Source: UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING submitted to
A NOVEL ARSENIC FILTER FOR FIELD APPLICATIONS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1000238
Grant No.
(N/A)
Project No.
WYO495-14
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 30, 2013
Project End Date
Feb 8, 2018
Grant Year
(N/A)
Project Director
Reddy, KA, J.
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING
1000 E UNIVERSITY AVE DEPARTMENT 3434
LARAMIE,WY 82071-2000
Performing Department
Ecosystem Science and Management
Non Technical Summary
Groundwater is a main source of drinking water for some rural areas including agricultural farmers. People in these rural areas are potentially at risk from elevated levels of arsenic (As) due to a lack of water treatment facilities. Global health awareness of As contamination of drinking water supplies has increased enormously in recent years in response to unintentional human exposure to As poisoning through groundwater supplies in India and Bangladesh (Bagla and Kaiser, 1996; Smith et al., 2000; Chakraborti et al., 2003)). Subsequently, several studies have reported that groundwater in many parts of the world contains elevated levels of As (Welch et al., 2003; Nordstrom, 2002; Smith et al., 2003; Xia and Liu, 2004). Studies have shown that long-term human exposure to drinking water containing As in excess of 50 μg/L causes increased risk of skin, lung, bladder, kidney cancer, and premature death (Bates et al., 1992). Both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) recommend 10 μg/L of As as the limit for human drinking water. Widespread efforts are being made globally to develop effective and affordable technologies for removal of As from water. However, As in water exists in two oxidation states, arsenite (III) and arsenate (V), and it is difficult to remove both oxidation states simultaneously under a wide range of water chemistries. The main theme of the proposed research is to develop a novel and effective one-step arsenic filter for field applications.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
10%
Applied
65%
Developmental
25%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
7230210202050%
7230210205050%
Goals / Objectives
Groundwater is an important drinking water resource for many rural communities. These small communities are at high risk for potential arsenic related health problems due to a lack of water treatment facilities. Natural processes and anthropogenic activities can mobilize arsenic in groundwater. The natural processes include weathering of aquifer minerals. Anthropogenic activities include energy production. The main theme of the proposed research is to develop a novel and effective one-step arsenic filter for field applications. If successful, the proposed research will results in an inexpensive arsenic removal technology for small communities and for produced water resulting from energy activities. Another important aspect of the proposed research is recruiting a graduate student who will be an integral part of the project. Earlier laboratory batch CuO-As experiments provide valuable information about reaction kinetics and effectiveness of CuO treatment in removal of As under different water chemistries. However, further studies are required to develop As filter for field applications. Also, information about regeneration of CuO particles and their effectiveness in removal of As from natural waters is required. To accomplish these goals we propose to develop a flow-through reactor using CuO nanoparticles and test As removal both under laboratory and field conditions. The objectives of this research will be to 1) design and implement a flow-through column to be used for in field, slip-stream filtration of arsenic, 2) demonstrate the effectiveness of arsenic removal by CuO in a wide range of water chemistries, 3) establish the effectiveness of a one-step regeneration and reuse of the CuO nanoparticles, 4) isolate, harvest and characterize the arsenic from the removal process, and 5) examine the effect of the flow-through arsenic filtration column on water quality. These research findings should significantly improve the health of many people by improving water quality.
Project Methods
Many of the studies performed by Martinson and Reddy in their 2009 publication will be repeated and expanded to include the characterization of CuO nanoparticles after regeneration and reuse. These studies will include analyzing the adsorption capacity, physical characterization, surface analysis, and chemical component analysis before and after regeneration. Also, the regeneration fluids will be evaporated and the precipitates will be analyzed for chemical constituents. These studies will be performed in lab using the batch experiment procedures described by Martinson and Reddy. Batch experiments are conducted in 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes using volumes of 50 mL or arsenic laden water and 2 g/L of CuO nanoparticles. To ensure that a variety of water chemistries are represented, research will be conducted at five locations, which known to contain arsenic in concentrations exceeding the EPA guidelines. Each site will also be selected to represent one of the following water use categories; natural water, agricultural water, community water (no water treatment facility), municipal water, and energy produced water. All locations will be in the State of Wyoming. The anticipated sites of each category are: Natural Water - Lewis Lake, Yellowstone National Park, WY; Agricultural Water - Privately owned groundwater well in Torrington, WY; Community Water - Privately owned groundwater well in Pinedale, WY; Municipal Water - Centennial, WY water treatment plant; Energy Produced Water - Uranium produced water, Campbell County. The flow-through column designed by Roth and Reddy will serve as the basic model for this study (Roth and Reddy 2009). In recent studies this design has been updated to control the flow rate with a pump and increase adsorption by including a magnetic stir bar in the reaction chamber. However, a few important modifications are necessary for the implementation of this column in the field. Namely, the column will require a power source for the pump and magnetic stirrer. In addition, the column will require a stand so that it may be set up on unlevel surfaces should they exist at the sampling location. Preliminary samples for all sites will be collected to serve as a reference and control point. To ensure the highest degree of quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC), all water samples will be collected in accordance with the guidelines of the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WYDEQ) in the Manual of Standard Operating Procedures for Sample Collection and Analysis. Each of the samples will be analyzed for their full chemical composition including lab analysis of alkalinity and concentrations of the major cations and anions. If it is shown that a site does not contain arsenic in concentrations above the EPA limit of 10 ppb, a new site will be identified and used in its place. A preliminary, mockup flow-through trial with simulated field conditions will be completed in lab prior to conducting field experimentation. This will serve as a basis for identifying unforeseen difficulties and will be repeated if deemed necessary.

Progress 09/30/13 to 02/08/18

Outputs
Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems:PI retired. Terminate without final report. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Nothing to report.

Publications


    Progress 10/01/15 to 09/30/16

    Outputs
    Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?One MS graduate student and one research scientist was trained. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results were shared with landowners of the groundwater from Torrington and Jackson, Wyoming. A research article was published in Scientific Reports journal. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Project Accomplishments: Twoidentical polycarbonate point-of-use flow-through columnfilters with CuO nanoparticles (CuO-NPs)were designed for field testing. The basic design of the filter is derived from previouslab experiments. However, several key modifications were made to this column design to allow for it to be operated in the field at ten times the flow rate used in previous studies. Contact time in the point-of-use filter of the CuO-NP and arsenic laden groundwater was approximately 2 min. Experiments were conducted on twodifferent groundwater samples (Torrington and Jackson) from Wyoming. For each groundwater sample, three tests were performed; one control (without CuO-NP) and two duplicate runs with CuO-NP. Following the initial treatment of arsenic laden water with CuO-NPs, the CuO-NP were regenerated in the field. All regeneration wash fluids were collected at the outlet and fully characterized for anion and cation concentrations. After the regeneration process, the flow-through filtration process was repeated using the regenerated CuO-NP. The initial flow-through process using CuO-NP as-prepared, regeneration of the CuO-NP, and second flow through using regenerated CuO-NP were performed. Additionally, control runs with the respective groundwater samples were conducted without CuO-NP in order to determine the effect of the glass filters and sand alone in the point-of-use filter column. A total of 20L for eachgroundwater well wastreated at a flow rate of 10L per hr.Sampling for all twogroundwater samples when treated with CuO-NP was conducted at 0, 5, 10, 20, 35, and 60 min, a control sample before testing, and a composite sample of all the water treated by the point-of-use filter were collected during the test. The same sampling protocol was used for the regenerated CuO-NP. The control tests for the twogroundwater samples were sampled at 0, 5, 10, 20, 35, 60, 90, 120 min. The difference in sampling protocol was due to the lack of a regeneration step during the control tests. All samples collected were measured for pH,arsenic, major cations and anions, and trace elements, including copper. The pH of Torrington and Jackson groundwater samples were 7.22 and 7.50, respectively. The concentration of arsenic at each field location exceeds the 0.01 mg/L MCL recommended by the USEPA and WHO for drinking water. Arsenic concentrations were 0.013 and 0.024 mg/L in the Torrington groundwater and Jackson groundwater, respectively. The groundwater from Torrington contained concentrations of SO42- of 150 mg/L and Si concentrations of 0.026 mg/L. The groundwater from Jackson contained concentrations of SO42- of 15 mg/L and Si concentrations of 0.008 mg/L. The controlfilters alone showed no effect on removal of arsenic from Torrington and Jackson groundwater in the field. The concentration of arsenic in the Torrington groundwater with as-prepared CuO-NP was decreased from 0.013 to 0.002 mg/L in the composite sample. The pH of the Torrington groundwater prior to treatment was 7.22. A drop in pH was seen to a pH of 6.55 in the initial 0 minute sample following treatment. Following this initial drop the pH slowly increased to a pH of 7.35 in the composite sample. Except for arsenic, no other chemical constituent of the Torrington water changed significantly following the treatment with CuO-NP, including copper. In the Jackson groundwater, the concentration of arsenic was decreased from 0.024 to 0.002 mg/L. The pH of the Jackson groundwater was 7.50 prior to the treatment with point-of-use filter column. Again, an initial drop in pH to 6.58 was noted, which then increased to 7.40 in the composite sample. There was no significant change in chemical constituents other than arsenic of the Jackson groundwater following the treatment with CuO-NP as-prepared, including copper.The CuO-NP were regenerated in the field by raising the pH of the solution entering the point-of-use filter column above the ZPC (> pH 9.4±0.4) of CuO-NP, desorbing the arsenic from the CuO-NP into solution which was then flushed through the system. The experiments were then repeated with the regenerated CuO-NP. The regenerated CuO-NP were slightly less effective in removing arsenic, from Torrington and Jackson groundwater samples, than the CuO-NP as-prepared. Similar to observations in the lab based point-of-use filter experiment, this is due to an incomplete flushing of arsenic from the reaction column of the point-of-use filter during regeneration and subsequently an incomplete regeneration of the CuO-NP. Arsenic concentration in the Torrington groundwater decreased from 0.013 to 0.004 mg/L following the treatment with regenerated CuO-NP, and the Jackson groundwater decreased in arsenic concentration from 0.024 to 0.003 mg/L. The effects of the regenerated CuO-NP on other chemical constituents were similar to that of the CuO-NP as-prepared, with no significant changes observed. Arsenic contamination of human drinking water supplies is a serious global health concern. Despite multiple years of research, sustainable arsenic treatment technologies have yet to be developed. This study demonstrates intrinsic abilities of cupric oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NP) towards arsenic adsorption and development of a point-of-use filter for field application.Results of this study suggest naturally occurring arsenic in groundwater samples was effectively removed by both as-prepared and regenerated CuO-NP in the field usingthe point-of-use flow-through column filter.

    Publications


      Progress 10/01/14 to 09/30/15

      Outputs
      Target Audience:Ag producers and In situ uranium mining industry Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Trained a graduate student and a research scientist. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results were presented at local, regional, and national meetings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Continue working on project goals.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? Prepared cupric oxide (CuO) nanoparticles.X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy experiments were used to examine adsorption, desorption, and readsorption of aqueous arsenite and arsenate by CuO-NP. Apoint -of-use flow-through filter column for lab and field testing was designed and developed.Experiments were conducted with a point-of-use filter, coupled with real-time arsenic monitoring, to remove arsenic from domestic groundwater samples. The CuO-NP were regenerated by desorbing arsenate via increasing pH above the zero point of charge. Results suggest naturally occurring arsenic was effectively removed by both as-prepared and regenerated CuO-NP in field demonstration of the point-of-use filter.

      Publications

      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2015 Citation: McDonald, K.J., B.R. Reynolds, and K.J. Reddy. 2015. Intrinsic properties of cupric oxide nanoparticles enable effective filtration of arsenic from water. Scientific Reports. DOI:10.1038/srep11110.
      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2015 Citation: Schilz, J.R., K.J. Reddy, S. Nair, T.E. Johnson, R.B. Tjalkens, K.P. Krueger, and S. Clark. 2015. (Invited) Removal of trace elements by CuO nanoparticles from uranium in-situ recovery bleed water and its effect on cell viability. Journal of Visual Experimentation. E52715, DOI:10.3791/52715.


      Progress 10/01/13 to 09/30/14

      Outputs
      Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? A graduate student and research scientist were trained. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Results were presented at local and regional meetings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Try to accomplish objectives 4 and 5.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? Point-of-use filter column to remove arsenic from groundwater was developed. Three identical polycarbonate point-of-use filters were designed for lab and field testing. The basic design of the filter is derived from previouslab experiments. However, several key modifications were made to this column design to allow for it to be operated in the field at ten times the flow rate used in previous lab based studies. Contact time in the point-of-use filter of the CuO-NP and arsenic laden groundwater was approximately 2 min. Experiments were conducted on three different groundwater samples from Wyoming. For each groundwater sample, three tests were performed; one control (without CuO-NP) and two duplicate runs with CuO-NP. Following the initial treatment of arsenic laden water, the CuO-NP were regenerated in the lab and the field (see Methods). All regeneration wash fluids were collected at the outlet and fully characterized for anion and cation concentrations. After the regeneration process, the flow-through filtration process was repeated using the regenerated CuO-NP. The initial flow-through process using CuO-NP as-prepared, regeneration of the CuO-NP, and second flow through using regenerated CuO-NP were performed. Additionally, control runs with the respective groundwater samples were conducted without CuO-NP in order to determine the effect of the glass filters and sand alone in the point-of-use filter column. Results suggested an effective oxidation of arsenite to arsenate on the surface of CuO-NP. Naturally occurring arsenic was effectively removed by both as-prepared and regenerated CuO-NP in field demonstration of the point-of-use filter.

      Publications


        Progress 09/30/13 to 09/30/13

        Outputs
        Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

        Impacts
        What was accomplished under these goals? This is a new project.

        Publications