Source: CORNELL UNIVERSITY submitted to
DAIRY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS: C,N, AND P MANAGEMENT FOR PRODUCTION, PROFITABILITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT.
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
NEW
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1008410
Grant No.
(N/A)
Project No.
NYC-478802
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
NE-1544
Program Code
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 26, 2015
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2020
Grant Year
(N/A)
Project Director
Mohammed, HU.
Recipient Organization
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
ITHACA,NY 14853
Performing Department
Vet Population Medicine & Diagnostic Science
Non Technical Summary
Our long-term objective is to ensure the soundness of the environment and address the uncertainty in the climate change while sustaining the economic viability of dairy production systems in NYS. The transport of pathogens of pathogens from livestock production systems contribute significantly to the degradation of the environment and the uncertainty associated with climate change.We are planning to carryout epidemiologic studies targeting dairy operations, both traditional and organic, to identify the zoonotic pathogens that are transported from these farms, shed light on the pathways by which they are transported, identify the factors that promote their presence and transportation, and determine the management practices that mitigate their associate risk.Knowledge developed through these studies will be incorporated in tools and educational materials and shared with the stakeholders.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
0%
Applied
100%
Developmental
0%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3063410110050%
7125010117050%
Goals / Objectives
Characterize and develop management practices to reduce GHG emissions and transport of nutrients, pathogens, pharmaceuticals, and VOCs from livestock production systems. This will include management of feed, manure collection, manure storage, and manure application. (Miller, Harrison, Herbert, Moriera, Miller, Powell, Rotz, Wattiaux, Hashemi) Develop science-based tools and educational materials to promote environmental stewardship on US dairy and beef industries. (Harrison, Herbert, Powell, Rotz, Westendorf, Westra)
Project Methods
We are planning to carry out a longitudinal epidemiologic study to determine the incidence of these foodborne pathogens in dairy and fresh produce organic operations in NYS. Animals, fresh produce, and environmental samples will be collected quarterly and analyzed for the presences of E. coli O157:H7, non-O157 food adulterant serotypes (O11, O26, O45, O111, O121, and O145) and Campylobacter (C. jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari) using a combination of bacterial enrichment and real-time PCR detection system. A twostep approach will be implemented to identify farms that housing animals with these pathogens and has potential to contribute to environmental quality degradation: First milk filters will be collected from these farms and examined for the presence of these pathogens using a combination of bacteriological and molecular techniques. Second, farms that are positive in the milk filter examination will be followed up with a thorough investigation that includes both animal and environmental sampling. The number of animals and environmental samples will be proportional to the size of the herd and the farm. The proportional sampling will be stratified by the age of the animals. Two types of samples will be collected: animals and environment samples. Fecal samples will be collected per rectum from three age groups of cattle: newborns, heifer, and adult cows.The first sample from the newborn will be collected at from animals up to 30 days of age.Heifers and cows will be sampled once each season for a total of 90 samples from animals on the farm. Calves will be sampled throughout the year.c. In addition to the animal sampling, we are planning to collect environmental samples on each farm following our previous sampling strategy. A multidimensional scale will be used to identify hydrologically sensitive sites along the pathway from animal housing and manure handling areas to the stream edge. Composite samples will be collected from each site at the time of animal sampling. The concept is to shed light on the pathway by which the pathogens moves from the source and contaminate the environment.Sample processing and Detection E. coli O157:H7Samples (animal and environmental) will be screened for E. coli O157:H7 using the BAX® System (http://www2.dupont.com/Qualicon/en_US/products/BAX_System/bax_realtime_EcoliH7.html). All samples will be inoculated into a primary enrichment medium consisting of modified E. coli broth (MEC broth) supplemented with novobiocin (16 mg/L) at a ratio of 1:10 (W/V). The enriched broth will be incubated for 24 hr at 37 oC. An inoculum of 20 µl of the incubated enriched will be transferred into 1 ml of secondary enrichment medium consisting of Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth without antibiotics and incubated for three hours at 37 oC. The inoculated BHI media will then be incubated for three hours at 37 oC before testing with the real-time PCR.Non-O157 Shiga Toxin Producing E. coli O GroupsAll samples will be screened for the presence of the STEC virulence genes (stx1, stx2 and eae) using a Real-time PCR assay (http://www2.dupont.com/Qualicon/en _US/products /BAX_System /bax_ecoli_testing.html) and will be performed on the bacterial lysate prepared after the secondary enrichment. The protocol calls for a two-step process. All samples will be further screened for the food adulterant serogroups of E. coli which include O26, O45, O103, O 111, O121, and O145.PCR detectionPCR detection will performed using the BAX Automated System. A 20 µl aliquot of the secondary enrichment (BHI) was added to 200 µl of the prepared lysing reagent (mixture of protease and lysis buffer) provided by the manufacturer. The samples will then be heated at 37°C and 95°C in a lysis reagent solution to rupture the bacterial cell wall and release the DNA. PCR tablets, which contain all the reagents necessary for PCR, will be hydrated with 30 µl of the lysed sample and processed in the cycler/detector provided by the manufacturer (AB 7500 FAST). A table of results that includes cfu/ml values for each target will be displayed, along with graphs of amplification curves.Campylobacter spp.Samples will be screened for C. jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari using the BAX® System (http://www2.dupont.com/Qualicon/en_US/products/BAX_System/bax_realtime_campy.html). All samples will be enriched in BHI, at a ration 1:10 (W/V), containing 6mg of cefoperazone, 6mg of vancomycin, and 2 mg of amphotericin each dissolved in 80 ml of distilled water. The inoculated media will be incubated at a microaerophilic atmosphere at 37°C for 24 hrs. A total of 20 µl of the incubated enriched inoculum will be transferred into 1 ml of the secondary enrichment medium (BHI without antibiotics) and incubated for 24 hrs at 37oC before processing by real-time PCR.PCR detectionAs in E. coli.We are planning to collect data on factors that are hypothesized to associate with the likelihood of introduction and permutation of these pathogens among these operations. Animals' factors may include source of feed, size of herd, biosecurity measures, and sanitary practices. Environmental factors may include type of soil, pH of soil, microbial concentration per gram, the source of fertilizer, biosecurity, sanitary measures. Hierarchal data analysis statistical techniques will be used to identify factors associated with the likelihood of these pathogens in animals and products from organic operations. In this Aim we will integrate the interaction between the animal and the environment on the likelihood of transmission and perpetuation of these pathogens to the environment. Using a combination of deterministic and stochastic methods, scenario path models will be developed describing the transmission and fate of the most prevalent species and genotypes, identified in Aim 1, from the source to environmental waters. For example, equations 1 through 3 describe the indirect transmission between cattle and the environment. The rate of change in the environmental concentration with a particular pathogen genotype (Wi) depends on the rate of contamination by an infected animal, (Ic), rate of environmental contamination by the other sources (gi); and the loss of viability of the pathogen (a). The described scenario relies on the rate of contamination of the environment (q) by cattle, the probability of contact with pathogens (j).The notations S, I, n, r, and R, indicates the number of susceptible cattle, number shedding the particular pathogen, total number of animals, rate of recovery, and number of recovered animals, respectively. Because of the uncertainty associated with some of the parameters several iterations will be run using the Monte Carlo simulations in @RISK software to determine whether the environmental transmission and fate rate would be altered if reasonable variations in each of the above parameters were made. We will also perform sensitivity analysis. Our model will also include information on management practice at these farms that promote environmental stewardship. Practice that reduce this microbial load will be identified in the analyses.The proposed research activities outlined in Aim 1 and 2 will generate improved understanding of the process of introduction, transmission, and fade of these pathogens. In collaboration with agricultural and regulatory stakeholders, we will develop beneficial management practices that are science-based to maximize the effectiveness of these practices in mitigating the associated risk at the farm level. The findings will be integrated into extension and educational programs for the purpose of closing the knowledge gap.

Progress 10/01/17 to 09/30/18

Outputs
Target Audience:We have continued to work with the staff at Cornell Cooperative Extension (CCE) office, Jefferson County, the Cornell University SCNY Regional Team at Cortland County, and the staff at Quality Milk Program at the Veterinary College. We continued to recruit producers and enroll them in the study. The letters were sent to both Traditional and Organic producers. Farmers who agreed to participate were enrolled in the study. A two-step sampling approach was adopted: First milk filters and milk samples were collected from each participating and screened for the presence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157, and Salmonella spp. and sampled their animals for the presence of the two foodborne pathogens of interest. If any of the samples (milk filter or milk) were positive each farmer was offered the opportunity to test individual animals and environmental samples in the second step in hope to identify the source(s) of the organism in hope of intervening to eradicate the respective organism(s) at the source(s). Changes/Problems:In addition, we are examining the mechanism(s) by which these pathogens could predispose hosts to disease. Currently were developing the molecular techniques to examine the positive samples for the presence of the cytolethal distending toxin (CDT). Moreover, we are to examine the positive isolates for the potential for antibiotic resistance. We are hoping to add, in addition to the phenotypic assessment, genotypic evaluation. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A graduate student has earned her PhD on the project and we are training several undergraduate students on molecular and epidemiologic approaches on this project. In addition, two undergraduate students were trained in research methodologies in epidemiologic investigation. The training included bacteriological and molecular techniques. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?In addition, the results are been shared with individual farmer/producer through the extension personnel in the respective county. We are hoping to collect additional information before sharing the other stakeholders. We have been sharing the results with peer through publications. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Continue to recruit more farmers from both production systems. Continue to collect more samples and analyze them for the presence these two pathogens and the serotypes of E. coli food adulterants. Continue to examine the samples for the presence of the of the cytolethal distending toxin (CDT). A predisposing factor for gastroenteritis and its sequelae. Continue to examine the isolates from the samples for the potential of antibiotic resistance. Continue the training of students and visiting scientists. We hope to develop science-based tool to promote environmental stewardship among organic dairy producers. Collate the information to develop materials on best management practices among these organic producers.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? All farms agreeing to participate were visited once either by the research assistant or by the county's staff to collect the milk filters and milk samples. The samples were tested for the presence of Campylobacter spp., E. coli O157:H7, and 6 serogroups of non-O157 (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145), and Salmonella spp. Milk filters and milk samples were collected from 4 organic farms and from 120 animals (30 per farms). All the samples were tested for the above mentioned organisms. Farms where the milk filter or milk samples were positive for any of the three-tested organisms were offered to carryout in depth investigation by sampling animals and the environment to identify the potential sources of these pathogens and recommend risk mitigation strategies to reduce the likelihood of any of the pathogens on the farm. We are currently evaluating the E. coli organisms identified in the research for antimicrobial resistance and the presence of the CDT (one of the viruelence gene). We are planning to compare these finding to isolates recovered from traditional dairy farms.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: Kenlyn Peters; Valenzuela NN, Ospina PA, Mohammed HO. Occurrence of Foodborne Pathogens on Conventional and Organic Dairy Farms in New York State. SF Food Dairy Tech J,. (In print).


Progress 10/01/16 to 09/30/17

Outputs
Target Audience:We have continued to work with the staff at Cornell Cooperative Extension (CCE) office, Jefferson County, the Cornell University SCNY Regional Team at Cortland County, and the staff at Quality Milk Program at the Veterinary College. We continued to recruit producers and enroll them in the study. The letters were sent to both Traditional and Organic producers. Farmers who agreed to participate were enrolled in the study. A two-step sampling approach was adopted: First milk filters and milk samples were collected from each participating and screened for the presence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157, and Salmonella spp; and sampled their animals for the presence of the two foodborne pathogens of interest. If any of the samples were positive each farmers were offered the opportunity to test individual animals in the second step. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A graduate student completed her PhD thesis and working on the publication from her thesis. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?For now through publication in peer-reviewed Journal. The publication are under review. In addition, the results are been shared with individual farmer/producer through the extension personnel in the respective county. We are hoping to collect additional information before sharing the stakeholders. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Continue to recruit more farmers from both production systems. Continue to collect more samples and analyze them for the presence these two pathogens and the serotypes of E. coli food adulterants. Continue to examine the samples for the presence of the of the cytolethal distending toxin (CDT). A predisposing factor for gastroenteritis and its sequelae. Continue to examine the isolates from the samples for the potential of antibiotic resistance. Continue the training of students and visiting scientists. We hope to develop science-based tool to promote environmental stewardship among organic dairy producers. Collate the information to develop materials on best management practices among these organic producers.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Activities: All farms were visited once either by the graduate student or by the county's staff and or the graduate student to collect the milk filters and milk samples. The samples were tested for the presence of Campylobacter spp., E. coli O157:H7, and 6 serogroups of non-O157 (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145), and Salmonella spp. Milk filter were collected from 25 organic farms 30 traditional/conventional dairies. All the samples were tested for the above mentioned organisms. Farms where the milk filter or milk samples were positive for any of the three-tested organisms were offered to carryout in depth investigation by sampling animals and the environment to identify the potential sources of these pathogens and recommend risk mitigation strategies to reduce the likelihood of any of the pathogens on the farm. The in-depth investigation included sampling animals, environment, water and feeding trough, and feed and silage. The table below shows the results of the analyses of the samples. Pathogen/serotype Conventional - 30 farms Conventional Prevalence Organic - 21 farms Organic Prevalence O157:H7 1 3.3% 0 0.0% STEC 8 26.7% 6 28.6% eae 14 46.7% 11 52.4% stx 13 43.3% 7 33.3% O26 4 13.3% 2 9.5% O111 0 0.0% 0 0.0% O121 5 16.7% 6 28.6% O45 6 20.0% 5 23.8% O103 9 30.0% 6 28.6% O145 2 6.7% 0 0.0% C. jejuni 1 3.3% 0 0.0% C. coli 3 10.0% 0 0.0% Salmonella 6 20.0% 1 4.8%

Publications


    Progress 10/26/15 to 09/30/16

    Outputs
    Target Audience:We have continued to work with the staff at Cornell Cooperative Extension (CCE) office, Jefferson County, the Cornell University SCNY Regional Team at Cortland County, and the staff at Quality Milk Program at the Veterinary College. Several producers were recruited and enrolled in the study. The recruitment letters were sent to these producers through personnel at the CCE office. The letters were sent to both Traditional and Organic producers. Farmers who agreed to participate were enrolled in the study. A two-step sampling approach was adopted: First milk filters and milk samples were collected from each participating and screened for the presence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157, and Salmonella spp. and sampled their animals for the presence of the two foodborne pathogens of interest. If any of the samples were positive each farmers were offered the opportunity to test individual animals in the second step. Changes/Problems:We were fortunate to have been approved to participate on project no.: 1008410, Dairy Production systems: C,N, and P management for production, profitability and the environment. We expanded the objectives to continue to complete the initial objective and address the aims in 1008410. In addition to the organic farms we have added traditional/conventional dairies to perform comparisons between the two systems of production. In addition, we are examining the mechanism(s) by which these pathogens could predispose hosts to disease. Currently were developing the molecular techniques to examine the positive samples for the presence of the cytolethal distending toxin (CDT). Moreover, we are to examining the positive isolates for the potential for antibiotic resistance. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?We have enrolled a PhD- student in the project who has been taking courses in epidemiology and attain proficiency to be able to carry out the proposed activities. In addition, two undergraduate students were trained in research methodologies in epidemiologic investigation. The training included bacteriological and molecular techniques. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?At this stage the results are being shared with individual farmer/producer through the extension personnel in the respective county. We are hoping to collect additional information before sharing with the stakeholders. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Continue to recruit more farmers from both production systems. Continue to collect more samples and analyze them for the presence these two pathogens. Examine the samples for the presence of the of the cytolethal distending toxin (CDT). Examine the isolates from the samples for the potential of antibiotic resistance. Continue the training of students and visiting scientists. We hope to develop science-based tool to promote environmental stewardship among organic dairy producers. Collate the information to develop materials on best management practices among these organic producers.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? All farms were visited once either by the graduate student or by the county's staff to collect the milk filters and milk samples. The samples were tested for the presence of Campylobacter spp., E. coli O157:H7, and 6 serogroups of non-O157 (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145), and Salmonella spp. Milk filter were collected from 25 organic farms 30 traditional/conventional dairies. All the samples were tested for the above mentioned organisms. Farms where the milk filter or milk samples were positive for any of the three-tested organisms were offered to carryout in depth investigation by sampling animals and the environment to identify the potential sources of these pathogens and recommend risk mitigation strategies to reduce the likelihood of any of the pathogens on the farm. The in-depth investigation included sampling animals, environment, water and feeding trough, and feed and silage.

    Publications