Source: GRAYSTAR PACIFIC SEAFOOD LTD submitted to NRP
RURAL COASTAL DEEP OCEAN MINERAL WATER PRODUCTION
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1022691
Grant No.
2020-33610-31868
Cumulative Award Amt.
$100,000.00
Proposal No.
2020-00728
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2020
Project End Date
Mar 31, 2022
Grant Year
2020
Program Code
[8.6]- Rural & Community Development
Recipient Organization
GRAYSTAR PACIFIC SEAFOOD LTD
1345 W 9TH AVE STE 203
ANCHORAGE,AK 995013236
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
This Phase 1 project addresses the research priority of increasing opportunities for employment and income generation in rural Alaskan coastal communities. The problem is low employment and poor economic opportunity in rural coastal Alaskan communities. There arevery few jobs, government support is extensive, and electricity is expensive. The opportunity is to develop a sustainable business, which will serve the rapidly growing nutraceutical market, provide year-round employment in rural Alaska, and offer the possibility of reducing retail electricity costs. The goal of this project is to develop a business to produce and sell Deep Ocean Water (DOW) as a nutraceutical beverage, in one or more coastal Alaska communities. DOW is seawater at obtained ocean depths of 250-1,500 meters. It has these characteristics: low temperature, high purity, and high concentrations (relative to surface seawater and to most mineral waters) of beneficial mineral nutrients, especially magnesium, calcium, and potassium. Its great depth means that it has minimal to no bacteria or phytoplankton (which, near the surface, remove the minerals from solution). DOW is a source of electrolytes that generally provide many health benefits. This is important because deficiencies in macro minerals and micro trace elements can lead to premature aging, immune dysfunction, and susceptibility to cardiovascular related diseases and diabetes. Therefore, we expect our products to be marketable with two distinct, desirable attributes - health and performance.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
0%
Applied
50%
Developmental
50%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
50250102000100%
Knowledge Area
502 - New and Improved Food Products;

Subject Of Investigation
5010 - Food;

Field Of Science
2000 - Chemistry;
Goals / Objectives
The problem is low employment and poor economic opportunity in rural coastal Alaskan communities. There are very few jobs, government support is extensive, and electricity is expensive. The opportunity is to develop a sustainable business, which will serve the rapidly growing nutraceutical market, and provide year-round employment in rural Alaska. The goal of this project is to develop a business to produce and sell Deep Ocean Water (DOW) as a nutraceutical beverage, in one or more coastal Alaska communities. This project will use established Reverse Osmosis (RO) technology in innovative ways, to enhance the economic development of rural Hawaii (at first) and rural Alaska (ultimate goal). RO technology is well-established, most visibly for municipal and maritime drinking water supplies. There are no ready sources of DOW in Alaska, because there are no deep seawater intakes. But the Hawaii Ocean Sciences & Technology Park of the National Energy Laboratory of Hawaii Authority offers a ready source of DOW, which supports many small, ocean-related businesses. We will rent indoor work space at HOST Park, install a portable RO system, produce test batches of DOW for human consumption, test the RO membranes from several manufacturers, evaluate production efficiency using cold seawater (NELHA produces at 5ºC) vs the equipment'snominal 25 ºC operating temperature, conduct chemical and organoleptic testing of the various batches, and evaluate possible Alaskan sites for pilot-scale and eventual bulk-scale production.
Project Methods
Efforts --(1) Buy, install, and operate a small RO system at HOST Park, with significant hands-on support from Reverse Osmosis of South Florida.(2) Be sure to include plumbing with which to blend small quantities of sea water (purified but not desalinated) into our RO products.(3) Test RO membranes from several manufacturers.(4) Conduct membrane testing at various temperatures: 5ºC HOST Park input (probably like Alaska's), and 10ºC and 15ºC (the manufacturer's nominal operating temperature is 25ºC), and note how long production takes and how much energy it consumes.(5) Engage an independent laboratory to conduct chemical testing (cations, anions, TDS, turbidity) of -• HOST Park seawater input• Our DOW outputs• Competitors' DOW products(6) Conduct our own organoleptic testing of -• Our DOW outputs• Competitors' DOW products(7) Evaluate possible Alaska sites for DOW production -• Preliminary list (Sitka, Seward, Kodiak, Unalaska/Dutch Harbor, Adak)• Compare and contrast DOW production in Hawaii vs how DOW might be produced in AlaskaEvaluation --• Which RO membrane(s) are suitable for cold sea water input• Rate of DOW production with cold seawater vs manufacturers' nominal rates• Energy efficiency of pilot-scale production of selected DOW products• Optimum "recipe": blend of RO water with some seawater, to achieve desired attributes (chemical and organoleptic)• Preliminary identification of probable containers (cans vs bottles)• Preliminary identification of possible marketing channels (wholesale, private label, retail, online, etc)• Possible methods of producing Deep Ocean Minerals and Deep Ocean Sea Salt from Deep Ocean Ocean Water (eg- evaporation)• Criteria for evaluation of possible Alaska sites: proximity to deep water, local infrastructure, cost of doing business (eg- electricity, construction, operation, shipping), logistics to/from Anchorage, etc

Progress 09/01/20 to 04/04/22

Outputs
Target Audience:Our target audience was sources of next-phase funding, both government and private sources. In this Phase 1, we proved the concept in Hawaii, and made the technology ready to advance to pilot-scale commercial production in Alaska (Alaska production of Alaska DeepOcean is the ultimate goal of our work). Changes/Problems:We experienced no changes or problems beyond those outlined in our progress report. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We started (and are continuing) to expand our network of possible investors. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? We accomplished most of our specific technical objectives (items 1-7), and added several additional accomplishments with no budget impact -- (1) Buy, install, and operate a small RO system at HOST Park, with significant hands on support from Reverse Osmosis of South Florida (ROSF). We switched from ROSF to AquaClear (AC), which supplied the RO system. PI Grabacki installed and operated the system, with some technical support from AC by phone, and lots of guidance from HOST Park operations staff. (2) Be sure to include plumbing with which to blend small quantities of sea water (purified but not desalinated) into our RO products As requested, AC installed a blend valve for this purpose. This did not actually do the job. But I accomplished this objective, with greater precision, by use of graduated cylinders. (3) Test RO membranes from several manufacturers AC supplied membranes from three manufacturers, but we used only one set, because of the other difficulties in operating the system (ie - I did not want to risk damaging the RO pressure vessels). (4) Conduct membrane testing at various temperatures: 5 C HOST Park input (probably like Alaska's), and 10 C and 15 C (the manufacturer's nominal operating temperature is 25 C), and note how long production takes and how much energy it consumes There was no ability to predict or control the temperature of the incoming seawater, or the ratio of cold/deep sweater vs warm/surface seawater. We ran most tests on straight cold (deep) seawater (because that is what we will encounter in Alaska), and experimented with blending in small amounts of warm seawater. (5) Engage an independent laboratory to conduct chemical testing (cations, anions, TDS, turbidity) of - • HOST Park seawater input • Our DOW outputs • Competitors' DOW products The chemical analyses of our DOW samples (by FQ Labs, Honolulu) wrer more expensive than anticipated. So - • I used HOST Park's data on its seawater input • I obtained chemistry data of competing products from their labels and websites (6) Conduct our own organoleptic testing of - • Our DOW outputs • Competitors' DOW products Done at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5% seawater blend into the RO permeate. Done with ogo (seaweed) infusion of DOW permeate. Done with competitors' products (7) Evaluate possible Alaska sites for DOW production - • Preliminary list (Sitka, Seward, Kodiak, Unalaska/Dutch Harbor, Adak) • Compare and contrast DOW production in Hawaii vs how DOW might be produced in Alaska Done. Selected Seward , and crafted a preliminary design of the process to be used in Alaska. Also met with Alaska Glacier Products (producer of Clear Alaska Glacier), regarding toll bottling of Alaska Deep Ocean. Additional accomplishments -- (8) Created a pitch deck with which to attract investment (government and private). (9) Created Alaska Deep Ocean LLC as a subsidiary of GRAYSTAR Pacific. (10) Performed a competitive analysis for our ilntended products. (11) Shipped our reverse osmosis equipment from Kailua-Kona HI to Seward AK, where we will operate. (12) Selected a maker of sea salt who will buy our waste brine. (13) Completed intensive TABA training.

Publications

  • Type: Other Status: Submitted Year Published: 2022 Citation: We submitted our final technical report to NIFA on 4 April 2022


Progress 09/01/20 to 08/31/21

Outputs
Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems:Request an extension to 4 April 2022 • Justification: significant unforeseen delays related to COVID-19, for example - o postponement of travel to work site (two trips), until after Alaska COVID- 19 testing protocols were in place (which had to agree with Hawaii requirements for visitors) o receiving the first two COVID-19 vaccinations, and being able to demonstrate officially to Hawaii entry agency o repeated delays by the equipment vendor, because of delays in their supply chains for the requisite components What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Summary of progress to date - • We accomplished most of our specific technical objectives - (1) Buy, install, and operate a small RO system at HOST Park, with significant hands on support from Reverse Osmosis of South Florida (ROSF). We switched from ROSF to AquaClear (AC), which supplied the RO system. PI Grabacki installed and operated the system, with some technical support from AC by phone, and lots of guidance from HOST Park operations staff. (2) Be sure to include plumbing with which to blend small quantities of sea water (purified but not desalinated) into our RO products As requested, AC installed a blend valve for this purpose. This did not actually do the job. But I accomplished this objective, with greater precision, by use of graduated cylinders. (3) Test RO membranes from several manufacturers AC supplied membranes from three manufacturers, but we used only one set, because of the other difficulties in operating the system (ie - I did not want to risk damaging the RO pressure vessels). (4) Conduct membrane testing at various temperatures: 5 C HOST Park input (probably like Alaska's), and 10 C and 15 C (the manufacturer's nominal operating temperature is 25 C), and note how long production takes and how much energy it consumes There was no ability to predict or control the temperature of the incoming seawater, or the ratio of cold/deep sweater vs warm/surface seawater. We ran most tests on straight cold (deep) seawater (because that is what we will encounter in Alaska), and experimented with blending in small amounts of warm seawater. (5) Engage an independent laboratory to conduct chemical testing (cations, anions, TDS, turbidity) of - • HOST Park seawater input • Our DOW outputs • Competitors' DOW products The chemical analyses of our DOW samples (by FQ Labs, Honolulu) wrer more expensive than anticipated. So - • I used HOST Park's data on its seawater input • I obtained chemistry data of competing products from their labels and websites (6) Conduct our own organoleptic testing of - • Our DOW outputs • Competitors' DOW products Done at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5% seawater blend into the RO permeate. Done with ogo (seaweed) infusion of DOW permeate. Done with competitors' products (7) Evaluate possible Alaska sites for DOW production - • Preliminary list (Sitka, Seward, Kodiak, Unalaska/Dutch Harbor, Adak) • Compare and contrast DOW production in Hawaii vs how DOW might be produced in Alaska Done. Selected Seward , and crafted a preliminary design of the process to be used in Alaska. Also met with Alaska Glacier Products (producer of Clear Alaska Glacier), regarding toll bottling of Alaska Deep Ocean.

Publications