Source: UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA submitted to
NATIONAL RESEARCH SUPPORT PROJECT 7(NRSP-7): SOUTHERN REGION
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0223548
Grant No.
2010-34143-21850
Project No.
FLA-VME-005056
Proposal No.
2010-01478
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
SS
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2010
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2012
Grant Year
2010
Project Director
Vickroy, T. W.
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
G022 MCCARTY HALL
GAINESVILLE,FL 32611
Performing Department
College of Veterinary Medicine
Non Technical Summary
Other countries with less stringent approval requirements have a variety of production aids available that producers in the US do not have. Foreign producers of lamb, wool, cheeses, farmed fish, farmed shrimp, honey, and game-birds frequently export those products to the US and it is usually up to the importers to check for tainted foods. For example, two-thirds of the honey consumed in the US is imported and a recent publication revealed significant contamination with banned antibiotics. Nearly 90 percent of the commercially farmed shrimp are imported and one-third of the lamb consumed in the US comes from Australia and New Zealand, some of it raised with the aid of products unavailable to US producers. Clearly efforts must be initiated to provide US animal producers with safe and effective means to compete in a global market, while assuring US consumers a safe and wholesome food supply. In 1976, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiated an extensive study of the minor use of animal drugs through the efforts of a minor use/minor species drug committee. This committee, comprised of representatives of the FDA's then Bureau of Veterinary Medicine and Bureau of Foods, the US Department of Agriculture, the pharmaceutical industry, and animal producer groups identified the problem as a lack of approved drugs for diseases of minor species and for the principal minor diseases of major species. The committee also identified the principal diseases for which drugs were not available in the minor species. Further, the committee recognized that the livestock industry in the United States relies heavily on the judicious use of drugs for the treatment and prevention of diseases in food animals. Without these drugs, animal suffering and mortality would continue to increase as would the cost of producing animal-derived food products. However, before a drug can be marketed for use in a food animal species, it must be shown to be safe to the human consumer of the animal-derived food as well as safe and efficacious in the target animal. The process of generating the safety and efficacy data necessary for FDA approval of a drug is costly and time-consuming. At present, the estimated cost to a pharmaceutical company for research necessary to obtain FDA approval for a new drug exceeds $40 million, and requires 8 to 10 years of concentrated research effort. The addition of a new label claim is also costly, ranging from $4 to $10 million. Because of this substantial investment in time and resources, pharmaceutical companies must be assured that the drug will have a reasonable potential for profit. Therefore, most drug approvals are sought only for those animal species that are produced in sufficient numbers to support large volume sales, specifically cattle, swine, chickens and turkeys. There is little economic incentive for pharmaceutical firms to generate data necessary to seek FDA approval of drugs in minor species; hence, very few drugs are available for management of diseases in these species. Inequities in drug availability represent serious management and economic problems for producers for minor species.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
10%
Applied
85%
Developmental
5%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
7115010118080%
7115010115020%
Goals / Objectives
This proposal requests funding for the continued implementation of the NRSP-7 Minor Use Animal Drug Program: Southern Region. The objectives of the Minor Use Animal Drug Program are to conduct a national program to obtain minor and specialty animal drug clearances (tolerances, exemptions and registrations) and to facilitate or conduct studies to provide data packets acceptable to the US Food and Drug Administration for approval of such identified drugs. These data cover drug efficacy, drug safety to the target animal species, human safety relative to consumption of food products derived from animals treated these drugs and assessment of the effect introduction of the drug to clinical use will have on the environment. These data are made available by the FDA through published Public Master Files that are announced publicly by notices in the Federal Register or postings on the Center for Veterinary Medicine web site [www.fda.gov/cvm/]. Federal regulations require extensive experimental data on efficacy, safety, and residue levels before any drug can be used in a food animal species. Data must be obtained for each animal species for which drug use is intended. At present, most minor species of food animals do not have the benefit of safe and effective drugs, such as are available for cattle, swine, and poultry. This situation has the potential for adverse effects upon both the producers and consumers of animal products. The allocation of projects between the different regions is on basis of regional stake holders, expertise, existing work load and facilities. The Southern Region, which is based at the University of Florida, currently has projects involving anthelminthics, miticides, and coccidiostats. These drugs cover industries/species as diverse as aquaculture, gamebirds, rabbits, and small ruminants. In addition the Southern Region acts as the Information Technology resource for the program hosting the program's web site [www.nrsp-7.org] and the project tracking system RUSTi. The direct users of the research results will be the farmers, producers and ranchers of the Southern Region. The potential beneficiaries of this research will be the consumers throughout the United States.
Project Methods
Federal and state scientists and veterinarians working with the various elements of the Minor Use Animal Drug Program will determine the minor use needs and develop research protocols for FDA/CVM approval. The executor of these protocols will be located in the four regional laboratories, the USDA-ARS components either within their institutions, or at other universities, research institutions or government laboratories. Industry will also be requested to cooperate in all phases of the project. The Regional Coordinators and their staff will collect and assemble the data into petitions for registration. FDA and manufacturers will be asked to aid in this process to insure both conformity with government regulations and industry recommended use patterns. Specifically, a system has been devised to review, evaluate and recommend the feasibility of each animal drug clearance proposal submitted. When a proposal is accepted, the necessary data will be obtained, compiled and submitted to FDA/CVM for establishment of a public master file which will lead to the approval of the drug. The completion of the Minor Use Animal Drug projects mentioned above entails intensive sample collections and sample analyses. Analytical method implementation and validation must be done for each drug for each species. Thousands of serum and tissue samples were analyzed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) for the florfenicol project alone and will need to be repeated for the bridge study or if the study has to be repeated in its entirety. These HPLC analyses were labor intensive and expensive, however, the data generated under GLP's will satisfy the FDA/CVM requirements.

Progress 09/01/10 to 08/31/12

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Multiple projects were in progress at the conclusion of this project and all will be carried forward pending continued funding. All project studies fell within the general mission of the NRSP-7 program to develop supportive data and otherwise facilitate regulatory approval of new and useful drug products that are suitable and safe for use in minor food animal species. The projects included the following: Lasalocid for Treatment of Coccidiosis in Pheasants (ADR#279)- This human food safety study is a collaborative effort between the North-Central and Southern Regions, with the in-life phase of studies planned for Iowa State and the analytical studies planned for Florida. Previous attempts to bridge the approved regulatory method for lasalocid analysis in bovine liver were unsuccessful, which led to the failure of a previous human food safety trial. We have now solved all of the analytical problems and have a robust and reliable working method. That method has undergone a partial validation in pheasant tissues, but did not receive concurrence from ONADE. Pending further CVM review and concurrence (expected Nov. 2012), this project will be in position to move forward with the in-life phase studies in the North-Central Region. The anticipated time line for project start up is Summer of 2013. Ivermectin Medicated Feed Block for Control of Cattle Fever Tick in South Texas (ADR#352) - Preliminary work has continued slowly on this project. The study represents a minor use in a major food animal species and is a collaborative effort among several agencies and institutions, including the North-Central Region and Southern Region as well as USDA-ARS and APHIS. The project has not yet received concurrence from the CVM and it is unclear whether it will proceed or be completed. The primary role of the Southern Region is to conduct analytical testing of ivermectin levels in medicated feed blocks, which will be used for drug delivery to cattle in pastures, contain a complex mixture of nutrients, minerals and numerous other ingredients, including molasses as a taste enhancer. We have been successful in adapting the approved regulatory method for ivermectin analysis in order to determine drug levels in the feed blocks. Work is currently in progress as we continue to analyze medicated blocks for consistency of drug levels. Fenbendazole in Game Birds (ADR#280) - This is a collaborative project among the North-Central, Western and Southern regions. The Southern Region has no principal role related to in-life studies (North-Central Region) nor the analytical phase (Western Region), so any final technical updates will be contained in those regional reports. Update on Other Programmatic Efforts and Changes: NRSP-7 Website: The Southern Region is responsible for maintaining and updating the NRSP-7 website, including MUMsRx and the RUSTi system for tracking the status of regional projects. In addition, the Southern Region coordinator organizes and coordinates monthly teleconferences among the regional coordinators and administrators. PARTICIPANTS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
The principal outcome that will contribute to a programmatic outcome/impact will be the validation and bridging of an analytical method for lasalocid residue analysis in liver and skin of ring-necked pheasants. The approved regulatory method for determination of lasalocid residues in edible animal tissues was originally developed and validated for bovine liver and, it was considered pivotal for this method to be adapted and validated in pheasant tissues as a critical prerequisite for a planned Human Food Safety (Tissue Residue) Trial for lasalocid in pheasants (Study# 2012‐235‐HFS). Full bridging of the regulatory method for lasalocid residue determination in pheasant tissues (liver and skin with adhering fat) was conducted in full compliance with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) guidelines in order to satisfy FDA requirements. It should be noted that several previous attempts to establish and validate the regulatory method for lasalocid residue determination in pheasant tissues were unsuccessful; accordingly, it was considered crucial to establish and validate a robust and reliable analytical method based on the approved regulatory method for lasalocid determination prior to undertaking in‐life tissue depletion studies. Based upon the outcomes from this preliminary validation study, it appears that the regulatory method is reliable, sensitive and specific for lasalocid determination in pheasant tissues, though it was necessary to incorporate several minor adjustments to the regulatory method. For convenience, we included side‐by‐side comparisons of the regulatory method and the slightly modified method for both the tissue sample extraction process as well as the procedure for lasalocid determination by high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorometric detection. In the latter case, it should be noted that a contemporary version of the analytical column was substituted since the column that was used for the original regulatory method is no longer available commercially. A copy of the standard operating procedure (SOP) for the modified method was submitted to the FDA-CVM Office for New Animal Drug Evaluation (ONADE) and a final decision on concurrence is expected in November of this year. The overall performance of the modified method was evaluated based on selectivity, system suitability, linearity, range, accuracy, precision, repeatability and tissue matrix interferences. Results from these evaluations revealed outcomes that were well within acceptable limits. Overall recoveries of lasalocid in spiked pheasant tissues were 83.4% (liver) and 104.4% (skin with adhering fat) with corresponding RSD values of 7.5% and 5.7%, respectively. Baseline studies of tissue controls for both liver and skin exhibited no significant peak interferences at the retention time for lasalocid. This method will provide critical analytical capacities for study 2012-235-HFS, which has been pending completion for more than four years.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 09/01/10 to 08/31/11

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Multiple projects were undertaken during the report period, all of which fell within the general mission of this program for developing supportive data for regulatory approval of new and useful drugs suitable and safe for use in minor food animal species. The projects included the following: ADR352- Ivermectin Efficacy against Cattle Fever Tick in southern Texas is a collaborative project among multiple entities, including the North- Central and Southern regions of NRSP-7, USDA-ARS and APHIS. This project is classified as a minor use project owing to the small number of affected animals and the relatively restricted geographical region that is impacted. ADR279- Lasalocid for Coccidiosis in Pheasants is a collaborative project between the North-Central and Southern regions. ADR280 Fenbendazole in Game Birds (pheasants, bobwhite quail, partridge) is a collaborative project among the North-Central, Western and Southern regions. ADR325- Florfenicol Injectable Solution for sheep for respiratory disease includes both a human food safety study and an efficacy study. ADR350 - Florfenicol (Nuflor Gold) for respiratory disease in sheep is currently pending and will not progress until CVM provides further guidance. ADR299 Pirlimycin for Dairy Goats is currently on hold until funding is identified and CIDR goat studies are completed. ADR135 - Erythromycin in Salmonids environmental assessment was sent to FDA/CVM for review and they requested a revision of certain sections and that a chronic toxicity study with Daphnia magna is performed. This chronic toxicity study has been performed with respect to aquatic insects. ADR324- Progesterone CIDRs for Goats (TAS, Milk Residue Study, and Efficacy) led to the establishment of a withdrawal period of zero and a milk discard time of zero. ADR340- Tulathromycin in Goats including a target animal safety study PARTICIPANTS: Not relevant to this project. TARGET AUDIENCES: Not relevant to this project. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
All projects are in various stages of completion as described on the program website at www.nrsp7.org.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period