Progress 09/01/18 to 08/31/20
Outputs Target Audience:Our effortswerefocused on collecting plant efficacydata, assess product application rates and develop a robust manufacturing process to demonstrate theeffectiveness, and compatiability of our technology to commercial tomato and strawberry growers. We focused on both field and controlled environement growers. In addition, this data is useful to develop future marketing tools to attract future customers and distributers. Changes/Problems:Task 4:Yeti Bloom and Yeti Bloom-S have not yet been registered. Both products are classified as soil amendments and are thus subject to each individual state's Department of Agriculture's regulations. State by state registration requirements for soil amendments are highly varied among the 50 states and can range from the simple submission of the product label and payment of a fee to the submission of a comprehensive regulatory dossier that is comprised of extensive scientific data such as plant trial results, marketing claims, heavy metal analysis, toxicity data and environmental impact studies to name a few. Registration can begin once the provisional is filed, marketting strategy is finalized and sales channels are identified/finalized. This work is anticipated to begin in 2021. Publication:A provisional patent is currently being drafted. Title:COMPOSITION FOR PLANT FERTILIZER BASED ON MICROBE-FREE BROTH.Expecting filing in Dec 2020 What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The participants in the project gained experience in translating microbial sciences performed at the benchto a commercial scale manufacturing environement including familiarization with manufacturing standards and practices. In addition, expansion of plant trials from small greenhouses to large scale operations results in valuable training in filed trial design and data management. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results have not yet been disseminated to the communities of interest (yet) as we are considering filing for patent protection in the coming months. Once the provisional(s) filed,We intend to share the results with potential customers (commercial tomato growers) and distributors. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
To addresstask 1, trials with tomatoes were conducted at several independent locations in 2019 and 2020 to evaluate Yeti Bloom S and Yeti Bloom. In 2019, we evaluated Yeti Bloom at the Pacific Ag Group in San Luis Obispo (CA).Results indicate that Yeti Bloom (0.6 mL/gal) appliedvia Dos-a-tron weekly did not elicit significantly different yield responses. However, it numerically improved the number of marketable fruits harvested by 22.7% over control (p=0.22). We also conducted field tomato trials at the University of Florida with Dr. Agehara, in 2019. The plants were treated with Yeti Bloom at a rate of 0.6 mL/gal applied once weekly throughout the entire growth cycle (10.1 gal/acre) by drip irrigation. Results indicate that Canopy area increased by 1.7% (27 day after transplanting, DAT) and 4.4% (41 DAT) compared to the control, but the effects were not statistically significant. Leaf macronutrients (N, K, and S) levels appeared to be improved by 5.9%, 8.7% and 10.5% respectively, but the effects were not statistically significant. Leaf Zn concentration was increased by 10.7% compared to the control. Other micronutrient levels also showed higher values in this treatment than the control, although the differences were not statistically significant. XL fruit and total marketable fruit yields increased by 12.7% and 13.2% in compared to the control, but the differences were not statistically significant. Unmarketable small fruit yield was reduced by 34% compared to the control, but the difference was not statistically significant. Shoot biomass at harvest and fruit Brix were not significantly affected by the treatment. In 2020, we conduct another trial at the University of Florida with Dr. S Agehara where we tested 3 Yeti Bloom prototypes on Tomato plants 'HM1823': Yeti Bloom, Yeti Bloom S and Yeti Bloom S in combination with a 3rdparty worm casting tea (Denali).Various application rates were tested for Yeti Bloom S (0.6 ml/gal, 5 mL/gal and 25 mL/gal), with or without the worm casting tea (applied per manufacturer recommendation). Results in non-destructive measurements during the experiment demonstrate that Growcentia product treatments increased plant height by up to 10% at 7 days after planting, increased stem diameter by up to 11% at 7 DAP and by up to 9% at 14 DAP. Our products also increased canopy area by up to 20% at 7 DAP and by up to 38% at 14 DAP. Finally, Growcentia product treatments increased root projected area by up to 27% at 7 DAP. In destructive measurements at the end the experiment (14 DAP), Growcentia product treatments increased total leaf area by up to 20%, increased shoot dry weight by up to 34%, increased root dry weight by up to 18% and increased total root length by up to 51% and root surface area by 60%, increased total root length by up to 51% and root surface area by 60%. Root:shoot ratio (biomass partitioning) was not affected by Growcentia product treatments. In 2020 at Pacific Ag Group in San Luis Obispo (CA), we conducted greenhouse tomato trials with Yeti bloom S.Three Yeti bloom S treatments were applied weekly: 5mL/gal, 25 mL/gal and 50 mL/gal. Data for fruit emergence rate, over all plant health, fruit yield (number and weight) as well as a fruit quality were collected. The 50mL/Gal application rate resulted in 4.29% increase in Brix, 12.09% increase in fruit width, 0.57% increase in Fruit height and 2.78% increase in plant vigor. We also conducted strawberry trials using Yeti Bloom at three separate locations. At the University of Florida (Dr. Agehara), strawberry plants 'Florida radiance' were grown using industry accepted management techniques. Treatments included Yeti Bloom (0.6mL/gal) weekly throughout the growth cycle (9.73 gal/acre), for two weeks after transplant (0.85 gal/acre) and weekly only during the bloom phase (8.88 gal/acre). Plants were monitored throughout the season, noting any relevant differences between treatments. Data collected included canopy area, plant biomass at harvest, marketable fruit yield, unmarketable fruit yield, size grades, fruit BRIX and leaf tissue analyses. Results indicate that Canopy area showed no significant effect of Yeti Bloom treatments. Post-blooming weekly treatments increased February yield by 15% and total marketable yield by 11% compared to the untreated control. These increases were statistically significant. Overall, Yeti Bloom treatments were recommended to be performed after blooming. Another strawberry trial was conducted by the University of California Agriculture and Natural resources (UCANR) at Manzanita Berry Farms by Dr Surendra Dara. Yeti Bloom was applied at 0.6 ml/gal and 1 mL/gal through drip for 90 min weekly from the first drip application. Competitor products i.e. Nutrisorb-L (Innovak Global), a microbe-rich Vermi-extract (TerraVesco), Germinal Plus (Fertum), EcoSil (Shemin Garden), EX10 (NanoChem), prototype 1-4 (BiOWiSH) we applied per recommendations in side by side trials. Results show that overall Yeti Bloom at 1mL/gal performed better than the 0.6mL/gal application. Overall in comparison with competitors' products, treatment with Yeti Bloom at 1 mL/gal resulted in 4.4% change from grower standard, the third highest change after BiOWiSH products. In a third trial conducted in Ventura county CA by Holden research and Consulting. The variety (Portola) utilized for this trial was grown in a commercial block of strawberries. This trial was set up with four treatments (grower standard, Yeti Bloom at 0.6 mL/gal weekly, 0.6 mL/gal every other week and 1 mL/gal every other week). Based on the data collected in this trial, the low rate Yeti Bloom applications applied every other week for this fall production period appeared to have significantly positive effects on yields, due to higher average weights of marketable fruit and higher production of marketable fruit, along with a general increase in total fruit production. The low rate Yeti Bloom applications applied every other week continued to produce nice yields relative to the grower standard while the prices increase thus giving substantially better relative returns to the farm. All data rated as significant was done so utilizing the New Duncan's Multiple Test Range at a 90% confidence level. To addresstask 2, we performed a competitor landscape analysis and compared Yeti Bloom application rate, concentrations and cost per application to 22 other commercially available microbe-based products of similar use. Yeti Bloom at 0.6 mL/gal is the most affordable (cost/application) OMRI listed product amongst the competition. Task 3was accomplisehd by optimizing and refiningthe current production process for Yeti Bloom. Over the courseof this grant, process optimization and scale-up efforts for the production of Yeti Bloom and Yeti Bloom S have resulted the establishment of a robust manufacturing platform at Growcentia's headquarters with a 50% increase in manufacturing staff. This new platform has been proven over the course of 2019 and 2020 to increase final product manufactured throughput per month by 37%, increase maximum annual production capacity by 63%, decrease the production time cycle by 80%, decrease product out of specification by 81%, decrease costs associated with quality control by 96% and decrease cost of goods manufactured by 50 %. Manufactured products using this new platform have been used in the plant efficacy trials described above. Task 4: In order to successfully launch Yeti Boom and/or Yeti Bloom-S in each state, the data in this grant will be considered to support product efficacy claims on plants as required by state regulators to ensure that the product(s) meet these state requirements.
Publications
|
Progress 09/01/18 to 08/31/19
Outputs Target Audience:We have used this grant to disseminate our ideas and potential product formulationsat the USDA/LARTA CWT commercialization workshop (November 14-15). Two of our lead scientists (Drs Karuna Chourey and Peter Baas) attended the AgBioTech Summit in Raleigh, NC (February 26-28, 2019). Peter Baas also presented at the AgBioTech Summit. Changes/Problems:As we conducted more market research it became clear that our current microbial formulation being applied frequently might have challenges to fit into current management practices. As such, we incuded two other biostimulant prototypes that are only applied part of the growth cycle and, thus, are more easily incorporated into current management practices. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?1) Two of our scientists (Drs Peter Baas and KarunaChourey) attended the USDA/LARTA CWT commercialization workshop in Washington, DC 2) Two of our scientists (Drs Peter Baas and KarunaChourey) and the CEO (Gregg Steinberg) attended the AgBioTech Summit 2019. 3) Two members of our executive leadership (Colin Bell and Gregg Steinberg) attended the World Agri-tech Innovation Conference, SF CA Feb 2019. Our CEO alsoattended 1) Davos on the Delta - Food and Ag Summit Memphis TN May 2019; 2) 2019 Crops & Chemicals Raleigh, NC May 2019. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The next reporting period will be characterized by the following activities: 1) Analyze and interpret all the greenhouse and field data 2) Test final product application regime efficacy against competitor products 3) Disseminating findings at the 4thPartnerships in Biocontrol, Biostimulants & Microbiome in Raleigh November 4-5, 2019
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
We are currently conducting trials with third party entities and the initial data is promising but the final results will not be in until the end of the growing season (August/September). 1. The trials to dial in application rates are being conducted currently with Pacific Ag and the University of Florida 2. These tests will be conducted based on the most successful Yeti Bloom formulation 3. We recently hired a Executive of Director of Production and MSAT with the specific goal of upgrading our production platform 4. Yeti Bloom is currently registered in all 50 states in the US.
Publications
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Accepted
Year Published:
2019
Citation:
Baas, P. (2019). Multi-species consortia: Developing the next generation of biostimulants to improve specialty crop yield and health. AgBioTech Summit, oral presentation, Raleigh, February 2019.
|