Progress 09/01/20 to 04/30/23
Outputs Target Audience:
Nothing Reported
Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?
Nothing Reported
How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
In addition to χ12341Salmonellavector we chose to explore the use of these alternative delivery vehicles, since we have noted some advantages of them in other vaccine programs including our Salmonella food safety program. We have also constructed a new plasmid capable of dual expression of two high-priority antigens. This allowed us to create one vaccine expressing two different antigens as opposed to a bivalent mixture. Furthermore, we constructed various vaccine candidates fused to the ClyA protein that facilitates protein expression and incorporation into Outer Membrane Vesicles (OMVs) to improve immunogenicity. We targeted Peb1, O988c, FlaA, Cja, Dps, TlyA, PorA, and Omp18. To enhance functionality of these antigens, we fused them to the vesicle-associated toxin ClyA of Escherichia coli. The Peb1 and O988c were individually fused ClyA. The FlaA, Cja and Dps was constructed as an expression operon in which FlaA was fused to the ClyA; similarly, TlyA, PorA and Omp18 were constructed as expression operon and TlyA was fused to the ClyA. We confirmed expression of the proteins using antiHis antibodies since each protein was his tagged. The plasmids containing the above constructs were introduced into Salmonella Typhimurium lysis strains χ12341, χ11534 and non-lysis CS17 (?Cya & Crp). Each strain was tested for expression of the antigens and stability during in vitro passages. Based on these results we produced batches for four different vaccine candidates and tested their efficacy in vaccination challenge model. To improve the challenge model, we have created a frozen seed culture. We have also systematically analyzed the in vitro culture conditions for Campylobacter and developed an optimized diluent with reducing agents containing oxygen-scavenging additives to ensure that the first and last chicken in each challenge gets the same quantity of Campylobacter challenge agent. We developed a Real Time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) to eliminate the bird-to-bird variability. Efficacy testing of vaccine candidates. We conducted three clinical studies in which we tested the efficacy of the vaccine candidates in broiler chickens. Study 1: Five (5) vaccine candidates (designated as C198, C199, C200, C201 and C202) were tested either singly or in combination. Ninety-six (96) male birds were assigned to four (4) treatment groups with two (2) cages per treatment and twelve (12) birds per cage. The group 1 served as non-vaccinated challenge control; Group 2 (C198), 3(C199 +201) and 4 (200+202) were vaccinated at study day (DOT) 0 by spray and D7 by oral gavage. On DOT14 all chickens were challenged with C. jejuni strain JB (a recent chicken isolate by oral gavage. On DOT 28 and 35, five (5) birds per cage were humanely euthanized. Both ceca and spleen/liver samples from each of the birds from each treatment group were aseptically removed and placed into individual sterile plastic sampling bags for C. jejuni isolation, culturing, and analysis. There were no differences (100% positive) in C. jejuni prevalence between any vaccine and the challenge control at either 28 or 35 days. On day 35, the mean of T4 (C200 and C202) was significantly lower than that of T1 and T2, while T3 was intermediate. The T4 (C200 + C202) had the lowest number at 10 Log 7.71 CFU/g , TG1, 2 and 3 had 10 Log 8.98 CFU/g, 8.82 CFU/g and 8.54 CFU/g, respectively. Prevalence of C. jejuni in liver/spleen was lowest in the untreated control at both day 28 and 35. Study #2: In this study, three treatments evaluating four different combinations of constructs were evaluated for reduction in C. jejuni colonization of ceca and internal organs. The vaccines were coarse sprayed (0.25 ml/chick) at day old and then gavaged on day 7 per experimental design to simulate a drinking water boost. On day 14, all chicks were challenged by oral gavage with the C. jejuni JB Strain at 5.0x 105 CFU/chick. On day 29 and 35, five birds per cage at each time were euthanized and ceca; liver/spleen were removed for C. jejuni enumeration by 10 fold dilution. There was no significant difference between treatments or days with respect to Campylobacter prevalence. Study #3: In this study different combinations of live Curtiss Healthcare vaccines were evaluated for efficacy against Campylobacter jejuni challenge strain, J.B. Treatments included a challenge control, Curtiss Vaccines 200/202, Curtiss Vaccines 210/211, and Curtiss Vaccines 200/202/210/211. Each treatment was represented by three replicate floor pens of 25 male Ross broiler chicks. At hatch (DOT 0), vaccines were applied at a dose of 0.25mL per chick and boosted on DOT 7 by gavage (0.1mL/chick). All chicks in all groups were orally gavaged with Campylobacter jejuni JB strain (1.4 x 105 CFU/mL) on DOT 14. On DOT 35, ceca and pooled liver/spleen samples were collected from five birds in each group. On DOT 43, only ceca samples were collected from five birds in each group. Campylobacter prevalence in the ceca on each collection day is found in Table 1. All groups had 100% prevalence in the samples collected on DOT 35. By DOT 42, the combination with Curtiss Vaccines 200/202/210/211 had numerically lower prevalence in the ceca relative other groups (P=0.24), Figure 1. On day 35, enumeration in the ceca was numerically lower in all vaccinated groups relative to the challenged control (Table 2, Figure 2). At this time, the Curtiss Vaccine 200/202/210/211 had the numerically lowest outcome (5.31 log10 CFU/g) relative to the challenge control (5.99 log10 CFU/g) (P=0.23). By day 43, overall Campylobacter colonization of the ceca had increased and all groups were numerically similar. Overall, the Curtiss vaccine 200/202/210/211 had the numerically lowest ceca campylobacter enumeration. Liver/spleen samples were evaluated for Campylobacter jejuni prevalence on DOT 35. The Curtiss vaccine 200/202/210/211 had 7% positives compared to the untreated challenge control at 20% (P=0.27). The Campylobacter jejuni prevalence (100%) on DOT 35 demonstrates a successful uniform challenge for all groups with expected animal-to-animal variations. This demonstrates that our approach to further optimization of the challenge material and culturing methods were successful and reliable. Vaccine candidates c200 and 202 consistently reduced the cecal Campylobacter loads in the ceca of vaccinated chickens when compared to control animals 3 weeks after challenge. Further optimization of vaccine dose, and timing of vaccination may further improve the efficacy of these vaccines. Overall, results are encouraging that one or more of these vaccines or vaccine combinations are effective in lowering C. jejuni colonization in chickens which is likely in reducing foodborne campylobacteria infection in human.
Publications
|
Progress 09/01/21 to 08/31/22
Outputs Target Audience:
Nothing Reported
Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?
Nothing Reported
How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We will further tests our candidates and select the most effective candidate which then will be tested for licesing.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Since our last report we made significant progress in three areas: Challenge development and optimization: In our previous experiments we noticed that there was significant variation (up to 6-7 Log10 CFU/gram of tissue) in the quantity of C. jejuni recovered from the non-vaccinated challenged chickens. This was attributed to this to challenge material and re-isolation procedures since we demonstrated that C. jejuni highly sensitive environmental factors. We addressed these by establishing a frozen challenge material using special medium and also employing special medium during recovery from the tissues. We also developed a quantitative PCR (qPCR) method. We validated both the challenge material and the quantitation methods by using spiked samples which were tested by culture and qPCR methods. We also tested our methodologies in a small challenge experiment. Our results showed that our qPCR method and culture method were correlated well qualitatively. The limit of detection for qPCR was 4log10 CFU/gram and worked well cecal samples and small intestinal samples in which there were large number of C. jejuni but not for liver and spleen samples suggesting C. jejuni load were below detection limit of qPCR. These experiments showed us that C. jejuni colonization is not limited to ceca, it readily colonizes small intestines and internal organs as shown in liver and spleen samples though much lower numbers. We will be further investigating these observations and their relevance to food safety. Construction of new vaccine candidates: For this, we targeted Peb1, O988c, FlaA, Cja, Dps, TlyA, PorA, and Omp18. To enhance functionality of these antigens, we fused them to the vesicle-associated toxin ClyA of Escherichia coli. The Peb1 and O988c were individually fused ClyA. The FlaA, Cja and Dps was constructed as an expression operon in which FlaA was fused to the ClyA; similarly, TlyA, PorA and Omp18 were constructed as expression operon and TlyA was fused to the ClyA. We confirmed expression of the proteins using antiHis antibodies since each protein was his tagged. The plasmids containing the above constructs were introduced into Salmonella Typhimurium lysis strains χ12341, χ11534 and non-lysis CS17 (?Cya & Crp). Each strain was tested for expression of the antigens and stability during in vitro passages. Based on these results we produced batches for four different vaccine candidates and tested their efficacy in vaccination challenge model. Efficacy testing of vaccine candidates: For this we conducted two clinical study in which tested efficacy of the vaccine candidates in broiler chickens. Study 1: Five (5) vaccine candidates (designated as C198, C199, C200, C201 and C202) were tested either singly or in combination. Ninety-six (96) male birds were assigned to four (4) treatment groups with two (2) cages per treatment and twelve (12) birds per cage. The group 1 served as non-vaccinated challenge control; Group 2 (C198), 3(C199 +201) and 4 (200+202) were vaccinated at study day (DOT) 0 by spray and D7 by oral gavage. On DOT14 all chickens were challenged with C. jejuni strain JB (a recent chicken isolate by oral gavage. On DOT 28 and 35, five (5) birds per cage were humanely euthanized. Both ceca and spleen/liver samples from each of the birds from each treatment group were aseptically removed and placed into individual sterile plastic sampling bags for isolation, culturing, and analysis. There were no differences (100% positive) in C. jejuni prevalence between any vaccine and the challenge control at either 28 or 35 days. On day 35, the mean of T4 (C200 and C202) was significantly lower than that of T1 and T2, while T3 was intermediate. The T4 (C200 + C202) had the lowest number at 10 Log 7.71 CFU/g , TG1, 2 and 3 had 10 Log 8.98 CFU/g, 8.82 CFU/g and 8.54 CFU/g, respectively. Prevalence of C. jejuni in liver/spleen was lowest in the untreated control at both day 28 and 35. b) Study #2: In this study, three treatments evaluating four different combinations of constructs were evaluated for reduction in C. jejuni colonization of ceca and internal organs. The vaccines were coarse sprayed (0.25 ml/chick) at day old and then gavaged on day 7 per experimental design to simulate a drinking water boost. On day 14, all chicks were challenged by oral gavage with the C. jejuni JB Strain at 5.0x 105 CFU/chick. On day 29 and 35, five birds per cage at each time were euthanized and ceca; liver/spleen were removed for C. jejuni enumeration by 10 fold dilution. There was no significant difference between treatments or days with respect to Campylobacter prevalence. Below table summarizes the C. jejuni concentrations on cecal samples of control and vaccinated groups. Mean (SE) Campylobacter log10 CFU/g in culture-positive ceca samples by treatment and day. Ceca were collected from 5 birds in each of 2 cages per group on days 29 and 35. Treatment Day 29 Day 35 Total T1. Untreated 5.86 (0.30) 6.13 (0.30) 5.99a (0.21) T2. C200 & C202 5.47 (0.30) 5.52 (0.32) 5.49a (0.22) T3. C210 & C211 5.74 (0.30) 5.23 (0.30) 5.49a (0.21) Total 5.69a (0.30) 5.62a (0.30) 5.65 (0.21) Marginal means with a superscript in common do not differ with a level of significance of 5% over all comparisons. Overall, results are encouraging that one or more of these vaccines or vaccine combinations are effective in lowering C. jejuni colonization in chickens which is likely in reducing foodborne campylobacteria infection in human.
Publications
|
Progress 09/01/20 to 08/31/21
Outputs Target Audience:
Nothing Reported
Changes/Problems:As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic the company was forced to scale-back our R&D operations in 2020 and the first part of 2021. This presented a great challenge in moving the project forward as the majority of the proposed studies require access to a vivarium. One of the antigens we proposed to clone has proven difficult. This may be because expression is toxic. As an alternative we may trying cloning small fragments or alternatively we may remove it from our list of potential candidates. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?
Nothing Reported
How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic the company was forced to scale-back our R&D operations in 2020 and the first part of 2021. While we have made some progress on the proposed studies with regards to the construction of vaccine candidates, the limitations imposed on our vivarium have not allowed us to start the proposed animal studies. We anticipate that we will have greater access to the vivarium in second half of 2021 and are confident that we will make significant progress on the proposed work and that the project can be completed within the requested extension of time. Earlier this year we requested and were granted a no-cost extension for award number 2020-33610-31987. An interim report was submitted to USDA that describes what was accomplished during the pandemic.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic the company was forced to scale-back our R&D operations in 2020 and the first part of 2021. While we have made some progress on the proposed studies with regards to the construction of vaccine candidates, the limitations imposed on our vivarium have not allowed us to start the proposed animal studies. We anticipate that we will have greater access to the vivarium in second half of 2021 and are confident that we will make significant progress on the proposed work and that the project can be completed within the requested extension of time. Earlier this year we requested and were granted a no-cost extension for award number 2020-33610-31987. Below is a review of work done as of May 2021 in support of this SBIR grant to develop recombinant attenuated salmonella vaccines to reduce Campylobacter colonization in poultry. During the Covid imposed shutdown we conducted additional bio-informatic analysis and further prioritized our list of antigens to select for the four we feel have the highest potential including Omp18, Peb1, DPS and Cj0988c. The team also conducted further characterization of the additional nine constructs already cloned into the pYA3764 and pG8R18 backbone and several plasmids containing candidate antigens have been moved into alternative Salmonella delivery vehicles. We have chosen to explore the use of these alternative delivery vehicles since we have noted some advantages of them in other vaccine programs. We have also constructed a new plasmid capable of dual expression of two high priority antigens. In addition, as a reagent we have purified protein for four proteins and for two proteins we have been able to immunized chickens and rabbits to generate a polyclonal antisera for use in western blots and ELISA's. The anti-sera from chickens is of good quality and demonstrated the antigenicity of these proteins in birds. Attempts to clone the Cj0427 antigen into the pYA3764 and pG8R18 vectors and obtain stable protein expression in the c12341 Salmonella vector proved difficult. We therefore propose to drop this candidate from our list. Lastly, we have done additional work to improve the Campylobacter colonization model. Campylobacter is highly sensitive to oxygen and exposure to oxygen during challenge or recovery after challenge can lead to wide variation in the model making it difficult to see positive effects of the vaccines. As discussed in our SBIR proposal the JB Campylobacter jejuni isolate that we propose to use in our studies that is found in the cluster associated with carcass contamination is less well lab adapted and more susceptible to oxygen exposure than the traditionally used NCTC strain. To improve the model, we have created a frozen masterseed culture for use in challenge models to ensure batch to batch consistency in the number of CFU's in each challenge dose. We have also developed an optimized diluent with oxygen scavenging additives that will ensure that the first and last chicken in each challenge gets the same titer regardless of time. These same additives can be used during the recovery phase to minimize the effects of oxygen exposure as a result of time and handling on the CFU counts recovered. We believe these modifications will decrease the variability among treated groups and allow for use of smaller number of animals and better statistical power. The addition of these changes is currently being tested in the model by Southern Poultry Research (SPRG) and results are expected in July of 2021. If successful we would implement these changes in the model for use in evaluating vaccine candidates.
Publications
|