Source: UNIV OF MINNESOTA submitted to
EXTENSION INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT - COORDINATION AND SUPPORT PROGRAM
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
EXTENDED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0223786
Grant No.
2010-41534-21807
Project No.
MIN-17-E03
Proposal No.
2010-01244
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
QQIPM
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2010
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2014
Grant Year
2013
Project Director
Durgan, B.
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF MINNESOTA
(N/A)
ST PAUL,MN 55108
Performing Department
Extension
Non Technical Summary
IPM research and extension programming crosses disciplines and is conducted by approximately 80 faculty and staff and is facilitated by the UMN IPM Program. Significant collaboration and coordination occurs in this organization; the UMN EFANS IPM Program has developed an extensive communication network and strong working relationships with its stakeholder groups. We recognize that in order for IPM programs to remain relevant, they require flexibility and responsiveness to new pressures including emerging and changing pest populations, sustainability of pest management systems, governmental regulations, and health and safety of applicators and the public. UMN EFANS IPM Program will respond to these challenges and advance its IPM program coordination, support and development in the following areas: IPM Implementation for Agronomic Crops, IPM Implementation for Specialty Crops, IPM Education for Pesticide Applicators, and IPM Training and Implementation in Schools. The UMN IPM team's efforts in each of these program areas will greatly benefit Minnesota and support all of the goals of the National IPM Road Map: i) to improve the cost benefit analyses of adopting IPM practices; ii) to reduce potential human health risks from pests and related pest management practices; and iii) to minimize adverse environmental effects from pests and related pest management practices.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2161310113010%
2161510113010%
2161510114010%
2161510116010%
2161820113010%
2161820114010%
2161820116010%
2162010113010%
2165399113010%
7215399113010%
Goals / Objectives
The University of Minnesota Extension Center for Food, Agriculture and Natural Resource Sciences (UMN EFANS) is a national leader in Integrated Pest Management, developing low-risk, effective approaches in all areas of pest management including agricultural, natural resources, post harvest and food safety and public and private structures. UMN IPM programs are effective, relevant and responsive and greatly impact Minnesota's and the nation's economy, environment and health. With this EIPM Coordination and Support application, UMN IPM proposes to advance its IPM program coordination, support and development in the following areas: IPM Implementation for Agronomic Crops, to improve the safety, profitability and sustainability of corn, soybean, and small grain production; IPM Implementation for Specialty Crops, to improve the safety, profitability and sustainability of sugarbeet and potatoes; IPM Education for Pesticide Applicators, includes Pesticide Applicator Training and the development and administration of an IPM Adoption Survey; and IPM Training and Implementation in Schools, an innovative new model for IPM in schools. The UMN IPM Program is a major participant in a well established, coordinated core of programming delivered by UMN Extension and integrated across disciplines and regions. Its extensive communication network and strong working relationships with stakeholders, including institutions, individuals, commodity groups, state agencies and collaborators across state boundaries, will serve to insure successful implementation of this EIPM proposal. The UMN IPM team strongly believes its proposed and continued efforts in each of these program areas will greatly benefit Minnesota and supports all three goals of the National IPM Road Map.
Project Methods
A coordinated core of programming delivered by UMN Extension addressing problems across disciplines and regions. We will make use of a variety of extensive communication networks and strong working relationships with stakeholders, including institutions, individuals, commodity groups, state agencies and collaborators across state boundaries. An extensive series of educational activities organized by the UMN EFANS at which pest management information plays a central role include the Ag. Professional Field Schools, Pesticide Applicator Training, Forage days, Small Grain Updates, Agricultural Professional Updates and the Crop Pest Management Short Course. Other extension events are held throughout the year which address specific and developing pest management issues and are also developed and delivered by REEs and IPM Specialists. Extension programs require supporting data, research, the generating of which is also conducted by members of the UMN IPM Program. IPM Specialists conduct multi-discipline, cooperative research efforts with faculty and staff from a variety of universities and other public and private research organizations. An IPM Adoption survey, conducted annually at pesticide applicator training events, will be used to evaluate the success and impact of eIPM goals.

Progress 09/01/12 to 08/31/13

Outputs
Target Audience: Agricultural professionals (consultants, elevator/cooperative personnel, agrochemical/industry personnel, independent applicators, etc), commodity groups soybean, corn, small grains, and sugarbeet), growers, agricultural financial personnel, government personnel (NRCS, school districts, etc) Changes/Problems: One IPM Specialists retired in 2011 (Dr. Carlyle Holen). We have modified the program to include a number of Regional Extnsion Educators, already involved in MN IPM activities. This has provided the program with wider geographic representation, strengthened some areas of expertise and provided more flexibility to the program as a whole. These changes were implemented in the 2012 grant year. In additin, a new position will be created in the upcoming year. We will have 1 FTE dedciated to developing, disseminating and coordinating digitally based IPM information developed by participants and cooperators. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? In 2009, IPM Adoption Surveys of independent growers indicated they rely on professional crop advisors and University resources for pest management information. In 2011, the UMN Extension IPM Program continued to focus on delivering education to Agricultural Professionals to act as message multipliers, incorporating newsletters and other electronic and digital outreach publications directed to both professional and grower audiences to educate growers. These efforts were supplemented with face to face meetings and field demonstration projects. In 2012, over 30 extension event meetings targeted to agricultural professionals, over 80 event meetings targeting growers, over 40 research and demonstration plot locations were conducted. Educational programs were the result of the collaborative efforts of 8 state faculty specialists, 27 UMN Extension personnel, 8 multistate collaborative research/extension efforts, and collaborations with industry personnel. In 2012, personnel from the IPM Program participated in programming and delivering content in multi-day Field Schools for Ag Professionals at 1 location; The Annual Crop Pest Management Short Course (1320 attendees), The Annual Agricultural Professional Update at 6 locations across the state (>350 individuals); Commercial, Noncommercial and Structural Pesticide Recertification Workshops at >25 locations across Minnesota; Winter Crops Days at multiple locations, and ~35 other events targeted at Agricultural Professionals throughout Minnesota. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? The IPM program supported 3 regional newsletters and 3 websites providing current IPM information and management recommendations: Cropping Issues in NW MN reports on developing IPM issues in northwest MN, SW MN IPM does the same for the SW, and Crop Connection the SE MN Regional Ag Newsletter. In 2012, the results from all cropping regional research and demonstration trials conducted by UMN Extension personnel in southern Minnesota were made available in a single report ("2012 Southern Minnesota Regional Research & Demonstration Trials"). UMN-IPM personnel helped develop and produce this report which includes methods, results, and full-color photos of most plots. To ensure an extension program effectively reaches its audience, some form of program evaluation is necessary. At annual pesticide applicator recertification meetings, we conduct an IPM Adoption Survey assessing the success of our educational efforts. Results are also presetned at events targeted at agricultural professionals (as above) and producers. IPM Personnel were involved in programming and delivering content at over 70 grower targeted events throughout the year in Minnesota and collaborating neighboring states, including Prairies Grains and Best of the Best events covering small grains and soybeans; Barriers to Bushels covering soybeans and corn; Sugarbeet Research & Education Board Annual Research Reporting Sessions, sugarbeet growers seminars and the International Sugarbeet Institute; Twilight Tour and Plot Days for potato and seed potato industries; and numerous grower events, plot and field tours, and Industry meetings throughout the growing season across Minnesota and neighboring collaborating states. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? The Agricultural Professional Updates, the Crop Pest management Short Course and Pesticide Applicator Training sessions will be held through the winter extension season, as will numerous other UMN Extension events. The websites, blogs, newsletters and other publications will be continued. In addition, we will be establishing a new position with the responsibilities of coordinating IPM information disseminated in digital formats (web, video, social media, Vine and other digital formats). The participants will continue to meet the goals of this project.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? University of Minnesota Extension and the UMN IPM Program annually designs and implements a series of IPM Adoption surveys. These surveys are conducted at Pesticide Applicator training and re-certification programs, ensuring a wide audience and high level of response. UMN Extension IPM personnel are pivotal in the originating this survey and continued to be heavily involved in their development and implementation. The survey is redesigned annually to assess not only the success of individual efforts and contributions, but when the results from all locations are analyzed; they provide a method whereby regional programming success can be evaluated. In 2012, 830 producers participated, answering questions designed to assess pest management in Minnesota (although not all 830 answered questions on the same cropping systems as the state wide survey crosses production areas). Events: In order to meet the needs of our clientele, UMN EFANS IPM Program participates in Extension events targeted both at producers and at agricultural professionals (through the UMN Institute for Agricultural Professionals). Some of the most successful and best established of which included the annual Agricultural Professional Updates, the Crop Pest Management Short Course, Winter Crop Days, the Commercial and Private Pesticide Applicator Training Programs, and multiple Field Days and plot tours. The UMN IPM Program personnel also collaborate with county and regional Extension Educators in the development and delivery of local and regional Extension programming related to pest management. Through the growing season of 2012, many Minnesota producers and agricultural professionals were battling resistance issues in corn, soybeans and potatoes. Increasing tolerance to insecticides, herbicides and fungicides were being encountered in all three cropping systems. Consequently, throughout the season and well into the fall and early winter, Extension programming was designed and delivered to provide insight into the development and management of pesticide resistance. This represented individual efforts by UMN IPM personnel across the state to ensure that Minnesota producers and agricultural professionals understand why the existing problems are developing and what can be done to manage the situation. Grower Participatory Research/Demonstration: There is a long history of grower participation in Minnesota’s Extension delivery. In 2012, the UMN IPM Program was assisted by growers in establishing on-farm research and demonstration trials at over 30 locations. These included soybean, small grain, corn, and alfalfa plots used to assess and demonstrate a wide variety of pest management tactics varying from insect management to insecticide resistance. The increasing problem of glyphosate resistance in Minnesota has resulted in significant research and demonstration on recognizing and managing resistant weeds. Evaluation: Of particular interest were the responses dealing with the onset of resistance in corn (to Bt traits) and to glyphosate, both of which indicated a growing awareness and concern over both issues. These data underscore the growing concern of growers about pesticide resistance. In Minnesota, these concerns were accelerated when laboratory trials confirmed chlorpyrifos resistance in some Two Spotted Spider Mite populations in soybeans. Consequently, the UMN EFANS IPM Program incorporated resistance management information in plot tours and fields days in the summer of 2013. This will also be a focus for events in 2013/14. In addition, a new extension project, initiated in 2012, was continued through the growing season of 2013. IN an effort to provide information to seed potato growers in MN (and North Dakota) on the incidence of aphid vectors of virus diseases, a suction trap network was established. While this network generates research data, it also provides seed potato producers with vital information needed for the timing of aphid management tactics. Weekly information on the densities and distributions of these insects was made available via direct email (with assistance of the Northern Plains Potato Growers Assoc), Twitter (#MNSpudbug), and a blog (aphidalert.blogspot.com).

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2012 Citation: MacRae, I., B. Potter, F. Breitenbach, & K. Ostlie. 2012. Perceived risk or economic return  what drives soybean management decisions? 7th Int. IPM Sypm., Memphis, TN, Mar. 27-29.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2012 Citation: Hesler, L.S., M.V. Chiozza, M.E. ONeal, G.C. MacIntosh, K.J. Tillman, D.I Chasndrasena, N.A. Tinsley, S.R. Cianzio, A.J. Costamagna, E. Cullen, C.D. DiFonzo, B.D. Potter, D.W. Ragsdale, K.Steffey, K.J. Koehler. (Approved with revisions1/07/13). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2012 Citation: Reynolds, G.J., Windels, C.E., MacRae, I.V., Laguette, S. 2012. Remote Sensing for Assessing Rhizoctonia Crown and Root Rot Severity in Sugar Beet. Plant Disease 96(4): 497-505 (first appeared as: First Look, Volume 0, Number ja (doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-10-0831)
  • Type: Websites Status: Other Year Published: 2012 Citation: MacRae, I. 2012. Aphid Alert 2012. A weekly blog reporting on the trap results of the Aphid Alert II network which monitored the presence of aphid vectors of viral diseases in potato. Available at: aphidalert.blogspot.com.
  • Type: Websites Status: Other Year Published: 2012 Citation: MacRae, I., J. Knodel, B. Potter, J. Wiersma. 2012. Update on Aster Leafhoppers in Wheat. Minnesota Crop News. May 8, 2012.
  • Type: Websites Status: Other Year Published: 2012 Citation: MacRae, I., J. Wiersma, J. Knodel, and B. Potter. 2012. Not all yellows are created equal (or, more correctly, not all yellows have an equal creation&). Minnesota Crop News, May 18, 2012. http://blog.lib.umn.edu/efans/cropnews/2012/05/not-all-yellows-are-created-eq.html
  • Type: Websites Status: Other Year Published: 2012 Citation: MacRae, I., R. Koch. 2012. Aphid Alert 2012. Minnesota Crop News, July 02, 2012. http://blog.lib.umn.edu/efans/cropnews/2012/07/aphid-alert-2012---ian-macrae.html
  • Type: Websites Status: Other Year Published: 2012 Citation: MacRae, I. 2012. Spider mites in soybeans. Minnesota Crop News, July 8, 2012. http://blog.lib.umn.edu/efans/cropnews/2012/07/spider-mites-in-soybeans.html
  • Type: Other Status: Other Year Published: 2012 Citation: MacRae, I. 2012. Scouting for Potato Insects  A Handbook & Field Guide. Prepared for RDO Inc. Scouting School, Park Rapids, MN, June 11, 2012.
  • Type: Websites Status: Other Year Published: 2012 Citation: Ostlie, K.R. and B.D. Potter. 2012(revised). Managing Two-Spotted Spider Mites on Soybeans. http://www.soybeans.umn.edu/crop/insects/spider_mites.htm
  • Type: Websites Status: Other Year Published: 2012 Citation: Potter, B.D. IPM Stuff electronic newsletter (1997-2012) http://swroc.cfans.umn.edu/ResearchandOutreach/PestManagement/index.htm


Progress 09/01/11 to 08/31/12

Outputs
OUTPUTS: In 2009, IPM Adoption Surveys of independent growers indicated they rely on professional crop advisors and University resources for pest management information. In 2011, the UMN Extension IPM Program continued to focus on delivering education to Agricultural Professionals to act as message multipliers, incorporating newsletters and other electronic and digital outreach publications directed to both professional and grower audiences to educate growers. These efforts were supplemented with face to face meetings and field demonstration projects. In 2011, over 35 extension event meetings targeted to agricultural professionals, over 70 event meetings targeting growers, over 50 research and demonstration plot locations were conducted. Educational programs were the result of the collaborative efforts of 12 state faculty specialists, 27 UMN Extension personnel, 8 multistate collaborative research/extension efforts, and collaborations with industry personnel. In 2011, personnel from the IPM Program participated in programming and delivering content in multi-day Field Schools for Ag Professionals at 2 locations; The Annual Crop Pest Management Short Course (1276 attendees), The Annual Agricultural Professional Update at 6 locations across the state (385 individuals); Commercial, Noncommercial and Structural Pesticide Recertification Workshops at 27 locations across Minnesota; Winter Crops Days at multiple locations, and ~35 other events targeted at Agricultural Professionals throughout Minnesota. In addition, IPM Personnel were involved in programming and delivering content at over 70 grower targeted events throughout the year in Minnesota and collaborating neighboring states, including Soybean College (an intensive on-campus event held at UMN Crookston), Prairies Grains and Best of the Best events covering small grains and soybeans; Barriers to Bushels covering soybeans and corn; Sugarbeet Research & Education Board Annual Research Reporting Sessions, sugarbeet growers seminars and the International Sugarbeet Institute; Twilight Tour and Plot Days for potato and seed potato industries; and numerous grower events, plot and field tours, and Industry meetings throughout the growing season across Minnesota and neighboring collaborating states. The IPM program also supported 3 regional newsletters and 2 websites providing current IPM information and management recommendations: Cropping Issues in NW MN reports on developing IPM issues in northwest MN, SW MN IPM does the same for the SW, and Crop Connection the SE MN Regional Ag Newsletter. In 2011, the results from all cropping regional research and demonstration trials conducted by UMN Extension personnel in southern Minnesota were made available in a single report ("2011 Southern Minnesota Regional Research & Demonstration Trials"). UMN-IPM personnel helped develop and produce this report which includes methods, results, and full-color photos of most plots. To ensure an extension program effectively reaches its audience, some form of program evaluation is necessary. At annual pesticide applicator recertification meetings, we conduct an IPM Adoption Survey assessing the success of our educational efforts. PARTICIPANTS: Dr. Beverly Durgan, Dean of Extension and Dir. UMN Expt. Station Dr. Ian MacRae, Dept. of Entomology, Extension State Specialist and Extension IPM Coordinator Bruce Potter, UMN Extension, Dept. of Entomology, IPM Specialist Fritz Breitenbach, UMN Extension, Dept. of Entomology, IPM Specialist Dr. Carlyle Holen (retired 2011) UMN Extension, Dept. of Entomology, IPM Specialist Dr. David Ragsdale, formerly UMN Dept. of Entomology, Extension State Specialist Dr. Stephen Kells, UMN Dept. of Entomology, Extension State Specialist Dr. Dean Malvick, UMN Dept. Plant Pathology, Extension State Specialist Lisa Behnkin, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator) Ryan Miller, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator) David Nicolai, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator) Phillip Glogoza, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator) Douglas Holen, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator) Russell Severson, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator) Elizabeth Stahl, UMN Extension, Regional Extension Educator (collaborator) Dr. Nick David, formerly UMN Extension, NDSU Dept. of Plant Science (collaborator) Dr. Carol Windels, UMN Plant Pathology (collaborator) Dr. Mark Boetel, NDSU Entomology (collaborator) TARGET AUDIENCES: Agricultural professionals (consultants, elevator/cooperative personnel, agrochemical/industry personnel, independent applicators, etc), commodity groups soybean, corn, small grains, and sugarbeet), growers, agricultural financial personnel, government personnel (NRCS, school districts, etc) PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: One IPM Specialists retired in 2011 (Dr. Carlyle Holen). We have modified the program to include a number of Regional Extnsion Educators, already involved in MN IPM activities. This has provided the program with wider geographic representation, strengthened some areas of expertise and provided more flexibility to the program as a whole. These changes will be implemented in the 2012 grant year.

Impacts
University of Minnesota Extension and the UMN IPM Program annually designs and implements a series of IPM Adoption surveys. These surveys are conducted at Pesticide Applicator training and re-certification programs, ensuring a wide audience and high level of response. UMN Extension IPM personnel are pivotal in the originating this survey and continued to be heavily involved in their development and implementation. The survey is redesigned annually to assess not only the success of individual efforts and contributions, but when the results from all locations are analyzed; they provide a method whereby regional programming success can be evaluated. In 2011, this survey indicated that as a result of University of Minnesota Extension IPM training more than half of respondents have significantly increased their use of monitoring and field scouting, more than 60% have significantly increased their use of safety precautions when using pesticides and keeping field records. Results also indicate that producers in southern MN are increasingly relying on UMN Extension IPM sources for initial information; producers in northern MN rely more on Coops and consultants for initial information but value UMN Extension for research results. Much of the 2011 survey focused on the prevalence and management of glyphosate resistant weeds. Approximately 69% of respondents indicated that glyphosate was not currently working as well as in the past. The top two tactics employed for managing resistant weeds tank mixing additional herbicides and rotating modes of action. Surveys indicated a growing adoption of mobile devices but an overwhelming number again this year stated they preferred hard-copies of extension bulletins, newsletters and fact sheets. We are increasing the inclusion and dissemination of these products at extension events. Other advanced application technologies, such as GPS mapping, auto boom and auto steering also seem to be increasingly adopted. These results demonstrate the inroads made by the UMN Extension IPM Program. For example, an overwhelming proportion of respondents report utilizing foliar applications in soybeans as a response to thresholds (~66.67%) and past surveys indicate as many as 80% of producers using thresholds are utilizing the threshold of 250 aphids/plant as recommended by UMN Extension. In the face of marketing pressure, this underscores the success of the UMN IPM programming efforts. Similar results can be found in glyphosate resistance, soybean cyst nematode and corn rootworm programming activities.

Publications

  • Breitenbach, F. 2011. Crop Connection 2011, The SE MN Regional Ag Newsletter. Pest updates, IPM research results and management information related to SE Minnesota. Delivered electronically via e-mail.
  • Glogoza, P. 2011. Cropping Issues in Northwest Minnesota - 2011. Agricultural issues, pest updates, IPM research results and management information related to NW Minnesota. Electronically delivered via e-mail and the web at: http://nwroc.umn.edu/Cropping_issues/CroppingIssues.htm
  • Glogoza, P., I. MacRae, R. Severson, and D. Zak. 2011. Soybean College: Addressing Soybean Production and Management. Cropping Issues in Northwest Minnesota. http://blog.lib.umn.edu/efans/cropnews/2011/11/soybean-college-addres sing-soy.html
  • Hadi, B.A.R., K. Tilmon, E. W. Hodgson, M. ONeal, D. Ragsdale, J. Bradshaw, J. Knodel, K. Ostlie, B. Potter and R. Wright. 2011. Integrated arthropod pest management. In, D. Deneke, (ed). Alternative practices for agricultural crop nutrient and pest management for South Dakota. South Dakota State University: Brookings, SD.
  • Knodel, J.J., and I. MacRae. 2011. Low densities of cereal aphids present in both ND and MN this week. MN Crops_Consultants & AgDakota Listserves. http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/pubs/plantsci/pests/e1143w1.htm
  • McCarville, M.T., M.E. ONeal, W.E. Fehr, B.P. McCornack, K. Tilmon, E.M. Cullen and B.D. Potter. 2011. Assessing the benefits of pyramids and seed treatments for soybean aphid (Aphis glycines) host plant resistance. 59th annual meeting of the Entomological Society of America November 13-16, 2011. Reno, NV. Display presentation.
  • MN Soybean research & Promotion Council, I. MacRae, and B. Potter. 2011. Soybean Science: The Real Story. Aphids. YouTube presentation on soybean aphid. http://www.youtube.com
  • Ostlie, K., B.D. Potter and L. French. 2011. Is it real Exploring the prospects of field resistance to corn-rootworm resistant transgenic corn in Minnesota. 59th annual meeting of the Entomological Society of America November 13-16, 2011. Reno, NV. Submitted paper.
  • Potter, B.D., K. R. Ostlie and J. M. Goos. 2011. Corn rootworm adult emergence patterns as effected by Bt-RW corn and crop rotation. 2011 Annual meeting of the North Central Branch of the Entomological society of America. March 13-16, 2011. Minneapolis, MN. Submitted paper.
  • Potter, B. 2011. SW MN Pest Management 2011. Provides pest updates, IPM research results and management information related to SW Minnesota. Electronically delivered through e-mail and on the web at: http://swroc.cfans.umn.edu/SWMNPEST/swmnpest.htm.


Progress 09/01/10 to 08/31/11

Outputs
OUTPUTS: In 2009 and 2010 IPM Adoption Surveys of independent growers, most reported relying on both Elevator/Cooperative resources and University resources, newsletters and websites for the majority of their pest management information. Consequently, in 2010, the UMN IPM Program continued to focus on delivering education to Agricultural Professionals to act as message multipliers and incorporate newsletters and other electronic and digital outreach publications directed to both professional and grower audiences educate growers. These efforts were heavily supplemented with meetings and demonstration projects. . In 2010, we also began to develop a pilot program to provide quick updates on developing pest problems to crop consultants. This program, called Heads-Up Network will provide text messages to crop consultants by region and crop system interests. In 2010, personnel from the IPM Program participated in programming and delivering content in multi-day Field Schools for Ag Professionals at 2 locations; The Annual Crop Pest Management Short Course held in conjunction with The Minnesota Crop Production Retailers Association (~1500 attendees), The Annual Agricultural Professional Update at 6 locations across the state; Commercial, Noncommercial and Structural Pesticide Recertification Workshops at 29 locations across Minnesota; Winter Crops Days at multiple locations, and ~35 other events targeted at Agricultural Professionals throughout Minnesota. In addition, IPM Personnel were involved in programming and delivering content at over 100 grower targeted events throughout the year in Minnesota and in collaborating neighboring states, including Prairies Grains and Best of the Best events covering small grains and soybeans; Barriers to Bushels covering soybeans and corn; Sugarbeet Research & Education Board Annual Research Reporting Sessions, Sugarbeet Growers Seminar and the International Sugarbeet Institute; Twilight Tour and Plot Days covering potato and seed potato industries; and numerous grower events, plot and field tours, and Industry meetings throughout the growing season across Minnesota and neighboring collaborating states. The IPM program also supported 3 regional newsletters and 2 websites providing current IPM information and management recommendations: Cropping Issues in NW MN and the website Red River IPM reports on developing IPM issues in northwest MN, SW MN IPM does the same for the SW, and Crop Connection the SE MN Regional Ag Newsletter. In 2010, the results from all cropping regional research and demonstration trials conducted by UMN Extension personnel in southern Minnesota were made available in a single report ("2010 Southern Minnesota Regional Research & Demonstration Trials"). UMN-IPM personnel helped develop and produce this report which includes methods, results, and full-color photos of most plots. To ensure an extension program effectively reaches its audience, some form of program evaluation is necessary. At annual pesticide applicator recertification meetings, we conduct an IPM Adoption Survey assessing the success of our educational efforts PARTICIPANTS: Dr. Beverly Durgan, Dean of Extension and Dir. UMN Expt. Station. Dr. Ian MacRae, Dept. of Entomology, Extension State Specialist and Extension IPM Coordinator. Bruce Potter, UMN Extension, Dept. of Entomology, IPM Specialist. Fritz Breitenbach, UMN Extension, Dept. of Entomology, IPM Specialist. Dr. Carlyle Holen (retired 2011) UMN Extension, Dept. of Entomology, IPM Specialist. Dr. David Ragsdale, formerly UMN Dept. of Entomology, Extension State Specialist. Dr. Stephen Kells, UMN Dept. of Entomology, Extension State Specialist. Dr. Dean Malvick, UMN Dept. Plant Pathology, Extension State Specialist. Lisa Behnkin, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator). Ryan Miller, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator). David Nicolai, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator). Phillip Glogoza, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator). Douglas Holen, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator). Russell Severson, UMN Extension Regional Extension Educator (collaborator). Elizabeth Stahl, UMN Extension, Regional Extension Educator (collaborator). Dr. Nick David, formerly UMN Extension, NDSU Dept. of Plant Science (collaborator). Dr. Carol Windels, UMN Plant Pathology (collaborator) Dr. Mark Boetel, NDSU Entomology (collaborator). Professional Development IPM Specialists attended The UMN Extension Annual Conference, other professional conferences and professional organization meetings in 2010. TARGET AUDIENCES: Agricultural professionals (consultants, elevator/cooperative personnel, agrochemical/industry personnel, independent applicators, etc), commodity groups soybean, corn, small grains, and sugarbeet), growers, agricultural financial personnel, government personnel (NRCS, school districts, etc), PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: One IPM Specialists retired in 2011 resulting in some budgetary savings but this position will be replaced as soon as possible. One IPM Specialist was on extended health leave for half of 2010 but has since returned to fulltime status.

Impacts
University of Minnesota Extension and the UMN IPM Program annually designs and implements a series of IPM Adoption surveys. These surveys are conducted at Pesticide Applicator training and recertification programs, ensuring a wide audience and high level of response. UMN Extension IPM personnel are pivotal in the originating this survey and continued to be heavily involved in their development and implementation. The survey is redesigned annually to assess not only the success of individual efforts and contributions, but when the results from all locations are analyzed, they provide a method whereby regional programming success can be evaluated. In both 2009 and 2010, this survey indicated that as a result of University of Minnesota Extension IPM training more than half of respondents have significantly increased their use of monitoring and field scouting, more than 60% have significantly increased their use of safety precautions when using pesticides and keeping field records. Results also indicate that producers are increasingly relying on UMN Extension IPM sources for research and field trial results and unbiased IPM information. Almost 60% report relying on UMN sources for accurate data and other UMN IPM extension materials to gain IPM related knowledge and practices. Surprisingly, only approximately half of respondents extensively use the internet to obtain IPM information while an overwhelming 85% use UMN Extension newsletters as primary, valued sources for IPM information. In 2010 the survey indicated that a greater distribution network of these publications would be helpful. We are currently investigating partnerships with elevator and co-op organizations to distribute publications of interest. These results demonstrate the inroads made by the UMN Extension IPM Program. For example, one of our greatest successes has been the increasing adoption and utilization of the recommended soybean aphid threshold of 250 aphids/plant when 80% of plants are infested. In the face of marketing pressure, this underscores the success of the UMN IPM programming efforts. Similar results can be found in glyphosate resistance, soybean cyst nematode and corn rootworm programming activities.

Publications

  • Potter, B. 2010. SW MN Pest Management. Provides pest updates, IPM research results and management information related to SW Minnesota. Electronically delivered through e-mail and on the web at: http://swroc.cfans.umn.edu/SWMNPEST/swmnpest.htm
  • MacRae, I. 2010. Red River IPM. Web-based newsletter providing pest updates, IPM research results and management information related to NW Minnesota at: http://nwroc.umn.edu/ent/redent.html
  • Breitenbach, F. 2010. Crop Connection, The SE MN Regional Ag Newsletter. Pest updates, IPM research results and management information related to SE Minnesota. Delivered electronically via e-mail.
  • Holen, C. 2010. Cropping Issues in Northwest Minnesota. Agricultural issues, pest updates, IPM research results and management information related to NW Minnesota. Electronically delivered via e-mail and the web at: http://nwroc.umn.edu/Cropping_issues/CroppingIssues.htm
  • MacRae, I. V., B.D. Potter, F. R. Breitenbach, K.R. Ostlie, C.D. Holen, 2010. An Economic Comparison of Soybean Insect Management Strategies. 2010 Annual meeting of the North Central Branch of the Entomological society of America March 14-17, 2010. Louisville,KY. Submitted paper.
  • Potter, B.D. and K.R. Ostlie, 2010. Corn Rootworm Adult Emergence Patterns as Effected by Bt-RW Corn and Extended Diapause. 2010 Annual meeting of the North Central Branch of the Entomological society of America March 14-17, 2010. Louisville,KY. Submitted paper.
  • Reynolds, G.J., C.E. Windels, I.V. MacRae, and S. Laguette. Submitted. Rhizoctonia Crown and Root Rot reduces chlorophyll content in Sugar Beet foliage. Submitted to Phytopathology, Oct 2010.
  • Reynolds, G.J., C.E. Windels, I.V. MacRae, and S. Laguette. Submitted. Remote sensing for assessing Rhizoctonia Crown and Root Rot severity in Sugar Beet. Submitted to Phytopathology, Oct 2010.Carroll, M.W., E.B. Radcliffe, I.V. MacRae, D.W. Ragsdale,
  • K.D. Olson, T. Badibanga. 2009. Border treatment to reduce insecticide use in seed potato production: biological, economic, and managerial analysis. Am. J. Potato Res. 86: 31-37.
  • Reynolds, G.J., Windels, C.E., MacRae, I.V., Laguette, S. 2009. Hyperspectral remote sensing for detection of Rhizoctonia crown and root rot in sugar beet. Phytopathology 99(6): s108-s108.