Source: STATE UNIV OF NEW YORK submitted to
MEASURING AIR POLLUTANT AND NOISE VARIABILITY AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS AROUND SYRACUSE, NY
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1017043
Grant No.
(N/A)
Project No.
NYZ1149862
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Aug 29, 2018
Project End Date
Dec 31, 2019
Grant Year
(N/A)
Project Director
Mirowsky, JA, .
Recipient Organization
STATE UNIV OF NEW YORK
(N/A)
SYRACUSE,NY 13210
Performing Department
Chemistry
Non Technical Summary
In conducting a study where the location being studied is incredibly important, it is imperativeto have preliminary data on a variety of locations in order to select the most appropriate final location/s to study. Therefore, I proposed a small study to get preliminary air quality and noise level data at 6 different locations around Syracuse - 3 locations will be in forested environments and 3 locations will be in urban environments; having background data on this locations will ultimately allow me to select 2 final locations (1 forested and 1 urban) to study the health benefits of visiting a forested environment when compared to an urban environment. Several health studies looking at the calming effects of being in a forest, compared to an urban environment, have been conducted. However, there are many factors such as differences in air quality and noise levels that are also drastically different between the two locations and can also contribute to differences in stress in people that are usually not measured in those works. In addition, there are a lot of air quality parameters that can be measured. For this grant, I am proposing using a new instrument that measures the amount of small air particles in the air that has been previously tied to negative health effects. This instrument, along with several others, will be deployed to this different locations and assist me in selecting the most ideal locations to study for a larger-scale McIntire Stennis grant proposal. This instrument has also not been used in previous studies assessing the health benefits of being in a forest. Once I obtain this data, I am looking for one urban and one forest location with comparable air pollution and noise levels for my study sites.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
20%
Applied
20%
Developmental
60%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
13406992000100%
Knowledge Area
134 - Outdoor Recreation;

Subject Of Investigation
0699 - Trees, forests, and forest products, general;

Field Of Science
2000 - Chemistry;
Goals / Objectives
I will do a thorough exposure assessment of noise and air quality of three forested locations (i.e. Heiberg Forest, Rand Tract, Baltimore Woods) and three urban locations (i.e. Marshall Street, Downtown Syracuse - Clinton Square, steps of the MOST). The two locations with similar noise and air quality measurements will be selected for further investigation in a future proposal assessing the health benefits of visiting forested environments.
Project Methods
To accomplish this, I will sit at each location (3 forested and 3 urban) for 30 minutes, up to 5 different times this summer but keep the exposure window the same (9am - 9:30am); there is temporal variability in air quality and noise measurements with the morning rush hour. I will note in detail the number of people I see, the number of passing cars, and other factors (i.e. construction, black flies, running creeks, chirping birds, weather). I will take detailed photographs of the locations each time I visit and what the participants could be viewing. I also will measure air particle concentration (PM2.5, particles with a diameter less than 2.5 µm) and ambient noise levels. In addition, I will measure the concentration of ultrafine particles (UFP, also called nanoparticles, particles with a diameter less than 0.1 µm). Descriptive statistics will be calculated at each location, and for each locale (i.e. forest, urban). Differences in location and locale will be determined using ANOVA with post-tests for multiple comparisons.

Progress 08/29/18 to 12/31/19

Outputs
Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems:For one of our urban locations (steps of the MOST), there was too much unintended foot traffic in the form of peddlers asking for money that influenced the noise measurements. The location was changed to a few blocks away in the front of the police station (OnCenter) to account for this. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?My graduate student completed this work during the summer of 2019. She gained experience going field work and how to interpret both the noise and air quality data. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? We found that the air pollutant concentration across our six locations (3 forested and 3 urban) were not drastically different. Interestingly, the concentration of air particles were actually higher, on average, at two of our forested locations compared to the remaining 4 locations. Much greater differences were observed for our noise measurements. The average noise levels at our urban locations were approximately 20 decibels higher than the average noise levels at our forested locations. For our urban locations, the average noise levels ranged from 64-70 dB, whereas the range of noise levels at our forested locations was 46-51 dB. Although we were unable to find two locations (one forested and one urban) with similar noise and air quality measurements, we can use this data to highlight that noise measurements should be taken into account or controlled for in future proposals assessing the health benefits of visiting forested locations.

Publications


    Progress 08/29/18 to 09/30/18

    Outputs
    Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?I will complete the required sampling in the reporting period that spans late May to early July.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Due to incliment winter weather, this study will be completed in late May through early July. No progess has yet been made.

    Publications