Source: UNIV OF WISCONSIN submitted to
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0214853
Grant No.
2008-34558-19331
Project No.
WIS01317
Proposal No.
2008-03295
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
EL
Project Start Date
Aug 1, 2008
Project End Date
Jun 30, 2010
Grant Year
2008
Project Director
Ventura, S.
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF WISCONSIN
21 N PARK ST STE 6401
MADISON,WI 53715-1218
Performing Department
LAND INFORMATION & COMPUTER GRAPHICS
Non Technical Summary
Much of rural America is facing a crisis - depressed rural economies, dwindling and aging workforces, and other conditions leading to stagnant rural economies. Without robust businesses, intact infrastructure, and a workforce trained for tomorrow's jobs, there is little hope that these areas will recover. Global climate change is expected to exacerbate these socio-economic pressures in rural areas. In much of the continental US, the predicted consequence is greater variability in weather - more floods, more droughts, and other extremes that hit resource-dependent economies particularly hard. Geospatial information technologies can play a role in the recovery from these problems. Appropriate development can provide a stimulus to local economies, including investments in sustainable development and conservation intended to mitigate climate change impacts. Geospatial information can help "sell" businesses on new sites; identify deficiencies in rural infrastructure and guide its development; enhance sustainable land management strategies in resource-dependent areas; and provide "telecommuting" and traditional employment. Geospatial tools play a critical role in disaster planning and mitigation for floods, wildfires, and other natural disasters, epidemics such as animal epidemics, and emergency evacuations for whatever reason. At the opposite end of the spectrum, some rural areas near growing cities are under tremendous development pressure, resulting in conversion of productive farmland and other open land uses to residential, commercial, and other developments. When not carefully planned and guided, the result is "sprawl" and concomitant issues of water quality and quantity, air quality, habitat loss, farmland conversion, transportation delays, etc. Geospatial technologies play several roles in making the development process more rational, including land suitability analyses, scenario development, visualization, and environmental modeling, monitoring, and regulation. In all these situations, we believe that the benefits of geospatial technologies are best realized when brought closest to those making decisions about the land - local officials, active citizens, interested businesses, public agency staff, and others involved in decision-making. Our research is aimed at determining what technologies and approaches work in various circumstances and for different issues. Beyond that, RGIS is ready to help with the education, training, application development, and demonstration projects needed to take advantage of geospatial technologies. Because RGIS has been in operation since 1999, it is able to conduct high-quality applied research on issues of geospatial technology implementation and effectiveness that cannot be determined in the course of a single year. This ability to do longitudinal evaluation is based on long-term commitment to stakeholders involved in pilot and demonstration projects. RGIS has built a reputation of providing needed and focused direct technical assistance and training programs, and recently, high quality conferences focused particularly on the needs of rural America.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1010199206020%
1320199206020%
1331099206010%
3113499206010%
6086099206020%
8056099206010%
9037210206010%
Goals / Objectives
The National Consortium for Rural Geospatial Innovations in America (RGIS) was created to help bring the benefits of geographic information systems and related spatial information technologies to rural and tribal America. Eight sites across the United States conduct projects and technology transfer activities in their regions to support a common mission. The entire group has several collective activities such as a website, technical bulletin series, software evaluation, and educational modules. Each site contributes unique expertise and the experience from regional activities to the collective accomplishments of the organization. Common objectives of the entire project, carried out by individual sites include: developing and implementing geospatial software, analysis methods, and models to empower local governments, organizations, and citizens to understand and participate in decisions that affect their lands, resources, economy, and quality of life; developing and evaluating tools to enhance rural security by using information technologies to enable more effective emergency response and disaster management, and by stabilizing and building local economies; educating and training people in the use of geospatial technologies for rural issues through workshops and programs, through creation of educational modules, web resources, technical assistance guidelines, printed bulletins, and videos; demonstrating state-of-the-art solutions for local land information systems through implementation of GIS and related web-based technologies for information access and dissemination to support the use of spatial data in rural issues; and fostering linkage to regional, state, tribal, and national land information systems and cooperation with agencies and organizations involved in their development and use, including promoting the use of federal initiatives such as National Spatial Data Infrastructure and related components. Each RGIS site will have at least four sets of activities in 2008: Local geospatial research: research on topics of particular interest to the sites state or region; Local support and services: training, technical assistance, facilitation and so forth for local and tribal governments; Common research: all RGIS sites will conduct research and development on rural response to climate change; Participate in the RGIS Consortium. RGIS, through the individual and collective actions of its eight sites, will continue to be effective in assisting rural stakeholders deal with land-related issues through implementation and use of advanced geospatial information technologies.
Project Methods
Project summaries for the eight RGIS sites are: Chesapeake-Wilkes- The primary local outreach objective of the RGIS Chesapeake-Wilkes site is to support the GIS technical needs of Pennsylvania counties; this is accomplished through regional coordination, outreach, technology research and demonstration projects, training/education and technology transfer. Our primary research objective is to assess community environmental problems that impact regional quality of life. Chesapeake-Penn State-The overall goal of this project is to provide technical support and outreach to user groups and to conduct research to develop improved decision-support systems for agriculture and environmental assessment, including: (1) initiate development of Pennsylvania OneStop conservation planning and nutrient management system; (2) provide technical assistance, training and support to the GIS user community in Pennsylvania; (3) develop an agricultural drought vulnerability assessment system for Pennsylvania; (4) evaluate use of multi-return LiDAR data for forest composition assessment. Great Lakes-The overall goal of RGIS-Great Lakes is to develop and disseminate spatial information technologies that can assist a Wisconsin transition to a bioeconomy. Three main activities are identified: Biofuels facility siting website, Bioenergy Sustainability Forum and Land Use Optimization: Great Plains The RGIS-Great Plains site will conduct local research, contribute to the RGIS inter-site research topic, conduct technology transfer and educational outreach, and carry out research that is applicable to the region. Mid-South-In FY2008 we are proposing to enhance rural security and emergency preparedness within smaller, rural communities of Arkansas. We intend to develop a standardized base map production system specifically for these users. The proposed map products were identified as a key support instrument during a recent tornado outbreak within our state. Pacific Northwest RGIS-PN will focus on problems facing rural managers in these environments, including GIS-based inventories of aesthetic resources, development of land use/land cover indicators for assessing and monitoring marine ecosystem health, use of remote sensing for habitat assessments, and development of baseline inventories to assess climate change impacts to coastal parks and surface water supplies and processes in semi-arid, agricultural landscapes. South Georgia The goals of South Georgia Rural Geospatial InnovationS (RGIS) project are to develop and provide geospatial technology opportunities to rural local governments and transfer these experiences, methods and technologies to other communities across our nation. Tribal Technical Center The overall objective of RGIS-Tribal Technical Center (RGIS-TTC) is to provide technology transfer through the use of short courses, distance education, and community-based demonstration projects in conjunction with the development of relevant geospatial applications focused on Tribal issues at the Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute (SIPI) campus for use on Indian reservation lands.

Progress 08/01/08 to 06/30/10

Outputs
OUTPUTS: The goal of RGIS-Great Lakes for FY2008 was to develop and disseminate spatial information technologies to assist Wisconsin's transition to a "bioeconomy." Several information resources were developed, along with specific geospatial analyses to support bioenergy policy. Biofuels Facility Siting Website: The "Sites and Sources" website provides information such as feedstock sources, infrastructure, and environmental constraints. This portion was done in collaboration with the Center for Community Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Extension (see http://www.uwex.edu/CES/cced/bioeconomy/). The Biofuels Exchange Website: This is a "craigslist" type mechanism for exchange of biomass materials. It provides tools to link producers and users, along with spatial query support (radius searches and transportation routes). Both regular producers (e.g., wood processing mills) and occasional producers (e.g., loggers involved in non-commercial tree-thinning operations) are accommodated (see http://biomap.wisc.edu/Biofuels_dev/index.phpID=Biomass). To provide a long-term home for these sites, we arranged for the Wisconsin Bioenergy Initiative and the Energy Center of Wisconsin to take the site and manage it in the future. Marginal Land Analysis: We conducted a statewide analysis of marginal land capable of producing bioenergy crops. Open land (not forested, not developed, not currently in agricultural production) was identified through satellite image processing. This was combined with information about soils, topography, and wetlands to determine where bioenergy crops such as switchgrass or short-rotation woody species (e.g., hybrid willows) could be grown. We have also analyzed the converse - land currently in annual row crop production that is highly erodible and, from an environmental perspective, would be better off in a permanent cover such as a dedicated bioenergy crop. Aggregation Facility Siting: We provided technical assistance to the University of Wisconsin-Madison power plant operators in locating a site or sites outside of Madison for aggregating and processing biofuels. They are converting UW-Madison heat and steam boilers to operate on biofuels within two years, and need sites outside of Madison to manage large volumes of material. Several spatial criteria including site conditions, rail access, and potential fuel sources were used to identify and recommend suitable sites. Standards and Guidelines for Safe and Sustainable Production of Biofuels on Marginal Land: While the use of marginal land for bioenergy crops obviates "food vs. fuels" arguments, these lands are environmentally sensitive and, in many cases, generating other ecosystem benefits. We are leading a group of scientists and public agency staff in an effort to create standards and guidelines to mitigate negative consequences of bringing these lands into production, including fostering research where specific quantitative information is not available to provide numeric values or thresholds. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals: Steve Ventura, Tom McClintock, Amy Seeboth, Asli Gocmen, Math Heinzel, Cassandra Garcia, Matt Kures, Joe Wolter; Partner Organizations: Center for Community Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Extension, Department of Soil Science, six rural towns in Vernon County WI, Wisconsin Bioenergy Initiative, Energy Center of Wisconsin, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Agriculture Trade & Consumer Protection; Training: Land Information and Computer Graphics facility provides about 12 short courses (1 - 3 days) in geographic information systems annually. TARGET AUDIENCES: The web resources were developed for communities, energy entrepreneurs, and regulators. The site has not been live long enough to know how these information resources are being used. The marginal lands analysis has been used by state executive and legislative agencies in state energy policy development. The University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of Facilities Planning and Management used the aggregation and processing site analysis in the design of a model for power plant fuel logistics. Five of the six rural towns that participated in the GIS planning exercises successfully developed a comprehensive land use plan. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
Bioenergy - Both the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture Trade & Consumer Protection have keen interest in the standards and guidelines for safe and sustainable bioenergy crop production. We have developed a Memorandum of Understanding with these agencies that will continue the guidelines development effort and disseminate the standards to the broader community potentially affected by them. The analyses of statewide marginal lands will be a key component in developing statewide bioenergy information policy; In particular, the Governor's Office of Energy Independence and State Legislature staff have requesting information and map products from these analyses. The maps provide a basis for people to know potential areas for bioenergy crop production from farm to county scales, while county and statewide statistics provide entrepreneurs a basis for decision-making. Land Use Plannng - The development of comprehensive land use is an (unfunded) state mandate which would have cost each town in the Kickapoo Valley upwards of $50,000 to hire a consultant. Instead, we were able to guide the towns through the process, resulting in much better public participation, more detailed plans, and better community support. Local Government Support - We have continued our training program with a short course program of about forty courses per year. These are mostly oriented around GIS software training in a broad range of applications. We continue to maintain several Web resources, including those mentioned above, the Community Planning Resource website to support comprehensive land use planning in Wisconsin, and the Wisconsin Buffers Initiative website dedicated to information used in the development of state agricultural nonpoint source pollution policy. We continue to provide significant direct technical assistance to county and tribal governments, and disseminate RGIS-related information at state and national meetings such as the Wisconsin Land Information Association, ESRI Users Group, and URISA.

Publications

  • Gocmen, Z.A., and S.J. Ventura (2010). Challenges to GIS Use in Planning: The Case of Public Planning Agencies in Wisconsin. Journal of the American Planning Association. 76(2):172-183.
  • Gocman, Z. A., S.J. Ventura and A. Seeboth. 2010. Geospatial Data Issues in Wisconsin Public Planning Agencies. University of Wisconsin-Extension, Publication G3872-03
  • Gocman, Z. A., S.J. Ventura and A. Seeboth. 2009. GIS Training: A Guide for Wisconsin Public Planning Agencies. University of Wisconsin-Extension, Publication G3872-02
  • Arrington, K.E. and S.J. Ventura. (2010). Modeling and Mapping Soil Infiltration Rates in Dane County, WI. ESRI Southeast Regional User Group Conference Proceedings, 2010. April 26-28, 2010, Charlotte NC.


Progress 08/01/08 to 07/31/09

Outputs
OUTPUTS: The overall goal of RGIS-Great Lakes for the FY2008 project was to develop and disseminate spatial information technologies to assist Wisconsin's transition to a "bioeconomy." A bioeconomy is based on renewable feedstocks as raw material. To ensure sustainability of bioeconomy activities that involve and affect rural communities and resources, several information resources were developed. Biofuels Facility Siting Website: This started as an effort to create a website to assist communities, entrepreneurs, regulators and other stakeholders in the location and evaluation of potential sites for biofuels production facilities. The "Sites and Sources" website provides information such as feedstock sources, infrastructure, and environmental constraints. This portion was done in collaboration with the Center for Community Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Extension (see http://www.uwex.edu/CES/cced/bioeconomy/). The Biofuels Exchange Website: This is a "craigslist" type mechanism for exchange of biomass materials. It provides tools to link producers and users, along with spatial query support (radius searches and transportation routes). Both regular producers (e.g., wood processing mills) and occasional producers (e.g., loggers involved in non-commercial tree-thinning operations) are accommodated (see http://biomap.wisc.edu/Biofuels_dev/index.phpID=Biomass). Marginal Land Analysis: We conducted a statewide analysis of marginal land capable of producing bioenergy crops. Open land (not forested, not developed, not currently in agricultural production) was identified through satellite image processing. This was combined with information about soils, topography, and wetlands to determine where bioenergy crops such as switchgrass or short-rotation woody species (e.g., hybrid willows) could be grown. Aggregation Facility Siting: We are providing technical assistance to the University of Wisconsin-Madison power plant operators in locating a site or sites outside of Madison for aggregating and processing biofuels. They will be converting UW-Madison heat and steam boilers to operate on biofuels within two years, and need sites outside of Madison to manage large volumes of material. Several spatial criteria including site conditions, rail access, and potential fuel sources were used to identify and recommend suitable sites. Standards and Guidelines for Safe and Sustainable Production of Biofuels on Marginal Land: While the use of marginal land for bioenergy crops obviates "food vs. fuels" arguments, these lands are environmentally sensitive and, in many cases, generating other ecosystem benefits. We are leading a group of scientists and public agency staff in an effort to create standards and guidelines to mitigate negative consequences of bringing these lands into production, including fostering research where specific quantitative information is not available to provide numeric values or thresholds. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals: Tom McClintock (Senior Outreach Specialist, LICGF) - training coordinator and instructor; Math Heinzel (Senior Information Processing Technician, LICGF) - software development and maintenance; Dan Capacio (Program Assistant II, LICGF) - FACETS program management and coordination; Nancy Wiegand (Senior Scientist, LICGF) - semantic interoperability research; Cassandra Garcia (Graduate Assistant, LICGF) - bioenergy website data acquisition and integration; Maggie Grabow (Graduate Assistant, SAGE) - FACETS operations and arrangements; Kyle Minks (Student Hourly, LICGF) - marginal lands analysis ground-truthing; Bevin Moeller (Student Hourly, LICGF) - power plant facility siting characterization; Joseph Wolter (Programmer, Soil Science) - biomass commodity exchange site development and coding; Jim Beaudoin (Programmer, APL) - bioenergy sites and sources interactive web mapping development. Collaborators: Wisconsin Focus on Energy, Wisconsin Office of Energy Independence, Wisconsin Department of Agriculture Trade and Consumer Protection, Wisconsin Department of Administration, Valley Stewardship Network, Vernon County Kickapoo Valley Reserve, Town of Union, Town of Stark, Town of Forest, Town of Clinton, Town of Whitestown, Town of Webster, Village of LaFarge. TARGET AUDIENCES: The National Consortium for Rural Geospatial Innovations in America (RGIS) was created to help bring the benefits of geographic information systems and related spatial information technologies to rural and tribal America. Eight sites across the United States conduct projects and technology transfer activities in their regions to support a common mission. The entire group has several collective activities such as a website, technical bulletin series, software evaluation, and Train-the-Trainer workshops. Each site contributes unique expertise and the experience from regional activities to the collective accomplishments of the organization. The overall mission of RGIS is: To eliminate the digital divide facing rural America by promoting the transfer of geospatial technologies to under-served rural areas by: 1) providing geospatial tools, technologies, and training to empower local governments, organizations, and citizens to understand and participate in decisions that affect their environment, economy, and quality of life; 2) educating and training a cadre of people to apply geospatial technologies to rural issues; 3) supporting the development of appropriate local land information systems as well as linkage to and cooperation with regional, state, and national land information systems. The activities of the RGIS sites include technical assistance in GIS implementation; pilot project demonstrations; data automation and database development; consultation and advice for local and tribal governments; software evaluation and development; model development; software and GIS application training; satellite telecasts; educational video production; public conferences and other professional presentations; technical and lay audience publications; and provision of information and technical resources through the RGIS website. The RGIS website is maintained by RGIS-CPSU. The website now has almost 200 downloadable information resources, including bulletins, reports, education modules and RGIS documentation such as annual reports. The printed bulletin series will be available while stocks remain, and thereafter bulletins will be available in .pdf electronic format only. We believe that RGIS has been effective in its goal of assisting agencies and organizations deal with land-related issues in rural America through implementation and use of advanced geospatial information technologies. As a result, we have helped improve the quality of life, environmental health, and economic competitiveness of rural communities. Today, local units of government are building key components of the information-technology infrastructure. RGIS helps disseminate innovative solutions from region to region and bridges local efforts with those of state and national agencies, such as the National Spatial Data Infrastructure. RGIS helps citizens in rural areas implement and apply geospatial technologies to the many land use, resource protection, and economic development decisions involved in creating sustainable rural communities. RGIS is bringing the benefits of the information age to rural America, where land is fundamental to resource-dependent economies and ways of life. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
Bioenergy - Both the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture Trade & Consumer Protection have keen interest in the standards and guidelines for safe and sustainable bioenergy crop production. We are currently negotiating a Memorandum of Understanding to finish this development effort and disseminate the standards to the broader community potentially affected by them. The analysis of statewide marginal lands will be a key component of this process, letting people know affected areas from farm to county scales. The "craigslist" biofuel exchange site is currently entering beta testing; we have had numerous indications that people are awaiting its official release so they can begin using it. We have also had, and will respond to, a request from entrepreneurs to include a section for posting of products and services related to bioenergy and biofuels. Land Use Plannng - The development of comprehensive land use is an (unfunded) state mandate which would have cost each town in the Kickapoo Valley upwards of $50,000 to hire a consultant. Instead, we were able to guide the towns through the process, resulting in much better public participation, more detailed plans, and better community support. Local Government Support - We have continued our training program with a short course program of about forty courses per year. These are mostly oriented around GIS software training in a broad range of applications. We continue to maintain several Web resources, including those mentioned above, the Community Planning Resource website to support comprehensive land use planning in Wisconsin, and the Wisconsin Buffers Initiative website dedicated to information used in the development of state agricultural nonpoint source pollution policy. We continue to provide significant direct technical assistance to county and tribal governments, and disseminate RGIS-related information at state and national meetings such as the Wisconsin Land Information Association, ESRI Users Group, and URISA.

Publications

  • Chi, G., and S.J. Ventura 2010, "A Spatio-temporal Examination of Population Change: Demographics, Livability, Accessibility, Desirability, and Developability." Population and Environment. in review.
  • Gocmen, Z.A., and S.J. Ventura 2010. "Challenges to GIS Use in Planning: The Case of Public Planning Agencies in Wisconsin." Journal of the American Planning Association. in press.
  • Niemann, B.J., S.J. Ventura, D. D. Moyer, R.E. Chenoweth. 2009. Planning Analyst. about 400 pages, ESRI Press, Redlands CA.
  • Gocman, Z. A., S.J. Ventura and A. Seeboth. 2008. "GIS Use in Wisconsin's Public Planning Agencies." University of Wisconsin-Extension, Publication G3872
  • Grabow, M., J. Sledge, S. Spak, A. Mednick, T. Holloway, B. Stone, S. Ventura, and J. Patz 2009. "Co-Benefits to Health and the Environment of Bicycling in Cities." Center for Biodiversity and Conservation's Fourteenth Annual Spring Symposium, April 2-3, New York, NY.
  • Jesse, E., editor, 2009. "Status of Wisconsin Agriculture, 2009." Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Cooperative Extension, University of Wisconsin Extension, 49 pages (RGIS pages: 38-39, 46-47).
  • Moltz, H.L., D.J. Ockerman, V.L. Lopes, W. Rast, and SJ. Ventura, 2010. "A Hydrologic Modeling Approach for Assessing Sediment Management in the Santa Fe Watershed." Journal of the American Water Resources Association. in review
  • Moltz, H.L., V.L. Lopes, W. Rast, S.J. Ventura 2009. "A Hydrologic-Economic Analysis of Best Management Practices for Sediment Control in the Santa Fe Watershed, New Mexico. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. in press.