Source: MICHIGAN STATE UNIV submitted to
ENHANCING POULTRY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS THROUGH EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND HUSBANDRY PRACTICES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
NEW
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1020075
Grant No.
(N/A)
Project No.
MICL04205
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
NE-1942
Program Code
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2019
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2024
Grant Year
(N/A)
Project Director
Siegford, JA.
Recipient Organization
MICHIGAN STATE UNIV
(N/A)
EAST LANSING,MI 48824
Performing Department
ANIMAL SCIENCE
Non Technical Summary
Due to an increasing global population, there is a need for sustainably, efficiently, and safely produced and processed protein, such as poultry. Adapting Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) techniques to poultry production and processing systems will further enhance the industry's capability to meet the growing demand. Consumer and retail demands of the poultry industry have resulted in an expansion in a variety of production and feeding systems with differing constraints and knowledge base. The collaborative research efforts outlined as part of the overall multistate project will further expand the concept of PLF, using automated continuous monitoring of animals to allow producers to record and assess in real-time, the health and welfare status of their animals.The broader multi-state poultry research team is comprised of environmental physiologists, behaviorists, animal welfare scientists, nutritionists, engineers, extension scientists, microbiologists, and economists. These collaborators have access to commercial-type, pilot scale, and laboratory-scale facilities with the equipment and expertise necessary to work in the proposed areas of research. Collaboration has been documented in the past with successful outcomes reported. Additionally, this multi-state group has several leading industry experts that are active participants. These industry connections provide valuable input and link researchers with commercial operations/birds/equipment to maximize the relevance and feasibility of research efforts.
Animal Health Component
10%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
40%
Applied
40%
Developmental
20%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3073210106025%
3153210106050%
4023210303025%
Goals / Objectives
Integrating technological advances into poultry systems. This will include collaborative research on incorporating engineering and technology to enhance system efficiency and sustainability through infrastructure development of blockchain production. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Establishing and adopting husbandry practices to a changing industry landscape. This collaborative research will encompass a multi-disciplinary approach to create a resilient poultry production system through optimal management of inputs and outputs in an ethically responsible manner.
Project Methods
Engineering and Technology (as part of Objective 1)Studies will establish methods that use novel technologies to enhance poultry production systems by integrating engineering, physiology, and ethology. State-of-the-art sensors, current data acquisition systems, and modern data analysis technologies (e.g., image processing and data mining) will be employed to better understand and improve housing ventilation, acoustic conditions, air quality, and lighting environments. Real-time monitoring systems using electronic and visual sensing systems will be developed to autonomously monitor poultry environmental interactions, bird behavior, and welfare. Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) technology to individually identify bird will be used to develop methods for commercial applications. In addition, a new style of perch will be developed such that the antenna will be integrated directly into the perch so that perches at different locations and heights within the cage-free housing system can be instrumented. Hen behavior at different locations (perch, drinker, nest box, feeder, etc.) will be recorded.Wearable sensor technology for laying hens will be developed and evaluated in alternative housing systems. Varying behavioral states will be validated through video recordings and used to correlate individual differences in behavior correlated to parasite infestation. Prototype acoustic sensors will also be used to track the use of space by laying hens housed in alternative housing systems, particularly in free-range and pasture-based systems.Physiological Response to Environment and Welfare (as part of Objective 2)Litter restriction during the middle of layer hen flocks as a means of reducing floor-laid and damaged eggs will be examined. Welfare measures, such as body weight, keel bone damage, foot health, and utilization of nest and litter areas will be measured for the litter-restricted birds. Birds&#39; litter access will be restricted at 54 weeks of age when ~60% of all eggs are being laid in the litter, at which time partial litter restriction will be implemented for a 4-week period. Under this scheme, doors to the litter areas will open automatically every day at 11:30 and close at 13:00. At the end of the 4-week restriction, hens will be again granted unrestricted access to evaluate if any effects of retraining are long-lasting. Egg production (i.e., total eggs laid in nests, enclosure, and litter; number of laid eggs versus number of damaged eggs), nest occupancy (number of hens in nest), litter utilization, and physical measures of hen&#39;s welfare before, during, 1 week and 4 weeks after the litter restriction period will be evaluated.Researchers will evaluate the influences of flock synchrony (number of hens simultaneously use a specific resource and performing the same behavior) and inter-bird distance (space a hen will place between herself and others in her group when performing a behavior), on hens&#39; ability to perform specific behaviors uninterruptedly (frequency and duration of behavior bouts). Video recordings made of hens on the litter will be used to capture hens while performing specific behaviors such as &#39;lying&#39;, &#39;standing&#39;, &#39;perching&#39; and &#39;dust bathing&#39; and &#39;wing flapping&#39; on litter area and perches, while in their day-to-day aviary housing environment at manufacturer&#39;s recommended stocking density. The number of hens on litter area and the number of hens performing selected behaviors at those times will be recorded from still images. Length and width of floor space, or width of perch space occupied by focal hens while performing selected behaviors, and inter-bird distances between focal and surrounding nearest hens during dust bathing will be recorded from each image (see Riddle et al., 2018 for details).The prevalence of keel bone fractures among laying hens in U.S. cage-free production systems will be evaluated in relation to rearing and housing. The effects of vertical complexity during pullet rearing on the development of spatial acuity and keel bone fracture development will be tested in a series of experiments conducted at a poultry facility at UC Davis. The development of spatial abilities will be evaluated using a combination of cognitive tests, behavioral assessments, and evaluations of space use. Keel integrity of individual birds will be evaluated via palpation. In addition, practices that have been proposed as viable environmental enrichments for poultry will be evaluated. The willingness of broiler chicks to forage for feedstuff will be evaluated throughout the growing period. The effects of foraging enrichment provision on general activity and growth of the birds will also be evaluated.

Progress 10/01/19 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:Outputs described in the project were aimed at a variety of audiences including poultry producers; undergraduate and graduate animal science, zoology, and veterinary students at MSU and beyond; colleagues in the scientific community; practicing veterinarians; and to a lesser extent, the general public. The research related to laying hens on farms alternative housing systems, is ultimately destined to be delivered to poultry producers and industry stakeholders through venues such as the Michigan Allied Poultry Industry Symposium and extension publications. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Janice Siegford is the principle investigator for the research activities described above and provides training and mentoring for a number of personnel associated with the lab. Tessa Grebey is working her her PhD with Dr. Siegford examining the impact of genetic strain on key behaviors laying hens show in litter areas of aviaries. In addition to research training, she is also learning to mentor and supervise students and present her material to scientific and lay audiences. Dr. Siegford currently serves on the graduate committee of Ana Rentsch (PhD, Animal Science, University of Guelph), who is examining the impact of various rearing aviary styles on laying hen pullets. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results have been disseminated via two scientific presentations and two peer-reviewed journal publications as detailed above under products and publications and under accomplishments in events and services. Results were also delivered to poultry producers in February 2020 at the Michigan Allied Poultry Industry winter symposium. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Dr. Siegford and PhD Student Grebey will continue to work examining dust bathing and wing flapping by laying hens on litter in aviaries. Dr. Siegford will continue to submit grant proposals for additional funding in order to extend the work to examine management practices that can be used to mitigate floor laying while accommodating the needs of hens to perform behavior on litter.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Work in Dr. Siegford&#39;s lab during the current reporting period falls under Goal 2 of the project. 1) Major activities. Work is underway on poultry projects examining impacts of genetic strain on dust bathing and wing flapping behaviors in an aviary system. The first paper on this work has just been published examining the impact of inter-bird distance and strain on how hens dust bathe in the open litter of an aviary. Work has just concluded and been published on a risk assessment related to the intersection of laying hen strain with bird behavior in the aviary. Work is funded by the Michigan Alliance for Animal Agriculture and additional funding is being sought from industry organizations and NIFA. 2) Data collected. Data on time of day when dust bathing/wing flapping occurs, number of other hens simultaneously dust bathing/wing flapping and impacts of length of time hens have been in the aviary system are being collected for 4 strains of laying hens. 3) Summary of results. Data from the next phase of the project are still being collected, so results are not yet available related to wing flapping or impact of length of time hens have been housed in the aviary on dust bathing. With respect to data on impact of conspecifics on dust bathing that was recently published, dens of 2 brown strains use more space to dust bathe, have shorter dust bathing bouts, stop dust bathing when other birds come close, and do not synchronize dust bathing when compared to hens of 2 white strains. Hens of these white strains were found in larger numbers on litter, dust bathed for longer and decreased the space used to dust bathe (but continued dust bathing) when other birds were near them. The risk assessment study revealed that white hens had higher odds of keel problems than brown hens, which was related to their greater use of the upper tier for nighttime roosting Using perches was associated with higher odds of keel deviations and worse plumage conditions but lower odds of foot lesions in all strains across lay. Finally, lower odds of non-nest laying were associated with white hens versus brown hens, and higher odds of non-nest egg laying resulted from higher use of nests and litter areas in all strains across lay. 4) Key outcomes. Data are still being collected from the current project so outcomes have not yet been determined. Previously, brown hens were found to be more sensitive to social disturbance than white hens and appear to need both more physical and space between themselves and other hens to dust bathe. White hens may be more motivated to dust bathe and occupy litter in general or may be more motivated to synchronize their behavior with other hens. With respect to the risk assessment study that was published during the reporting period, distinct differences were found among strains and resource use in an aviary and were linked to different risks to hens&#39; production, health and welfare.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Ali ABA, Campbell DLM, Siegford JM. 2020. A risk assessment of health, production, and resource occupancy for 4 laying hen strains across the lay cycle in a commercial-style aviary system. Poultry Science, 99:4672-4684. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.057.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Grebey TC, Ali ABA, Swanson JC, Widowski TM, Siegford JM. 2020. Dust bathing in laying hens: strain, proximity to, and number of conspecifics matter. Poultry Science, 99:4103-4112. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.032.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Grebey T Ali AB, Swanson JC, Widowski T, Siegford J*. Accepted. Circadian rhythm of dust bathing in 4 strains of laying hen. 2020 Poultry Science Association Annual Meeting. (poster)
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Ali A, Siegford J. 2020. Solving floor laying in aviaries: can temporary litter restriction retrain hens without impacting welfare. 2020 International Poultry Scientific Forum. 2020:58. (talk)