Source: ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to
EQUILIBRIUM PRICING AND POSITIONING OF NEW FOOD PRODUCTS IN A SOCIAL NETWORK
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0220257
Grant No.
2010-65400-20487
Project No.
ARZR-2009-04140
Proposal No.
2009-04140
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
96160
Project Start Date
Feb 1, 2010
Project End Date
Jan 31, 2013
Grant Year
2010
Project Director
Richards, T.
Recipient Organization
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
660 S MILL AVE STE 312
TEMPE,AZ 85281-3670
Performing Department
Morrison School of Management and Agribusiness
Non Technical Summary
Developing and marketing innovative food products is essential to keep up with changing consumer tastes, sustain international competitiveness, and improve the efficiency of the agricultural marketing system. While there is large amount of research on the value of new products, there is little on key strategic problems faced by innovating firms: how to price and design new food products subject to social network, or interpersonal demand effects. The primary objective of the proposed research is to describe equilibrium pricing and design strategies in a multi-product, differentiated-product, vertical market characterized by social network effects. We use an explicitly spatial model in which manufacturers choose both the price and location in attribute space in a two-stage game-theoretic framework. Both stages are subject to indirect network effects through the interaction of individual demands. We estimate the model using experimental choice data on a hypothetical new breakfast cereal. The empirical model of demand explicitly considers each product's unique location in attribute space, and uses these results to simulate pricing and product design. Our results will provide stakeholders with critical insights into how pricing and design decisions are influenced by social network effects.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
50%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
60362993010100%
Knowledge Area
603 - Market Economics;

Subject Of Investigation
6299 - Marketing, general/other;

Field Of Science
3010 - Economics;
Goals / Objectives
The primary objective of the proposed research is to estimate equilibrium pricing and design strategies for new food products in a multi-product, differentiated-product market characterized by social network effects. By allowing for the effect of human interaction on the demand for a hypothetical new food product, we apply the behavioral economics paradigm to innovation in food supply networks for the first time. In order to achieve these objectives, in the proposed research, we will first construct a theoretical model of equilibrium price and attribute-design (location in attribute space) for differentiated food products sold in a differentiated-products oligopoly retail market. Second, we will specify a structural (demand and supply) econometric model of new food product demand, incorporating explicit definitions of social and attribute space, and estimate the model using spatial econometric methods. Our third objective is to design and implement a social network analysis experiment in order to generate willingness-to-pay data from a realistic test-bed environment for a series of new food products that differ in terms of their price and location in attribute space. Fourth, we will estimate the econometric model using the data generated from the social network analysis / choice experiment. With these results, our fifth objective is to conduct welfare simulations on the economic value (consumer surplus plus producer surplus) of the equilibrium pricing, design and social network effects described in this research. As a sixth objective, we also seek to estimate the effect of demographic and socioeconomic attributes on equilibrium pricing, product design and social network effects in the development of local and other value-added food products. Finally, our seventh objective is to develop and recommend business and government strategies that will aid in the successful development and commercialization of value-added food products using the insights and methods developed in this research. In terms of expected results, we believe that successful achievement of these objectives will generate significant advances in: (1) the theoretical industrial organization literature on equilibrium price and product location, (2) the empirical literature on estimating price and location games, and (3) the social network literature on applications to the economics of product innovation. On a practical level, USDA, state departments of agriculture and emerging agribusinesses responsible for either designing and marketing new food products, or helping others to do so, will be better armed to make effective decisions with our research. Further, managers need to understand the role social networks can play in helping their product gain market share, and how they can use their marketing resources to exploit any social networks they may have access to.
Project Methods
The analysis will consist of five stages: (1) development of economic and econometric models of equilibrium product design and pricing, (2) extend econometric model to include social network effects, (3) social network / product valuation experiment design and implementation, (4) econometric estimation, testing and simulation, and (5) results interpretation, report generation and dissemination. Our approach in the first stage is based on a structural model of a frequently-purchased consumer food market (breakfast cereal) in which we endogenize the equilibrium choice of both price and attribute design. By structural model, we mean that the primitives consist of a model of demand estimated at the consumer-level, a model of supply that is based on first order conditions to a Bertrand-Nash choice of firm-level optimal price and product design, and a distance-metric measure of product differentiation. The econometric model consists of a discrete choice, random utility model of differentiated product demand (Anderson, de Palma and Thisse, 1992). While mixed-logit models account for consumer heterogeneity and product differentiation by allowing for correlation among consumer-specific response parameters, we adopt a more explicit approach by directly measuring the distance between individuals and products in attribute space and estimating the model using spatial econometric methods (LeSage 1998; Pinkse and Slade, 2004; Slade, 2004; Richards, Hamilton and Patterson, 2007). This distance metric (DM) approach represents both a more intuitive way to describe the location of products in attribute space, and a more useful means of generating econometric results that growers can use in developing new products. In the second stage, we extend the DM / discrete choice model to include social network effects. This extension is a natural and relatively straightforward extension of the DM approach because the model already includes a distance matrix in attribute space - we simply add another that represents the distances among our experimental subjects that we collect in the third stage of the study. Once the demand estimates are in place, we estimate the supply-side of the model. Assuming Bertrand-Nash competition among manufacturers in prices and product location, we estimate strategic response parameters derived from the solution of a game-theoretic model of firm rivalry. In the fourth stage, we simulate the implied changes in consumer welfare from introducing a new, hypothetical food product with attributes that place it within the existing attribute space. By comparing simulation results between outcomes with the social network effects included with those where we assume no social network effects, we can derive the economic importance of leveraging space both in an attribute and social context.

Progress 02/01/10 to 01/31/13

Outputs
OUTPUTS: We have produced a number of outputs relevant to the objectives of this grant. Our primary means of disseminating the findings of our research have been through professional meetings, and interactions with trade and industry groups. In addition, there are working papers available through the ASU Morrison School website where interested parties may be able to find the details of our research. In summary, we have generate three significant publications from this grant, each of which has been presented approximately five times to various stakeholder groups. PARTICIPANTS: Stephen F. Hamilton, California Polytechnic State University, and Timothy J. Richards, Arizona State University were the principal investigators on the grant. There were no significant collaborations on this grant. TARGET AUDIENCES: The target audience for this research was academic professionals, and practitioners in agricultural marketing. Our choice of presentation venues reflected, and were consistent with, this audience. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
Our findings have contributed to a number of important outcomes, each of which were produced as a result of the resources made available to this grant from the AFRI program. First, we have contributed to the understanding of how social networks can be effective in marketing new food products. Our finding that it is not necessarily the most connected person in the network who is the most important, but the most influential one, should change the thinking of firms in the food industry that are looking to leverage their social media strategy. Second, our finding that price and differentiation are negatively correlated contribute to our understanding about how consumer markets for food function. Specifically, it was previously believed that in order to earn high margins, firms would have to significantly differentiate their products from others. However, in food markets differentiation means resigning oneself to a small market, and having to reduce price in order to increase sales. By moving to the center of the market, firms can earn higher margins. Third, we found that grocery retailing involves significant network externalities. That is, manufacturers demand shelf space and consumers demand variety so supermarkets are better off earning profit from vendors rather than from consumers.

Publications

  • Timothy J. Richards, William Allender and Stephen F. Hamilton. Rivalry in Price and Location by Differentiated Product Manufacturers. Accepted and Forthcoming. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2013.
  • Timothy J. Richards, Stephen F. Hamilton and Geoff Pofahl. Network Economics in Supermarket Retailing. Accepted and Forthcoming in European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2012.
  • Timothy J. Richards and Stephen F. Hamilton. Social Networks and New Product Choice. Submitted to Marketing Science, September 2012.


Progress 02/01/10 to 01/31/11

Outputs
OUTPUTS: In the past year, we have produced the following outputs pursuant to the objectives described in the above grant: 1. We have constructed a theoretical model of equilibrium price and attribute-design for differentiated food products sold in a differentiated-products oligopoly retail market, 2. We have specified a structural econometric model of new food product demand, incorporating explicit definitions of social and attribute space, and estimate the model using spatial econometric methods, 3. We have designed and implemented a social network analysis experiment that generated data for a new food product that differs from others in price and location in attribute space, 4. We have estimated econometric models using the data generated from the social network analysis / choice experiment, 5. We have estimated the effect of demographic and socioeconomic attributes on equilibrium pricing, product design and social network effects with respect to new food products, and 6. We have drawn a number of implications for business and government strategies that are potentially useful in helping agribusinesses develop and market new food products. PARTICIPANTS: Not relevant to this project. TARGET AUDIENCES: Not relevant to this project. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
We are one year into a two-year project, so have completed only the analysis component to this point. We are in the process of submitting manuscripts for publication and, once these are accepted, will move to the creation of materials that will have the intended impacts described in our proposal.

Publications

  • Timothy J. Richards, William Allender and Stephen F. Hamilton. Rivalry in Price and Location by Differentiated Product Manufacturers. Submitted to the International Journal of Industrial Organization. January 2012. Timothy J. Richards and Stephen F. Hamilton. Social Networks and New Product Choice. Revise and resubmit at Quantitative Marketing and Economics, November 2011.