Source: UNIV OF CONNECTICUT submitted to
BIOACCUMULATION AND DEPURATION OF NANOPARTICLES BY MARINE BIVALVES: POTENTIAL FOODBORNE HAZARDS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SHELLFISH SAFETY
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1007724
Grant No.
2016-67017-24427
Project No.
CONW-2015-05688
Proposal No.
2015-05688
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
A1331
Project Start Date
Dec 1, 2015
Project End Date
Nov 30, 2019
Grant Year
2016
Project Director
Ward, J. E.
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF CONNECTICUT
(N/A)
STORRS,CT 06269
Performing Department
Marine Science
Non Technical Summary
Manufactured nanomaterials are being used in a variety of consumer products including sunscreens, cosmetics, personal-care products, and paints. Nanomaterials are extremely small compounds having at least one dimension less than 100 nanometers. For comparison, one typical hair from a human head or a single sheet of paper has a thickness of approximately 100,000 nanometers. These tiny particles are smaller than the cells of a human body and, in fact, smaller than the nucleus inside of those cells. With an increasing presence in household goods, the demand for and the production of nanomaterials composed of carbon, metal oxides, polystyrene and silica has also increased. For example, to fill product needs the world-wide production of titanium-dioxide nanoparticles is projected to exceed 200,000 tons/year by 2016. As the production of nanomaterials increases, so too does the likelihood of release into the environment as a result of spills, use of products, post-consumer degradation of material, leaching from septic tanks and landfills, or outflow from wastewater treatment facilities. Many questions regarding the environmental safety of nanomaterials have been raised. Toxicological effects of nanoparticles in humans are well studied and include inflammation, oxidative stress and DNA damage. Even particles made of low-toxicity material (e.g., polystyrene) can be harmful when delivered in their nano form, presumably due to their high surface area. Comparatively little research has focused on the effects of nanomaterials on marine ecosystems, or whether this class of emerging pollutants could be transferred through marine food webs to humans. Coastal ecosystems near densely populated, industrialized regions are particularly vulnerable to the infiltration of man-made materials such as nanoparticles. Filter-feeding bivalves, such as clams, mussels and oysters, which are harvested or cultured for human consumption, are particularly susceptible to nanoparticle exposure given their abundance in coastal waters and their particle feeding behavior. Few studies, however, have addressed how these animals encounter nanoparticles in the environment and little is known about the accumulation and elimination of nanoparticles by bivalves. In this project, we will investigate whether nanoparticles could be a foodborne hazard in shellfish. Specifically, we will study: 1) the way in which bivalves encounter and ingest nanoparticles; 2) whether they accumulate nanoparticles during chronic exposure; and 3) if bivalves can eliminate the nanoparticles from their body after exposure ceases, and if so how long does it take. Results will provide realistic estimates of exposure and bioaccumulation of nanoparticles in shellfish, and help elucidate the potential for nanoparticles to be passed to higher trophic levels including humans. Ultimately, new knowledge generated by our research will inform decision makers, and guide strategies for the management of this class of emerging pollutants, and help ensure and improve shellfish safety. Through outreach and dissemination activities, we will educate and deliver science-based knowledge to scientists, shellfish growers, managers, and the general public in order to inform decision making. Such actions will serve to enhance the environmental quality of coastal ecosystems and help protect the living marine resources on which aquaculture and fisheries rely. Protecting fish and shellfish resources is important for both long-range improvement and sustainability of the aquaculture and fisheries industries. Determining the extent to which nanoparticles are an emerging food safety issue is also critical for ensuring the quality and safety of seafood collected by recreational activities. Such activities have been shown to enhance human health and the well-being of society.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
80%
Applied
20%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
7113724106067%
7113723106033%
Goals / Objectives
The proposed research will examine an emerging food safety issue by characterizing the uptake and depuration of an emerging pollutant (i.e., manufactured nanoparticles) by several species of commercially important marine bivalves, including: 1) the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis; 2) the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica; and 3) the quahog clam, Mercenaria mercenaria. These benthic suspension feeders are among the most important bivalve species on the East and Gulf Coasts of the US, supporting large aquaculture and fisheries industries (USDA 2005). The study will determine the bioaccumulation and depuration of two different types of nanoparticles that are commonly used for industrial applications and in a variety of consumer products, including: titanium dioxide (TiO2) and plastic (polystyrene). Specifically, we will investigate how feeding limitations and the form of delivery (freely suspended or incorporated in marine aggregations) affects nanoparticle bioavailability, ingestion, and thus internal exposure. Informed by these results, we will then expose bivalves to nanoparticles for several weeks and determine net bioaccumulation, and after exposure ceases, quantify the rate of elimination during depuration. To accomplish these goals, we have developed several lines of research to investigate nanoparticles as an emerging food safety issue:• Initiative 1: Determine bioavailability by quantifying the rates at which freely suspended nanoparticles and nanoparticles incorporated within marine aggregates are ingested;• Initiative 2: Quantify the bioaccumulation of nanoparticles during a chronic exposure of several weeks;• Initiative 3: Define the depuration rate and residual concentrations (if any) of nanoparticles over a post-exposure period, and estimate the overall bioaccumulation factors.
Project Methods
Animals (ca. 3 cm shell length) will be collected from local populations or local aquaculture facilities, held in flowing natural seawater (Avery Point, UConn), and acclimated to laboratory conditions for several days before being used in experiments. Two different types of nanoparticles will be tested, both of which are widely used in sunscreens, skin-care products, and biological imaging, including: 1) UV-Titan M212, a nanocomposite composed of TiO2 (rutile) coated with alumina and glycerin (ca. 86 nm); 2) Polystyrene, a nanoplastic (100 nm). Nanoparticles will be characterized by examining BET surface area (Micromeritics Tristar 3000), size distribution and electric potential (DLS, Malvern Zetasizer Nano). The concentration of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in samples will be determined by means of a quadrapole ICP-MS (Perkin-Elmer Elan DRC II) following established methods. The number of fluorescent polystyrene nanoparticles will be determined by means of a scanning, fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi F-2500). Initiative 1: Nanoparticles will be incorporated into laboratory-made aggregates following established methods. Briefly, natural seawater will be passed through a 210-µm sieve to remove large plankton. Nanoparticles are then added and the suspension transferred to 1-L plastic bottles, some of which are placed on a roller table at 15 RPM for 4 to 5 days, whereas others are placed next to the roller table to serve as controls (no marine aggregates). Nanoparticle exposure experiments will be conducted in an environmental chamber held at a temperature consistent with ambient conditions measured in the holding tanks, and on a 12hr:12hr light:dark cycle. Individual bivalves will be introduced into 1-L roller bottles containing freely suspended nanoparticles or nanoparticles incorporated in marine aggregates. Animals will be attached to removable rods and positioned in the center of each bottle. Each bottle will be supplied with gentle aeration and stirred for 10 sec every 15 min. Several animals will be delivered only sieved seawater or aggregates without added nanoparticles to serve as experimental blanks, allowing us to correct for the background concentration of metals and plastics in the samples. Animals will be allowed to feed for 3 hours. After this period animals will be removed from the bottles and their soft tissues (mantle, gills, visceral mass) isolated by dissection and rinsed with Milli-Q (MQ) water. All feces produced during the 3-hour feeding period will be collected for each animal and placed in separate tubes/vials. Samples will then be prepared and analyzed as described above. Initiative 2: Nanoparticle exposure experiments will be conducted as described above with the following modifications. First, if the results of Initiative 1 indicate no effect of mode of delivery on the quantity of nanoparticles ingested, then animals will be exposed only to freely suspended nanoparticles. Second, animals will be delivered each type of nanoparticle for a period of 14 days as follows. A separate experiment will be conducted for each combination of bivalve species and nanoparticle type. Each day animals will be transferred to individual chambers (1 L) filled with fresh, sieved seawater. Chambers will be spiked with nanoparticles to provide a final concentration of 1 mg L-1. A low concentration of the microalga Tetraselmis sp. (ca. 2 x 103 cells ml-1) will also be added to stimulate feeding. Stirring and aeration (as above) will keep all particles in suspension. Water samples will then be collected to determine the concentration of particulate matter >4 µm in size, and verify the concentration of added nanoparticles. Several hours after the start of an experiment, water samples from all chambers will again be collected to determine the concentration of particles and calculate feeding rates. Samples for pumping rates will be collected at least twice each day. The next day, each bivalve will be transferred to a clean chamber filled with fresh, sieved seawater, and the routine repeated. Feces produced by each animal will be collected and placed in individual falcon tubes. Feces will be pooled for days 1 to 7, and then days 8 to 14. After 7 days, 1/3 of the bivalves exposed to nanoparticles and several "blank" animals will be sacrificed to determine bioaccumulation rates. The experiment will continue for another 7 days, after which time another 1/3 of the bivalves will be sacrificed and the remaining bivalves used in the experiment described in Initiative 3 below. Sacrificed animals and feces will be stored at -20º C until prepared and analyzed as described above. A bioaccumulation index (BAI) will then be calculated by normalizing the number or mass of nanoparticles taken up over the exposure period (7 or 14 days) to the total volume of water processed over the same time period, and the dry mass of the soft tissues. The normalized BAI accounts for differences in nanoparticle accumulation due to feeding activity and mass of tissue. Finally, bioaccumulation factors (BAF) will be calculated. Tissue concentrations will be expressed per kg, and water concentrations per L, so that BAF is essentially unitless (the typical method of reporting BAF). Initiative 3: Exposure of bivalves to freely suspended or aggregated nanoparticles will follow the procedures outlined in Initiative 2. After an experiment, however, 1/3 of the bivalves will be transferred to clean, individual 1-L chambers filled with natural seawater without nanoparticles. The shells of each animal will be cleaned with filtered seawater prior to transfer. Feces will be collected each day post-exposure for a period of 7 days. Preliminary experiments will help guide our choice of the time period over which depuration will be followed. Feces from each animal, from each day will be stored in separate Falcon tubes. These samples will allow us to determine the time course for egestion and elimination of nanoparticles from the animal. Seawater in each beaker will be changed daily, and the microalga Tetraselmis sp. will be added to each beaker (ca. 1 x 104 cells ml-1) after every 24 hrs to stimulate transit of material through the digestive tract. At the end of the depuration period, all animals will be sacrificed. Animals and feces will be stored at -20º C until prepared and analyzed as described above. Data obtained in Initiatives 1, 2, & 3 will be used to develop models of uptake and elimination of each NP type by each species of bivalve. We will start with a simple one-compartment model with one first order uptake and one first-order elimination term. The uptake of nanoparticles into the bivalves can be modeled by estimating the tissue concentration (Ct) at any time by: [dCA/dt = uptake - (elimination + growth)]. Uptake is dependent on the assimilation efficiency for the nanoparticles (AE), the feeding rate (FR), and the concentration of nanoparticles in the water (CW). The elimination rate will depend on the concentration of nanoparticles in the bivalve, and its dry tissue mass. The parameters for the model (uptake efficiency or assimilation efficiency, and elimination rate) will be derived from the uptake and depuration experiments outlined above. One- and multi-way analysis of variance tests (ANOVA) will be used to examine the data (Systat 13). Statistically significant effects will be further analyzed by means of Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) multiple comparison tests. Project evaluation will be accomplished through peer-review of experimental design, methods and results during manuscript review. Outreach efforts and manuscript preparation and submission will occur in years 2 and 3.

Progress 12/01/15 to 11/30/19

Outputs
Target Audience:The following audiences were reached: Interdisciplinary audience of scientists at: NSF/NIEHS Oceans and Human Health PI Meeting (April 2016) National Shellfisheries Association meetings - March 2017 - March 2018 - March 2020 USDA-NIFA PI meetings - July 2016 - July 2017 - July 2018 International Conference on the Environmental Effects of Nanoparticles and Nanomaterials meetings (ICEEN) - August 2016 - September 2018 Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry meetings (SETAC) - November 2018 - November 2016 Aquatic Sciences Meeting (February 2019) Aquaculture meeting (March 2019) Science of Microplastics in the World Ocean workshop (October 2019) General public audience at: Global Café event (UConn) focusing on the impact of Rachel Carson's life and work (Oct. 2016) UConn-Avery Point 50th Festival (October 2017) Metanoia on the Environment titled "Unfiltered: An Exhibition About Water" (University of Connecticut; April 2018) Groton Conservation Commission, Town of Groton (September 2019) Interdisciplinary audience of scientists and industry members at: Mystic Aquarium, CT (May 2017; Ridgway Research Seminar) Gathering of the CT Shellfish Commissions (January 2020) Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Undergraduate, graduate students and a postdoctoral researcher were trained as part of initiatives 1-3. A research assistant also gained new analytical skills, thus contributing to their professional development. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?To date, results have been disseminated through conference presentations (see Products/Outputs above), both oral and poster formats. We published 5 peer-reviewed papers and will be submitting two manuscripts that describes the uptake and depuration of nanoplastics and Titan nanoparticles by bivalves in the next few months (initiatives 2 and 3). We will also be submitting a manuscript that describes the uptake of nanomaterials by bivalves based on delivery form (initiative 1), and a manuscript that describes the phototoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles on Crepidula larvae. Additionally, through education and outreach activities, we have disseminated our work to grade school students, the general public, and interested parties within the shellfish industry. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? To accomplish these goals, we conducted several lines of research to investigate nanoparticles as an emerging food safety issue: • Initiative 1: Determine bioavailability by quantifying the rates at which freely suspended nanoparticles, and nanoparticles incorporated within marine aggregates are ingested; We found there was no difference in the uptake of titanium dioxide nanoparticles between two delivery forms (flocs or freely suspended) by mussels and oysters (see Doyle et al. 2015, Mar. Environ. Res. 110: 45-52.). The incorporation of polystyrene nanoparticles into flocs was low in general, but we found no difference in the uptake between two delivery forms (flocs or freely suspended) for mussels and oysters. • Initiative 2: Quantify the bioaccumulation of nanoparticles during a chronic exposure of several weeks; Overall, we found very little evidence of bioaccumulation of titanium dioxide and polystyrene nanoparticles in mussels and oysters during a chronic exposure. Our preliminary experiments on clams suggested that these animals would not perform well in the laboratory for several weeks, so we did not proceed with those chronic exposure experiments. • Initiative 3: Define the depuration rate and residual concentrations (if any) of nanoparticles over a post-exposure period, and estimate the overall bioaccumulation factors. We found that both mussels and oysters depurate nanoparticles very quickly, and the majority of the titanium dioxide and polystyrene was found in the feces post-exposure. Although they do eliminate micro-sized particles faster than the nano-sized particles, there was no evidence of bioaccumulation. We did find interesting results with the micro-polystyrene beads, and chose to pivot to further studies on the uptake, ingestion and egestion of microplastics by bivalves. Additionally, we found early life stages are particularly vulnerable to the effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, and did further studies on the effects on the Atlantic slipper snail, Crepidula fornicata.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: Haynes, V.N., J.E. Ward, B.J. Russell & A.G. Agrios, 2017. Review: Photocatalytic effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on aquatic organisms  current knowledge and suggestions for future research. Aquatic Toxicology, 185: 138148
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: Zhao, S.Y., M. Danley, J.E. Ward, D. Li & T.J. Mincer, 2017. An approach for extraction, characterization and quantitation of microplastic in natural marine snow using Raman microscopy. Analytical Methods, 9: 1470-1478
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: Zhao, S.Y, J.E. Ward, M. Danley & T.J. Mincer, 2018. Field-based evidence for microplastic in marine aggregates and mussels: Implications for trophic transfer. Env. Sci. & Tech. 52: 1103811048
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Ward, J.E., S. Zhao, B.A. Holohan, K.M. Mladinich, T.W. Griffin, J. Wozniak & S.E. Shumway, 2019. Selective ingestion and egestion of plastic particles by the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) and eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica): Implications for using bivalves as bioindicators of microplastic pollution. Env. Sci. & Tech. 53: 8776-8784.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Ward, J.E., M. Rosa & S.E. Shumway, 2019. Capture, ingestion and egestion of microplastics by suspension-feeding bivalves: a 40-year history. Anthropocene Coasts 2: 39-49.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Other Year Published: 2020 Citation: Ward. J.E., Holohan, B., Haynes, V., Mladinich, K., and Griffin, T., (in prep). Ingestion and egestion of micro- and nano-plastic by the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, and eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica: no evidence for bioaccumulation of plastic.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Other Year Published: 2020 Citation: Ward, J.E., Holohan, B., Haynes, V., and Mladinich, K., (in prep). Examining ingestion and egestion of micro- and nano-titania by the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, and eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Other Year Published: 2020 Citation: Ward, J.E., et al. (in prep). Ingestion of polystyrene nanoparticles by three species of bivalve molluscs: no effects of form of delivery.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Other Year Published: 2020 Citation: Haynes, V., Tallec, K., and Ward, J.E., (in prep). TiO2 nanoparticles are phototoxic to Atlantic slipper snail larvae (Crepidula fornicata).


Progress 12/01/18 to 11/30/19

Outputs
Target Audience:The following audiences were reached: 1. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists at the Aquatic Sciences Meeting (February 2019). 2. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists and industry members at the Aquaculture meeting (March 2019). 3. General public audience at Groton Conservation Commission, Town of Groton (September 2019). 4. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists at the Science of Microplastics in the World Ocean workshop (October 2019). 5. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists and industry members at the CT Shellfish Commissions meeting (January 2020). 6. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists and industry members at the National Shellfisheries Association meeting (March 2020). Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Graduate students and postdoctoral researcher were trained as part of initiatives 2 and 3. A research assistant also gained new analytical skills, thus contributing to their professional development. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?To date, results have been disseminated through conference presentations (see Products/Outputs above), both oral and poster formats. We published 2 peer-reviewed papers and will be submitting two manuscripts that describes uptake and depuration of nanoplastics and Titan nanoparticles by bivalves in the next few months (initiatives 2 and 3). We will also be submitting a manuscript that describes the uptake of nanomaterials by bivalves based on form of delivery (initiative 1). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? To accomplish these goals, we conducted several lines of research to investigate nanoparticles as an emerging food safety issue: • Initiative 1: Determine bioavailability by quantifying the rates at which freely suspended nanoparticles, and nanoparticles incorporated within marine aggregates are ingested; This initiative was completed in previous years. • Initiative 2: Quantify the bioaccumulation of nanoparticles during a chronic exposure of several weeks; Completed the final two week exposure experiments quantifying the uptake of polystyrene nanoparticles by oysters. Began analyzing frozen tissue samples from previous experiments to determine the uptake of plastic and UV-Titan M212 nanoparticles by mussels and oysters. • Initiative 3: Define the depuration rate and residual concentrations (if any) of nanoparticles over a post-exposure period, and estimate the overall bioaccumulation factors. Following the two week exposure experiments described above, a one week depuration period was carried out for mussels and oysters. Again, all materials were frozen for analyses. Samples for mussels and oysters exposed to Titan nanoparticles are being analyzed. Experiments on exposure of oysters to polystyrene nanoparticles were conducted, and samples from depuration period are being analyzed.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Ward, J.E., S. Zhao, B.A. Holohan, K.M. Mladinich, T.W. Griffin, J. Wozniak & S.E. Shumway, 2019. Selective ingestion and egestion of plastic particles by the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) and eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica): Implications for using bivalves as bioindicators of microplastic pollution. Env. Sci. & Tech. 53: 8776-8784.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Ward, J.E., M. Rosa & S.E. Shumway, 2019. Capture, ingestion and egestion of microplastics by suspension-feeding bivalves: a 40-year history. Anthropocene Coasts 2: 39-49
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Other Year Published: 2020 Citation: Ward. J.E., Holohan, B., Haynes, V., Mladinich, K. and Griffin, T., (in prep). Ingestion and egestion of micro- and nano-plastic by the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, and eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica: no evidence for bioaccumulation of plastic.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Other Year Published: 2020 Citation: Ward, J.E., Holohan, B., Haynes, V., and Mladinich, K., (in prep). Examining ingestion and egestion of micro- and nano-titania by the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, and eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Other Year Published: 2020 Citation: Ward, J.E., et al. (in prep). Ingestion of polystyrene nanoparticles by three species of bivalve molluscs: no effects of form of delivery.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Other Year Published: 2020 Citation: Haynes, V., Tallec, K., and Ward, J.E., (in prep). TiO2 nanoparticles are phototoxic to Atlantic slipper snail larvae (Crepidula fornicata).


Progress 12/01/17 to 11/30/18

Outputs
Target Audience:The following audiences were reached: 1. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists and industry members at the National Shellfisheries Association meeting (March 2018). 2. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists at the USDA-NIFA PI meeting (July 2018) 3. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists at the 13th international conference on the Environmental Effects of Nanoparticles and Nanomaterials (September 2018) 4. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists at the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC; November 2018). 5. Interdisciplinary Audience of University students, professors, staff and general public at an event for the Metanoia on the Environment titled "Unfiltered: An Exhibition About Water" (University of Connecticut; April 2018). Changes/Problems:A one-year, no-cost extension for the grant has been approved. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Undergraduate and graduate student were trained as part of the second year initiatives. A research assistant also gained new skills, thus contributing to their professional development. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?To date, results have been disseminated through conference presentations (see Products/Outputs above), both oral and poster formats. We have also published 3 peer-reviewed papers and will be submitting a manuscript that describes uptake and depuration of nanoplastics by bivalves in the next few months. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In the no-cost extension year, we will complete the analyses of frozen materials and develop a biokinetic model of NP uptake and depuration. Manuscripts describing our work will be prepared and submitted.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? • Initiative 1: Determine bioavailability by quantifying the rates at which freely suspended nanoparticles and nanoparticles incorporated within marine aggregates are ingested; 1) Previously (year 1), we characterized the physical properties of polystyrene and UV-Titan M212 nanoparticles, and determined the percent incorporation of polystyrene nanoparticles (NP) in marine snow. We then determined the uptake of NP by oysters when delivered particles that were freely suspended (aged for 3 days) or that were incorporated into marine snow. In year 2, we ran identical experiments with mussels and clams to determine the uptake of both NP delivered in both forms (freely suspended, in marine snow). Data from these experiments are currently being analyzed. • Initiative 2: Quantify the bioaccumulation of nanoparticles during a chronic exposure of several weeks; 1) Two week exposure experiments quantifying the uptake of UV-Titan M212 nanoparticles by mussels and oysters have been completed and all material is frozen for analyses. Two week exposure experiments quantifying the uptake of polystyrene nanoparticles by mussels and oysters have also been completed. The samples for mussels have been analyzed, and those for oysters will be analyzed in the spring of 2019. In all experiments, bivalves were exposed to a 0.1 mg/L/hr concentration of nanoparticles for two weeks, and were fed a standard microalgal diet throughout the exposure period. • Initiative 3: Define the depuration rate and residual concentrations (if any) of nanoparticles over a post-exposure period, and estimate the overall bioaccumulation factors. 1) Following the two week exposure experiments described above, a one week depuration period was carried out for mussels and oysters. Again, all materials were frozen for analyses. Samples for mussels have been analyzed, and those for oysters will be analyzed in the spring of 2019. Results from initiatives 2 and 3 above were presented by Ward at the 2018 USDA-NIFA PI meeting.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: Zhao, S.Y, J.E. Ward, M. Danley & T.J. Mincer, 2018. Field-based evidence for microplastic in marine aggregates and mussels: Implications for trophic transfer. Env. Sci. & Tech. 52: 11038⿿11048


Progress 12/01/16 to 11/30/17

Outputs
Target Audience:The following audiences were reached: 1. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists at the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (November 2016) 2. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists and industry members at the National Shellfisheries Association meeting (March 2017). 3. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists at the USDA-NIFA PI meeting (July 2017) 4. Interdisciplinary audience of aquarium staff and scientists at the Mystic Aquarium, CT (May 2017; Ridgway Research Seminar) 5. General public at the UConn-Avery Point 50th Festival (October 2017) Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Undergraduate and graduate student were trained as part of the second year initiatives. A research assistant also gained new skills, thus contributing to their professional development. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?To date, results have been disseminated through conference presentations (see Products/Outputs above), both oral and poster formats. We have also published 2 peer-reviewed papers and submitted a manuscript which is now being revised for final consideration. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In the third year, we will complete the two week exposure experiments for clams and quantify their uptake of UV-Titan M212 nanoparticles. We will also complete a one-week depuration period for clams. Finally, we will analyze frozen materials and develop a biokinetic model of NP uptake and depuration. Manuscripts describing our work will be developed.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? To accomplish these goals, we conducted several lines of research to investigate nanoparticles as an emerging food safety issue: • Initiative 1: Determine bioavailability by quantifying the rates at which freely suspended nanoparticles and nanoparticles incorporated within marine aggregates are ingested; Previously (year 1), we characterized the physical properties of polystyrene and UV-Titan M212 nanoparticles, and determined the percent incorporation of polystyrene nanoparticles (NP) in marine snow. We then determined the uptake of NP by oysters when delivered particles that were freely suspended (aged for 3 days) or that were incorporated into marine snow. In year 2, we ran identical experiments with mussels and clams to determine the uptake of both NP delivered in both forms (freely suspended, in marine snow). Data from these experiments are currently being analyzed. • Initiative 2: Quantify the bioaccumulation of nanoparticles during a chronic exposure of several weeks; Two week exposure experiments quantifying the uptake of UV-Titan M212 nanoparticles by mussels and oysters have been completed and all material is frozen for analyses. A two week exposure experiment quantifying the uptake of polystyrene nanoparticles has also been completed. In all experiments, bivalves were exposed to a 0.1 mg/L/hr concentration of nanoparticles for two weeks, and were fed a standard microalgal diet throughout the exposure period. Finally, a preliminary experiment with clams has been conducted to identify the optimal procedures for the two week uptake experiment that will be conducted next summer. • Initiative 3: Define the depuration rate and residual concentrations (if any) of nanoparticles over a post-exposure period, and estimate the overall bioaccumulation factors. Following the two week exposure experiments described above, a one week depuration period was carried out for mussels and oysters. Again, all materials have been frozen for analyses.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: Haynes, V.N., J.E. Ward, B.J. Russell & A.G. Agrios, 2017. Review: Photocatalytic effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on aquatic organisms  current knowledge and suggestions for future research. Aquatic Toxicology, 185: 138148 (partial support)
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: Zhao, S.Y., M. Danley, J.E. Ward, D. Li & T.J. Mincer, 2017. An approach for extraction, characterization and quantitation of microplastic in natural marine snow using Raman microscopy. Analytical Methods, 9: 1470-1478 (partial support)
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2018 Citation: Doyle, J.J., J.E. Ward & G.H. Wikfors, in revision. Acute exposure to TiO2 nanoparticles produces minimal apparent effects on oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin), hemocytes. Marine Pollution Bulletin (partial support)


Progress 12/01/15 to 11/30/16

Outputs
Target Audience:The following audiences were reached: 1. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists at the NSF/NIEHS Oceans and Human Health PI Meeting (April 2016) 2. Interdisciplinary audience of scientists at the USDA-NIFA PI meeting (July 2016) 3. Scientist focused on environmental nanotechnology at the ICEENN meeting (Aug. 2016) 4. High school students from CT at the Global Café event (UConn) focusing on the impact of Rachel Carson's life and work (Oct. 2016) 5. Undergraduate students from UConn at the Global Café event (UConn) focusing on the impact of Rachel Carson's life and work (Oct. 2016) 6. Interdisciplinary audience of faculty at the Global Café event (UConn) focusing on the impact of Rachel Carson's life and work (Oct. 2016) Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Undergraduate and graduate student were trained as part of the first year intitiatives. A research assistant also gained new skills, thus contributing to their professional development. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?To date, results have been disseminated through conference presentations (see "other products"), both oral and poster formats. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In the second year of the project, we will complete experiments to quantifying the rates at which freely suspended nanoparticles and nanoparticles incorporated within marine aggregates are ingested with mussels and clams (Initiative 1). Informed by these results, we will then begin experiments to quantify the bioaccumulation of nanoparticles during a chronic exposure (Initiative 2), and define the depuration rate and residual concentrations (if any) of nanoparticles over a post-exposure period (Initiative 3).

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? • Initiative 1: Determine bioavailability by quantifying the rates at which freely suspended nanoparticles and nanoparticles incorporated within marine aggregates are ingested; 1) We characterized the physical properties of the polystyrene nanoparticles (NP) using the same techniques that we employed to previously characterize UV-Titan M212 (a surface-coated TiO2 NP), the other nanoparticle that will be examined in the study. Specifically, Zeta potential and hydrodynamic diameter of the NP were determined by means of a Zetasizer Nano 2ZS instrument (Malvern Instruments Inc.). Multipoint Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area measurements of the NP were made by means of a Micromeritics TriStar 3000 static pressure surface area analyzer. Characterization was carried out immediately after suspending NP in seawater and 72 hours after being placed in seawater. 2) In laboratory experiments, we determined the percent incorporation of polystyrene nanoparticles (NP) in marine snow, an important hetero-aggregation in the ocean. Similar to the incorporation of UV-Titan into marine snow, polystyrene NP showed the greatest increase in incorporation over the first 72 hours, with diminishing increases to 168 hours. Unlike UV-Titan NP, however, polystyrene NP had a maximum incorporation of approximately 27% (cf. UV-Titan incorporation = 95%; Doyle et al. 2014). 3) We determined the uptake of NP by oysters when delivered particles that were freely suspended (aged for 3 days) or that were incorporated into marine snow. Data from these experiments are currently being analyzed. • Initiative 2: Quantify the bioaccumulation of nanoparticles during a chronic exposure of several weeks; Nothing to report • Initiative 3: Define the depuration rate and residual concentrations (if any) of nanoparticles over a post-exposure period, and estimate the overall bioaccumulation factors. Nothing to report

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2017 Citation: Haynes, V.N., J.E. Ward, B.J. Russell & A.G. Agrios, 2017. Review: Photocatalytic effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on aquatic organisms  current knowledge and suggestions for future research. Critical Reviews in Toxicology [in review]