Source: COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to
MANAGEMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ANIMALS IN A RADIOLOGICAL OR NUCLEAR INCIDENT
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0223830
Grant No.
2010-37610-21869
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2010-04854
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2010
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2012
Grant Year
2010
Program Code
[NI]- Critical Issues
Recipient Organization
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
FORT COLLINS,CO 80523
Performing Department
Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences
Non Technical Summary
The prospect of fallout from nuclear weapons or from other radiological incidents has increased significantly with the proliferation of enrichment technologies to countries such as North Korea and Iran and the surge in international terrorist activity. The potential for possession of nuclear weapons by non-state actors greatly increases the probability of the deployment of nuclear weapons in the future. The fallout from a nuclear weapon, a nuclear reactor accident, or a radiological dispersal device will most likely lead to deposition of radioactive materials upon agricultural animals. Although animals may be evacuated from a contaminated area, the animals may themselves be contaminated, and spread this contamination to the new location. An alternative frequently considered is the mass slaughter of the animals. This project seeks to minimize both physical and monetary damage to agriculture from external, and where applicable internal, contamination of animals. Testing will be performed on ex-vivo samples of cows, pigs, chickens and horses, followed by proof testing on live animals. A unique aspect of this project is the use of irradiated uranium (U3O8) to produce fission products similar to those seen from an actual nuclear weapon, allowing testing of a plethora of radionuclides at once. Decontamination methods to be tested include weathering (control), soap and water, dry vacuuming, wet vacuuming, and development of a novel agent as designed by CBI. The measurement of contamination using common instruments to develop rapid sorting techniques is key to this project. Possibly the most challenging aspect of the project will be the determination of what levels of contamination will result in salvageable livestock, as this will require consideration of a multi-variable set of exposure, husbandry, and future use conditions combined with the social aspects of public acceptance of contaminated livestock, foodstuffs, and animal products.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3143510201030%
3143310201015%
3143410201015%
3143210201015%
3143220201015%
3143810201010%
Goals / Objectives
OBJECTIVES 1. Identify and address the most critical research and extension gaps relating to the response to, and recovery from, catastrophic exposure of agricultural animals to contaminating radioactive agents to: a. minimize potentially catastrophic damage to American agriculture and the environment, b. ensure safety and security of the food supply, and c. better protect animal and public health in the event of an accidental or intentional radiological release. 2. Establish a collaborative effort that will assemble existing information for dissemination using existing local, regional, national, and international capabilities and capacities SPECIFIC AIMS 1. Develop model(s) tools to help delineate zones of likely salvage potential, questionable salvage potential, and unlikely salvage potential for livestock and poultry under differing exposure and production scenarios. 2. Analyses of comparative efficiency and effectiveness of lower technology versus higher technology methods of decontaminating animals exposed mainly externally, mainly internally, or through both routes. 3. Critical analyses of apparently effective animal decontamination methods that might also have unintended consequences such as transfer of contamination to other animals, humans, food (e.g., milk), the environment, and equipment such as milking machines. Performed simultaneously with Aim 2. 4. Cross validation of monitoring and decontamination procedures developed for humans to agricultural animal species. Performed simultaneously with Aim 2. EXPECTED RESULTS Specific Aim 1 - Initial rapid results detailing the use of existing programs to ascertain the potential for contamination of agricultural animals (estimate contamination levels) and if animals can be salvaged. Specific Aim 2 - Specific recommendations as to what agents work, and which agents are practical/impractical. Development of techniques for rapidly screening large populations of animals for contamination Specific Aim 3 - Identification of complicating factors Specific Aim 4 - Identification of agents that may translate to other species and dissemination of information regarding hypothesis to this effect. Our hypothesis is that soap and water, which works well on human skin, will also work on pig skin.
Project Methods
METHODS The experimental design will utilize five basic scenarios where the nuclides are spread using a multi-channel pipetter, simulating rain drops on the ex-vivo samples. Simulated raindrops containing the radioactive contaminant are hypothesized to be the most realistic condition as the majority of fallout results from rain "scrubbing" the atmosphere of particulate aerosols. The contamination will then be allowed to dry on the samples, again to simulate natural environmental conditions. The design assumes that large, dry particles deposited as a result of a nearby RDD or nuclear weapon would be easily brushed off, and only those deposited via raindrops would "stick". Five basic decontamination scenarios will be utilized: weathering (control), soap and water, dry vacuuming, wet vacuuming, and CBI decontamination agents. The effect of "weathering" will be used as a control, simulated rain only on the ex-vivo samples will be utilized to ascertain how the nuclides behave over time. Multiple applications of "rain" will be applied via pipetters to determine if/when contamination levels decrease without intervention. Soap and water will be utilized on further ex-vivo samples as they are common, low cost, and frequently utilized. The first application will be simply soap and water, followed by scrubbing, if necessary. Dry vacuuming of the ex-vivo samples may prove to be low cost and effective if successful. Wet vacuuming (similar to carpet cleaner) where soap and water are recycled and captured may prove to be effective for nuclides that bind to the ex-vivo samples. Finally, we will collaborate with CBI (CBI Polymers, a division of Cellular Bioengineering Inc.) to explore novel compounds that are eligible for FDA approval for indirect contact with food. Each decontamination agent will be tested five times on the various samples to measure statistical variation. Cowhide, pig skin, and chicken will be used for the initial trials, and a single sample of horse hide will be used to ascertain if cowhide decontamination efficacies can be directly related to cow hide. Decontamination efficacy will be measured using multiple instruments that can determine the amount of activity and the radionuclide present. A major focus of the research will be evaluating cost of the agent, volume of decontaminating materials needed, volume of waste, efficacy, potential for spread of contamination and level of technology required. Our hypothesis is that the ex-vivo results will directly translate to live animals. Thus, only one animal will be tested for the techniques that are found to be most promising. We will evaluate each decontamination technique for unintended consequences, and pitfalls of performing/not performing decontamination.

Progress 09/01/10 to 08/31/12

Outputs
Target Audience: Federal and state governmental agencies which handle radioactive emergencies. Veterinarians, farmers, ranchers, and the public. Changes/Problems: Initially used natural uranium (U3O8) as the source, but had difficulties with solubility. The source was thought to be soluble, but initial decon efforts presented solids of the source collecting on the bottom of beakers. Other potential uranium sources were researched and the best source for the decon project was uranyl acetate. Uranyl acetate has a high solubility at low temperatures, low volatility, and minimal effects on pH. Further decon efforts using uranyl acetate displayed no signs of insolubility. Live animal decon efforts were not conducted due to the remarkable condition of the animal hide samples used in the glovebox. There is no expected physiological change between the hide samples and a live animal. Results are expected to be consistent. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Graduate student opportunities: presented research at international and national meetings, conducted webinars to various audiences, organized the decon protocol, radioactive material work practices, organizing and addressing radioactive waste/shipments, minimizing radiation exposures, working with radiation instruments, and statistical interpretation of results. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Presented the research project to audiences at IRPA 2012, HPS 2012, HPS 2013, webinars to the USDA and veterinarians, and a presentation to Kansas state emergency responders. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? This is the final report.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Aim 1 – Article published in Journal of Health Physics, 2011 defined animal salvageability, described an animal triage flowchart, and proposed recommended dose levels for immediate screening. Aim 2 – Five decontamination methods for removing fission fragments from cow hides were tested within a glovebox. Liquid drops of irradiated uranyl acetate were placed on cow hides to simulate fallout from a reactor accident/nuclear weapon explosion. The five decon methods include water rinse, soap and water, dry vacuum, wet vacuum, and a commercial decon gel. Three decon attempts were conducted for each method and the results were measure by using three radiation field instruments (Geiger Muller probe, NaI probe, and a beta scintillator). Aim 3 – None noted. Aim-4 – A pig skin study was performed by Dan Mannis (graduate student) and he determined that soap and water, when applied at a moderate pressure between approximately 8 and 14 psi, was most effective at removing contamination. Furthermore, he investigated a commercial agent, and found no statistical difference in removal. The most important aspect was to apply a steady stream of pressure in the recommended range of 8-14 psi. Dan published all of this information in his thesis, which is avaialbel to the public and a publication is planned.

Publications

  • Type: Theses/Dissertations Status: Under Review Year Published: 2014 Citation: Doses to livestock from contamination events, P.J. Sprenger


Progress 09/01/11 to 08/31/12

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Outfiitted the glovebox to contain three contamination detectors with external meter, vacuum hose port, and decontamination rigs while meeting containment requirements Irradiated two U3O8 samples and performed decontamination efforts on cow hides. Results were a decrease in counts, but some efforts had an increase. This is likely due to chunks of U3O8 that became embedded in the hides. The U3O8 was not as soluble as previously understood. Researched various uranium compounds to yield similar results as U3O8 (solubility, pH, reactivity, reactor fission time, and safety). Determined uranyl acetate as the best option. Currently awaiting the arrival of sample to conduct more decontamination efforts. PARTICIPANTS: Not relevant to this project. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
Presented project information and decontamination protocol at the 2012 IRPA meeting in Glasgow, the 2012 Health Physics Society Meeting in Sacramento, and the Livestock Emergency Disease Response System (LEDRS) group for the state of Nebraska. All groups expressed great interest in the research and are anticipating further results, especially after learning about the events at Fukushima.

Publications

  • D. McMillan, T.E. Johnson, Y. Guo, A. Brandl. A Plan for the Handling of Externally Contaminated Livestock. Health Physics, 101 (Supplement 3), S164-S169, 2011.
  • Brandl A. Contribution to: Moves and Milestones, News from the Network: Austrian Researchers Abroad. Bridges, the Office of Science and Technology, Embassy of Austria, Online Magazine; vol. 30, July 2011.
  • Brandl A., Johnson T.E., Sprenger P. Strategies for Radioactive Decontamination of Livestock. Western Dairy News, March, 2012.
  • Brandl A. An Analytic Approach to Calculating the Dose to Animals Due to External Exposure. Health Physics, 102 (Issue 6), p687-695, 2012.


Progress 09/01/10 to 08/31/11

Outputs
OUTPUTS: We have identified the critical research gaps relating to catastrophic exposure of agricultural animals to contaminating radioactive agents. Currently, we are engaged in identifying the most effective models and tools for delineating salvage potential for livestock. We have analyzed various strategies for evaluating animals and how best to handle mass animal contamination. As salvageability of livestock is a function of dose to the effected animals, the mathematical basis of animal dosimetry has been investigated. A publication on animal dose calculation has been accepted by a peer reviewed journal. All required supplies and equipment have been purchased and experiments to verify best practices on ex-vivo tissue are scheduled to begin next month. Additional personnel have been assigned to the project that are funded from outside sources in addition to those designated in the proposal; a PhD student, MS student and two undergraduates. Progress has been rapid since the arrival of the equipment (glove box) and we expect to see several additional publications as a result of this research. To date, we have published two papers on this project and a short note. PARTICIPANTS: We have been in almost continuous communication with Dr Gordon Cleveland (USDA APHIS) regarding the outcomes and status of this project. We are currently working with the NIOSH Agricultural centers to distribute copies of the peer reviewed publication produced for this project, and have already disseminated the information via the High Plains Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health and Safety. We are coordinating with the Extension Disaster Education Network (EDEN) to prepare a nationwide webinar that will disseminate the information obtained via our research to date. Due to various logistical delays, we have increased the number of persons working on this project; we currently have two undergraduates, one MS and one PhD student working exclusively on this project. TARGET AUDIENCES: This project endeavors to educate agricultural businesses and other facilities that raise animals which might potentially become contaminated in an untoward nuclear event. As noted above in "Participants" we have teamed with the NIOSH Agricultural Centers, and EDEN. Dr Thomas Hinton (IRSN) in France is assisting us with international dissemination of the information, as our goal is worldwide education on effective decontamination techniques. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
Shortly after this project was funded, the reactor accident at Fukushima occurred. USDA, USAF, and USMC have all had extensive communication with Drs. Brandl and Johnson concerning radioactive contamination of animals and contamination in general. The background research that was performed for this grant provided a solid, scientific basis for recommendations.

Publications

  • D. McMillan, T.E. Johnson, Y. Guo, A. Brandl. A Plan for the Handling of Externally Contaminated Livestock. Health Physics, 101 (Supplement 3), S164-S169, 2011.
  • Brandl A. Contribution to: Moves and Milestones, News from the Network Austrian Researchers Abroad. bridges the Office of Science and Technology, Embassy of Austria, Online Magazine vol. 30, July 2011.
  • Brandl A. An Analytic Approach to Calculating the Dose to Animals Due to External Exposure. Health Physics, accepted for publication 2011.