Source: OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY OF SOILS TREATED WITH ANIMAL MANURE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1007016
Grant No.
(N/A)
Project No.
OKL02989
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2015
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2020
Grant Year
(N/A)
Project Director
Desilva, U.
Recipient Organization
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
STILLWATER,OK 74078
Performing Department
Animal Science
Non Technical Summary
Animal feeding operations are increasing in size and they are concentrated on certain geographical locations. Consequently, they produce large quantities of manure that needs to be disposed of. The current practice is to disperse the manure as fertilizer on agricultural fields and to plant crops on them. The manure contains large quantities of animal gut microbes that have been exposed to sub-therapeutic levels of antibiotics that are commonly used in animal agriculture. The long-term effect of antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant bacteria or of animal microbes is not well-understood.We have access to soil samples that have been continuously treated with different types of animal manure for 15 years. Samples were collected annually for chemical analyses.We propose to undertake a comprehensive analysis of these samples to ascertain; A.) The effect of long-term manure amendment on soil microbial ecosystem. B.) presence, abundance and persistence of antibiotic-resist organisms in treated soil. C.) The presence and abundance of antibiotic residues in the soil.In achieving these goals, we will extract DNA from soil samples and perform a high-throughput sequence analysis of bacterial DNA to identify the diversity and relative presence of different organisms, test the soil for presence of antibiotic-resistant organisms and will assay for antibiotic residues as well.At the conclusion of the proposed research, we will have a better understanding of the population dynamics of soil-derived as well as animal gut microbes on treated soil, will understand the long-term effect of manure-derived antibiotic-resistance in soil as well as the survivability of antibiotic resistant bacteria in manure amended soils.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
60%
Applied
40%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1040110110030%
7124099104010%
3073599104030%
3073399104030%
Goals / Objectives
The long-term goal of my research is to better understand the population dynamics of soil microbial ecosystems in response to manure amendment. The overall objective of this project is to determine the changes in soil microbial ecosystems in response to long-term treatment with animal waste (cattle manure and swine effluent).The specific objectives of this proposal are;Determine the effect of long-term manure amendment on microbial communities in soilDetermine the presence and abundance of antibiotic-resistant organisms in soil treated with different manure.Determine the presence, abundance and type of antibiotic residues in soil.
Project Methods
The project consists of three specific aims. Methods are listed under each specific aim.Specific Aim 1: Determine the effect of long-term manure amendment on microbial communities in soil. Total DNA will be extracted from soil treated with different animal manure. A fragment of 16S rRNA gene would be amplified by PCR. Resulting amplicons will be primer-tagged and sequence analyzed using Illumina MiSeq technology resulting in ~300bp paired-end fragments. Reads would be assembled into OTUs and taxonomies assigned. Principal Component analyses would be performed to ascertain differences and trends among samples.Specific Aim 2: Determine the presence and abundance of antibiotic-resistant organisms in soil treated with different manure and determine the survivability of such organisms over time. Soil would be suspended in PBS media and plated on agar plates containing different antibiotics. Bacteria that grow on these plates would be pooled. DNA from the pooled samples would be extracted, end-repaired, and cloned into a Fosmid vector. Fosmid clones would be grown in media supplemented with antibiotics and resulting clones would be sequence analyzed to identify them. A second approach would utilize a battery of ~75 PCR assays developed against known antibiotic resistant genes.Specific Aim 3: Determine the presence, abundance and type of antibiotic residues in soil. Soil samples will be homogenized and filtered. Filtrate would be used to impregnate 20mm filter disks and air-dried. These disks would be used in antibiotic sensitivity assays on plates containing either E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, or Proteus mirabilis. Soil would also be tested using a panel of commercial ELISA tests designed to detect Bacitracin, Carbadox, Chlortetracycline, Lincomysin, Penicillin, and Monensin.

Progress 10/01/15 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:animal producers, soil microbiologists, waste management experts, veterinarians Changes/Problems:We found the quality of DNA in soils stored under non-optimal conditions is not suitable for high throughput microbiome analyses as we managed to extract very small quantities of DNA from older soils. Antibiotic resistance genes seem difficult to interpret as control soils with no manure amendment had higher levels of genes associated with antibiotic resistance. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?One graduate student completed her doctoral degree working on this project. Several undergraduate students worked on different aspects of the project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Journal articles and discussions at professional meetings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?This is the final report for this project.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? We selected soil samples collected in the years 1999, 2000, 2003,2005, and 2007 to analyze fluctuations in microbial diversity and soil properties due to manure amendment. As samples, when collected, were not intended for microbial analysis and as they were stored between 10-16 years in non-optimal conditions, we could not extract high-quality DNA from most samples. We managed to obtain enough DNA by doing multiple rounds of extractions and pooling samples. V4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA gene was PCR amplified and sequence analyzed using the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform resulting in over 2.2 million 250bp paired-end raw reads. Soil pH, phosphorous, potassium, magnesium, calcium, total nitrogen (TN), and total carbon (TC) were also measured in bovine manure and swine effluent treated soils over the years. Overall, soil P content was significantly affected by treatment and time. Soil pH, Mg, and Ca only significantly changed over time. Both beef manure and swine effluent decreased soil pH over time. Although soil pH is considered one of the most important determinants of soil microbiome, our study did not show pH having a significant influence on soil microbiome. There was no difference between the treatments. Beef manure increased soil P content significantly higher than swine effluent. Most soil properties fluctuated over time without an obvious trend with the exception of Mg., which significantly decreased over time. A total of 30 soil samples representing two treatments, three replicates, and five-time points were sequence analyzed for microbiome analysis. A total of 2,294,735 paired-end raw reads were generated at an average of 76,491±15,173 reads/sample. A total of 29 microbial phyla were identified and they were further classified into 57 classes, 136 orders, 280 families, and 816 genera. The top phyla present in the soil were Actinobacteria, firmicutes, Alphaproteobacteria, and Acidobacteria. Surprisingly, we did not find that these organisms changed significantly and predictably over time. Phylum Actinobacteria was more abundant in swine effluent treated soils in 2000 than in any other soil, whereas Firmicutes were more abundant in bovine manure treated soils in 2003 than in any other treatment. The top four genera in the soils were Gaiella, Solirubroacter, Paenibacillus, and Nitrosphora. Only Nitrosphora significantly changed over treatment. Swine effluent significantly increases the amount of Nitrosphora compared to bovine manure. We found that soil potassium (K) is the key determinant on swine effluent treated soils. Overall, in this study, we found that the soil nutrient content slightly declined over time while no obvious temporal change was observed in the soil microbiome. We also did not find an effect of continuous cultivation on soil microbiome. The core microbiome remained stable in eight years of intensive cultivation. We found that the richness of the soil microbiome slightly decreases over time, indicating an overall decline in microbiome abundance. Total carbon seemed to be the driving force behind soil microbial fluctuations. The core microbiome remained stable over eight years. There was no distinguishable temporal change in the microbiome. We tested the soil samples with a battery of ~20 PCR assays for antibiotic resistance genes. We were only able to detect the presence of four antibiotic resistance genes in the samples we tested. Chlo-Cat (presence of chloramphenicol resistance), Multi-acrD and Multi-mexD (multidrug resistance genes), TetW, TetQ, TetU (tetracycline resistance). These markers were present in bovine manure treated, swine effluence treated, and control (no manure amendment) soils. There was no significant and consistent difference between soil types and the abundance of the markers. There was a slight increase in TetQ marker in control soils.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Spring, S., Premathilake, H., DeSilva, U., Shili, C., Carter, S., Pezeshki, A. 2020. Low Protein  High Carbohydrate Diets after Energy Balance, Gut Microbiota Composition and Blood Metabolomics in Young Pigs. Scientific Reports 10(1):3318
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2020 Citation: Hanak, E., DiGirolamo, N., DeSilva, U., Marschang, R., Brandao, J., Desprez, I., Lulich, J. 2020. Composition of Ferret Uroliths in North America and Eurasia: 1054 cases (2010-2018), Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association (JAVMA), in press
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Ramanathan, R., Kiyimba, F., Gonzales, J., Mafi, G., DeSilva, U. 2020. Impact of Up-and Downregulation of metabolites and mitochondrial content on pH and Color of the Longissimus Muscle from Normal-pH and Dark-Cutting Beef. Jour-nal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68(27), 7194-7203
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2020 Citation: Ramanathan, R., Kiyimba, F., Gonzalez, J., Mafi, G., DeSilva, U. 2020. Down-regulation of glycolytic metabolites and mitochondrial content differences in dark-cutting beef impact muscle-pH and color
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2020 Citation: Qi, D., Wieneke, X., Xue, P., Li, H., DeSilva, U. 2020. Total nitrogen is the main soil property associated with soil fungal community composition in karst rocky desertification regions in the Wushan County, Chongquin, China.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Spring, S., Premathilake, H., Bradway, C., Shili, C., DeSilva, U., Carter, S., Pez-eshki, A. 2020. Effect of Very Low-Proten deits Supplemented with Branched-Charin Amino Acids on Energy Balance, Plasma Metabolomics and Fecal Mi-crobiome of Pigs. Scientific Reports, 10(1) 1-16


Progress 10/01/18 to 09/30/19

Outputs
Target Audience:Animal producers, soil microbiologists, veterinarians, Changes/Problems:Antibiotic resistance genes do not seem to correlate with the fertilizer amendment. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Journal articles and presentations at scientific meetings What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?publish some of the newer analyses.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? After analyzing samples spanning 15 years, we sequence analyzed over 4 million bidirectional sequence reads of 16S rDNA fragments, seven soil properties, soil pH and levels of several chemicals were also analyzed. The data shows that soil microbial communities are different under long-term manure amendments. Total carbon seems to be the key driving factor shaping bovine manure treated soil microbiome while potassium is the main determinant of swine effluent treated soils. The core microbiome of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Proteobacteriaand Chloroflexi, Gemmitmonadetes and Planctomycetes remain stable in non-fertilized soils over a 12-year period. Phyla Actinobacteria and Firmicutes are enriched in bovine manure while Gemmatimonadetes and Nitrospirae respond best to swine effluent treatment.

Publications


    Progress 10/01/17 to 09/30/18

    Outputs
    Target Audience:Animal Scientists, Soil Scientists, Feedlot operators Changes/Problems:Soil Ph seems to be the largest driver of microbial variation. We have been having problems amplifying antibiotic resistant genes What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A graduate student completed her dissertation working on this project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Journal articles and presentations at professional meetings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Further analyze the samples for antibiotic resistance status.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? We have access to a collection of soil samples from soil that was treated with cattle manure, swine effluent, chemical fertilizer and left untreated for 15 years. Samples were collected every year and were archived. We extracted DNA from samples spanning the whole time period and used 16S rDNA fragment analysis to survey the temporal fluctuation of the microbial community over the 15-r time span. We generated over 4 million bi-directional sequence reads. Seven soil properties, pH, and the levels of several chemicals were measured. Results show that soil microbiome communities are different under long-term manure amendment. Total carbon is the key driving factor shaping bovine manure treated soil microbiome while potassium is the main determinant of swine effluent treated soils. The core microbiome of Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Gemmitmonadetes, and Planctomycetes remain stable in non-fertilized soils over the 12 year period. Phyla Actinobacteria and Firmicutes are enriched in bovine manure while Gemmatimonadetes and Nitrospirae respond best to swine effluent treatment.

    Publications

    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: Ahlberg, C. M., K. Allwardt, A. Broocks, K. Bruno, L. McPhillips, A. Taylor, C. R. Krehbiel, M. Calvo-Lorenzo, C. J. Richards, S. E. Place, U. DeSilva, D. L. VanOverbeke, R. G. Mateescu, L. A. Kuehn, R. L. Weaber, J. M. Bormann, and M. M. Rolf. 2018a. Test duration for water intake, ADG, and DMI in beef cattle. Journal of animal science 96(8):3043-3054. (Article) doi: 10.1093/jas/sky209
    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: Ahlberg, C. M., K. Allwardt, A. Broocks, K. Bruno, L. McPhillips, A. Taylor, C. R. Krehbiel, M. S. Calvo-Lorenzo, C. J. Richards, S. E. Place, U. DeSilva, D. L. VanOverbeke, R. G. Mateescu, L. A. Kuehn, R. L. Weaber, J. M. Bormann, and M. M. Rolf. 2018b. Environmental effects on water intake and water intake prediction in growing beef cattle. Journal of animal science 96(10):4368-4384. (Article) doi: 10.1093/jas/sky267
    • Type: Other Status: Other Year Published: 2018 Citation: Bruno, K., L. J. McPhillips, M. Calvo-Lorenzo, U. deSilva, C. R. krehbiel, M. M. rolf, S. E. place, D. L. Step, R. G. mateescu, D. L. vanoverbeke, and T. C. Husz. 2018. Effect of temperament measures on feedlot cattle performance. Journal of Animal Science 96:18-19. (abstract)
    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Awaiting Publication Year Published: 2018 Citation: Qi, D., X. Wieneke, J. Tao, X. Zhou, and U. Desilva. 2018. Soil pH is the primary factor correlating with soil microbiome in karst rocky desertification regions in the Wushan County, Chongqing, China. Frontiers in Microbiology 9(MAY)(Article) doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01027


    Progress 10/01/16 to 09/30/17

    Outputs
    Target Audience:animal scientists, soil microbiologists Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A graduate student is being provided professional development and training How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Journal articles and presentations at professional meetings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Further analyze soils for antibiotic residues

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Treatment of Agricultural land with animal manure as fertilizer is common practice with large-scale animal industry. This is especially prevalent in geographical areas in the country where high-density animal feeding operations have flourished. This manure contains large number of enteric microorganisms that has been exposed to sub-therapeutic levels of antibiotics and antimicrobials that are commonly used in animal agriculture. It is well-established that manure amendment increases soil quality, productivity and biodiversity. We used samples from a previous study where soil was treated with cattle manure, swine effluent, chemical fertilizer and untreated for 15 years. We extracted DNA from samples spanning 12 years from manure treated soils and from the control, and used 16S rDNA fragment analysis to survey temporal fluctuation in microbial community over 12 year period. Illumina HiSeq platform was used to survey microbiome community by deep sequencing and over 4 million bi-directional sequence reeds were generated. Seven soil properties, pH, total nitrogen, total carbon, potassium, phosphorous, magnesium, and calcium were measured to assess soil quality and fertility. Results show that soil microbiome communities are different under long-term manure amendment. Total carbon is the driving factor shaping bovine manure treated soil microbiome while potassium is the main determinant of swine effluent treated soils. The core microbiome of Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Gemmitmonadetes, and Planctomycetes remain stable in non-fertilized soils over the 12 year period. Phyla Actinobacteria and Firmicutes are entiched in bovine manure while Gemmatimonadetes and Nitrospirae respond best to swine effluent treatment.

    Publications

    • Type: Book Chapters Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: U. DeSilva and W.S. Damron. 2017 Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering. In: Introduction to Animal Science: Global, Biological, Social and Industrial Perspectives. W. Stephen Damron. Pearson Education Inc.
    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: Ke YL, Mitacek RM, Abraham A, Mafi GG, VanOverbeke DL, DeSilva U, Rama-nathan R. 2017. Effects of Muscle-Specific Oxidative Stress on Cytochrome c Release and Oxidation Reduction Potential Properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65: 7749-7755.


    Progress 10/01/15 to 09/30/16

    Outputs
    Target Audience:Fellow scientsts, undergraduate and graduate students Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A graduate student is being provided professional development and training. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?A major sequencing effort of 16S rDNA fragments from microoranisms from manure amended soil is planned. We will also look for more antibiotic resistant markers.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Treatment of agricultural land with animal manure as fertilizer is common practice in states with large-scale animal industry. This is especially prevalent in geographical areas in the country where high-density animal feeding operations have flourished. This manure contains large number of enteric microorganisms that has been exposed to sub-therapeutic levels of antibiotics and antimicrobials that are commonly used in animal agriculture. The long-term effect of continuous treatment of animal manure on agricultural soils or the effect of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance bacteria on soil is not very well understood. In a previous study, soil was treated with cattle manure, swine effluent, chemical fertilizer and untreated for 15 years. Each year, soil samples from these plots were collected and archived. We have successfully isolated DNA from these samples, amplified 16S rDNA gene fragments from each year. We have sequence analyzed a cross-section of these samples as a proof-of-concept and have generated over 40,000 sequence reads. They represent ~220 genera of microorganisms that are both reported from animals as well as soil. We have optimized real-time PCR assays for ~25 known antibiotic resistance genes and have tested them on soil samples. Further analysis of these samples are underway.

    Publications

    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2015 Citation: Roberts SL, Lancaster PA, DeSilva U, Horn GW, Krehbiel CR. 2015. Coordinat-ed gene expression between skeletal muscle and intramuscular adipose tissue in growing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 93: 4302-4311.
    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2015 Citation: Chako, C.Z., Step, D.L., Malayer, J.R., Krehbiel, C.R., DeSilva, U. and Streeter, R.N. 2015 Subacute ruminal acidosis and ruminal lactic acidosis: a review. The Bovine Practitioner 49:2:140-146