Source: UNIV OF CONNECTICUT submitted to
ACHIEVING RISK REDUCTION THROUGH IDENTIFICATION OF RESEARCH, EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY NEEDS OF ARTISAN AND FARMSTEAD CHEESEMAKERS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1005395
Grant No.
2015-67017-23108
Project No.
CONSUSDAconf1
Proposal No.
2014-05689
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
A1331
Project Start Date
Feb 1, 2015
Project End Date
Jan 31, 2016
Grant Year
2015
Project Director
D`Amico, D.
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF CONNECTICUT
(N/A)
STORRS,CT 06269
Performing Department
Animal Science
Non Technical Summary
With the growth in small-scale cheese production and consumption, coupled with recent regional and national recalls and foodborne illness outbreaks, there is concern that these products represent an emerging, previously unrecognized vehicle of foodborne hazards. There is therefore a critical need for focus on ensuring the safety of these products through research and training. Our objective in this strengthening conference proposal, addressing the Improving Food Safety priority (A1331), is to provide a unique venue for collaboration between several diverse groups each with an interest in ensuring the safety of artisan cheese that would not have a similar opportunity to meet and work together. Through facilitated discussions this consortium will identify current knowledge, training, and research gaps for pathogen prevention and control. Building from this knowledge we will identify action items and collaboration groups to address specific training and research gaps leading to the generation of a white paper detailingour conclusions as well as recommendations to address training and research needs. Following dissemination of this new knowledge, follow-up surveys will be utilized to assess overall impact. Upon succesful completion, we expect to have identified gaps in our current system and developed novel recommendations for research and outreach activities to address food safety concerns related to this emerging industry thereby enhancing the long-term economic viability of dairy farms and manufacturers.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
7123430302045%
7123430303045%
7123430110010%
Goals / Objectives
Our long-term goal is to develop and implement strategies to enhance the safety of dairy foods. Ensuring the safety of dairy products will preserve and enhance consumer confidence thereby sustaining demand and the economic viability of small dairy farms and the quality of life for farmers and consumers. Our objective in this conference proposal is to foster collaboration by bringing together animal scientists, veterinarians, food microbiologists, industry partners, extension educators and artisan producers to identify research, education and extension needs as well as control strategies to proactively address artisan and farmstead cheeses as a vehicle of food borne hazards. We plan to attain the objective of this application by pursuing the following specific aims:1. Develop a consortium of individuals and groups dedicated to enhancing artisan and farmstead cheese safety.2. Identify current knowledge, training, and research opportunities and challenges for pathogen prevention and control in artisan and farmstead cheese making.3. Identify action items and collaboration groups to work on specific training and research gaps.4. Generate a white paper detailing the current challenges and opportunities as well as recommendations to address training and research needs5. Conduct a follow-up evaluation to assess the impact of the conference.
Project Methods
CONFERENCEThe overall approach for this conference will be similar to that of National Food Safety Education Conference organized by the Partnership for Food Safety Education that brings together stakeholders from government, industry and consumer groups with food-safety educators to identify the best ways to educate consumers about steps they can take to avoid foodborne illnesses. In addition to directly targeting speakers and topics we will solicit abstracts for presentations at the conference to ensure the best material and subjects possible. With that, the proposed program below is subject to change. Regardless, the proposed conference will focus on 4 major themes:1. Understanding the Current Situation: Assessing the issues and current opportunities.2. Assessing Cheese Safety Training and Education Programs: Examining how eachgroup perceives the effectiveness of current cheese safety education offerings in changingproducer behavior. Reviewing case studies of programs that have been successful.3. Technology Transfer: Considering the tools and technologies artisan and farmsteadcheese makers can use to enhance the safety of their products.4. Motivating Behavior Change: Exploring ways and incentives to foster behavioralchanges that promote cheese safety.The proposed program constitutes all areas we would like to cover. The breakout groups will provide a forum for small producers to describe and highlight barriers and challenges. With that, the proposed program below is subject to change with the understanding that it may appear ambitious for a 2-day conference as presented. We will work to involve audience interaction and reaction to each presentation through facilitated question and answer periods. This will maximize small producer participation.Day 1: August 2, 2015.Morning: Understanding the Current Situation: Assessing the issues and current opportunities.• An Overview of the U.S. Artisan Cheese Industry:o Changes in the U.S. Artisan Industry-Jeff Roberts, VIAC's Principal Consultanto Opportunities and Challenges-Professor Paul Kindstedt, University of Vermont• Food Safety Challenges:o FDA perspective- John Sheehan, FDA;o International perspective: Jeff Farber, Health Canada;o Notes from the field: Dennis D'Amico, University of Connecticut, Marianne Smukowski, Wisconsin CDR; Kerry Kaylegian, Penn State;o Retailer perspective: Cathy Gaffney, Wegmans; Cathy Strange, Global Cheese Buyer, Whole Foods Market• Cheesemaker Needs: Highlighting barriers for safe production in small operations.o Nora Weiser, Executive Director American Cheese Society;o Unique challenges of the future: Andy and Mateo Kehler, Cellars at Jasper Hill• State Regulatory Needs:o Casey McCue, NY Dept. of Ag. and Markets and President of the National Association of Dairy Regulatory OfficialsAfternoon: Assessing Cheese Safety Training and Education Programs• What training is offered? Reviewing case studies of current programs. Panel to include representatives from various programs including:o Rob Ralyea and Martin Weidmann, Cornell University; Dennis D'Amico,University of Connecticut; Phil Tong/Nana Farkye, Cal Poly; Liz Goddick,Oregon State; Seana Doughty, Owner/Cheesemaker Bleating Heart Cheese,President California Artisan Cheese Guild• FSMA and the Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance: Pernendu Vasaveda, PCV & Associates, LLC.• Breakout groups: Facilitated discussion to identify future needs and opportunities based on the conference sessions and Q&A. Discuss how each group perceives the effectiveness of current offerings in changing producer behavior and areas forimprovement, collaboration, and harmonization.Day 2: August 3, 2015.Morning: Technology Transfer• Resources available to enhance food safety:o Assistance available though large manufacturers: Representative from the IC FSOCo Role of the veterinarian in cheese safety: Mark Wustenberg, DVM, Tillamook Cheeseo Microbiological testing methods: Jeff Kornacki, Ph. D: President, Kornacki Microbiology Solutions, Madison, WIo Protective Cultures: Rex Infanger, Account Manager at Daniscoo Non-thermal processing alternatives: Mansel Griffiths, Director, Canadian Research Institute for Food Safety, University of Guelpho Sanitary Design and Sanitation for Artisan/Farmstead Operations: Neville McNaughton, CheezSorce; Tony Erickson, Principle Chemist, Ecolab.Afternoon:• Town Hall Discussion: The purpose of the town hall style discussion is to gather input from attendees including those that do not deliver more formal presentations. This will provide an outlet for producers to engage in discussion and voice their opinions.• Breakout groups: Facilitated discussion to address the development of incentives to foster behavioral changes that promote cheese safety.• Regroup:o Summarize issues, opportunities and ideas from each breakout groupo Identify action items and collaboration groups to work on specific training and research gaps.o Prioritization of ideas, development of action plans, and timeline generation for the publication of the proceedings and agreed upon actions.WHITE PAPER AND CONFERENCE EVALUATIONWhite Paper. The white paper can provide a summary of the gaps identified and solutions defined as to providing artisan/farmstead cheese makers additional resources to address food safety. This summary will also provide educators a basis for future food safety training, including the use of Extension in reaching the artisan/farmstead cheese makers. The white paper will also serve to transfer knowledge and understanding of a this issue from all perspectives and provide information to aid in achieving risk reduction through the various approaches identified including workshops and training, outreach, and technology transfer. The white paper will also explain the results or conclusions resulting from the conference including collaborations.Conference Evaluation. We will utilize members of the consortium and a newly developed evaluation tool to determine the effectiveness of the conference and subsequent white paper in achieving our objectives and addressing our themes (Understanding the Current Situation; Assessing Cheese Safety Training and Education Programs; Technology Transfer; Motivating Behavior Change). More specifically, we will seek feedback on the development or improvement in education offerings, the implementation of food safety technologies, and changes in food safety knowledge. We will also seek to assess changes in the understanding of the state of the industry and its future directions related to food safety. Data will be collected through surveys (paper and/or online) of participants and producers as a whole (through ACS direct mailing) at two points in time. We will collect feedback and formative evaluation data immediately after their completion of the conference. To the extent possible, we will collect follow-up data six to twelve months post dissemination of the white paper to determine the longer term impact on cheese safety and identify new or additional research and training needs of cheese makers. The IC and DRI will also facilitate two to three focus groups and interviews with conference attendees to supplement survey data with qualitative, case-level data. We will directly target other groups represented at the conference to gauge observed change as well (Dairy Promotion Checkoff programs, Whole Foods, etc.). Regarding regulators, the white paper and survey will be provided to government agencies (i.e. NIFA, ARS, FSA, AMS, CFSAN) to identify changes as well.

Progress 02/01/15 to 01/31/16

Outputs
Target Audience:A total of 85 conference participants were selected from a list of ~200 potential speakers and active participants generated by the conference coordinators to include representatives from the federal and state governments, as well as representatives from the cheese industry including producers (large and small), milk advisory boards, dairy associations, cheese councils and guilds, retailers, distributors, and consumer groups. In addition, extension educators, faculty and students from tribal and land grant colleges and other institutions involved with dairy product education, training, and research were included. Although demographic information was not collected, members of ethnic minorities were in attendance. Self-reported participant occupations/affiliations were broken down as follows: Cheesemaker/Owner (n=14) Distribution/Retail (n=10) Education/research/extension (n=20) Consultant (n=8) Quality Assurance (QA) (n=7) Student (n=10), Government (n=2) Other (n=14) Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The forum itself was a professional development opportunity for many of the 85 participants. In particular, ten graduate students studying dairy and food science/safety were in attendance with travel support provided by this grant. Through this opportunity students were exposed to the unique food safety needs of this industry segment as well as the impact of education and public policy on small businesses. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?An executive summary of the forum was shared with participants. A summary of the conference highlights will also be published as a general interest paper in a forthcoming edition of Food Protection Trends. Quantitative and qualitative data obtained from the forum and related evaluations tools will be published in the Journal of Extension following peer review. This manuscript was recently submitted. A link to the article, available free of charge, will be provided to forum participants to share with their networks. Links and reference will also be disseminated through the American Cheese Society and other industry contacts and collaborators to reach any remaining stakeholders of interest. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? A list of ~200 potential speakers and active participants generated by the conference coordinators to include representatives from the federal and state governments, as well as representatives from the cheese industry including producers (large and small), milk advisory boards, dairy associations, cheese councils and guilds, retailers, distributors, and consumer groups. In addition, extension educators, faculty and students from tribal and land grant colleges and other institutions involved with dairy product education, training, and research were included. A consortium of85 individuals was selected to attend the forum. Self-reported participant occupations/affiliations were broken down as follows: Cheesemaker/Owner (n=14); Distribution/Retail (n=10); Student (n=10); Education/research/extension (n=20); Consultant (n=8); Quality Assurance (QA) (n=7); Government (n=2); and Other (n=14). Those unable to attend but expressing interest are included in follow up communications in the case that they want to participate in future objectives. The forum program was developed around the following four themes to identify current knowledge, training, and research opportunities and challenges for pathogen prevention and control in artisan and farmstead cheese making: Understanding the Current Situation: Providing an overview of the American artisan cheese industry, current regulatory environments, and new requirements and expectations from the supply chain. Assessing Food Safety Challenges and Opportunities for Training: Overview of current food safety educational offerings and additional needs. Technology Transfer: Overview of artisan cheese focused research and resources available to producers to enhance safety. Implementing Change:Exploring ways and incentives to foster behavioral changes that promote cheese safety. The forum was planned as a two-day event consisting of panels of three to five short presentations (~15 minutes) as well as longer, stand-alone presentations, grouped by category within the aforementioned themes. Each session included a facilitated question and answer period to involve audience interaction and reaction to each presentation. The forum identified the diverse local and regional resources available. One major outcome was that collaboration on the development and coordination of effective and harmonized training and outreach solutions is needed. Focus groups and discussions held during the five months following the forum identified how forum participants are applying information and networking opportunities provided at the forum to education efforts and grant applications. Although it is too soon to identify long-term outcomes, medium term outcomes emphasize the actions taken by attendees. Working groups are developing a centralized open access website to house the various resources available. Ideally this will include forms, templates, webinars, videos, research articles, as well as a list of consultants and a calendar of events for training opportunities among others. This site will also host the presentations from the forum and other forum materials. In addition, this site will house quick guidance documents on recalls, inspections, and audits, among other summary documents provided by FDA and state regulators to effectively communicate the inspection and regulatory process and policies. FDA, state regulators, extension educators, and producer groups are working collaboratively to strengthen the accuracy and value of the code of best practices available through the American Cheese Society as a living document. Participants are also collaborating on grant proposals to develop online content and distance learning opportunities. Current education programs are being translated to online format for distance learning and collaborative groups are being formed to better harmonize future online and regional training efforts. Teams of extension educators are being assembled to harmonize online training materials to supplement on-site interactive training programs offered regionally. An executive summary of the forum was shared with participants. A summary of the conference highlights will also be published as a general interest paper in a forthcoming edition of Food Protection Trends. Quantitative and qualitative data obtained from the forum and related evaluations tools will be published in the Journal of Extension following peer review. This manuscript was recently submitted. A link to the article, available free of charge, will be provided to forum participants to share with their networks. Links and reference will also be disseminated through the American Cheese Society and other industry contacts and collaborators. Follow up evaluations were completed in the short term following the conference and are included in the aforementioned publications. For example, general forum evaluation responses were rated on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Based on general forum evaluation responses there was general agreement that: The forum was very valuable conference (4.73 +/- 0.54; n=45) The size of the event was appropriate (4.85 +/- 0.36; n=46) The interactions were beneficial (4.28 +/- 1.5; n=50) The amount of allotted time for the forum was sufficient (3.79 +/- 1.25; n= 47) Successful short-term outcomes included agreement that: Gaps and solutions to providing artisan cheesemakers additional resources to address food safety were identified (4.76 +/- 0.44; n=45) Understanding of the state of the industry and its future directions related to food safety improved (4.59 +/- 0.65; n=46) Long term will be possible once more time passes from the date of the event held this past summer.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2016 Citation: Artisan Cheese Food Safety Forum Identifies Challenges and Opportunities in Education and Outreach. Submitted to Journal of Extension.
  • Type: Other Status: Submitted Year Published: 2016 Citation: Artisan Cheese Food Safety Forum: 2015 Conference Summary. Submitted to Food protection Trends.