Source: UNIV OF MINNESOTA submitted to
MITIGATION OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN POULTRY THROUGH RESENSITIZATION, VACCINATION, AND MICROBIAL RESTORATION
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1014715
Grant No.
2018-68003-27464
Cumulative Award Amt.
$1,199,602.00
Proposal No.
2017-05602
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2018
Project End Date
Mar 31, 2023
Grant Year
2018
Program Code
[A4171]- Effective Mitigation Strategies for Antimicrobial Resistance
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF MINNESOTA
(N/A)
ST PAUL,MN 55108
Performing Department
Veterinary and Biomedical Sci
Non Technical Summary
The reduction of antibiotic use in animal agriculture in the United States is a necessary step towards reducing the emergence and persistence of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial pathogens of humans and animals. However, reduction of use does not promise reduction of resistance, and this approach may create ancillary problems related to increased disease-associated mortality. This work will attack these problems in a multi-pronged effort. First, genetic technology will be used develop a system that targets antimicrobial resistance. Second, web-based open access tools will be developed to educate poultry producers about vaccination strategies and provide a simple way to choose vaccine strains. Third,probiotics will be characterized and examined in commercial turkeys to develop better probiotics. Finally, symposia and online educational materials related to prebiotics and probiotics will be delivered to appropriate audiences to provide clarity to the confusing realm of alternative feed additive selection and use. Overall, this project will build on the future of mitigation strategies against antimicrobial resistance and will provide educational and hands-on tools to enable science-based decision-making by the poultry producer.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
50%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3113230110050%
3113220110050%
Goals / Objectives
The reduction of antibiotic use in animal agriculture in the United States is a necessary step towards reducing the emergence and persistence of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial pathogens of humans and animals. However, reduction of use does not promise reduction of resistance, and this approach may create ancillary problems related to increased disease-associated mortality. Commercial poultry production desperately needs research and tools to 1) mitigate the existing detrimental effects of antimicrobial resistant pathogens, and 2) maintain bird performance and health in the absence of antibiotics. This work will attack these problems in a multi-pronged effort. First, emerging CRISPR/Cas technology will be used develop a delivery system that targets antimicrobial resistance-encoding bacterial plasmids and their associated resistance genes, building a suite of tools with future application for reducing the on-farm prevalence of multidrug resistant bacterial pathogens. Second, web-based open access tools will be developed to educate poultry producers about vaccination strategies and provide a simple way to choose appropriate autogenous vaccine strains using high-resolution whole genome sequencing approaches. Third, next-generation host-adapted bacterial strains with probiotic potential will be characterized and examined in commercial turkeys as a model platform development of host-specific probiotics in animal agriculture. Finally, symposia and online educational materials related to prebiotics and probiotics will be delivered to appropriate audiences to provide clarity to the confusing realm of alternative feed additive selection and use. Overall, this project will build on the future of mitigation strategies against antimicrobial resistance and will provide educational and hands-on tools to enable science-based decision-making by the poultry producer.
Project Methods
1.1 Development of tools to target multiple plasmid types. While the use of pCas9 is effective for proof-of-concept, pCas9 does not possess conjugative machinery, limiting its ability to be delivered to native bacterial populations in settings such as the poultry environment. To be effective in practice, we will develop a mechanism to deliver the CRISPR-Cas systems to native poultry microbiota.1.2 Development of a conjugative delivery system. One method of CRISPR/Cas delivery is to develop the system on a promiscuous, self-transmissible plasmid. We will develop this system.1.3 Assessment of conjugative delivery system potential. As in vitro proof-of-concept, the delivery system will be mated with several wild type pan-susceptible E. coli and Salmonella recipients. The purpose of these matings is to determine the transfer efficiency into each genetic background.1.4In vitroassessment of conjugative delivery system activity. Next, the ability of the system to inactivate plasmids within anin vitropopulation will be assessed.1.5 Testing of delivery system in laboratory litter experiments. We will perform spiked-in litter experiments to determine the efficacy of the delivery system in a litter matrix.1.6 Testing of delivery system in the turkey model. The same delivery and test strains created in 1.5 will be used to assess the ability of the CRISPR/Cas system to inactivate IncA/C2 plasmids in a poultry production setting. Samples will be processed to determine 1) counts of test strain, 2) counts of delivery strain, 3) proportion of test strain that have acquired the delivery system, and 4) proportion of test strain harboring an IncA/C2 plasmid and its associated resistance genes.2.1 Examine the ecology of clinical ORT and E. coli from commercial turkey operations across the U.S. in relation to vaccination status. A key aspect of choosing strains for autogenous vaccination is a full understanding of the diversity of pathogen in the poultry barn environment.We will partner with several companies to collect clinical ORT and E. coli isolates from commercial turkeys over a two-year period. Partners include two major turkey producers and two vaccine companies.2.2 Examine pathogen ecology during implementation of autogenous vaccination programs.Vaccines introduce forces that drive the population of microbes, as described for the ORT example. A successful vaccination campaign might eliminate the specific strains for which immunity is most strongly selective, while providing an advantage to the strains that are under reduced pressure from the vaccine. The goal of an autogenous vaccine program should not only be the elimination of the target pathogen strains, but also the prediction of which strains are likely to emerge due to reduced competition and open niches. In this project, we will begin to gather necessary data to inform future mathematical models required to predict the long-term efficacy and unintended consequences of autogenous vaccine programs.Six commercial farms will be enrolled for this study (three each for ORT and E. coli). Farms will be followed for two years. Autogenous vaccine strain-switching will occur halfway through the sampling period, enabling the effects of vaccine change to be measured (before and after switch).The following questions will be pursued with the resulting data: 1) Is breeder/broiler vaccination associated with a significant shift of circulating strains? 2) How long does it take for strains to shift following introduction of a novel vaccine? 3) How often should sampling occur in monitoring and how many isolates should be analyzed? 4) Which genetic markers or phenotypic traits are affected by the vaccine program? While beyond the scope of this study, this work will inform future models used to predict population shifts in response to vaccination.2.3 Build a tool for rapid analysis of ecology pathogen within a poultry system.For vaccines targeting a poultry pathogen to be successful, pathogen ecology needs to be considered across a system. Currently, there is no way to effectively monitor pathogen ecology in this manner at high resolution. To that end, an online tool will be developed to empower poultry companies to use whole genome sequencing data for rapidly determining pathogen ecology. We will create a tool called Poultry Pathogen Analysis, or PoPPA. This tool will be implemented and maintained through Poultrydiseaseplanning.com. Two initial databases within PoPPA will be created for ORT and E. coli (Objective 2.1-2.2). Each database will contain a diverse collections clinical and environmental isolates.Users will be able to visualize their uploaded isolates relative to all isolates in the database. Uploaded isolates will become a part of the larger database, but will be de-identified from most metadata to protect privacy. In sum, the key features of this tool are 1) ability to upload raw WGS data and have it analyzed to completion in one click; 2) access to all isolates uploaded to PoPPA for comparison purposes, to better understand pathogen ecology in geographical areas and systems; 3) ability to maintain and update user's own collection with new data in real time; and 4) an algorithm that will predict best candidate vaccine strains based upon uploaded data. All functions in PoPPA will be in easy-to-use format with drop-down boxes with detailed explanations of options.Objective 3.1 Perform a systematic review on prebiotics/probiotics efficacy in poultry.Systematic review methodology and meta-analysis, if appropriate, will be used initially to evaluate the presence and quality of available evidence addressing whether prebiotic/probiotic use in poultry exhibits beneficial effects on performance and disease outcome. This question is critical because such products are most commonly marketed as alternatives to antibiotics, yet to our knowledge this topic has not been explored in systematic fashion for poultry. Prebiotic/probiotic efficacy and its suitability for different challenges needs to be examined.Objective 3.2 Determine if host adaptation in lactobacilli leads to enhanced colonization and efficacy in poultry. The underlying assumption to host adaptation is that it leads to evolutionary success, and that success should translate to enhanced probiotic potential in the appropriate animal species. Here, we will test this hypothesis by comparing L. johnsonii from chickens, turkeys, and mammalian sources. The logic flow for these experiments is that we will:1. Identify different strains of chicken-source, turkey-course, and mammalian-source L. johnsonii.2. Assess these strains for their ability to persist in the presence of bile salts and low pH.3. Assess strains from different host sources with similar properties in #2 for their in vitro ability adhere to chicken and turkey cell lines and grow in chicken and turkey cecal contents.4. Compete strains with similar properties in #2 in a turkey colonization model.Translate Interventions into Practice. Multiple means of dissemination of knowledge from this project will be used. These extension and outreach programs will be guided through consultation with both the Stakeholder Team and the Advisory Board. We will employ three primary methods of delivery:Symposia and technical sessions at existing poultry conferences and animal health and food safety professional meetings targeting industry, government and consumer stakeholdersArticles in outcome-focused scientific and trade publications to reach both the scientific community as well as the industry practitioners who are the front line of implementation of any new practices and protocols by the broiler industryPrograms for targeted technology, such as podcasts and webinars, to disseminate information to audiences that may not be most effectively reached with traditional approaches?

Progress 07/01/18 to 03/31/23

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audiences during this reporting period included: 1. Laboratory-based training: scientists focusing on bioinformatic and laboratory approaches to analyze and validate multi-omics datasets were trained during this period. 2. Informal outreach: This work was discussed extensively with members of the MN poultry industry and allied industry. This includes primarily broiler and turkey companies in MN, and several agricultural feed additive companies. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This work supported research by two PhD students in the Comparative Molecular Biosciences graduate program at the University of Minnesota. One graduated in 2021 and the second will graduate in 2023. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results have been shared with the scientific community and with members of the poultry industry via local meetings (Minnesota Turkey Growers Association), national meetings (Poultry Science Association, Conference for Research Workers in Animal Diseases), and industry member meetings (National Chicken Council). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1. We have develoiped a CRISPR/Cas system in E. coli and Salmonella. Using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, we have successfully developed a system that targets avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) multidrug resistance-encoding plasmids. Interestingly, we determined that the target sequences of these plasmids have varying levels of efficacy in vitro against APEC plasmids. The most efficacious target identified was targeting the hlyF hemolysin gene of APEC plasmids. With this target, we are able to eliminate the plasmid following electroporation at rates of 90%, both when the plasmid is in laboratory strains and wild type APEC strains. We have next developed plasmid-based delivery systems utilizing IncP and IncX plasmid backbones. These plasmids were tested to deliver the CRISPR-Cas9 systems against wild type APEC in a simulated poultry litter environment. Thisdemonstrates its ability to target a highly relevent poultry pathogen (APEC) habroring MDR phenotypes. Objective 2. Two vaccine ecology studies were conducted. First, we partnered with a commercial turkey company to collect samples from 16 different farms with matched control/vaccinated barns. These farms were receiving a commercial E. coli vaccine for the first time ever. Flocks were followed for 2 cycles. Weekly samples were collected, including litter samples, boot sock samples, cloacal swabs, and tracheal swabs. Samples were cultured in enterobacterial enrichment broth and stored. More than 12,000 samples were collected. We screened over 1,000 of these samples using a top-down approach (PCR through whole genome sequencing) to determine if application of a commercial E. coli vaccine shifts on-farm ecology of commensal and clinical E. coli populations. We found that two rounds of E. coli vaccination with an O78-based APEC vaccine do shift the populations of E. coli in the gut and respiratory tract of birds, with shifts away from Clermont phylogenetic groups haboring the O78 serogroup. A second was done as a part of a PhD thesis with a student funded through a separate USDA National Needs Fellowship. She partnered with a commercial turkey company to follow flocks with histories of no Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) vaccination versus those with histories of continuous ORT vaccination. She developed an ORT culturing method where she can isolate ORT from a mixed community. Samples were collected for this project in 2020. This workillustratedthe lack of efficacy of "controlled exposure" of live, non-attenuated Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) to prevent subsequent infection with ORT. Our analyses indicate that this practice has little to no impact on preventing the same strains from causing disease later in the turkey's life. We have collected clinical E. coli, ORT, and Pasteruella from turkey producers. To date we have collected nearly 4,000 total isolates, and the majority of these have been whole genome sequenced. These data form the basis for online tools and research tools for the poultry industry to track bacterial pathogens through production systems. As a result of this work, we published a paperwhich redefines the avian pathogenic E. coli pathotype. Objective 3. A systematic review has been completed by scientists in our laboratory studying the impact of probiotic use on poultry performance. This is pending publication. We have published multiple papers describing lactobacilli-based and phytogenic interventions which successfully reduce Salmonella load within the bird and/or during processing. We have established a cell adhesion/invasion model to study lactobacilli/Salmonella interactions, and have screened lactobacilli from ten different species for their adhesion and/or invasion abilities. This work is currently under review for publication. We studied host specificity of L. johnsonii in detail using high-resolution genomics, in vitro phenotypic assays, and live bird trials. We determined that evidence of host specificity exists even between different avian species (chickens versus turkeys), and host-specific strains demonstrate superior ability to influence performance compared to non-host-specific counterparts. Objective 4. Blog articles have been written with focus on vaccination and its impacts on poultry bacterial pathogen populations. We have utilized the data from this study to develop a course at the University of Minnesota on poultry food safety (POUL 5102) which is a component of a newly developed Poultry Health Certificate Program.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: Delago J, Miller EA, Flores-Figueroa C, Munoz Aguayo J, Cardona C, Smith AH, Johnson TJ. Survey of clinical and commensal Escherichia coli from commercial broilers and turkeys, with emphasis on high-risk clones using APECTyper. Poultry Science, Jul;102(7):102712.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2022 Citation: Johnson TJ, Miller EA, Flores-Figeuroa C, Munoz-Aguayo J, Cardona C, Fransen K, Lighty M, Gonder E, Nezworski J, Haag A, Behl M, Kromm M, Wileman B, Studniski M, Singer RS. Refining the definition of the avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) pathotype through inclusion of high-risk clonal groups. Poultry Science 101:102009.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: Johnson A, Miller EA, Weber B, Flores-Figueroa C, Munoz Aguayo J, Kollanoor Johny A, Noll S, Brannon J, Kozlowicz B, Johnson TJ. Evidence of host specificity in Lactobacillus johnsonii genomes and its influence on probiotic potential in poultry. Poultry Science 102:102858.


Progress 07/01/22 to 03/31/23

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audiences during this reporting period included: 1. Laboratory-based training: scientists focusing on bioinformatic and laboratory approaches to analyze and validate multi-omics datasets were trained during this period. 2. Informal outreach: This work was discussed extensively with members of the MN poultry industry and allied industry. This includes primarily broiler and turkey companies in MN, and several agricultural feed additive companies. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This work supported research by two PhD students in the Comparative Molecular Biosciences graduate program at the University of Minnesota. One graduated in 2021 and the second will graduate in 2022. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Objective 1. Live poultry trials and poultry litter experiments will be conducted to determine if CRISPR/Cas9 can be delivered via conjugative plasmids to eliminate APEC plasmids. Objective 2. E. coli field trial samples will be further processed in the laboratory using PCR and whole genome sequencing. Objective 3. Systematic review will be completed. In vitro adhesion and invasion assays will be utilized to study lactobacilli/Salmonella interactions. Objective 4. A symposium will be organized to deliver information about vaccination on bacterial populations to producers and stakeholders.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1. We have been working on the CRISPR/Cas system in E. coli and Salmonella. Using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, we have successfully developed a system that targets avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) multidrug resistance-encoding plasmids. Interestingly, we determined that the target sequences of these plasmids have varying levels of efficacy in vitro against APEC plasmids. The most efficacious target identified was targeting the hlyF hemolysin gene of APEC plasmids. With this target, we are able to eliminate the plasmid following electroporation at rates of 90%, both when the plasmid is in laboratory strains and wild type APEC strains. We have next developed plasmid-based delivery systems utilizing IncP and IncX plasmid backbones. These plasmids will be tested to deliver the CRISPR-Cas9 systems against wild type APEC in a simulated poultry litter environment. Finally, this system will be tested in live birds via oral gavage to confirm the ability to target APEC plasmids. The successful validation of this system will demonstrate its ability to target a highly relevent poultry pathogen (APEC) habroring MDR phenotypes. This work is in preparation for publication. Objective 2. Two vaccine ecology studies are being conducted. First, we partnered with a commercial turkey company to collect samples from 16 different farms with matched control/vaccinated barns. These farms were receiving a commercial E. coli vaccine for the first time ever. Flocks were followed for 2 cycles. Weekly samples were collected, including litter samples, boot sock samples, cloacal swabs, and tracheal swabs. Samples were cultured in enterobacterial enrichment broth and stored. More than 12,000 samples were collected. We have screened over 1,000 of these samples using a top-down approach (PCR through whole genome sequencing) to determine if application of a commercial E. coli vaccine shifts on-farm ecology of commensal and clinical E. coli populations. We found that two rounds of E. coli vaccination with an O78-based APEC vaccine do shift the populations of E. coli in the gut and respiratory tract of birds, with shifts away from Clermont phylogenetic groups haboring the O78 serogroup. WGS will be further used to determine the phylogenetic reach of the vaccine against strains and ST types within this phylotype. This work in in preparation for publication. A second was done as a part of a PhD thesis with a student funded through a separate USDA National Needs Fellowship. She partnered with a commercial turkey company to follow flocks with histories of no Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) vaccination versus those with histories of continuous ORT vaccination. She developed an ORT culturing method where she can isolate ORT from a mixed community. Samples were collected for this project in 2020. We have published a manuscript on this work, illustrating the lack of efficacy of "controlled exposure" of live, non-attenuated Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) to prevent subsequent infection with ORT. Our analyses indicate that this practice has little to no impact on preventing the same strains from causing disease later in the turkey's life. We have collected clinical E. coli, ORT, and Pasteruella from turkey producers. To date we have collected nearly 4,000 total isolates, and the majority of these have been whole genome sequenced. Analyses of these isolates are in progress. These data will form the basis for online tools and research tools for the poultry industry to track bacterial pathogens through production systems. As a result of this work, we have submitted an articloe for publication which redefines the avian pathogenic E. coli pathotype. Objective 3. A systematic review has been completed by scientists in our laboratory studying the impact of probiotic use on poultry performance. Laboratory work is being conducted on Lactobacillus-based interventions, and good progress has been made examining alternative products plus vaccines combined with lactobacilli for their ability to control Salmonella. We have published multiple papers describing these interventions. We have established a cell adhesion/invasion model to study lactobacilli/Salmonella interactions, and have screened lactobacilli from ten different species for their adhesion and/or invasion abilities. This work is currently under review for publication. Objective 4. Blog articles have been written with focus on vaccination and its impacts on poultry bacterial pathogen populations.

Publications


    Progress 07/01/21 to 06/30/22

    Outputs
    Target Audience:The target audiences during this reporting period included: 1. Laboratory-based training: scientists focusing on bioinformatic and laboratory approaches to analyze and validate multi-omics datasets were trained during this period. 2. Informal outreach: This work was discussed extensively with members of the MN poultry industry and allied industry. This includes primarily broiler and turkey companies in MN, and several agricultural feed additive companies. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This work supported research by two PhD students in the Comparative Molecular Biosciences graduate program at the University of Minnesota. One graduated in 2021 and the second will graduate in 2023. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We plan to complete and publish the systematic review in Objective 3. We also plan to complete live bird trials to assess host specificity of L. johnsonii in Objective 3.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1. We have been working on the CRISPR/Cas system in E. coli and Salmonella. Using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, we have successfully developed a system that targets avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) multidrug resistance-encoding plasmids. Interestingly, we determined that the target sequences of these plasmids have varying levels of efficacy in vitro against APEC plasmids. The most efficacious target identified was targeting the hlyF hemolysin gene of APEC plasmids. With this target, we are able to eliminate the plasmid following electroporation at rates of 90%, both when the plasmid is in laboratory strains and wild type APEC strains. We have next developed plasmid-based delivery systems utilizing IncP and IncX plasmid backbones. These plasmids will be tested to deliver the CRISPR-Cas9 systems against wild type APEC in a simulated poultry litter environment. Finally, this system will be tested in live birds via oral gavage to confirm the ability to target APEC plasmids. The successful validation of this system will demonstrate its ability to target a highly relevent poultry pathogen (APEC) habroring MDR phenotypes. This work is in preparation for publication. Objective 2. Two vaccine ecology studies are being conducted. First, we partnered with a commercial turkey company to collect samples from 16 different farms with matched control/vaccinated barns. These farms were receiving a commercial E. coli vaccine for the first time ever. Flocks were followed for 2 cycles. Weekly samples were collected, including litter samples, boot sock samples, cloacal swabs, and tracheal swabs. Samples were cultured in enterobacterial enrichment broth and stored. More than 12,000 samples were collected. We have screened over 1,000 of these samples using a top-down approach (PCR through whole genome sequencing) to determine if application of a commercial E. coli vaccine shifts on-farm ecology of commensal and clinical E. coli populations. We found that two rounds of E. coli vaccination with an O78-based APEC vaccine do shift the populations of E. coli in the gut and respiratory tract of birds, with shifts away from Clermont phylogenetic groups haboring the O78 serogroup. WGS will be further used to determine the phylogenetic reach of the vaccine against strains and ST types within this phylotype. This work in in preparation for publication. A second was done as a part of a PhD thesis with a student funded through a separate USDA National Needs Fellowship. She partnered with a commercial turkey company to follow flocks with histories of no Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) vaccination versus those with histories of continuous ORT vaccination. She developed an ORT culturing method where she can isolate ORT from a mixed community. Samples were collected for this project in 2020. We have published a manuscript on this work, illustrating the lack of efficacy of "controlled exposure" of live, non-attenuated Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) to prevent subsequent infection with ORT. Our analyses indicate that this practice has little to no impact on preventing the same strains from causing disease later in the turkey's life. We have collected clinical E. coli, ORT, and Pasteruella from turkey producers. To date we have collected nearly 4,000 total isolates, and the majority of these have been whole genome sequenced. Analyses of these isolates are in progress. These data will form the basis for online tools and research tools for the poultry industry to track bacterial pathogens through production systems. As a result of this work, we have submitted an articloe for publication which redefines the avian pathogenic E. coli pathotype. Objective 3. A systematic review has been completed by scientists in our laboratory studying the impact of probiotic use on poultry performance. Laboratory work is being conducted on Lactobacillus-based interventions, and good progress has been made examining alternative products plus vaccines combined with lactobacilli for their ability to control Salmonella. We have published multiple papers describing these interventions. We have established a cell adhesion/invasion model to study lactobacilli/Salmonella interactions, and have screened lactobacilli from ten different species for their adhesion and/or invasion abilities. This work is currently under review for publication. Objective 4. Blog articles have been written with focus on vaccination and its impacts on poultry bacterial pathogen populations.

    Publications


      Progress 07/01/20 to 06/30/21

      Outputs
      Target Audience:The target audiences during this reporting period included: 1. Laboratory-based training: scientists focusing on bioinformatic and laboratory approaches to analyze and validate multi-omics datasets were trained during this period. 2. Informal outreach: This work was discussed extensively with members of the MN poultry industry and allied industry. This includes primarily broiler and turkey companies in MN, and several agricultural feed additive companies. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This work supported research by two PhD students in the Comparative Molecular Biosciences graduate program at the University of Minnesota. One graduated in 2021 and the second will graduate in 2022. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Objective 1. Live poultry trials and poultry litter experiments will be conducted to determine if CRISPR/Cas9 can be delivered via conjugative plasmids to eliminate APEC plasmids. Objective 2. E. coli field trial samples will be further processed in the laboratory using PCR and whole genome sequencing. Objective 3. Systematic review will be completed. In vitro adhesion and invasion assays will be utilized to study lactobacilli/Salmonella interactions. Objective 4. A symposium will be organized to deliver information about vaccination on bacterial populations to producers and stakeholders.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1. We have been working on the CRISPR/Cas system in E. coli and Salmonella. Using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, we have successfully developed a system that targets avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) multidrug resistance-encoding plasmids. Interestingly, we determined that the target sequences of these plasmids have varying levels of efficacy in vitro against APEC plasmids. The most efficacious target identified was targeting the hlyF hemolysin gene of APEC plasmids. With this target, we are able to eliminate the plasmid following electroporation at rates of 90%, both when the plasmid is in laboratory strains and wild type APEC strains. We have next developed plasmid-based delivery systems utilizing IncP and IncX plasmid backbones. These plasmids will be tested to deliver the CRISPR-Cas9 systems against wild type APEC in a simulated poultry litter environment. Finally, this system will be tested in live birds via oral gavage to confirm the ability to target APEC plasmids. The successful validation of this system will demonstrate its ability to target a highly relevent poultry pathogen (APEC) habroring MDR phenotypes. This work is in preparation for publication. Objective 2. Two vaccine ecology studies are being conducted. First, we partnered with a commercial turkey company to collect samples from 16 different farms with matched control/vaccinated barns. These farms were receiving a commercial E. coli vaccine for the first time ever. Flocks were followed for 2 cycles. Weekly samples were collected, including litter samples, boot sock samples, cloacal swabs, and tracheal swabs. Samples were cultured in enterobacterial enrichment broth and stored. More than 12,000 samples were collected. We have screened over 1,000 of these samples using a top-down approach (PCR through whole genome sequencing) to determine if application of a commercial E. coli vaccine shifts on-farm ecology of commensal and clinical E. coli populations. We found that two rounds of E. coli vaccination with an O78-based APEC vaccine do shift the populations of E. coli in the gut and respiratory tract of birds, with shifts away from Clermont phylogenetic groups haboring the O78 serogroup. WGS will be further used to determine the phylogenetic reach of the vaccine against strains and ST types within this phylotype. This work in in preparation for publication. A second was done as a part of a PhD thesis with a student funded through a separate USDA National Needs Fellowship. She partnered with a commercial turkey company to follow flocks with histories of no Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) vaccination versus those with histories of continuous ORT vaccination. She developed an ORT culturing method where she can isolate ORT from a mixed community. Samples were collected for this project in 2020. We have published a manuscript on this work, illustrating the lack of efficacy of "controlled exposure" of live, non-attenuated Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) to prevent subsequent infection with ORT. Our analyses indicate that this practice has little to no impact on preventing the same strains from causing disease later in the turkey's life. We have collected clinical E. coli, ORT, and Pasteruella from turkey producers. To date we have collected nearly 4,000 total isolates, and the majority of these have been whole genome sequenced. Analyses of these isolates are in progress. These data will form the basis for online tools and research tools for the poultry industry to track bacterial pathogens through production systems. As a result of this work, we have submitted an articloe for publication which redefines the avian pathogenic E. coli pathotype. Objective 3. A systematic review has been completedby scientists in our laboratory studying the impact of probiotic use on poultry performance. This will be completed in 2021. Laboratory work is being conducted on Lactobacillus-based interventions, and good progress has been made examining alternative products plus vaccines combined with lactobacilli for their ability to control Salmonella. We have published multiple papers describing these interventions. We have established a cell adhesion/invasion model to study lactobacilli/Salmonella interactions, and have screened lactobacilli from ten different species for their adhesion and/or invasion abilities. This work is currently under review for publication. Objective 4. Blog articles have been written with focus on vaccination and its impacts on poultry bacterial pathogen populations. We are working on formal online extension materials to provide on poultrydiseaseplanning.com that will inform about vaccine use and considerations in poultry production. A symposium is being targeted for 2022 at a national poultry research meeting.

      Publications

      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2021 Citation: Miller EA, Winfield B, Weber BP, Flores-Figueroa C, Munoz-Aguayo J, Huisinga J, Johnson TJ. 2021. Convergence of the turkey gut microbiota following cohabitation under commercial settings. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 12:1-10.
      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2021 Citation: Nair DVT, Johnson TJ, Noll SL, Johny AK. 2021. Effect of supplementation of a dairy-originated probiotic bacterium, Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. freudenreichii, on the cecal microbiome of turkeys challenged with multidrug-resistant Salmonella Heidelberg. Poultry Science 100:283-295.
      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Nair DVT, Thomas JV, Dewi G, Brannon J, Noll SL, Johnson TJ, Cox RB, Johny AK. 2020. Propionibacterium freudenreichii B3523 reduces cecal colonization and internal organ dissemination of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Heidelberg in finishing turkeys. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 30:100107.
      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2022 Citation: Dewi G, Manjankattil S, Peichel C, Jia S, Nair D, Vickers Z, Johnson TJ, Cardona C, Noll S, Johny AK. 2022. Effect of plant-derived antimicrobials against multidrug-resistant Salmonella Heidelberg in ground turkey. Poultry Science, In Press.
      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2021 Citation: Smith E, Miller EA, Munoz-Aguayo J, Flores-Figueroa C, Nezworski J, Studniski M, Wileman B, Johnson TJ. 2021. Genomic diversity and molecular epidemiology of Pasteurella multocida. PLOS ONE 16:e0249138.


      Progress 07/01/19 to 06/30/20

      Outputs
      Target Audience:The target audiences during this reporting period included: 1. Laboratory-based training:scientists focusing on bioinformatic and laboratory approaches to analyze and validate multi-omics datasets weretrained during this period. 2. Informal outreach: This work was discussed extensively with members of the MN poultry industry and allied industry. This includes primarily broiler and turkey companies in MN, and several agricultural feed additive companies. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This work supported research by twoPhD students in the Comparative Molecular Biosciences graduate program at the University of Minnesota. One graduated in 2021and the second will graduate in 2022. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Objective 1. Live poultry trials and poultry litter experiments will be conducted to determine if CRISPR/Cas9 can be delivered via conjugative plasmids to eliminate APEC plasmids. Objective 2. E. coli field trial samples will be further processed in the laboratory using PCR and whole genome sequencing. Objective 3. Systematic review will be completed. In vitro adhesion and invasion assays will be utilized to study lactobacilli/Salmonella interactions. Objective 4. A symposium will be organized to deliver information about vaccination on bacterial populations to producers and stakeholders.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1. We have been working on the CRISPR/Cas system in E. coli and Salmonella. Using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, we have successfully developed a system that targets avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) multidrug resistance-encoding plasmids. Interestingly, we determined that the target sequences of these plasmids have varying levels of efficacy in vitro against APEC plasmids. The most efficacious target identified was targeting the hlyF hemolysin gene of APEC plasmids. With this target, we are able to eliminate the plasmid following electroporation at rates of 90%, both when the plasmid is in laboratory strains and wild type APEC strains. We have next developedplasmid-based delivery systems utilizing IncP and IncX plasmid backbones. These plasmids will be tested to deliver the CRISPR-Cas9 systems against wild type APEC in a simulated poultry litter environment. Finally, this system will be tested in live birds via oral gavage to confirm the ability to target APEC plasmids. The successful validation of this system will demonstrate its ability to target a highly relevent poultry pathogen (APEC) habroring MDR phenotypes. This work is in preparation for publication. Objective 2.Two vaccine ecology studies are being conducted. First, we partnered with a commercial turkey companyto collect samples from 16 different farms with matched control/vaccinated barns. These farms were receiving a commercial E. colivaccine for the first time ever. Flocks were followed for 2cycles. Weekly samples were collected, includinglitter samples, boot sock samples, cloacal swabs, and tracheal swabs. Samples were cultured in enterobacterial enrichment broth and stored. More than 12,000 samples were collected. We have screened over 1,000 of these samples using a top-down approach (PCR through whole genome sequencing) to determine if application of a commercial E. coli vaccine shifts on-farm ecology of commensal and clinical E. coli populations. We found that two rounds of E. coli vaccination with an O78-based APEC vaccine do shift the populations of E. coli in the gut and respiratory tract of birds, with shifts away from Clermont phylogenetic groups haboring the O78 serogroup. WGS will be further used to determine the phylogenetic reach of the vaccine against strains and ST types within this phylotype. This work in in preparation for publication. A second wasdoneas a part of a PhD thesis with a student funded through a separate USDA National Needs Fellowship. Shepartneredwith a commercial turkey company to follow flocks with histories of no Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) vaccination versus those with histories of continuous ORT vaccination. She developed an ORT culturing method where she can isolate ORT from a mixed community. Samples were collected for this project in 2020.We have published a manuscript on this work, illustrating the lack of efficacy of "controlled exposure" of live, non-attenuated Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) to prevent subsequent infection with ORT. Our analyses indicate that this practice has little to no impact on preventing the same strains from causing disease later in the turkey's life. We havecollectedclinical E. coli, ORT, and Pasteruella from turkey producers. To date we have collected nearly 4,000 total isolates, and the majority of these have been whole genome sequenced.Analyses of these isolates are in progress. These data will form the basis for online tools and research tools for the poultry industry to track bacterial pathogens through production systems. Objective 3.A systematic review is being coordinated by scientists in our laboratorystudying the impact of probiotic use on poultry performance. This will be completed in 2021.Laboratory work is being conducted on Lactobacillus-based interventions, andgood progress has been made examining alternative products plus vaccines combined with lactobacilli for their ability to control Salmonella. We have published multiple papers describing these interventions.We have established a cell adhesion/invasion model to study lactobacilli/Salmonella interactions, and have screened lactobacilli from ten different species for their adhesion and/or invasion abilities. This work is currently under review for publication. Objective 4. Blog articles have been written with focus on vaccination and its impacts on poultry bacterial pathogen populations. We are working on formal online extension materials to provide on poultrydiseaseplanning.com that will inform about vaccine use and considerations in poultry production. A symposium is being targeted for 2022at a national poultry research meeting.

      Publications

      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2021 Citation: Smith E, Miller EA, Munoz-Aguayo J, Flores-Figueroa C, Nezworski J, Studniski M, Wileman B, Johnson TJ. Genomic diversity and molecular epidemiology of Pasteurella multocida. PLOS ONE 16:e0249138.
      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2021 Citation: Miller EA, Winfield B, Weber BP, Flores-Figueroa C, Munoz-Aguayo J, Huisinga J, Johnson TJ. Convergence of the turkey gut microbiota following cohabitation under commercial settings. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 12:1-10.
      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Azam M, Mohsin M, Johnson TJ, Smith EA, Johnson A, Umair M, Saleemi MK, Rahman S. Genomic landscape of multi-drug resistant avian pathogenic Escherichia coli recovered from broilers. Veterinary Microbiology 247.
      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Smith E, Miller E, Weber B, Munoz-Aguayo J, Flores-Figueroa C, Huisinga J, Nezworski J, Kromm M, Wileman B, Johnson TJ. Genomic landscape of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in commercial turkey production in the United States. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 86:e02874-19.
      • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Ward TL, Weber BP, Mendoza KM, Danzeisen JL, Llop K, Lang K, Clayton JB, Grace E, Brannon J, Radovic I, Beauclaire M, Heisel TJ, Knights D, Cardona C, Kogut M, Johnson C, Noll SL, Arsenault R, Reed KM, Johnson TJ. Antibiotics and host-tailored probiotics similarly modulate effects on the developing avian microbiome, mycobiome, and host gene expression. mBio 10: e02171-19.
      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Smith E, Johnson TJ, et al. Genomic landscape of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in commercial turkey production in the United States. American Association of Avian Pathologists Annual Meeting, July 2020, Virtual.
      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Stumvoll K, Kromm M, Gerken E, Tourville J, Lighty M, Johnson TJ. Impact of E. coli vaccination on production performance of turkeys and the phylogenetics of E. coli population over time. American Association of Avian Pathologists Annual Meeting, July 2020, Virtual.
      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Johnson T, Weber B, Reed K, Noll S, Knights D, Ward T, Cardona C, Kogut M, Arsenault R. Antibiotic-free alternatives to improve health and performance in commercial turkeys: genomic insights. Conference for Research Workers in Animal Diseases, Chicago, IL, December 2019.


      Progress 07/01/18 to 06/30/19

      Outputs
      Target Audience:The target audiences during this reporting period included: 1. Laboratory-based training: twopostdoctoral scientists focusing on bioinformatic and laboratory approaches to mitigate antimicrobial resistance weretrained during this period. 2. Scientific symposia: The knowledge generated from this project was disseminated to poultry producers at the symposia ofthe Norht Central Avian Disease Conference annual meeting in Minneapolis, MN, March 2019. 3. Informal outreach: This work was discussed extensively with members of the MN poultry industry and allied industry. This includes primarily broiler and turkey companies in MN, and several agricultural feed additive companies. Meetings were conducted at the Mid-Central Research and Outreach Center in Willmar, MN. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This project has provided the opportunity to train and mentor twopostdoctoral students and two PhD students (National Needs Fellows)in bioinformatics and laboratory techniques related to Objectives 2 and 3. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The PI has made a number of presentations at local high schools and community colleges in the central MN area using the goals and results of this project as an example of cutting-edge science that occurs in the heart of agriculture in the USA. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Objective 1. The CRISPR/Cas tools developed will be tested against field strains in vitro to assess the efficacy of the system towards eliminating plasmids. A conugative system using IncP-type plasmid vectors will be developed as a means to naturally deliver the CRISPR/Cas system to other bacteria, and this will be tested in vitro using natural conjugation experiments. Objective 2. Longitudunal field studies will be conducted to assess ORT and E. coli ecology across farms, geographical locations, and time in the US turkey production sector. The database to harbor genomic data used to predictors of ecological pathogen shifts in response to vaccination and other mitigation strategies will continue to be developed. Objective 3. A systematic will be started to survey literature for determination of the effectiveness of prebiotic and probiotic approaches towards enhancing performance and reducing disease in poultry production. In vitro screens will be conducted to determine host adaptive properties of probiotic strains in turkeys and chickens. In vitro pathogen inhibition studies will be conducted. Objective 4. A symposium will be proposed for the Midwest Poultry Federation meeting in Minneapolis in March 2020. Similarly, a symposia will be proposed for upcoming meetings at the American Association for Avian Pathologists and IPPE.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1. The CRISPR/Cas system targeting different plasmid types has been developed in the laboratory. These tools will be used towards in vitro testing to determine the theoretical ability of a CRISPR-Cas delivery system to target multiple plasmids circulating in poultry production systems in the US. Objective 2. Genome sequences of approximately 100 ORT and 500 avian pathogenic E. coli have been obtained and analyzed. Tools used to analyze strains included whole genome SNP-based typing, pangenome analysis, and mining of genomic data for molecular serotype, virulence genotype, plasmid content, resistance gene content, MLST type, cgMLST type, and wgMLST type. The database that will harbor these strains is in development. Poultry companies have been contacted for enrollment into studies examining on-farm ORT and E. coli ecology using clinical, commensal, and environmental isolates collected in longitudinal manner. Objective 3. In vitro avian and mammalian epithelial cell line modelshave been established in the laboratory and are currently being tested using strains of Lactobacillus, E. coli, and Salmonella. In vitro pathogen inhibition models are in development using supernaten-based and direct cell-cell inhibition models. Objective 4. Two articles were published in trade magazines for turkey producers to introduce the concepts of bacterial strain typing, and why this matters for the producer.

      Publications

      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Jahan N and Johnson T. Comparative genome analyses of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) from commercial turkey production in the U.S. The Poultry Science Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, July 2018.
      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Correlating phenotype and genotype in turkey-derived Lactobacillus johnsonii to discover effective probiotic strains for use in commercial turkeys. The Poultry Science Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, July 2018.
      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Thomas J, Weber B, Wakil A, and Johnson T. Identifying turkey-specific Lactobacillus strains that inhibit poultry pathogens, and exploring prebiotic-probiotic combinations that enhance their growth. The Poultry Science Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, July 2018.
      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Johnson A, Weber B, and Johnson T. Using probiotic performance assays and comparative genome analysis of Lactobacillus johnsonii strains to discover effective probiotics for use in commercial turkeys. The Gut Health Symposium, St. Louis, MO, November 2018.
      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Jahan N and Johnson T. Comparative genome analyses of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli from commercial turkey and broiler production. The Conference for Research Workers in Animal Diseases, Chicago, IL, December 2018.
      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Smith E and Johnson T. Pangenome analysis of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale clinical isolates and vaccine strains from US turkeys. The Conference for Research Workers in Animal Diseases, Chicago, IL, December 2018.
      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Persistence against resistance: human vs. animal antibiotics. Invited keynote presentation at the 72nd North Dakota Poultry Industries Annual Meeting, Fargo, ND, December 2018.
      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale: what can we learn from its DNA? Invited talk at the American College of Turkey Veterinarians annual meeting, Denver, CO, July 2018.