Progress 09/01/20 to 06/30/21
Outputs Target Audience:The target audience for this report is anyone involved with water treatment, agriculture, irrigation, & the resulting contaminated agricultural drainage water and the agirculutre drainge evaporation ponds. The purpose of this report is to provide a technical and economic analysis of a novel solar desalination method that can: 1. treat agriculture drainage to potable water standards to mitigate the negative environmental impact of agriculture drainage water 2. treat the concentrated agrilcuture drainge water in evaporation ponds to reclaim the extensive amount of land used for evaporation ponds and mitigate the negative environmental impacts of evaporation ponds. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?SolMem provided opportunities for professional development to undergraduates, graduates, and research professionals. An undergraduate student helped conduct research which was used as the foundation for the technoeconomic report; helearnedmembrane distillation fundamentals,key technoecomic performance parameters of NESMD (GOR, flux, LCOW), and how to work as part of a team. A Rice graduate student helped develop the experimental apparatus and helped with the water quality analysis, gaining hands on experience. A research professional conducted the experiments, analyzed the results, and generated the report, gaining experience on conducting stuctured research under a government grant. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?SolMem is using its connections in the water treatment field to disseminate the results of this grant, which indicate that our technology is a cost effective solution for managing agriculture drainage water. Specifically, SolMem is currently engaged with BlueTechValley, a California based organization whose members are academic and professional experts in water treatment and agriculture; we will use our connections with this organization to find potential demonstration sites for our pilot plant. Any connections that the USDA can provide in the agriculture drainage segment would be greatly appreciated. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
USDA SBIR Phase 1 Grant Final Report: Abridged 1 Introduction A Low Cost Desalination Method for Agriculture Drainage Management investigates a novel membrane distillation (MD) method called nano photonic enabled membrane distillation (NESMD) to produce pure water from agriculture drainage water using sunlight as the only energy source. 2 Experimental Results & Discussion 2.1 Impact of Solar Intensity on NESMD Performance NESMD experiments were conducted under 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 5000 W/m2. Key performance indicators (KPI) were flux, GOR (an efficiency parameter that represents the ratio energy consumed to treat feedwater to the energy delivered to NESMD membrane), and water recovery. All three KPIs substantially increased as solar intensity increased. Under 5000 W/m2 a flux of ~5 LMH, a GOR of 63%, and a water recovery of 99% were achieved. SolMem recommends coupling the NESMD technology with a parabolic trough to deliver concentrated sunlight to enable MLD. 2.2 Impact of Salinity on NESMD Performance Experimental results indicate that feed salinity does not adversely impact NESMD performance until around ~70,000 ppm. Agriculture drainage water ranges from hundreds of ppm up to a hundred thousand ppm. These results indicate that NESMD is suitable to treat agriculture drainage water up to ~70,000 ppm with 1000 W/m2 of solar irradiation. 2.3 Impact of Feed Flow Rate on NESMD Performance Results indicated that feed flow rate does not adversely impact NESMD flux or GOR, but adversely impacts the water recovery. It is recommended to use the lowest feed flow that maximizes water recovery, but does not induce membrane scaling from increased concentration of the feed solutes. 2.4 Impact of Coolant Flow Rate on NESMD Performance Results indicated that coolant flow rate does not have a large impact on NESMD performance at the lab scale. NESMD performance is not impacted as long as the coolant flow rate has sufficient capacity to receive the latent heat of condensation of the product vapor. Future experiments should investigate extremely low and extremely high coolant flow rates to further validate the above claim. Additionally, experiments need to be conducted at a bench/pilot scale, as heat and mass transfer behave differently at a larger scale. 2.5 Removal of As, Se, B Arsenic, selenium, and boron are troublesome contaminants commonly found in agriculture drainage water. ICP-OES and conductivity meter results confirmed that membrane distillation treated 100% of arsenic, selenium, and boron from the simulated agriculture drainage evaporation pond water. Complete removal arsenic and selenium indicates that NESMD is a robust and reliable treatment method for the most extreme case of agriculture drainage water. 2.6 Impact of TOC on NESMD Performance Organic compounds are commonly found in agriculture drainage water, and the concentration of organics is typically measured in ppm of total organic carbon (TOC). Experiments were performed at the highest concentrations of organics found in agriculture drainage literature (93 ppm) to exhibit a worst-case scenario, under 1000 W/m2. Flux results indicated that organic fouling does not have a significant impact on NESMD performance over the course of a single day of operation. 2.7 Impact of scaling ions (Ca, Mg, SO4, CO3) on NESMD performance Agriculture drainage water contains common scaling compounds, such as calcium/magnesium -carbonates/sulfates; Flux results indicate the NESMD is adversely impacted by the presence of common scaling compounds. While no wetting events occurred (transport of feed solute to the product freshwater), the flux clearly decreased as the day of NESMD operation progressed. It is recommended that antiscalant is added to the NESMD feed in order to mitigate the adverse impacts of scaling compounds on flux, and to prevent wetting events. 3 Pilot Plant Analysis Experimental results indicate that NESMD has the potential to treat feedwater up to 250,000 ppm TDS to generate freshwater well within EPA drinking water standards and operate at minimum liquid discharge (MLD). SolMem believes these results merit a pilot scale analysis of NESMD. 3.1 Pilot Plant Pre-treatment Requirements First hand analysis and research of agriculture drainage water revealed that the pilot plant will require the following pre-treatment operations: cartridge filter, and chemical dosing pumps for addition of antiscalant and sodium hypochlorite. 3.2 Pilot Plant Cleaning in Place (CIP) System Research into common membrane distillation system revealed that oxalic & citric acid is required for acidic cleaning of scaling, sodium hydroxide is required for caustic treatment of organic fouling, and an air compressor/blower will be needed to dry membranes if a wetting events occurs. 4 Technoeconomic Analysis The first competitive area for NESMD is off-grid desalination of agrilculture drainage water. The primary competing technology in the off-grid desalination area is photovoltaic panels coupled with RO desalination (PV-RO). The main advantage of PV-RO is the use of renewable solar energy and the availability of commercial parts. The main disadvantages include the low energy efficiency of PV panels, high energy costs of RO, and feedwater limitations of RO. PV-RO systems have a TDS operational range of 0 - 70,000 ppm. Existing PV-RO plants have reported LCOW over a wide range 2.3 - 13 $/m3. The LCOW for PV-RO is a strong function of location. The second competitive area for NESMD is the concentration of brines beyond the operational limit of RO (TDS >70,000 ppm). NESMD's main competing technology in the field of brine concentration are mechanical vapor compression (MVC) brine concentrators (BC). Quotes from brine concentrator vendors have an average LCOW range of 7.5 - 29 $/m3. The model for a single effect NESMD unit has a predicted LCOW range of 1.6 - 8 $/m3. If SolMem develops multi-effect NESMD technology, the predicted LCOW range is 1.10 - 2.5 $/m3. 4.2 Sensitivity Analysis & Cost Minimization Strategy There are four main cost components to the NESMD LCOW: 1. System equipment capital cost 2. Parabolic trough capital cost 3. System equipment operational cost 4. Parabolic trough operational cost. The sensitivity analysis of SolMem's LCOW model revealed that NESMD LCOW is the strongest function of GOR, system equipment cost, and parabolic trough cost. By maximizing the GOR through a multi-effect NESMD reactor, minimizing the parabolic trough cost through strategic partnerships with companies developing state-of-the-art parabolic troughs, and predicting the impact of feed salinity on the LCOW, SolMem can offer a competitive, low solar powered desalination that offers a simple solution to complex wastewater problems, capable of achieving minimum liquid discharge in a single unit operation.
Publications
|