Source: AIL RESEARCH, INC submitted to NRP
A THERMAL DISTILLATION PROCESS FOR EXPANDING WATER RESOURCES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1020200
Grant No.
2019-33610-30171
Cumulative Award Amt.
$648,648.00
Proposal No.
2019-02311
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2019
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2022
Grant Year
2019
Program Code
[8.4]- Air, Water and Soils
Recipient Organization
AIL RESEARCH, INC
57 HAMILTON AVE STE 205
HOPEWELL,NJ 08525
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
The project will expand agricultural water resources by proving the efficacy with which a novel, thermal distillation process separates waste brine into pure water and solid mineralsthat can be landfilled or sold to a secondary processor for mineral recovery. In the preferred implementation, solar collectors supply the thermal energy needed to drive the process, thereby meeting USDA's program priority to expand the use of alternative and renewable energy. Although the projects seeks toexpandwater resources for agricultural, the technology to be proven will also address a second USDA program priority: aid agriculturally-related manufacturing by providing the country's food processing plants an environmentally acceptable, economical means of treating wastewater.
Animal Health Component
35%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
35%
Developmental
65%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1110210202040%
4030210202060%
Goals / Objectives
A large majority of the world's freshwater usage goes to agriculture - estimates put agricultural needs worldwide at around 70% of all human use. Furthermore agriculture's use of water is still increasing globally due not only to population growth, but also due to higher plant transpiration rates driven by increasing ambient temperatures. In many parts of the world this has led to significant drops in groundwater levels as it is pumped out faster than it can recharge.In California, where more than 60% of the U.S. fruits and vegetables are grown, agriculture accounts for approximately 80% of water use. The state estimates that groundwater is being over-pumped by at least 2.5 million acre-feet per year leading to twenty-one of the state's groundwater basins being identified as critically over-drafted. Under California's new Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, over 1 million irrigated acres in California, 10% of the state's total, are at risk being forced to be fallowed unless new water supplies are found.However, in California and elsewhere while freshwater reserves in the ground are shrinking brackish groundwater reserves are growing. This growth in brackish groundwater is mainly due to salts brought in with irrigation water, seawater intrusion in coastal zones or agricultural runoff. For example it is estimated that in California's Central Valley salts are building up at a rate of 700 million tons per year due to both the importation of irrigation water from the mountains and agricultural runoff high in nitrates.Brackish groundwater is mostly unusable for agriculture. As groundwater salts increase over 500TDS, plants grow more slowly, yield less, require more water, and suffer greater mortality. Salt buildup in agricultural basins is increasingly viewed as a long-term threat comparable to water shortage.Recent surveys have identified tens of billions of acre-feet of brackish groundwater underlying significant portions of the U.S. California alone has hundreds of millions of acre-feet of brackish groundwater--over one-fourth of all the water in the state. The use of these brackish groundwater reserves for agriculture could significantly ease over pumping of neighboring fresh groundwater reserves, allowing them to recharge.So why aren't we desalinating brackish groundwater for agriculture? The simple answer is that costs are much too high. Even for high value crops farmers can only afford to pay around $0.60 per cubic meter for water--a price that is about one-third that for potable water produced by the Carlsbad and Santa Barbara reverse-osmosis seawater desalination plants.With as little as 1/30th the salt concentration of seawater, brackish water should be less expensive to desalinate. However, a breakdown of the costs to desalinate brackish water shows that the process is heavily penalized by the cost of waste brine disposal. If disposal costs are ignored, a reverse osmosis facility could convert as much as 90% of brackish water to freshwater at a cost of $0.40 per cubic meter. However the 10% stream of waste brine with high salt concentrations presents an almost impossible disposal challenge, costing from $6 to $24 per cubic meter. Brine disposal increases the blended price for water provided by inland RO to between $0.95 to $2.75 per cubic meter--a price well beyond the $0.60 per cubic meter that growers of even high value crops (e.g., vineyards, tree nuts, tomatoes, berries) can afford.Why is brine disposal so expensive? Weight of the brine is the key issue. An RO facility treating 100 acre-feet of brackish water at 90% recovery will leave 10 acre-feet, 13,600 tons of brine to be disposed. The four environmentally approved disposal means now available - (1) transportation to an ocean disposal point, (2) injection into a deep well, (3) evaporation in a surface pond, and (4) evaporation in a dedicated thermal Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) facility--are all far too expensive.Of the four disposal methods now available, the one for which technology advances could dramatically lower disposal cost is the dedicated ZLD facility. Our primary objective is to bring to the market a ZLD process that immediately lowers disposal costs to less than $3.50 per cubic meter and, when mature, to less than $2.00. Once these objectives are met, the our ZLDtechnology will open the country's vast inland brackish groundwater reserves to agriculture. Furthermore by taking salt out of the agricultural water ecosystem the technology we develop will begin to reverse salt buildup in many of the nation's key agricultural water basins.
Project Methods
The development of the brine concentrator will proceed through multiple phases of laboratory testing in which small scale models are first operated with representative brine for increasing long durations leading to the operation of full-scale modules under conditions that simulate field operation. The experience from laboratory operation will feed into a design study, including engineering drawings of a 5-gpm deployable system that extracts at least 90% of the water from the waste brine discharged from a reverse-osmosis plant that processes brackish water. Computer modeling of the 5-gpm plant will determine its energy use and operating costs (dollars per cubic meter of product). An engineering analysis of the cost to manufacture the 5-gpm system will be used to estimate its final selling price to the end-user and the capital component of the cost to process brine (again, dollars per cubic meter of product).Laboratory tests of alternative configurations and materials for a brine crystallizer will be conducted. Detailed, post-test examinations, including SEM imaging, will determine which materials can meet the long term performance requirements of a brine crystallizer. Engineering drawings will be prepared of possible brine crystallizer.

Progress 09/01/19 to 08/31/22

Outputs
Target Audience:Industrial manufacturers and users of technology for concentrating brine; government agencies that regulate facilities for brackish water conversion Changes/Problems:Proprietary changes have been made to the design for the DGD processor that correct problems that occurred in Phase II testing and in the Bureau of Reclamation competition. The changes are now being implemented in a 30-plate module. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?A 1-gpm DGD processor based on the DGD technology developed in the Phase II SBIR effort was built and operated for one week as part of the "More Water, Less Concentrate" competition sponsored by the Bureau of Reclamation. A final report documenting the one-week test has been submited to the Bureau of Reclamation What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Phase II work, while not yet proving the long-term operation of a full-scale, brine concentrator module, has successfully identified critical failure mechanisms. All identified failure mechanisms have reasonable design solutions that are now being implemented in a 30-plate model with full-size plates (i.e., 18" x 90"). If a DGD brine concentrator is to expand inland water resources it must meet an initial cost metric of $3.40 per cubic meter of processed brine. The CAPEX for the DGD, which will be on the order of $2.00 per cubic meter, can be met only if the central processing module is fabricated from relatively inexpensive materials. The extruded polypropylene condensing plates and non-woven fiberglass wicks that were successfully used in the Phase I work can meet the target CAPEX for a commercial system. The design for a DGD prototype composed mostly of extruded polypropylene plates and non-woven fiberglass wicks that can efficiently operate long term must address the following challenges: During the start-up transient, the upper section of the prototype increases in temperature by approximately 80oC (144oF). The Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) for the polypropylene plates is about an order of magnitude greater than the CTE for fiberglass. This difference in expansion/contraction during thermal cycling must be accommodated without stress-induced distortions that cause the brine wicks and condensing plates to touch. The scale-up of the prototype to plates that are approximately 8 feet (2.4 m) in height greatly increases that hydrostatic pressure on the fittings and seals at the bottom of each plate. The scale-up to longer plates must be accompanied by a higher brine flow per wick if the CAPEX target is to be met. The requirement to collect the brine that flows off the wicks without contaminating the condensate that flows off the plates becomes more difficult to meet as the per-wick brine flow increases. Polypropylene is a mostly non-crystalline material that creeps under stress. The creep will be greatest at high temperature and can lead to distortions that compromise critical isolation/sealing elements within the assembly. During Phase II, 12configurations of a DGD processor were built and tested. Although none of the twelve designs achieved long-term, reliable operation, failure mechanisms associated with both the wicking surfaces and condensing plates were identified. Athirteenth design that addresses the identified weakness and failure mechanisms has been developed.

Publications


    Progress 09/01/20 to 08/31/21

    Outputs
    Target Audience:Target audiences include (1) researchers developing innovative technologies for brine concentration and wastewater disposal, and (2) project developers searching for new technology that offer them a lower cost approach to brine disposal for inland RO/EDR facilities Changes/Problems:The design of the fundamental unit of the DGD process--the condensing plate paired with the brine wick--has undergone extensive redesign as tests of subscale models have uncovered problems. In summary the major problems have been (1) buckling of the condensing plates after long-term, high temperture operation, (2) warping of the condensing plates caused by stresses induces by temperature changes in regions where thin metal plates (with very low Coefficient of Thermal Expansion) are bonded to the plastic walls (with very high CTE) of the condensing plates, and (3) stability of the wicking surfaces when exposed to hot, flowing brine. A 10-plate model is now being built that incorporates solutions to themajor problems. Principal features of this model are (1) all condensing plates and wicks will hang within a frame so that they are kept in tension (thus avoiding buckling),(2) wicking surfaces will be made from two plies of non-woven fiberglass sheet without an underlying plastic plate (thus avoiding problems caused by delamination, and (3) all metal surfaces will be converted to plastic so that warping caused by different CTEs is avoided.. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?As part of the Solar Desalination Prize AILR has delivered two short presentations to audiences with interest either in applying or commercializing the Diffusion-Gap Distillation technology. AILR is now leading a three-company team competing under the name BrineZero What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?To support its entries in the two competitions, AILR will continue to refine and test the plate/wick design for the DGD process. Thiswork will continue in the 10-plate test rig that has been built under this contract. The objective of this work will be to both improve performance and to lower the cost to manufacture. Once a refined design has been proven, AILR will project a cost for brine concentration and assess in which applications the developed technology is commercially viable.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? A detailed design for a 1 gpm brine concentrator was developed. The design, which includes three modules each with 80 condensing plates, is based on two-years of problem-solving in 12 different configurations of sub-scale (10-plate) experimental models of the Diffusoin-Gap Distillation process.. Plans are now underway to construct a fully-functional, 1-gpm brine concentration for testing in June 2022 in Yuma, AZ under the Burea of Reclamation's More Water/Less Concentratecompetition.

    Publications


      Progress 09/01/19 to 08/31/20

      Outputs
      Target Audience:Target audiences include (1) researchers developing innovative technologies for brine concentration and wastewater disposal, and (2) project developers searching for new technology that offer them a lower cost approach to brine disposal for inland RO/EDR facilities Changes/Problems:The original goals of the project were to advance both brine concenration and brine crystallization (ZLD) to commercial readiness. Technical work has been redirected tofocuson brine concentration only. The scale up of Phase I work forbrine concentration to a size appropriate for commerial applications has been challenging. Commercial-scale prototypes have continuously operated for several days but projections of useful lifetime based on post test inspection of the prototypes did not meet the goal of thousands of hours of operation before servicing.We will continue to explore design changes that produce a robust prototype that will require scheduled maintenance no more frequently than once per year. Lower cost brine concentration without ZLD has value to our commercialization partner in this project--Global Water Innovation. We will continue to work with GWI to insure that a brine concentrator based on our technology meets theirneeds for expanding the market that they have targeted. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Progress on developing a low-cost means of brine concentration has been included in non-proprietary submissions to the competition for the Solar Desalination Prize What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Wewill continue the build-->test-->diagnose-->redesign cycle of development until we have proven a robust design that can stably operate for thousands of hours.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? Phase II work, while not yet proving the long-term operation of a full-scale, brine concentrator module, has successfully identified critical failure mechanisms. All identified failure mechanisms have reasonable design solutions that are now being implemented in a 10-plate model. If a DGD brine concentrator is to expand inland water resources it must meet an initial cost metric of $3.40 per cubic meter of processed brine. The CAPEX for the DGD, which will be on the order of $2.00 per cubic meter, can be met only if the central processing module is fabricated from relatively inexpensive materials. The extruded polypropylene condensing plates and non-woven fiberglass wicks that were successfully used in the Phase I work can meet the target CAPEX for a commercial system. The design for a DGD prototype composed mostly of extruded polypropylene plates and non-woven fiberglass wicks that can efficiently operate long term must address the following challenges: During the start-up transient, the upper section of the prototype increases in temperature by approximately 80 C (144 F). The Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) for the polypropylene plates is about an order of magnitude greater than the CTE for fiberglass. This difference in expansions/contractions during thermal cycling must be accommodated without stress-induced distortions that cause the brine wicks and condensing plates to touch. The scale up of the prototype to plates that are approximately 8 feet (2.4 m) in height greatly increases that hydrostatic pressure on the fittings and seals at the bottom of the plate. The scale up to longer plates must be accompanied by a higher brine flow per wick if the CAPEX target is to be met. The requirement to collect the brine that flows off the wicks without contaminating the condensate that flows off the plates becomes more difficult to meet as the per-wick brine flow increases. Polypropylene is a mostly non-crystalline material that creeps under stress. The creep will be greatest at high temperature and can lead to distortions that compromise critical isolation/sealing elements within the assembly. Four DGD prototype have been built and tested. The first two prototypes failed in ways that uncovered problems that would be difficult to solve without unacceptable increases in the cost of materials. The third and fourth prototypes failed in ways that could be addressed by relatively minor changes to the design. The four prototypes are described in a separate interim report.

      Publications