Source: CLEMSON UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
FOREST MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES IMPLEMENTATION
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0189098
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2001
Project End Date
Jun 30, 2004
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
CLEMSON,SC 29634
Performing Department
FORESTRY & NATURAL RESOURCES
Non Technical Summary
Forest management objectives generally fall into timber production, multiple use, or protection categories. Forest research is generally short-term and targeted toward specific problems and the results incorporated into overall management plans. The economic and ecological responses that result over extended time periods have not been fully evaluated. This project will evaluate three management strategies and examine the long-term effectiveness of cultural treatments on forest health and sustainability.
Animal Health Component
25%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
75%
Applied
25%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1230613106060%
1230699310020%
1230699301020%
Goals / Objectives
Evaluate three different forest management regimes in terms of biological and economic responses. Develop "benchmarks" that can be used to evaluate regional forest policy. Maintain diverse conditions on the Clemson Experimental Forest for teaching, research and public service programs. Increase public awareness of forest management goals and proceedures.
Project Methods
Continue implementation of forest management guides initiated under CRIS research project SCZ00055-FR. These management scenarios will eventually result in three distinct forest conditions representing commercial, multiple use and protection forest management strategies. These conditions will be created through implementation of management guidelines on 12 management units previously established. In addition to timber volume/value, assessments will be made on wildlife harvest from hunting areas. Recreational trail use will be monitored on certain trails. Comprehensive listings and distribution of plant and animal species will be accumulated through compilation of data from projects on the Forest. Maintain comprehensive records of cultural treatments, timber inventory, harvest volume and value. Continue to use and improve the continuous forest inventory (CFI) system to estimate growth, mortality, and harvest and provide additional data for harvest scheduling. Continue to improve the geographic information systems for analyzing and reporting data by site or keyword queries and to facilitate Sustainable Forest Inventory reporting. Provide a broad array of forest conditions and management practices while maintaining environmental quality and forest sustainability through implementation of prescribed management scenarios. In addition, implement and evaluate new techniques for increasing productivity and protecting the environment. Maintain current and implement new demonstrations of best forest management practices applicable to each management strategy. Assign specifically targeted research projects to appropriate management units to evaluate effectiveness of prescriptions. Install signage along roads and trails. Conduct tours of research and management areas for professional and non-professional audiences.

Progress 07/01/01 to 06/30/04

Outputs
Project terminated early due to reassignment of principal investigator. No further research accomplishments beyond that which was previously reported on 2003 annual report.

Impacts
Conclusions drawn from evaluation of management regimes implemented on the CEF will be valuable in developing regional forest policy regarding silviculture, wildlife management and environmental issues.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 01/01/03 to 12/31/03

Outputs
Implementation of commercial, multiple use and protection management regimes continue on Clemson Experimental Forest (CEF). There were no significant losses from southern pine beetle (SPB) on the CEF in 2003 after more than 800 acres of pine timber was killed during 2001 and 2002. Adequate spring rainfall and abundant populations of predator beetle apparently resulted in the collapse of the SPB outbreak. Reforestation of the areas lost to SPB continued into 2003 with emphasis on protection and multiple use management areas where losses were greatest. Approximately 50 acres of commercial, 83 acres of multiple use, and 68 acres of protection forest treatment areas were regenerated to loblolly pine. Another 75 acres of protection forest were naturally regenerated to a mixture of pine and hardwood. Another 130 acres outside treatment areas were also planted. Three additional treatment areas were added to the National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study (FFS) on the CEF to augment treatments areas that were severely damaged by SPB. Students and scientist involved in the FFS studies on the CEF generated 11 publications, 4 abstracts, 1 thesis and 5 posters in 2003. A research proposal to address problems of reforestation of SPB killed timberlands was submitted.

Impacts
Conclusions drawn from evaluation of management regimes implemented on the CEF will be valuable in developing regional forest policy regarding silviculture, wildlife management and environmental issues.

Publications

  • Cox, S.K., H.T. Erwin, and T.J. Straka. 2003. The Clemson Land-Use Project: A Jewel of the New Deal. In. Proc. 2002 Society of American Foresters National Convention; Winston Salem, NC, October 5-9, 2002, pp. 301-303.


Progress 01/01/02 to 12/31/02

Outputs
As anticipated, the southern pine beetle (SPB) epidemic, exacerbated by drought conditions, continued throughout 2002. Timber losses statewide exceeded $254 million, more than double the previous record. Clemson Experimental Forest (CEF) SPB timber losses were approximately 316 acres in 2002, somewhat less than the 463 acres loss in 2001. Timber losses for 2002 included 152 acres in multiple use management units, 72 acres in commercial management units, 24 acres in protection management units and 67 acres outside the research units. The combined SPB timber losses for 2001 and 2002 totaled 228 acres for protection forest units, 237 acres for multiple use units, and 126 acres for commercial units and 192 acres for areas not in the research program. The ninth quinquennial measurement of the CEF permanent inventory points was completed early in 2002. Even though there was considerable volume loss due to SPB, gross cubic volume increased on all treatment units as a result of survivor growth, in-growth and on-growth. Preliminary results of inventory data indicate a gross volume increase of 74.6, 73.3, and 40.9 cubic feet per acre for commercial, multiple use and protection management units respectively.

Impacts
South Carolina timber losses from southern pine beetle exceeded $254 million in 2002. Preliminary data indicates that commercial forest management units may be less susceptible to southern pine beetle damage. The combined SPB timber losses on the Clemson Experimental Forest for 2001 and 2002 totaled 228 acres for protection forest management units, 237 acres for multiple use management units, and 126 acres for commercial management units.

Publications

  • Cox, S. K., and T. J. Straka. 2002. Clemson University Management Alternatives Research Project: twenty year results. In. Proc. 2001 Soc. Am. For. Nat'l. Conv. (Denver, Colo.; Sept. 13-17, 2001): 347-350.


Progress 01/01/01 to 12/31/01

Outputs
The southern pine beetle caused a loss of approximately 76 million dollars in South Carolina during 2001. This was the second highest dollar loss to southern pine beetle on record in the state. The majority of losses occurred in the piedmont and mountain areas of the state. Approximately 463 acres of timber was killed on the Clemson Experimental Forest during 2001. Of those acres, approximately 45 acres are within commercial management units, 85 acres are within on multiple-use management units, and 204 acres are within protection forest management units. These acreages represent 1.12%, 1.68% and 5.12% of the total acreages in commercial, multiple-use and protection management units respectively. Another 125 acres (2.12%) of timber was killed on areas outside the management alternatives research areas. Sanitation and salvage harvesting of beetle-infested areas were conducted across all management units. It is not clear if differences in timber mortality from southern pine beetle can be attributed to management treatments. Significant losses are expected to continue through 2002.

Impacts
Timber value losses due to southern pine beetle were approximately 76 million dollars in South Carolina in 2001. Timber management strategies can influence the susceptibility of stands to beetle mortality. Approximately 204 acres of timber on protection forest management units were killed by beetle activity compared to 45 acres on commercial management units in 2001.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period