the 24-month project, detailing the project objectives, work performed, and results obtained.

Progress 09/01/20 to 08/31/22

Outputs
Target Audience:The project results are targeted to help growers and grower-processors operate more efficiently, reducing waste and saving on their production costs in a number of direct ways: First, by determining earlier if fields will not produce sufficient yield, or within the needed time window, to justify additional expenditures; then by helping them allocate worker resources more cost-effectively by directing harvest crews where they are most needed and when; and finally, by helping them plan and manage their supply against fluctuations related to weather, pests, weeds or disease outbreaks. Our overall strategy for commercializing the project results has been to demonstrate the improved forecasting to our current customers, who use our web and mobile applications for forecasting based on plant population counts we derive from aerial imagery. We demonstrated our new capabilities by comparing our forecasted harvest dates and yields to their actual schedules and yields. In the course of developing the forecasting capabilities in cooperation with partner-customers, we identified several additional but related customer needs we are addressing with additional development. As a result, we are providing a set of integrated services that help make the fresh produce production process more efficient and therefore profitable. As we further develop the targeted capabilities, we will begin sharing the concepts with additional candidate customers in the fresh produce industry, in line with our commercialization objectives. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?We contracted interns to perform in-field data collection. One of the interns became a UAV pilot and provides us aerial imagery collection. ? How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have shared customer-specific results to date with the associated partner-customers: Bonipak Produce, Bonduelle Fresh Americas, the celery partner-customer that prefers to remain anonymous, Cal Giant and Taylor Farms. ? What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The project developed precision crop maturity forecasting models for three key fresh produce crops: iceberg lettuce, celery and strawberries. Current approaches to forecasting harvest dates are based on historical planting and harvest information and do not capture the significant variabilities from local weather, soil conditions and farmer practices. Our approach was to supplement forecasted weather data with unique modeling techniques and computer vision analysis of aerial imagery collected over fields during the crop growing cycle. During the second phase of the project, we refined the methods that were proven for iceberg lettuce during the first phase, acquiring more data and validating the approach for different varieties and geographic locations. In addition, we extended the techniques from lettuce to celery and strawberries, which were identified by our grower partners as priorities for improved forecasting. Task 1 - Phase II Data Collection for Iceberg and Other Crops Subtask: Arrange with our grower partners and other growers to obtain additional historical planting and harvest data. We began Phase II with the partner-customer with which we worked during Phase I, Bonipak Produce. During Phase II we also added several other partner-customers. These include Bonduelle Fresh Americas for iceberg and romaine lettuce grown to be harvested by weight for processing, a major industry producer of celery that prefers remaining anonymous, and Cal Giant for strawberries. Subtask: Collect ground truth measurements of physical plant properties. We contracted interns to perform substantial in-field data collection. Subtask: Coordinate the timing and locations of ground truth plant measurements with aerial imagery acquisition. Coordination of locations for ground truth measurements and imagery acquisition was achieved by marking sections of fields where GT measurements were taken using colored PVC pipes that were visible in the aerial imagery. Subtask: Evaluate the use of additional tools to assess crop height, including digital surface models derived during the photogrammetric process. We identified plant canopy height as an important variable to include in our forecasting model, and we used photogrammetric processing of aerial photos to derive canopy heights. We also evaluated UAV-mountable rangefinders as an alternative to photogrammetry for canopy height measurements. Task 2 - Test and Refine Prototype Iceberg Forecasting Models Subtask: Accumulate EDDs using historical weather data for additional, historical grower planting and harvest data from Task 1 and evaluate values for different geographic regions, different iceberg varieties and different growers. We focused on the growing regions of Bonduelle Fresh Americas, for iceberg lettuce harvested by head weight; not head size. Subtask: Use additional ground truth plant data from Task 1 to plot against accumulated EDDs and evaluate goodness of fit. We collected GT and weather data for bulk romaine for Bonduelle, which we used to develop a preliminary bulk romaine forecasting model. Subtask: Develop an equivalent model for forecasting head weight. For forecasting by weight, we focused on bulk romaine and we collected several plant weight measurements, including whole plant fresh weight, heart weight (having stripped excess leaves), maximum and minimum harvestable weights, and radial circumferences of the whole plant and core. We employed a grower-specified average head weight per field to estimate total yield weight per field from imagery-derived plant population counts. Task 3 - Operationalize Iceberg Forecasting Subtask: Identify tools and infrastructure needed to scale up forecasting. One area we addressed to reduce image acquisition costs was improved flight logistics. We refined the command and control system developed during the first year of the project to handle scalable scheduling and processing of aerial imagery for many fields. We also made improvements to our mobile app for in-field data collection to incorporate adjustments to harvest yield estimates based on reductions from impacts of pests, weeds and diseases. Subtask: Integrate preliminary toolset and infrastructure into GeoVisual's processing pipeline to support lettuce forecasting operationally. We integrated the iceberg forecasting capabilities developed to date with this project into our processing pipeline, with results available to our customers in web and mobile applications. Subtask: Standardize some customer inputs (e.g. formats for field boundaries; planting data). One of the key challenges we faced working with the fresh produce industry has been a lack of standards in how data is stored and shared, particularly for data associated with fields and planting. Subtask: Update GeoVisual's SeedGreen web and mobile applications with additional GUI components for customer data input and decision making based on forecasting. We developed and refined a number of different views on the data and the analytics we developed under this project. Task 4 - Extend Forecasting to Other Customer-Priority Crops Subtask: Accumulate EDDs using historical weather data for historical grower planting and harvest data and evaluate values for the priority crops, ideally for different geographic regions, varieties and growers.For celery and strawberries, EDDs were found less effective than for iceberg lettuce, but we operationalized its use for determining when to collect aerial imagery for consistent crop maturity estimates. Subtask: Use ground truth plant measurements from Task 1 to plot against accumulated EDDs and evaluate goodness of fit to assess which measurements provide reliable model parameters and have strong correlations to measurements that can be made from aerial imagery. For celery, we acquired field measurements of several plant characteristics we considered to be of possible relevance for yield forecasting. For strawberries, we selected several growth stages for observation over time. Subtask: Develop models using a methodology similar to iceberg lettuce for the additional priority crops: combine values, GAC and ground truth measurements and other imagery-derived measurements to develop a preliminary capability to forecast optimal harvest dates and associated yields. Our focus for celery was a capability to forecast a celery field's harvest yields for a specified harvest date. We found the forecasting of such optimal harvest dates to be challenged not only by the inconsistencies observed in accumulated EDDs values, but also by significant variability in the days between planting and harvest as reported by our partner-customer. ?Our approach for strawberries involved three separate models. Model 1 takes as input UAV imagery and derives flower counts. Model 2 takes as input imagery dates, field location, plant variety and weather data and predicts when flowers will mature into later growth stages. The results of Model 1 and 2 are fed into Model 3 to derive a yield estimate.

Publications


    Progress 09/01/20 to 08/31/21

    Outputs
    Target Audience:The project results are targeted to help growers and grower-processors operate more efficiently, reducing waste and saving on their production costs in a number of direct ways: First, by determining earlier if fields will not produce sufficient yield, or within the needed time window, to justify additional expenditures; Then by helping them allocate worker resources more cost-effectively, by directing harvest crews where they are most needed and when; Finally, by helping them plan and manage their supply against fluctuations related to weather, pests, weeds or disease outbreaks. Our overall strategy for commercializing the project results is to demonstrate the improved forecasting to our current customers, who use our web and mobile applications for forecasting based on plant population counts we derive from aerial imagery. We will demonstrate our new capabilities by comparing our forecasted harvest dates and yields to their actual schedules and yields. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have shared customer-specific results to date with the associated partner-customers: Bonipak Produce, Bonduelle Fresh Americas, the celery partner-customer that prefers to remain anonymous, Cal Giant and Taylor Farms. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We will continue our work on forecasting for lettuce harvested by weight, celery and strawberries. The principal crop of one of the partner-customers using the service for iceberg is celery, so we anticipate developing the celery forecasting capabilities into an operational service as well. In the course of developing the forecasting capabilities in cooperation with partner-customers, we identified several additional but related customer needs we are addressing with additional development. Our strategy is to provide a set of integrated services that help make the fresh produce production process more efficient and therefore profitable. As we further develop the targeted capabilities, we will begin sharing the concepts with other candidate customers in the fresh produce industry, in line with our commercialization objectives.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? This project is developing precision crop maturity forecasting models for several key fresh vegetable crops. Current approaches to forecasting harvest dates are based on historical planting and harvest information and do not capture the significant variabilities from local weather, soil conditions and farmer practices. Our approach is to apply forecasted weather data with a unique modeling technique and supplement with innovative computer vision analysis of aerial imagery collected over fields during the crop growing cycle. We are successfully commercializing the forecasting capability for iceberg, for the partner-customers with whom we are collaborating on the project. In addition, we are extending the techniques from lettuce to other crops that have been identified by our grower partners as priorities for improved forecasting: romaine, celery and strawberries. The proposed innovation will help growers and grower-processors produce more efficiently, reducing crop waste and saving on their production costs in a number of direct ways: first by determining earlier if fields will not produce sufficient yield, or within the needed time window, to justify additional expenditures; then by helping them allocate worker resources more cost-effectively, by directing harvest crews where they are most needed and when; and finally by helping them plan and manage their supply against fluctuations related to weather, pests, weeds or disease outbreaks. We are integrating results into our web and mobile applications, which our partner-customers currently use for production management and with less precise forecasting based on plant population counts. Task 1 - Phase II Data Collection for Iceberg and Other Crops ? Subtask: Arranged with our grower partner and other growers to obtain additional historical planting and harvest data. We began Phase II with the partner-customer with which we worked during Phase I, Bonipak Produce. During Phase II we also added several other partner-customers. These include Bonduelle Fresh Americas for iceberg and romaine lettuce grown to be harvested by weight for processing, a major industry producer of celery that prefers remaining anonymous, and Cal Giant for strawberries. ? Subtask: Collect ground truth measurements of physical plant properties. Principally we utilized university students as interns to perform in-field data collection. ? Subtask: Coordinate the timing and locations of ground truth plant measurements with aerial imagery acquisition. Coordination of locations for ground truth measurements and imagery acquisition was achieved by marking sections of fields where GT measurements were taken using colored PVC pipes that were visible in the aerial imagery. ? Subtask: Evaluate the use of additional tools to assess crop height, including digital surface models derived during the photogrammetric process. This subtask ended up being very relevant for our work on celery forecasting. We identified plant canopy height as an important variable to include in our forecasting model. Task 2 - Test and Refine Prototype Iceberg Forecasting Models For each of the planned subtasks listed as bullets below, we describe the progress made towards them during the reporting period. ? Subtask: Accumulate EDDs using historical weather data for additional, historical grower planting and harvest data from Task 1 and evaluate values for different geographic regions, different iceberg varieties and different growers. We focused on the growing regions of Bonduelle Fresh Americas, with the difference being that the forecasting model we focused on for Bonduelle is for iceberg lettuce harvested by head weight; not head size. ? Subtask: Use additional ground truth plant data from Task 1 to plot against accumulated EDDs and evaluate goodness of fit to assess which physical plant measurements provide reliable model parameters and correlate strongly with measurements derivable from aerial imagery. We collected GT and weather data for bulk romaine for Bonduelle, which we used to develop a preliminary bulk romaine forecasting model. ? Subtask: Develop an equivalent model for forecasting head weight. For forecasting by weight, we focused on bulk romaine and we collected several plant weight measurements, including whole plant fresh weight, heart weight (having stripped excess leaves), maximum and minimum harvestable weights, and radial circumferences of the whole plant and core. Task 3 - Operationalize Iceberg Forecasting ? Subtask: Identify tools and infrastructure needed to scale up forecasting. One area we addressed to reduce image acquisition costs was improved flight logistics. Our pilots made several minor improvements in the field to reduce the drone and sensor setup and teardown times between flights. ? Subtask: Integrate preliminary toolset and infrastructure into GeoVisual's processing pipeline to support lettuce forecasting operationally. We have integrated the iceberg forecasting capabilities developed to date with this project into our processing pipeline, with results available to our customers in web and mobile applications. ? Subtask: Standardize some customer inputs (e.g. formats for field boundaries; planting data). One of the key challenges we have faced working with the fresh produce industry has been a lack of standards in how data is stored and shared, particularly for data associated with fields and planting. ? Subtask: Update GeoVisual's SeedGreen web and mobile applications with additional GUI components for customer data input and decision making based on forecasting. We have developed and refined a number of different views on the data and analytics we are deriving under this project, based on feedback from our partner-customers about what they perceive as most valuable for improving their operational efficiency. Task 4 - Extend Forecasting to Other Customer-Priority Crops ? Subtask: Accumulate EDDs using historical weather data for historical grower planting and harvest data and evaluate values for the priority crops, ideally for different geographic regions, varieties and growers. We investigated the use of EDDs as a harvest forecasting technique in our development of forecasting capabilities for celery and strawberries. ? Subtask: Use ground truth plant measurements from Task 1 to plot against accumulated EDDs and evaluate goodness of fit to assess which measurements provide reliable model parameters and have strong correlations to measurements that can be made from aerial imagery. For celery, we acquired field measurements of several plant characteristics we considered to be of possible relevance for yield forecasting. For strawberries, we selected several growth stages for observation over time. ? Subtask: Develop models using a methodology similar to iceberg lettuce for the priority crops: combine values, GAC and ground truth measurements and other imagery-derived measurements to develop a preliminary capability to forecast optimal harvest dates and associated yields. Celery Yield Forecasting Our focus for celery was on the development of a preliminary capability to forecast a celery field's harvest yields for a specified harvest date, rather than attempting to also forecast the date of optimal yield. We found the forecasting of such optimal harvest dates to be challenged not only by the inconsistencies observed in accumulated EDDs values, but also by significant variability in the days between planting and harvest as reported by our partner-customer. Strawberry Yield Forecasting Our approach involves three separate models. Model A takes as input UAV imagery and derives flower counts. Model M takes as input imagery dates, field location, plant variety and weather data and predicts when flowers will mature into later growth stages. The results of Model A and Model M are fed into Model Y to derive a yield estimate.???

    Publications